389 minutes

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

389 minutes

Post by Right_winger » Fri Nov 06, 2020 7:45 pm

Since our last goal..

Question is how long will it be until we score again? Don’t look remotely like scoring at all just now.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: 389 minutes

Post by tiger76 » Fri Nov 06, 2020 7:49 pm

Crikey is it that long, our best chance of a goal is probably from a set-piece, but even they're dire by our usual standards.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Elizabeth » Fri Nov 06, 2020 7:56 pm

We have goalscoring threats, now is the time to keep clean sheets above anything else

Aclaret
Posts: 4139
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:16 pm
Been Liked: 1306 times
Has Liked: 1402 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Aclaret » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:00 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Fri Nov 06, 2020 7:56 pm
We have goalscoring threats, now is the time to keep clean sheets above anything else
Who is the threat ? It's not Barnes, it's not Jay or Vydra ( not on the pitch long enough) it must be Wood ?

Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Right_winger » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:11 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Fri Nov 06, 2020 7:56 pm
We have goalscoring threats, now is the time to keep clean sheets above anything else
I agree and disagree.

We do have goal scoring threats in the team but they are playing with Dyches shackles on.

I get that for the better teams but against those around us we need to be scoring goals to win games. Over 4 games since we scored and haven’t remotely looked like scoring is not
Good enough.

Our mismanagement of the squad over the past couple of years has caught up with us.
This user liked this post: NewClaret

huw.Y.WattfromWare
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 1004 times
Has Liked: 905 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by huw.Y.WattfromWare » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:18 pm

I feel for our strikers. Since Dwights game has gone backwards they’ve had nothing to feed off. We urgently need him to start running at his FB and getting them wonderful crosses across the 6 yd line.
Tonight we didn’t even use the roll back to Westy, for him to get a cross into the danger area.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: 389 minutes

Post by tiger76 » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:20 pm

Our goals thus far.

Wood vs Leicester (good move and finish)

Dunne vs Leicester (header from a set-piece)

Westwood vs Newcastle (I think this was also from a set-piece that was initially cleared, and he hammered in the loose ball)

We are creating virtually nothing from open play, and that's the worry, it's not like our strikers are missing chances, we aren't even making the chances for them to miss,

thelaughingclaret
Posts: 900
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:23 pm
Been Liked: 291 times
Has Liked: 99 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by thelaughingclaret » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:23 pm

If you think we pose a threat going forward you are delusional and need to take your claret/Dyche/Garlick tinted specs off. Today we were dire. We have been in all games. Embarrassing really.

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3324
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 1094 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Boss Hogg » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:25 pm

Think it will need a set piece, penalty ( unlikely), the wind, a huge defensive error or an OG. We look utterly lacking in creativity in the final third and completely toothless in attack.

Dyched
Posts: 5941
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:34 am
Been Liked: 1922 times
Has Liked: 446 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Dyched » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:25 pm

It’s a problem. We needed to identify and sign a creative type in the summer along the lines of Zidane/Totti/Seedorf. Shame it didn’t happen.

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by MACCA » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:34 pm

2 words, and not my usual phrase, so we will go with simply

Cheers Mike

HunterST_BFC
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
Been Liked: 1402 times
Has Liked: 2691 times
Location: varied

Re: 389 minutes

Post by HunterST_BFC » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:37 pm

How to stop Burnley scoring?

Easy ... play 3 5 2 with one of the MF deep picking off the second balls from knock downs.
I could go on...

But if you think about it...

buzzclarets79
Posts: 666
Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 2:05 am
Been Liked: 227 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by buzzclarets79 » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:37 pm

Dyched wrote:
Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:25 pm
It’s a problem. We needed to identify and sign a creative type in the summer along the lines of Zidane/Totti/Seedorf. Shame it didn’t happen.
Unless they are willing to run their socks off and track back SD wouldn't fancy that type of player and that's the issue, he puts work rate above everything else including flair and creativity. Could you see a Glen Little or Robbie Blake type player in this team? I couldn't yet that's just what we need. Ideally we need pace and lots of it

tarkys_ears
Posts: 4267
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 1515 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by tarkys_ears » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:38 pm

We've scored 3 goals this season.

Time for a change of direction.

