FAO CT
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
FAO CT
haha CT. Did you tell your audience about how you deleted my post at the end of the MEE thread, because I don't see my comment there anymore highlighting the fact that you started a post about Burnley Women yet apparently' aren't interested in them?
Oh the irony about not censoring when you then delete my offensive post about you and then explain, in your words, what happened rather than letting people judge them in their own way. You really are a class act!
Oh the irony about not censoring when you then delete my offensive post about you and then explain, in your words, what happened rather than letting people judge them in their own way. You really are a class act!
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: FAO CT
You are manipulating things to suit your own agenda. Let mine be judged as I write them! Not in your words but in mine!
-
- Posts: 7362
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2220 times
- Has Liked: 2211 times
Re: FAO CT
Bore off.
Re: FAO CT
Just give it a rest
-
- Posts: 3072
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1102 times
- Has Liked: 857 times
Re: FAO CT
Someone’s having a well entertaining Monday evening.
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: FAO CT
why? CT is claiming things he didn't do and is lying. If that's OK for your grand master then fair enough but I ain't having it.
HE DIDN'T BUMP THE MEE THREAD AS HE WRITES coz he's the DON, I DID. But he deleted that so you don't know.
I highlight he is a hypocrite & he is censoring these pages when there is something he doesn't like or gets under his skin. FACT!
-
- Posts: 7179
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3606 times
- Has Liked: 1033 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: FAO CT
I think you’ll find that he’s called Matt Bee, not Mee.
Getting simple facts like this incorrect really shows a neglect and ambivalence to the women’s game that I personally find disgusting.
Getting simple facts like this incorrect really shows a neglect and ambivalence to the women’s game that I personally find disgusting.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FAO CT
I will tell you again, I DID NOT DELETE YOUR POST so don't call me a liar.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:28 pmwhy? CT is claiming things he didn't do and is lying. If that's OK for your grand master then fair enough but I ain't having it.
HE DIDN'T BUMP THE MEE THREAD AS HE WRITES coz he's the DON, I DID. But he deleted that so you don't know.
I highlight he is a hypocrite & he is censoring these pages when there is something he doesn't like or gets under his skin. FACT!
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: FAO CT
TYPO, sorry. I'm the one bloody trying to defend the women's game!jedi_master wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:30 pmI think you’ll find that he’s called Matt Bee, not Mee.
Getting simple facts like this incorrect really shows a neglect and ambivalence to the women’s game that I personally find disgusting.
-
- Posts: 7179
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3606 times
- Has Liked: 1033 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: FAO CT
I was joking to be very clear….diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:32 pmTYPO, sorry. I'm the one bloody trying to defend the women's game!
I don’t think anyone has shown any disrespect to the women’s game. I have no interest in it at all, more power to those that do, but you cannot expect websites built to discuss Burnley FC (the men’s team) to automatically decide to follow the women’s game without someone devoting a lot of time and energy attending the matches etc.
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: FAO CT
so one of your mods did then and you're the boss so clearly under instructionsClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:31 pmI will tell you again, I DID NOT DELETE YOUR POST so don't call me a liar.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FAO CT
No, someone else did, I was unaware of it until you started you childish rant and accused me of being a liar. The people who help me moderate the board, and your behaviour has shown we need more, are not under any instructions.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:36 pmso one of your mods did then and you're the boss so clearly under instructions
You are the liar making false accusations. It's sickening, it really is. I've got another ruined evening because of someone behaving appallingly on this board.
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: FAO CT
How can I defend myself if my posts are deleted and then over-ridden with your EDIT & SUMMARY, in your words?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:38 pmNo, someone else did, I was unaware of it until you started you childish rant and accused me of being a liar. The people who help me moderate the board, and your behaviour has shown we need more, are not under any instructions.
You are the liar making false accusations.
It's all rather convenient isn't it!
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FAO CT
Defend yourself? I did not remove your post, simple as that. All I ask is people post with some decency on this board. You have chosen not to.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:41 pmHow can I defend myself if my posts are deleted and then over-ridden with your EDIT & SUMMARY, in your words?
It's all rather convenient isn't it!
-
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:53 pm
- Been Liked: 219 times
- Has Liked: 517 times
Re: FAO CT
diamondpocket - oh dear , you are really showing yourself up - must be well past your bed time by now! Up the jolly dancers to trollytime!
-
- Posts: 9323
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: FAO CT
As I’ve listed elsewhere, I DELETED DIAMONDPOCKET’S post.
My reasons for it were this…
1) it appeared to be a post that was directly questioning your editing of the UpTheClarets website, subtly hidden in a different thread, where you might not have seen it.
2) the content of the post appeared provocative with the intention of trying to start an argument.
3) the message completely ignored the your previously stated rationale and thus, appeared very disrespectful.
4) it questioned a moderator’s final decision and thus, broke board rules.
I make no apology for my actions.
Thank you
John
My reasons for it were this…
1) it appeared to be a post that was directly questioning your editing of the UpTheClarets website, subtly hidden in a different thread, where you might not have seen it.
2) the content of the post appeared provocative with the intention of trying to start an argument.
3) the message completely ignored the your previously stated rationale and thus, appeared very disrespectful.
4) it questioned a moderator’s final decision and thus, broke board rules.
I make no apology for my actions.
Thank you
John
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FAO CT
Thanks John, it's a shame I felt the need to take you away from what you were doing to post this but I was sickeningly being called a liar.jdrobbo wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:49 pmAs I’ve listed elsewhere, I DELETED DIAMONDPOCKET’S post.
My reasons for it were this…
1) it appeared to be a post that was directly questioning your editing of the UpTheClarets website, subtly hidden in a different thread, where you might not have seen it.
2) the content of the post appeared provocative with the intention of trying to start an argument.
3) the message completely ignored the your previously stated rationale and thus, appeared very disrespectful.
4) it questioned a moderator’s final decision and thus, broke board rules.
I make no apology for my actions.
Thank you
John
-
- Posts: 9323
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: FAO CT
Oh dear!diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:28 pmwhy? CT is claiming things he didn't do and is lying. If that's OK for your grand master then fair enough but I ain't having it.
HE DIDN'T BUMP THE MEE THREAD AS HE WRITES coz he's the DON, I DID. But he deleted that so you don't know.
I highlight he is a hypocrite & he is censoring these pages when there is something he doesn't like or gets under his skin. FACT!
-
- Posts: 9000
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2015 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
Re: FAO CT
Only clever trolls have any depth of knowledge about their subject and is why they quickly resort to gross exaggeration and then outright name calling. I don’t miss youth clubs.
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: FAO CT
Can you please confirm John this was the post on the BURNLEY PART WITH BEE thread & not my after-thought Topic where I angrily posted at CT? Under your reasons, which I have not seen anywhere else, I can understand why the thread was pulled. But I am more concerned about my reply to BURNLEY PART WITH BEE that has been replaced with CT's reply. But mine is nowhere to be seen which explains all the threads that followed, including this one.jdrobbo wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:49 pmAs I’ve listed elsewhere, I DELETED DIAMONDPOCKET’S post.
My reasons for it were this…
1) it appeared to be a post that was directly questioning your editing of the UpTheClarets website, subtly hidden in a different thread, where you might not have seen it.
2) the content of the post appeared provocative with the intention of trying to start an argument.
3) the message completely ignored the your previously stated rationale and thus, appeared very disrespectful.
4) it questioned a moderator’s final decision and thus, broke board rules.
I make no apology for my actions.
Thank you
John
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FAO CT
If you look on that thread, that's where John first posted his response. It was that post that he removed, the one you accused me of removing and then, when I said it wasn't, led to you calling me a liar and all the rest.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:02 pmCan you please confirm John this was the post on the BURNLEY PART WITH BEE thread & not my after-thought Topic where I angrily posted at CT? Under your reasons, which I have not seen anywhere else, I can understand why the thread was pulled. But I am more concerned about my reply to BURNLEY PART WITH BEE that has been replaced with CT's reply. But mine is nowhere to be seen which explains all the threads that followed, including this one.
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: FAO CT
Presumably the official site reports on the woman’s team?
Woundnt it just be easier to read about them on there?
Woundnt it just be easier to read about them on there?
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:14 pm
- Been Liked: 552 times
- Has Liked: 258 times
Re: FAO CT
So many numpties. It’s why I don’t post much.
This is a good board where a lot of exiles get
A lot of good info about the Clarets.
It must be a right pain in the backside to moderate though.
This is a good board where a lot of exiles get
A lot of good info about the Clarets.
