- Search

Gazclaret83

Row Z wrote: ↑
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:36 pm
Can’t remember a single chance they created tonight other than their “goal” and a few corners.

Luton dictated play for the most. I didn't go tonight an watched on tv. There is just nothing about us,no patterns of play,just hope. That proper hurt tonight an just sealed relagation for me

Gazclaret83

Row Z wrote: ↑
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:36 pm
Can’t remember a single chance they created tonight other than their “goal” and a few corners.

Luton dictated play for the most. I didn't go tonight an watched on tv. There is just nothing about us,no patterns of play,just hope. That proper hurt tonight an just sealed relagation for me

Gazclaret83

Goobs wrote: ↑
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:26 pm
Disagree. The first 30 was poor but they created nothing after that we were comfortable and easily the better and more dangerous side.

No we wasn't unfortunately. The most dangerous an better side was Luton

Gazclaret83

Luton have caused plenty of teams problems all season - we created plenty of chances tonight including JBG’s early and should have been out of sight. Yes we sat back, but they created nothing other than their “goal”. They caused us problems last year, and don’t forgot the loan players we lost too. ...

Gazclaret83

SGr wrote: ↑
Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:54 pm
Like clockwork.

Lot of people on here are in denial regarding how bad we really are.

Haha. I 100% agree. Luton bossed us for large parts of that game. We're down now unfortunately

Gazclaret83

Leisure wrote: ↑
Mon Oct 30, 2023 7:57 pm
Just 4 left.

Who's the lucky 4

Gazclaret83

Top and bottom for me is:- first we need a settled back four. Beyer and Eckdal, for now Taylor at left back and a new right back. A tough strong midfield player. Help for Foster up front. 100% agree with this. Why not Jack cork though. Can't understand why he doesn't even get on, he's pretty assure...

Gazclaret83

equinox wrote: ↑
Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:06 pm
What on earth was the problem?

Apparently he couldn't play in kompanys system

Gazclaret83

Squazo wrote: ↑
Tue Sep 19, 2023 4:41 pm
i’d rather go to grounds like luton than the new soulless grounds…. loved it last night at Forest

100% mate.

Gazclaret83

jojomk1 wrote: ↑
Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:05 pm
Exactly

Muric
Roberts, Dakhil, Beyer, Taylor
Anyone, Brownhill, Cullen, Berge, Koleosho
Foster

But Taylor can't play in this system haha absolute joke. The defending today was bad. Playing a right back at left back when we have a perfectly good left back is beyond me.

Gazclaret83

We played man-to-man against City and played a high line against Villa. We'll need to tweak it a bit and find distances our players can better work with, but the days of protecting the box are gone. We're building towards being a possession team first and foremost. You can't just abandon the whole ...

Gazclaret83

Charlie Taylor is an excellent defender and just what we need on the prem, until there is a rhythm in the team and wins. If that happens, then maybe someone else, who can enhance that, however, we will be up against it often and Charlie is the man for that. 100% agree with this. We ain't championsh...

Gazclaret83

BurnleyFC wrote: ↑
Sat Sep 02, 2023 12:20 am
I’m not sure how we’re going to accommodate all these wide attacking players, but we shall see.

But apparently we can't accomidate Charlie Taylor. Hahhaha

Gazclaret83

Anonymous Claret wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 11:13 pm
We've got Tresor.
Super Mike Tresor.
I just don't think you understand.
Hes Kompany's man.
Better than Zidane.
We've got super K
Mike Tresor

Love it. Well happy. 2-0 Burnley tomorrow

Gazclaret83

Gazclaret83 wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 10:19 pm

But Taylor can defend as a left back. I don't care about the system. Charlie is better at left back the the guy that come in. Roberts on the right an Charlie on left gives us balance.

Gazclaret83

But it won’t give us balance. We will have to completely change our entire set up to accommodate him. Our left back has to be able to play the ball. Taylor just simply can’t do that. If he can’t do that then we have to put players around him to accommodate this. Another poster highlighted the diffe...

Gazclaret83

Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 10:08 pm
We don’t have balance because for the 100th time Taylor can’t play in this system

It’s like asking Sam Vokes to play the Amdouni role

So you wouldn't start Charlie Taylor against spurs to give us balance at the back????

Gazclaret83

Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 10:08 pm
We don’t have balance because for the 100th time Taylor can’t play in this system

It’s like asking Sam Vokes to play the Amdouni role

He played Wednesday night. Why can't Taylor play this system?

Gazclaret83

Gazclaret83 wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 10:05 pm
Not my fault. But think we'll be okay

3 in the middle an Charlie at left back,we have balance again

Gazclaret83

BurnleyFC wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 10:04 pm
Seriously.

The squad is unbalanced.

Not my fault. But think we'll be okay

Gazclaret83

Vegas Claret wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 10:02 pm
Pete O'Rourke
@SportsPeteO
Chelsea youngster Ian Maatsen is set to stay at Stamford Bridge and sign a new contract after turning down a potential move to Burnley.

