Post
by Spiral » Sat Jul 30, 2022 6:42 pm
At the risk of sounding like a crazy person denying the evidence in front of my eyes, even though Costelloe's average position was far out wide I'm still not totally sold on this being a deliberate 4231, and I think what we saw is totally consistent with a 4222 setup. I know that sounds ridiculous looking at average positions, but I'd make the argument that a box formation authorises Costelloe to use the space he found out wide for reasons outlined a bit further up the thread. I think there's a valuable distinction to be made between in-game positioning and the setup of a system, because a setup implies certain duties and positional expectations for individual players in accord with the roles they're given within that system, and those roles, when done right, are apparent. I think as fans it's useful for us to intelligently understand what's being attempted, because this will inform our judgements as to how well we're playing as a team, and the performance of individual players, and if we start from a position of fundamentally misunderstanding what is being attempted, we run the risk of demanding things from players they aren't expected to do. Essentially, clarity makes us better critics. I stand to be corrected about everything I'm posting, and quite obviously I defer to the manager and coaches and players, so rather than looking at this in terms of declarative statements, for me it's about interpretation. So then, to defy what I see with my own eyeballs...
Based on his positioning a case can be made for Costelloe playing as a winger in the traditional sense within a 4231, but where do Bastien and Brownhill fit into this? If a case is to be made for a particular setup being deployed, then every part of the system is usually identifiable in a coherent way (this is why systems exist, to provide a coherent tactical approach), and this is where identifying it as a 4231 breaks down for me a little bit. The reason for this is that for it to be coherently identified as a 4231 you'd need to make a case for Bastien being utilised as a winger (the left side of the 3), and Brownhill as a no10 (behind the striker). But aside from being a central midfielder by trade and not a winger, Bastien found himself waaaay further inside than you'd ever expect a winger, and Brownhill a little bit further wide than you'd expect a no10, not to mention the fact that you'd expect Brownhill to get a bit closer to Barnes were he playing in the middle of the 3. You'd also need to make a case for Costelloe being the one tasked with providing width: fair enough, he did that, making a few by-line runs, but he also found himself in central positions more times than you'd expect a winger to be. Roberts did a proper wingback job up and down the right hand side: but why would you play a wingback alongside a winger? Costelloe looked to receive crosses a few times within or nearly within the width of the goalposts — this is where you'd usually find forwards positioning themselves.
So going back to systems being coherent, and the apparentness of the roles being taken up, when looking at Costelloe in isolation his average position map (and also what we all saw with our eyes) might suggest him being utilised as a winger in the traditional sense (which he can play and has done for the U23s), but to be considered a winger within a 4231 would require us to interpret Bastien and Brownhill as taking up positions not typically seen within that system. Could it be argued as being a lop-sided 4231? This seems contrived, because it suggests a game plan to set up to create width on the left from Maatsen alone, but to use two players to create that width on the right hand side with Costelloe and Roberts. If we are to look for an explanation for the setup, the freedom allowed within a 4222 box provides all the answer without having to pat an asterisk next to a 4231. Was our system a system played with a right winger, or a system played with a free-roaming forward playing to his strengths and the opponent's weakness? Like I mentioned above, I think Costelloe found himself on the right because that's where the space was, but this does not necessarily suggest we set up with a winger. A 4222 allows the forward to find those wide positions. So personally I interpret it as Costelloe being a forward in a 4222, rather than a winger in a 4231. This might seem like a distinction without a difference, but go back to my first paragraph and the bit I said about clarity and understanding allowing us to make better critiques.
There's also the fact that on the club's official match report, it said this:
"Kompany handed out six debuts including to academy graduate Dara Costelloe who started up front."