It must be a right pain in the backside to moderate though.
These 3 users liked this post: Leisure Vegas Claret Buxtonclaret
-
- Posts: 8369
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2977 times
- Has Liked: 2075 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: FAO CT
He seems to be having a deal of success if this thread is anything to go by.
Just let it go and he'll go away if nobody is biting, with a bit of luck.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FAO CT
And here is the log and I've seen he's also issued you with a warning.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:02 pmCan you please confirm John this was the post on the BURNLEY PART WITH BEE thread & not my after-thought Topic where I angrily posted at CT? Under your reasons, which I have not seen anywhere else, I can understand why the thread was pulled. But I am more concerned about my reply to BURNLEY PART WITH BEE that has been replaced with CT's reply. But mine is nowhere to be seen which explains all the threads that followed, including this one.
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: FAO CT
yeah, like the official reports on the men's team as well. what's your point? doesn't mean there can't be something fan based on here as well.Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:05 pmPresumably the official site reports on the woman’s team?
Woundnt it just be easier to read about them on there?
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FAO CT
So rather than apologise for you outbursts aimed at me, you've started on women's football being covered on here again which is what started it all in the first place. Let's just repeat, the women's team will not be covered and a full apology would be appreciated.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:10 pmyeah, like the official reports on the men's team as well. what's your point? doesn't mean there can't be something fan based on here as well.
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: FAO CT
Perhaps Diamondpocket is a member of the women's team?
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: FAO CT
haha, I didn't start it. Bordeaux brought it up by asking me a question. In your book of politeness, should i not reply to the question?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:13 pmSo rather than apologise for you outbursts aimed at me, you've started on women's football being covered on here again which is what started it all in the first place. Let's just repeat, the women's team will not be covered and a full apology would be appreciated.
I know it won't be covered. I've got it, it seems others haven't as they are the ones continuing the conversation.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FAO CT
You accused me of removing a thread that hadn’t been removed. You accused me of removing a post that I hadn’t removed. You called me a liar. You called me a bigot.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:16 pmhaha, I didn't start it. Bordeaux brought it up by asking me a question. In your book of politeness, should i not reply to the question?
I know it won't be covered. I've got it, it seems others haven't as they are the ones continuing the conversation.
I’d think that was worthy of an apology.
-
- Posts: 9323
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: FAO CT
Perhaps this thread will offer a small window of insight into the voluntary task of board moderating. Tony gets so much grief, as do the rest of the mods. It’s just so uncalled for.
A few months ago, I constructed a post about the ‘identity’ of our football team and how we’d like to see Burnley perceived moving forward.
It took quite a while to type out, yet within fifteen minutes the thread was removed. It was annoying but understandable, as deleting individual posts would have led to a very confusing thread chain. I never questioned that decision as I know when posting that this Dan happen.
There’s one poster who repeatedly accused me of deleting and editing over his posts and would not take my word for it. Sadly, this is what happens far too frequently.
The birth of other forms of social media has made moderating what appears like a very simple forum, far, far more difficult than it ever used to be.
A few months ago, I constructed a post about the ‘identity’ of our football team and how we’d like to see Burnley perceived moving forward.
It took quite a while to type out, yet within fifteen minutes the thread was removed. It was annoying but understandable, as deleting individual posts would have led to a very confusing thread chain. I never questioned that decision as I know when posting that this Dan happen.
There’s one poster who repeatedly accused me of deleting and editing over his posts and would not take my word for it. Sadly, this is what happens far too frequently.
The birth of other forms of social media has made moderating what appears like a very simple forum, far, far more difficult than it ever used to be.
This user liked this post: 1968claret
-
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:45 pm
- Been Liked: 664 times
- Has Liked: 379 times
Re: FAO CT
Why do we seem to get this type of thread when schools are off?
-
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:17 pm
- Been Liked: 504 times
- Has Liked: 635 times
Re: FAO CT
Perhaps Fiamondpocket should just leave this board if he doesn’t like it?boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:14 pmPerhaps Diamondpocket is a member of the women's team?
He/she doesn’t have to come on here. The board is run by people giving up their own time for our benefit.
If you don’t like the way they do that then leave and start your own message board.