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by MACCA » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:44 pm

tarkys_ears wrote:
Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:38 pm
We've scored 3 goals this season.

Time for a change of direction.
True, I think signing some players might actually work, especially if they are better than what we currently have.

Dyched
Posts: 5941
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:34 am
Been Liked: 1922 times
Has Liked: 446 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Dyched » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:47 pm

buzzclarets79 wrote:
Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:37 pm
Unless they are willing to run their socks off and track back SD wouldn't fancy that type of player and that's the issue, he puts work rate above everything else including flair and creativity. Could you see a Glen Little or Robbie Blake type player in this team? I couldn't yet that's just what we need. Ideally we need pace and lots of it
I agree.

One thing that gets me is Barnes. George Boyd fitted our system to a T. Scott Arfield did, David Jones did, Dean Marney did, Stephen Ward did etc etc. Players that we let go for nowt when they simply weren’t good enough for where we were/are at. Barnes is nowhere near good enough anymore, yet he still starts. Baffling.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Elizabeth » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:53 pm

This is a good point we got today even if the opposition were beatable on any other day. We have forwards who have proven in recent seasons that they all can score in the PL and it is good they are all fit, they will start scoring once the service comes.
Rest assured work will be put into getting McNeil and Brownhill more into the game once the defensive side of the team is sorted and I hope Dyche rests the former because, he needs it

bodge
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 729 times
Has Liked: 475 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by bodge » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:56 pm

The next first goal sweep winner will be a millionaire.
This user liked this post: Quickenthetempo

HunterST_BFC
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
Been Liked: 1402 times
Has Liked: 2691 times
Location: varied

Re: 389 minutes

Post by HunterST_BFC » Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:48 am

HunterST_BFC wrote:
Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:37 pm
How to stop Burnley scoring?

Easy ... play 3 5 2 with one of the MF deep picking off the second balls from knock downs.
I could go on...

But if you think about it...
nudging this thread because "I can't believe I'm the only one to think this?"
With our squad and likely players - we are not hard to work out are we?

Stopping us scoring is easy bar set plays.
MF over run etc etc

No real pace to counter while being sat back.

Ramble over (not rant). We lack players capable of giving SD any chance of changing things.

UTC
This user liked this post: lucs86

Sheedyclaret
Posts: 984
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:44 am
Been Liked: 170 times
Has Liked: 45 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Sheedyclaret » Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:55 am

Get barnes out the side

California Colner
Posts: 1405
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:31 pm
Been Liked: 172 times
Has Liked: 114 times
Location: Santa Clarita, LA

Re: 389 minutes

Post by California Colner » Sat Nov 07, 2020 3:28 am

The simple fact is we have no pace up front
Hard to create chances when the defenders are far quicker

jojomk1
Posts: 4804
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 842 times
Has Liked: 577 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by jojomk1 » Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:15 am

thelaughingclaret wrote:
Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:23 pm
If you think we pose a threat going forward you are delusional and need to take your claret/Dyche/Garlick tinted specs off. Today we were dire. We have been in all games. Embarrassing really.
Sad to say,

Spot on !!

Stockbrokerbelt
Posts: 555
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:43 am
Been Liked: 228 times
Has Liked: 137 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Stockbrokerbelt » Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:38 am

Lets get rid of Dyche & the coaching team as we have enough experts on here.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2785
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 711 times
Has Liked: 88 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:53 am

Stockbrokerbelt wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:38 am
Lets get rid of Dyche & the coaching team as we have enough experts on here.
Obviously I wouldn’t sack dyche but I look forward to a more attacking style of play, whatever league we are in.

snapcrackleandpop
Posts: 449
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 122 times
Has Liked: 151 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by snapcrackleandpop » Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:09 am

Elizabeth wrote:
Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:53 pm
This is a good point we got today even if the opposition were beatable on any other day. We have forwards who have proven in recent seasons that they all can score in the PL and it is good they are all fit, they will start scoring once the service comes.
Rest assured work will be put into getting McNeil and Brownhill more into the game once the defensive side of the team is sorted and I hope Dyche rests the former because, he needs it
I love your optimism but I don’t see it, we have 2 forwards slower than Captain Tom and a midfield lacking quality, but fingers crossed eh.
This user liked this post: DomBFC1882

steve1264b
Posts: 616
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 12:31 pm
Been Liked: 160 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by steve1264b » Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:10 am

As sean himself said, the longer we go without one the more likely it is to happen.

