Darren Drysdale (ref)
-
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1829 times
- Has Liked: 2623 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Nothing new though is it and this guy was well rated, although he never had to ref at the Turf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=6SIGn2scNRU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=6SIGn2scNRU
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 9:27 pm
- Been Liked: 133 times
- Has Liked: 114 times
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
As a grass roots referee, I find it disconcerting that people are backing a lengthy ban for the ref.
He was wrong, but didn't do much to merit, for example, a 12 month ban.
The respect campaign has fallen by the wayside, and players, coaches (and parents where applicable) need to REALLY respect match officials, and the FA and FIFA, plus all leagues, should be backing the officials appropriately.
More of a move towards rugby do things would be a start.
He was wrong, but didn't do much to merit, for example, a 12 month ban.
The respect campaign has fallen by the wayside, and players, coaches (and parents where applicable) need to REALLY respect match officials, and the FA and FIFA, plus all leagues, should be backing the officials appropriately.
More of a move towards rugby do things would be a start.
These 6 users liked this post: dpinsussex Ashingtonclaret46 fidelcastro Falcon Rowls Vegas Claret
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Player went first in that one and I don't think Collina did much wrong, more a defensive action.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:06 pmNothing new though is it and this guy was well rated, although he never had to ref at the Turf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=6SIGn2scNRU
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
I couldn't tell you what game it was, but if that was Southampton so be it. I said at the time it was a penalty and could understand his frustration. Purely an observation that you didn't think Barnes deserved a long ban for his actions.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:01 pmIf you are referring to the Southampton game when he was denied the clearest of penalties, I actually reported at the time that having been carded for being taken out by the goalkeeper he was very fortunate not to get a second yellow for his rant. What would you want me to do, run on and red card him?
What amazes me with you is that you will defend referees to the hilt. When they make a bad decision, you try and tell us it's correct. When they have bad games, you try and tell us they haven't. I used to think tybfc's brother was bad enough.
I'll support you on wanting abuse clamping down whether that abuse is aimed at players, referees, supporters or whoever, it's downright shocking. Alan Judge had no right to wag his finger in the referee's face but what happened next is totally unacceptable.
I do not defend referees to the hilt, what I do is try and give a perspective on why a particular decision will have been made by quoting the laws of the game. If law is applied correctly then the referee is correct irrespective.of what blinkered football fans think.
Tys brother was very forthright and honest in his assessment. Unfortunately you choose not to accept the reasoning behind why decisions are made. What I won't do is come on here and slate a colleague. I wonder is that the reasoning behind why you think I defend referees?
If the player hadn't done what he did, do you honestly think the referee would have done what he did. If you read one of my earlier posts you will see the words "I don't condone"
-
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1829 times
- Has Liked: 2623 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
I would have loved to have seen him do that on the Turf to a Burnley player in front of a full house whether it was defensive or not.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:09 pmPlayer went first in that one and I don't think Collina did much wrong, more a defensive action.
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Why would he deserve a long ban? He got a yellow card for what the officials couldn't see should have been a penalty. Those officials, Anthony Taylor and Adam Nunn, then didn't think anything that followed was worth any punishment. Under what circumstances, when referee and assistant have taken no action, would it warrant a ban?dpinsussex wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:12 pmPurely an observation that you didn't think Barnes deserved a long ban for his actions.
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
My earlier response is something you should read TonyClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:15 pmWhy would he deserve a long ban? He got a yellow card for what the officials couldn't see should have been a penalty. Those officials, Anthony Taylor and Adam Nunn, then didn't think anything that followed was worth any punishment. Under what circumstances, when referee and assistant have taken no action, would it warrant a ban?
"Interesting point re the other way round. In law there was no head butt so at worst a yellow card for adopting an aggressive attitude (C1 UB)"
So based on what would happen to a player for going head to bead is a yellow card. Why then does a referee deserve a lengthy ban?
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
And what action do you think would be taken against a player who went head to head with a referee? I would sincerely hope it's not a three match ban because it is deserving of a much longer suspension.dpinsussex wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:18 pmMy earlier response is something you should read Tony
"Interesting point re the other way round. In law there was no head butt so at worst a yellow card for adopting an aggressive attitude (C1 UB)"
So based on what would happen to a player for going head to bead is a yellow card. Why then does a referee deserve a lengthy ban?
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
You're worse than a politician for not answering the questionClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:20 pmAnd what action do you think would be taken against a player who went head to head with a referee? I would sincerely hope it's not a three match ban because it is deserving of a much longer suspension.
-
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1182 times
- Has Liked: 418 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
A serious enough ban. As it so happens though, Drysdale didn't headbutt Judge and merely leaned in towards a much shorter man.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 3:52 pmAnd what punishment do you think a player would receive if he headbutted a referee?
To utilise that rationale though, do you think there would be no repercussions if Referees used the type of language towards players that they receive, currently?
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
I think it’s about time a ref lost it with all the jumped up little cheating cocks week in week out, I’m genuinely surprised it’s taken so long.
I really feel for Drysdale, it appears like he’s being made an example of. Let’s not forget that if the players and fans actually had any respect for the referees incidents like this would never happen in the first place.
I would personally support the viewpoint that players should not be permitted to speak to the ref until spoken to and only captains should be permitted to speak to them during time when the ball is dead. Of course you’d get Stupidity from a lot of players ignoring the ref and having some “gamesmanship” (otherwise known as cheating) but you come to expect that from those players who lack brain cells to rub together.
I really feel for Drysdale, it appears like he’s being made an example of. Let’s not forget that if the players and fans actually had any respect for the referees incidents like this would never happen in the first place.
I would personally support the viewpoint that players should not be permitted to speak to the ref until spoken to and only captains should be permitted to speak to them during time when the ball is dead. Of course you’d get Stupidity from a lot of players ignoring the ref and having some “gamesmanship” (otherwise known as cheating) but you come to expect that from those players who lack brain cells to rub together.
-
- Posts: 7333
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2218 times
- Has Liked: 2207 times
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Storm in a teacup.
Drysdale was wrong, but come on, talk of a long ban is way OTT.
Drysdale was wrong, but come on, talk of a long ban is way OTT.
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Been coming for a long time now. The way some players speak to referees is disgraceful. I'm only surprised it's taken this long for a ref to retaliate.
I must say though, the way it's been covered, and the way some speak about the incident on here, you'd think the ref had kicked seven bells out of the player. Blown way out of all proportion.
I must say though, the way it's been covered, and the way some speak about the incident on here, you'd think the ref had kicked seven bells out of the player. Blown way out of all proportion.
These 2 users liked this post: Zlatan Darthlaw
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:31 pm
- Been Liked: 96 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
looks like a pen to me. anywhere else on the pitch thats a foul.
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
I think some referees do, others don't use the sort of language. No he didn't headbutt him but if Judge had done that to Drysdale then I'd expect a lengthy ban would be on the way.Darthlaw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:29 pmA serious enough ban. As it so happens though, Drysdale didn't headbutt Judge and merely leaned in towards a much shorter man.
To utilise that rationale though, do you think there would be no repercussions if Referees used the type of language towards players that they receive, currently?
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
YesClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:53 pmBeen coming for a long time? Surprised it's taken this long?
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
I'd argue it'd be more astonishing if I disagreed with myself.
These 3 users liked this post: dpinsussex Bosna tim_noone
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
I have just read the match report.
Let's just say the language used would be most certainly asterixed out in here.
Words questioning the referees integrity, his lack of hair and a 4 letter very abusive word for the non award of the pen.
He repeated it very aggressively as he got closer.
I am sure you can work it out. (Cue the guess the phrase contest coming up)
My main question is why not just show the red card?
At that level the match officials are almost expected to just get on with it and ignore.
I haven't seen the outcome.e as yet of the hearing.
Roll on microphones is all I can say.
This user liked this post: Zlatan
-
- Posts: 18061
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3862 times
- Has Liked: 2070 times
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Footballers give out more abuse than any profession I can think of.
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Outcome was a backdated ban. He is now free to referee again
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
For anyone interested the important parts of what was said are on the attached tweet. I do not want anyone to repeat the words on this forum though as it will likely close the thread.
https://twitter.com/talksportdrive/stat ... 62343?s=21
https://twitter.com/talksportdrive/stat ... 62343?s=21
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Sensible ZlatanZlatan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 7:51 pmFor anyone interested the important parts of what was said are on the attached tweet. I do not want anyone to repeat the words on this forum though as it will likely close the thread.
https://twitter.com/talksportdrive/stat ... 62343?s=21
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Hmm! be interesting if or when he next referees Ipswich wont it.dpinsussex wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 7:40 pmOutcome was a backdated ban. He is now free to referee again
As for the verdict I think the FA have got it correct, no DD should not have reacted in the manner he did, but Judge isn't exactly innocent with his behaviour in this incident.
-
- Posts: 7211
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2378 times
- Has Liked: 3804 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
The attitude of players towards officials in general is a reflection of their lack of social skills and screaming and shouting abuse has become the normal. It really is beyond ridiculous especially when an innocuous throw given the correct way can lead to a torrent of foul mouth abuse.
RED CARD RED CARD RED CARD and it WOULD go away quickly.
RED CARD RED CARD RED CARD and it WOULD go away quickly.
-
- Posts: 4529
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2594 times
- Has Liked: 760 times
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
A good referee, which Drysdale patently isn't, one of the worst I've ever seen in fact, would have sent Judge off for what he allegedly said. Judge denies saying that so there's a good chance Drysdale to be embellishing somewhat in an attempt to cover his back.
-
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 156 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Surprises me a bit Drysdale didn't send Judge off for calling him a cheat.
I recall many years ago, a team mate asking a ref if he would be sent off for calling the ref a cheat, and the ref replied he would.
Player then asked the Ref if he would be sent off for thinking the Ref was a cheat. Ref replied he wouldn't. So player replied he'd just think it.
Times were different then.