Good on him

Gazclaret83

BurnleyFC wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 9:59 pm
Really feels like we’ve missed a trick this transfer window, despite the plethora of incomings.

After spending a 100m plus. Seriously

Gazclaret83

LaLigaClaret wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 8:18 pm
As a PL team we can't even complete a loan deal for players based in our leagues when we need some positions to be strengthened. Pathetic really.

Do you support Blackburn or Leeds by any chance?

Gazclaret83

I read gushing reports of how much he admired VK and how much he wanted to play for us. Staff at Arsenal were convinced it was a done deal because he said he wanted to come here. Reports of his desire to come here came out before there was any talk of us being interested in him. The fact that he ev...

Gazclaret83

Agree. Wow

Gazclaret83

Newty wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 7:37 pm
How can you even compare to SD's defence when it's two polar opposite systems? Imagine Pope, Taylor, Mee, Tarky and Lowton trying to play in VK's possession based, 'play it out from the back' system, rather than a low block. It would be utterly shambolic.

I'd take it tomorrow please

Gazclaret83

Fair enough. I stand corrected. Thought we didn't want him in the end. But if he's turned us down hoping for a better offer haha

Gazclaret83

Maybe the case. But kompany was chasing him for a while. Think I heard we pulled the plug on the deal rather than the player

Gazclaret83

Claret Alfie wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 7:12 pm
Lokonga has joined Luton. We must have pulled out of that one, surely. He’d been linked to bigger clubs than us too.

We pulled out due to his fitness an previous injuries

Gazclaret83

Firthy wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 6:56 pm
I think if we get Tresor then my only disappointment will be not getting Maatsen or another LB.

100%

Gazclaret83

What is now crystal clear is that VK wanted both Maatsen and Tella. If we end up with neither it's not because VK didn't think they were good enough for the PL/'moved on' or whatever other theories we've seen. If he wanted tella kompany would have got him. Don't think kompany thought he was up to t...

Gazclaret83

Tresor hopefully

Gazclaret83

I honestly think we're okay. Yeah a left back would have been good but kompany thinks different or it would have been soreted earlier. Just think we need to play 3 in the middle. A mid field of Cullen brownhill berge as a 3 sounds solid to me. Berge further forward

Gazclaret83

Milltown1882 wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 5:37 pm
Origi medical booked in at Forest....

Good I honestly don't think he improves us. He left Liverpool an has scored 2 goals at AC Milan. Not worth it it my view. Jay can do that

Gazclaret83

We've spent 100m plus. If we can get tresor I'll be happy. Not bothered for origi or maatsen at the prices an wages being thrown about. Will we stay up, absolutely we will

Gazclaret83

agreenwood wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 4:48 pm
The emotional swing (jubilation and the toys out the pram) some people on this thread go through with every bit of news that comes out is unreal.

Because we love the club an hope kills you

Gazclaret83

Get Ben mee back haha

Gazclaret83

4midable wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 4:31 pm
Hes not.coming

Obligation to buy then means nothing. So we could just take maatsen on loan for season an let west ham say get him on a free

Gazclaret83

Gordaleman wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 4:21 pm
Daily Mail now saying Maatsen fee is £13.5 million.

A bit of sanity at last.

So Chelsea now want less money for maatsen when they said he wouldn't move for less than 20m

Gazclaret83

Cap wrote: ↑
Fri Sep 01, 2023 4:07 pm
Not surprised at that fee

Trying to convince him haha. Leave it

Gazclaret83

31.5 million haha how does that fit into kompanys sell on model? Nathan tella would have looked good compared to this deal

Gazclaret83

Sounds like maatsen doesn't want the move but Chelsea have agreed fee. Would love it to happen but for right reasons

Gazclaret83

Charlie Taylor Burnley left back.

Gazclaret83

Salford city

Gazclaret83

Muric,brownhill an Taylor surly have to be considered Saturday now. Everton at home 3rd round please

Gazclaret83

bfcjg wrote: ↑
Sat May 06, 2023 10:03 pm
What is your favourite Ashley goal ? Mine is his goal v Wigan when we were promoted, perfect finish to a perfect build up. His goal at West Ham very special as well.

Palace at home. 3-2 Burnley

Gazclaret83

MT03ALG wrote: ↑
Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:53 pm
Irvine and Lochhead

Payton an cooke

Gazclaret83

Croydon Claret wrote: ↑
Fri Mar 17, 2023 9:56 pm
Reading is a Royal (no pun intended or noticed) PITA to get to, so hoping that will put a few off and it ends up on general sale

Gazclaret83

After 2 adult tickets my self haha. Will pay 75 quid each if anyone wants to sell

Gazclaret83

Great point tonight that. 4 points on the road. Bottom three next up. UTC

Search found 97 matches