We are a team short on confidence, who don't want to take a risk. We dug in and got a point.

We are finding our feet again.

We are improving, getting better.

Ive always thought we are a streaky team under this managers don't know the stats but it always feels to me we dont do win one lose one draw one.

Get a victory and we could easily go on a run.

NewClaret
Posts: 13399
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3084 times
Has Liked: 3804 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by NewClaret » Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:26 am

tiger76 wrote:
Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:20 pm
Our goals thus far.

Wood vs Leicester (good move and finish)

Dunne vs Leicester (header from a set-piece)

Westwood vs Newcastle (I think this was also from a set-piece that was initially cleared, and he hammered in the loose ball)

We are creating virtually nothing from open play, and that's the worry, it's not like our strikers are missing chances, we aren't even making the chances for them to miss,
Exactly this. Was going to write the same on the Wood & Barnes thread.

Our issue is midfield. Dwight is creating very little. Our corners and FK’s have been poor. Our right side is non-existent and should’ve been strengthened in summer. I love Brownhill & Westy but it’s fair to say they haven’t exactly been controlling midfield or creating chances when we do. Last night, Lamptey (playing as wing back) pegged back Taylor, our only real attacking threat of recent games.

We could put Kane up front and he wouldn’t score with the service Wood & Barnes are getting.
These 3 users liked this post: Top Claret Enola Gay tiger76

NewClaret
Posts: 13399
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3084 times
Has Liked: 3804 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by NewClaret » Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:29 am

California Colner wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 3:28 am
The simple fact is we have no pace up front
Hard to create chances when the defenders are far quicker
Disagree. Wood scored 14 last season and he hasn’t become any slower. The problem lies with the service he’s receiving.

Dark Cloud
Posts: 6634
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2001 times
Has Liked: 3331 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Dark Cloud » Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:35 am

Our midfield is primarily about stopping the opposition scoring and unfortunately the best attacking threat we have from midfield in Dwight, is now turning and playing the ball backwards pretty much 100% of the time, mainly because he never seems to have the ball in the opposition half any more. Whether he's under instructions or other teams are nullifying him much more effectively I don't know, but as a result chances for our strikers have largely dried up. Our other best chance of creating something up front is JBG and he's never fit enough these days to have a run of games or to seriously influence a game. Brady I simply don't count because I'm not really sure what he does tbh.
This user liked this post: Vino blanco

Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Right_winger » Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:41 am

NewClaret wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:29 am
Disagree. Wood scored 14 last season and he hasn’t become any slower. The problem lies with the service he’s receiving.
You are right, Wood is a good forward but he needs at least someone to do a bit of work for him to allow him to get the chances.

Our problem is lack of quality personnel and instructions to defend at all costs not committing any players forward.

Our lack of pace also hurts us massively on the counter and that’s why the ball just keeps coming back as the oppositions defensive line can move 10-15 yards up the pitch further compressing us. We have no pace to turn anyone and it seems we are under instructions not to take a man on.

The frustrating thing is we seem to allow teams to waltz forward at will and stand off them all the time.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12359
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 920 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Nov 07, 2020 9:40 am

HunterST_BFC wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:48 am
nudging this thread because "I can't believe I'm the only one to think this?"
With our squad and likely players - we are not hard to work out are we?

Stopping us scoring is easy bar set plays.
MF over run etc etc

No real pace to counter while being sat back.

Ramble over (not rant). We lack players capable of giving SD any chance of changing things.

UTC
We only have 2 decent centre halfs and we havent got anyone nearly good enough to play RWB in the Premier League. Apart that its still a crap idea as teams would just walk through that side at ease

Rileybobs
Posts: 16827
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6947 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:27 am

snapcrackleandpop wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:09 am
I love your optimism but I don’t see it, we have 2 forwards slower than Captain Tom and a midfield lacking quality, but fingers crossed eh.
How dare you call Captain Tom slow.
This user liked this post: jrgbfc

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by TVC15 » Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:46 am

NewClaret wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:26 am

We could put Kane up front and he wouldn’t score with the service Wood & Barnes are getting.
Yes he would.
The difference with the top world class forwards like Kane who are valued ten times the likes of Wood and Barnes is that they need far less chances or half chances to score. They also make the players around them better.