These 3 users liked this post: tiger76 Volvoclaret Leisure
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: FAO CT
yet once again, you don't ACKNOWLEDGE your words and questioning. LOOK AT THE ABOVE QUOTE -"YOU'VE STARTED ON WOMEN'S FOOTBALL BEING COVERED ON HERE AGAIN".ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:13 pmSo rather than apologise for you outbursts aimed at me, you've started on women's football being covered on here again which is what started it all in the first place. Let's just repeat, the women's team will not be covered and a full apology would be appreciated.
Your semantics are WRONG. I did not start, I was asked a question by BORDEAUX, who started, and I replied.
Maybe this thread also highlights the use of WORDS and the English Language because people clearly do not understand what they mean! Why is this being allowed and everything he says is GOSPEL? This is exactly the same reason as to why I called you a LIAR because you are making things up to be the victim!
I wasn't angry before but now I am. This just proves it! I'm sorry but this is a joke.
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: FAO CT
Or even start her own message board?1968claret wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:23 pmPerhaps Fiamondpocket should just leave this board if he doesn’t like it?
He/she doesn’t have to come on here. The board is run by people giving up their own time for our benefit.
If you don’t like the way they do that then leave and start your own message board.
Don't start on me, I was only having a laugh
-
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 8:08 am
- Been Liked: 295 times
- Has Liked: 60 times
Re: FAO CT
Oooh, I feel like i am accidentally reading the year 6 parents WhatsApp group.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FAO CT
It’s quite simple.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:26 pmyet once again, you don't ACKNOWLEDGE your words and questioning. LOOK AT THE ABOVE QUOTE -"YOU'VE STARTED ON WOMEN'S FOOTBALL BEING COVERED ON HERE AGAIN".
Your semantics are WRONG. I did not start, I was asked a question by BORDEAUX, who started, and I replied.
Maybe this thread also highlights the use of WORDS and the English Language because people clearly do not understand what they mean! Why is this being allowed and everything he says is GOSPEL? This is exactly the same reason as to why I called you a LIAR because you are making things up to be the victim!
I wasn't angry before but now I am. This just proves it! I'm sorry but this is a joke.
Are you prepared to apologise for calling me a liar a bigot and for taking actions I hadn’t taken? YES OR NO.
I’m upset by this. It’s not a joke to me because I’ve been accused wrongly. So, easy, just YES OR NO.
-
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:45 pm
- Been Liked: 664 times
- Has Liked: 379 times
Re: FAO CT
Because it would be even emptied than Claretsmad.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:26 pmOr even start her own message board?
Don't start on me, I was only having a laugh
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: FAO CT
I've been accused too as seen above, I'm upset too but it's OK, we'll just deal with your feelings coz you're the special one.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:29 pmIt’s quite simple.
Are you prepared to apologise for calling me a liar a bigot and for taking actions I hadn’t taken? YES OR NO.
I’m upset by this. It’s not a joke to me because I’ve been accused wrongly. So, easy, just YES OR NO.
SORRY
Happy now?
-
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:17 pm
- Been Liked: 504 times
- Has Liked: 635 times
Re: FAO CT
Wasn’t starting on you boatshed. Just think that if someone has such an issue with how the board is run then why not just leave it? Really don’t understand why you would keep posting.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:26 pmOr even start her own message board?
Don't start on me, I was only having a laugh
As I say, nothing aimed at you.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
Re: FAO CT
Maybe somebody interested enough should start a UTCW forum and get all this crap off this one.
Last edited by Jel on Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FAO CT
So your answer is no. I’ve had a ruined and stressful evening all caused by your posting. You accused me of actions and called me a liar. You started two further, very offensive threads that had to be removed.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:32 pmI've been accused too as seen above, I'm upset too but it's OK, we'll just deal with your feelings coz you're the special one.
SORRY
Happy now?
Now you make the childish ‘special one’ comment.
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: FAO CT
you asked for an apology. I said SORRY. Stop going over old ground repeating yourself, you're the one dragging it out forever.
Good Night and Good Luck old friend. Over & Out. Good riddance
Good Night and Good Luck old friend. Over & Out. Good riddance
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: FAO CT
You are not a friend, but over & out confirmed.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:46 pmyou asked for an apology. I said SORRY. Stop going over old ground repeating yourself, you're the one dragging it out forever.
Good Night and Good Luck old friend. Over & Out. Good riddance
These 4 users liked this post: 1968claret Mayoclaret Leisure Vegas Claret