I recall many years ago, a team mate asking a ref if he would be sent off for calling the ref a cheat, and the ref replied he would.
Player then asked the Ref if he would be sent off for thinking the Ref was a cheat. Ref replied he wouldn't. So player replied he'd just think it.
Times were different then.
-
- Posts: 15234
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3156 times
- Has Liked: 6743 times
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
He used the two C words I would always send off for.
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Like quoon said, it seems our Darren is stretching the truth somewhat.
If Ipswich do have audio evidence to back up Judge’s claims, then Drysdale would probably face even further repercussions, possibly even the sack.
He’s probably just made it a whole lot worse for himself.
If Ipswich do have audio evidence to back up Judge’s claims, then Drysdale would probably face even further repercussions, possibly even the sack.
He’s probably just made it a whole lot worse for himself.
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Could be a bluff by the player too.BurnleyFC wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 9:46 amLike quoon said, it seems our Darren is stretching the truth somewhat.
If Ipswich do have audio evidence to back up Judge’s claims, then Drysdale would probably face even further repercussions, possibly even the sack.
He’s probably just made it a whole lot worse for himself.
I have had plenty of clubs say to me they had video evidence of foul tackles that resulted in red cards and they would appeal.
Guess how many actually did have the proof?
Yes you guessed - None
This user liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46
-
- Posts: 4529
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2594 times
- Has Liked: 760 times
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
There's no reason for the player to bluff as he's not been charged with anything. It's fairly obvious Judge gave Drysdale a mouthful but not a mouthful that Drysdale judged terrible enough to send Judge off.
Instead Drysdale wanted to play the big hard army man and use "a posture of authority" rather than use actual authority he had and send him off. Total ********, he shouldn't be allowed to referee again.
Instead Drysdale wanted to play the big hard army man and use "a posture of authority" rather than use actual authority he had and send him off. Total ********, he shouldn't be allowed to referee again.
This user liked this post: ClaretTony
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
I note dpinsussex was quick to defend Drysdale and condemn Judge but very interesting to see that Judge has denied it and says Ipswich Town have sound recordings to back him up.quoonbeatz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:42 pmA good referee, which Drysdale patently isn't, one of the worst I've ever seen in fact, would have sent Judge off for what he allegedly said. Judge denies saying that so there's a good chance Drysdale to be embellishing somewhat in an attempt to cover his back.
Judge was very wrong with his finger wagging and also very wrong IF he said what Drysdale claims he did.
That’s the end of the matter I assume unless Ipswich and Judge choose to take action.
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Where have I defended Drysdale Tony?? Balanced perspective more like.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 2:10 pmI note dpinsussex was quick to defend Drysdale and condemn Judge but very interesting to see that Judge has denied it and says Ipswich Town have sound recordings to back him up.
Judge was very wrong with his finger wagging and also very wrong IF he said what Drysdale claims he did.
That’s the end of the matter I assume unless Ipswich and Judge choose to take action.
-
- Posts: 4529
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2594 times
- Has Liked: 760 times
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Well for a start you took the referees report as proof.
This user liked this post: ClaretTony
-
- Posts: 30627
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
straight red for foul and abusive language for starters never mind the cheat comment
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Let's just say I have heard more lies from players trying to fool / deceive match officials and disciplinary panels than I care to remember .
All I quoted was what had been submitted to the FA. I never once said I believed what was in it.
What I have said is that if that was said there should have been a red card issued.
Referees do not suddenly lose the plot unless something very severe has happened.
Something happened to make him react like that.
Probability would favour the side of the match official.
-
- Posts: 10311
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3337 times
- Has Liked: 1954 times
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
If he did say what he is accused of then why wasn’t he sent off?
Did he forget about his red card?
Did he forget about his red card?
-
- Posts: 4529
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2594 times
- Has Liked: 760 times
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Which is entirely the point. His failure to issue a red card points to his description of what was said being not entirely true, otherwise he'd have sent Judge off rather than square up to him.dpinsussex wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 11:38 pmAll I quoted was what had been submitted to the FA. I never once said I believed what was in it.
What I have said is that if that was said there should have been a red card issued.
Trust me, I've seen enough referees reports that certainly don't tally with what actually happened to know that this does work both ways, but it's always the refs side the authorities back. (Mainly as there's money to be made that way)
And for what its worth, what Drysdale alleges Judge said certainly wouldn't have made me square up to him, unless I had a real attitude problem, like Drysdale clearly does. It's certainly not pleasant but it's really not enough to make you act like a 2 bit pub brawler, unless you're that way inclined of course.
-
- Posts: 67789
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32408 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Darren Drysdale (ref)
Absolutely - according to his evidence he's allowed a player to abuse him by using that sort of language and calling him a cheat without sending him off. That's shocking refereering. Will be very interesting if Ipswich Town now provide the audio evidence because should Drysdale have lied he should never be allowed on a football pitch again.Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Sat Mar 13, 2021 9:29 amIf he did say what he is accused of then why wasn’t he sent off?
Did he forget about his red card?