That’s why strikers who cost £15m and less and who are bought from the lower leagues rarely manage to score more than 12 or 13 goals a season. For the price we paid for our forwards they have often outscored strikers in this league who cost a lot more.

At the moment I agree we are just not making enough chances for the amount of chances our strikers normally need to score.

DomBFC1882
Posts: 1682
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 2:21 pm
Been Liked: 462 times
Has Liked: 2398 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by DomBFC1882 » Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:55 am

Barnes SHOULD NOT be playing. He should be 4th choice striker he offers absolutely nothing and it's dire to watch

NewClaret
Posts: 13399
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3084 times
Has Liked: 3804 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by NewClaret » Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:05 am

TVC15 wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:46 am
Yes he would.
The difference with the top world class forwards like Kane who are valued ten times the likes of Wood and Barnes is that they need far less chances or half chances to score. They also make the players around them better.

That’s why strikers who cost £15m and less and who are bought from the lower leagues rarely manage to score more than 12 or 13 goals a season. For the price we paid for our forwards they have often outscored strikers in this league who cost a lot more.

At the moment I agree we are just not making enough chances for the amount of chances our strikers normally need to score.
Which chance would he have taken last night though? We didn’t have one. Or how would he have made us play better when we were backs to the wall and 20% possession second half?

I’m not disputing the broader point, we’d be higher up in the league had we had a player of Kane’s quality for the other games, but last night their system completely nullified us.

I suppose you could say that a player of Kane’s quality would’ve allowed us to play 451 which may have made the difference to being overrun in midfield.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16827
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6947 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:13 am

NewClaret wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:05 am
Which chance would he have taken last night though? We didn’t have one. Or how would he have made us play better when we were backs to the wall and 20% possession second half?

I’m not disputing the broader point, we’d be higher up in the league had we had a player of Kane’s quality for the other games, but last night their system completely nullified us.

I suppose you could say that a player of Kane’s quality would’ve allowed us to play 451 which may have made the difference to being overrun in midfield.
Kane would probably have scored the chance where Barnes had the ball in the box with his back to goal and opted to lay the ball off to Dwight’s middle foot.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12359
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 920 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:14 am

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:13 am
Kane would probably have scored the chance where Barnes had the ball in the box with his back to goal and opted to lay the ball off to Dwight’s middle foot.
Has Dwight got 3 feet :shock:

Rileybobs
Posts: 16827
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6947 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:17 am

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:14 am
Has Dwight got 3 feet :shock:
Barnes appeared to think so.

NewClaret
Posts: 13399
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3084 times
Has Liked: 3804 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by NewClaret » Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:24 am

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:13 am
Kane would probably have scored the chance where Barnes had the ball in the box with his back to goal and opted to lay the ball off to Dwight’s middle foot.
Middle foot :lol: :lol:

Fair point, had forgotten that one. Annoying. Poor effort from Dwight that - would expect him to hit the target with his middle foot from there.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by TVC15 » Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:43 am

NewClaret wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:05 am
Which chance would he have taken last night though? We didn’t have one. Or how would he have made us play better when we were backs to the wall and 20% possession second half?

I’m not disputing the broader point, we’d be higher up in the league had we had a player of Kane’s quality for the other games, but last night their system completely nullified us.

I suppose you could say that a player of Kane’s quality would’ve allowed us to play 451 which may have made the difference to being overrun in midfield.
We did have a couple of chances but I assumed you were talking about this season rather than just last night - and whilst I get that we are all fed up at the moment with our performances our results are not just down to the lack of service (though that is definitely a big factor).
Barnes just looks way way off the pace since returning from his injury - he’s offering the team virtually nothing and whilst he has missed a couple of big chances too it’s more his overall game which is costing us at the moment.
I am really struggling to get my head round how Jay or Vydra would not offer the team more.

