Three match ban for Tarkowski

addisclaret · Post by **addisclaret** » Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:10 pm

2 Bee Holed wrote:Some Burnley fans were wondering why he had flipped.
It was not like him to lose his temper so easily.
Fruitless? I wasn't expecting the Club or the F.A. to use
my evidence. However, it did explain to some sensible Burnley fans, in advance of today,
why he had so uncharacteristically lost control. As it turns out, I had found the exact reason
and it was very similar info that was put to the F.A. to try and reduce his ban.
Up until that point, I and some others simply thought he had simply lost it.

Anyhow, keep coming up with the Dad's Army clips of him being 'a stupid boy''.
I forget just how hard some people are especially with broken bones in their hands.
Can you not find a clip where they call Pike 'fruitless'?

Read this in iambic pentameter and the world seems a better place

dsr · Post by **dsr** » Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:12 pm

LoveCurryPies wrote:Tarks was stupid to respond. 3 match ban will probably cost the club in points and potentially a place or two. Those places are worth several million come the end of the season.

We know he would have missed Spurs and Man U anyway, so let's wait until after the Huddersfield game before we get too excited about points lost.

Steve1956 · Post by **Steve1956** » Fri Dec 22, 2017 3:11 am

addisclaret wrote:k...nob

Who me or Tarkowski

dermotdermot · Post by **dermotdermot** » Fri Dec 22, 2017 3:19 am

But if he has broken his hand and has had to have surgery on it it doesn’t matter anyway. He would have to miss at least three games. A win win situation

Claretforever · Post by **Claretforever** » Fri Dec 22, 2017 6:44 am

I was thinking this, Dermot. I wouldn’t have thought Dyche would have played him for a week or two anyway? Mee missed a couple because of having stitches in his leg.

RocketLawnChair · Post by **RocketLawnChair** » Fri Dec 22, 2017 7:24 am

Rileybobs wrote:The ball wasn't in play, ergo no penalty.

On reading my post again I've made my point poorly Rileybobs. I am referring to both incidents the penalty that was given and the elbow.

Moving on to tomorrow if Wood goes into the area and wraps his trailing leg around Vertongan and goes down I will be demanding and expecting a penalty.

If Vertongan unknowingly too us breaks his hand and Ashley gives it a gentle squeeze and Vertongan then elbows Ashley in the ribs I will be demanding and expecting he sees a red card. If as in Tarkowskis case the referee says he didn't see the incident I will be then expecting the FA to ban Vertongan for 3 games for violent conduct not that it will be much benefit too us after the event.

I am sure when Murray squeezed Tarks hand it hurt like ******* hell and would I have reacted in the same situation of course I would, but how Tarks reacted is a 3 game ban all day long broken hand or not.

2 Bee Holed · Post by **2 Bee Holed** » Fri Dec 22, 2017 7:36 am

addisclaret wrote:Read this in iambic pentameter and the world seems a better place

Well thank you addisclaret.
I will take that as a compliment.
I am glad you find my words so soothing and poetic.

They're not f**c*ing meant to be today.

addisclaret · Post by **addisclaret** » Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:49 pm

Steve1956 wrote:Who me or Tarkowski

Perhaps both

addisclaret · Post by **addisclaret** » Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:51 pm

2 Bee Holed wrote:Well thank you addisclaret.
I will take that as a compliment.
I am glad you find my words so soothing and poetic.

They're not f**c*ing meant to be today.

You're very welcome. I also think the special brew I was doused in at the time helped with the soothing as well.

Three match ban for Tarkowski

Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski

Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski

Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski

Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski

Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski

Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski

Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski

Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski

Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski