Dean Smith
-
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1004 times
- Has Liked: 905 times
Dean Smith
Accepts his FA charge, after being sent off at City. The FA outcome could put him out of the dugout or banned from the ground next week.
-
- Posts: 6880
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2742 times
- Has Liked: 4314 times
Re: Dean Smith
He misses the Newcastle game
-
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 336 times
- Has Liked: 1516 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Dean Smith
How can Dean Smith receive a fine for questioning the officials on what was a very contentious decision (ok technically a right one but I don't think many knew that was the rule)? If what he said was what he said is true It was hardly insulting.
Klopps gets away with far worse every game, waving his arms, screaming/shouting at the officials, yet that goes unpunished.
Klopps gets away with far worse every game, waving his arms, screaming/shouting at the officials, yet that goes unpunished.
These 2 users liked this post: DomBFC1882 MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Dean Smith
I don't mind Smith at all but someone in his position, earning what he does, should know the laws of the game.bf2k wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:07 pmHow can Dean Smith receive a fine for questioning the officials on what was a very contentious decision (ok technically a right one but I don't think many knew that was the rule)? If what he said was what he said is true It was hardly insulting.
Klopps gets away with far worse every game, waving his arms, screaming/shouting at the officials, yet that goes unpunished.
This user liked this post: Falcon
-
- Posts: 5756
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1745 times
- Has Liked: 344 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
Re: Dean Smith
I don't get why this rule is contentious
As soon as a defender plays the ball, where the opposition players are is irrelevant really. How many times do we see a complacent defender back-passing the ball straight into the feet of an attacker? Also, is not the same as when a cheeky striker waits behind a goalkeeper to put the ball down to nick it off him and roll it into the net?
As soon as a defender plays the ball, where the opposition players are is irrelevant really. How many times do we see a complacent defender back-passing the ball straight into the feet of an attacker? Also, is not the same as when a cheeky striker waits behind a goalkeeper to put the ball down to nick it off him and roll it into the net?
Re: Dean Smith
I guess the main question is was the city player gaining an advantage by being offside in the first place? I think he was, so the rules need to change imo
-
- Posts: 545
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:42 am
- Been Liked: 184 times
- Has Liked: 601 times
- Location: Dordogne/Fenland
Re: Dean Smith
How on earth did Jonathan Moss come to the correct decision????????
These 2 users liked this post: MT03ALG bobinho
Re: Dean Smith
That rule and the current off side rule, not flagging at the immediate point he's off side definitely needs changing. What an earth they were thinking of when they decided to change those rules is beyond me.
Re: Dean Smith
Moss originally issued a yellow card
Smith then appeared to carry on with some sort of abuse to him
Moss shrugged his shoulders (as if to say you give me no choice) but then pulled out a red card, but did not show a second yellow first
Should it not be a 3 game ban if a straight red was given
What Moss did is not against the rules
Smith then appeared to carry on with some sort of abuse to him
Moss shrugged his shoulders (as if to say you give me no choice) but then pulled out a red card, but did not show a second yellow first
Should it not be a 3 game ban if a straight red was given
What Moss did is not against the rules
This user liked this post: dpinsussex
-
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1133 times
- Has Liked: 1606 times
- Location: Worsthorne
-
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 336 times
- Has Liked: 1516 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Dean Smith
I agreed they should but I think everyone other than referees have missed that rule change.arise_sir_charge wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:09 pmI don't mind Smith at all but someone in his position, earning what he does, should know the laws of the game.
Re: Dean Smith
Ridiculous rule. Rediculous red card. He has done the game a favour and should be thanked not charged
-
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1004 times
- Has Liked: 905 times
Re: Dean Smith
That is the one rule that doesn’t need changing. How many times did the flag used to go up and be wrong. For the little bit of fuss that has been made about perceived chance of injury, I haven’t yet heard of an actual occurence, against the goal scoring opportunity being denied. I’ll take what we have.