NewClaret
Posts: 13399
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3084 times
Has Liked: 3804 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by NewClaret » Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:17 pm

TVC15 wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:43 am
We did have a couple of chances but I assumed you were talking about this season rather than just last night - and whilst I get that we are all fed up at the moment with our performances our results are not just down to the lack of service (though that is definitely a big factor).
Barnes just looks way way off the pace since returning from his injury - he’s offering the team virtually nothing and whilst he has missed a couple of big chances too it’s more his overall game which is costing us at the moment.
I am really struggling to get my head round how Jay or Vydra would not offer the team more.
Tbh, creating chances is one thing I don’t normally worry about. We seem to create enough chances even when we play poorly. The quality of those chances has been lower this season though, particularly at key points in the game (Dwights poor FK with one minute to go last night being an example).

Yesterday I thought we just got overrun by their 5 in midfield. Barnes and Wood were outnumbered by the 3 at the back and Dwight had to keep tracking the very impressive Lamptey so we had no service (my views on the RW situation being well documented :lol:) Shame we don’t have the players to counter those systems when we come against them - maybe we will when Cork is fit.

Re: Barnes, I think his ****housery adds something & gets us up for it. It feels like we’re missing the crowd a bit now in that respect. Also wins FK’s (would like to see the stats on that), which seem to be the main outlet for us, albeit agree with another poster that refs appear to be getting wise to that too. Also feel he’s had the better chances and drawn the better saves in the odd game where we’ve created chances.

That said, hard to argue we didn’t look better overall with JRod and Vydra towards end of last season. I like that Dyche is loyal and allows players to play in to form, but agree we’re probably reaching the limit on that front.

warksclaret
Posts: 6671
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1693 times
Has Liked: 788 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by warksclaret » Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:20 pm

Which other PL manager would not change his starting forwards with no goal in 389 minutes

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5115
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1618 times
Has Liked: 890 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by BurnleyFC » Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:54 pm

It’s a bit bleak at the minute, isn’t it?

It almost has shades of Cotterill’s nineteen about it.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by tim_noone » Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:42 pm

DomBFC1882 wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:55 am
Barnes SHOULD NOT be playing. He should be 4th choice striker he offers absolutely nothing and it's dire to watch
Talking of 4th choice strikers. .. that Bamford chappie knows were the onion sack is...seems to gave a good bit of Pace to.oh Well!!

HunterST_BFC
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
Been Liked: 1402 times
Has Liked: 2691 times
Location: varied

Re: 389 minutes

Post by HunterST_BFC » Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:33 am

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 9:40 am
We only have 2 decent centre halfs and we havent got anyone nearly good enough to play RWB in the Premier League. Apart that its still a crap idea as teams would just walk through that side at ease
Dev Ad'
with respect... ish.

Your post is out of context (see my post earlier that it refers to).

D'A' - why have you recently turned into a ....?
Bored? Maybe?
Happy to help.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12359
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 920 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Devils_Advocate » Tue Nov 17, 2020 9:18 am

HunterST_BFC wrote:
Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:33 am
Dev Ad'
with respect... ish.

Your post is out of context (see my post earlier that it refers to).

D'A' - why have you recently turned into a ....?
Bored? Maybe?
Happy to help.
I've just looked back and can see I misread your post so apologies as you are correct my reply was totally unwarranted. I still dont agree with the real point you made but its a much more reasonable one than what I thought and definitely has some merit to it.
This user liked this post: HunterST_BFC

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6943
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1485 times
Has Liked: 1846 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by Woodleyclaret » Tue Nov 17, 2020 4:45 pm

There is some bxxxxxxs talked on here
Barnsley is a star who has been out for ages and unlucky not to score in games since his return
He will get back into the groove against Palace UTC

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: 389 minutes

Post by tiger76 » Tue Nov 17, 2020 9:01 pm

I don't care who scores against Palace, as long as someone does and we collect the 3 points, that's all that matters on Monday.
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

longside72
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2016 9:33 am
Been Liked: 184 times
Has Liked: 224 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by longside72 » Tue Nov 17, 2020 9:10 pm

Barnsley is a star who has been out for ages and unlucky not to score

There will be some confusion if Barnsley scores for Burnley !!

HB Claret
Posts: 640
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:09 am
Been Liked: 171 times
Has Liked: 81 times

Re: 389 minutes

Post by HB Claret » Wed Nov 18, 2020 7:45 am

Thought this topic was about a song from Rent ?

Post Reply