-
- Posts: 5756
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1745 times
- Has Liked: 344 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
Re: Dean Smith
I think the issue I have is when its obvious that a player is offside. It happened in last nights game. I think I was Barnes was put through, (he was offside), he collected the ball and waited around the penalty area waiting for support, (he knew his was offside) he looked at the linesman, then he carried on shrugging of the defender and then tried to play the ball but it was intercepted and cleared away... then the flag went up.
Good time wasting tactic though
Good time wasting tactic though
-
- Posts: 6887
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1468 times
- Has Liked: 1839 times
Re: Dean Smith
Dean Smith could be lip read calling the ref a ****.That was after he was sent off
The misunderstood rules of football is common amongst some players and managers especially the offside laws
Clearly the Villa player played on his opponent and a goal was the correct decision
The misunderstood rules of football is common amongst some players and managers especially the offside laws
Clearly the Villa player played on his opponent and a goal was the correct decision
This user liked this post: Falcon
-
- Posts: 9247
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4069 times
- Has Liked: 6535 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Dean Smith
For a game that’s been around for over 125 years, for people who have spent their entire adult life being part of it to not know the rules means the game has been changed by the governing body without satisfactory explanation.
Rules are changed with alarming regularity, no surprise people can’t keep up.
Rules are changed with alarming regularity, no surprise people can’t keep up.
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:40 pm
- Been Liked: 892 times
- Has Liked: 1161 times
- Location: Proudsville
Re: Dean Smith
How long should the City player have waited then before rejoining the fray then before his 'offsideness' had worn off. Because that's the logical end point of the discussion if the law is 'wrong'.
Rule is correct
Decision was correct
Smith was a dick about it
Rule is correct
Decision was correct
Smith was a dick about it
-
- Posts: 30273
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 10916 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Dean Smith
the new rule is the issue, Linesman should have raised his flag the moment the ball went forward, this play on until after the fact is dreadful, will cause injury and I would imagine at some point result in legal action
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 4489
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2561 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
Re: Dean Smith
Unsurprisingly, it's VAR that has caused this. If you're going to disallow goals for offside after looking at a replay then it's only fair that you don't blow up for offside straight away in case the liner has got it wrong and there isn't an offside. I said this way back when VAR first came in that you either review everything or nothing because every in a football match happens as a consequence of what happened previously.
Thats why we've got this daft situation where everyone knows it's offside but they have to play on. Liners are redundant now. I mean they only give us and outs anyway but there's no real need for that anymore either. Might as well get rid.
Dean Smith is a bit of a bell but he was absolutely right the other night. Moss and co cocked it right up.
Thats why we've got this daft situation where everyone knows it's offside but they have to play on. Liners are redundant now. I mean they only give us and outs anyway but there's no real need for that anymore either. Might as well get rid.
Dean Smith is a bit of a bell but he was absolutely right the other night. Moss and co cocked it right up.
-
- Posts: 17773
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4044 times
- Has Liked: 1846 times
-
- Posts: 4489
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2561 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
Re: Dean Smith
Until Mings passes the ball. Fairly obvious really.
-
- Posts: 4489
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2561 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
Re: Dean Smith
See the identical Ronaldo incident from the same night for the correct way to handle it.
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Dean Smith
Rodri chases down the keeper who at 0-0 would have stood there and wasted time had he not. Why should be then be further disadvantaged?
Keeper plays a poor kick, City win header, Mings can head it back but tries to play, isn’t hood enough and loses out.
Nothing wrong with the rule in that scenario. How many times do defenders just clear their lines.....can you imagine Mee or Tarks bringing that ball down with Rodri there, not a chance.
Keeper plays a poor kick, City win header, Mings can head it back but tries to play, isn’t hood enough and loses out.
Nothing wrong with the rule in that scenario. How many times do defenders just clear their lines.....can you imagine Mee or Tarks bringing that ball down with Rodri there, not a chance.
-
- Posts: 4489
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2561 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
Re: Dean Smith
Hahaha definitely worth it.