Defence v attack

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
expoultryboy
Posts: 1627
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
Been Liked: 341 times
Has Liked: 477 times

Defence v attack

Post by expoultryboy » Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:57 pm

Everyone's moaning about our defence , but we've only conceded 12 in 12 games and 3 of those were in one match . Our problem is not creating and scoring more at the other end . We have plenty of the ball without actually hurting teams .

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6979
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Woodleyclaret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:58 pm

Too slow getting it out to our pacy wide men
Why only 1 sub used ?

basil6345789
Posts: 2713
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
Been Liked: 482 times
Has Liked: 2292 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by basil6345789 » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:02 pm

expoultryboy wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:57 pm
Everyone's moaning about our defence , but we've only conceded 12 in 12 games and 3 of those were in one match . Our problem is not creating and scoring more at the other end . We have plenty of the ball without actually hurting teams .
Agreed but notwithstanding that we should still know how to set-out a plan to defend a lead for the closing minutes of a game.

ksrclaret
Posts: 6927
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2570 times
Has Liked: 771 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by ksrclaret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:05 pm

For the volume of possession we have, we don't work the defence enough. We pass it around safely and in front of the opposition. We settle for a safe, slow tempo and don't have the urgency to create.

We're also poor defensively considering we only have to actually defend for 20% of a game. That needs sorting, starting with the personnel.

So, issues at both ends of the pitch. Anyone sensible can see that.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15275
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:10 pm

If you look at our attacks...
Rodriguez isn't getting in the box enough.
Tella isn't a left winger, I'm not sure why he is spending so much (ineffective) time out there.
It's clearly part of a game plan but that plan isn't creating enough clear cut opportunities at present

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10328
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3342 times
Has Liked: 1964 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:11 pm

If you have the ball that much you have to be creating and scoring far more than we do.
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Defence v attack

Post by tiger76 » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:13 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:58 pm
Too slow getting it out to our pacy wide men
Why only 1 sub used ?
VK can't win can he makes changes in the Cardiff game and folk complain, doesn't make changes tonight and still folk complain.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

bumba
Posts: 3136
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by bumba » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:13 pm

We don't penetrate enough and we haven't got any proper defenders, it's frustrating and quite frankly I'm finding it all a bit boring now.
All that possession but it's the same old backwards safe passes.
Cullen for me needs dropping

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Defence v attack

Post by tiger76 » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:14 pm

Bordeauxclaret wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:11 pm
If you have the ball that much you have to be creating and scoring far more than we do.
Agreed especially when you wouldn't back us to keep a clean sheet.
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud

Burnley1989
Posts: 7413
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2326 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Burnley1989 » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:14 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:13 pm
VK can't win
Correct :lol:
This user liked this post: ervi34

Jambounchained
Posts: 691
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:52 am
Been Liked: 171 times
Has Liked: 44 times
Location: Todmorden

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Jambounchained » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:15 pm

Should’ve bought a striker IMO
This user liked this post: Stayingup

boatshed bill
Posts: 15275
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:17 pm

bumba wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:13 pm
We don't penetrate enough and we haven't got any proper defenders, it's frustrating and quite frankly I'm finding it all a bit boring now.
All that possession but it's the same old backwards safe passes.
Cullen for me needs dropping
I can't see any reason to drop Cullen.
He and Cork were excellent. Cullen hardly lost a ball all night and was constantly available.
If we are looking for a problem to solve it is that we rarely put the oppositions' CBs under any pressure.

Vino blanco
Posts: 5367
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 1904 times
Has Liked: 1980 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Vino blanco » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:22 pm

I said on here many times before the season started that we needed two Championship quality strikers, we didn’t sign any and it is showing. We have a lot of very similar forward players, tricky, lightweight but no power. On the defence, I have also said on here many times, we need to play Beyer at centre back with Charlie in his best position at left back. Vitinho and Maatsen will never be left backs whilst they have holes in their arrises.

bumba
Posts: 3136
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by bumba » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:24 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:17 pm
I can't see any reason to drop Cullen.
He and Cork were excellent. Cullen hardly lost a ball all night and was constantly available.
If we are looking for a problem to solve it is that we rarely put the oppositions' CBs under any pressure.
I'd rather he lost the ball 2/3 times because he'd attempted to pass a ball forward, we won't win football matches passing the ball backwards. Several times he has the chance to play someone in and turns back and goes safe.
We need some penetration not this tippy tappy boring stuff that's so predictable and easy to play against
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

boatshed bill
Posts: 15275
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:27 pm

bumba wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:24 pm
I'd rather he lost the ball 2/3 times because he'd attempted to pass a ball forward, we won't win football matches passing the ball backwards. Several times he has the chance to play someone in and turns back and goes safe.
We need some penetration not this tippy tappy boring stuff that's so predictable and easy to play against
Actually I get that.
I do think his main roll is to receive the out-ball, something he does really well
his 2nd job appears to be filling inon the left when Maatsen/Vitinho attack from left back...something else he does well.

bfcjg
Posts: 13366
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5091 times
Has Liked: 6909 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by bfcjg » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:32 pm

We do our best work out wide, we need the pace and penetration down the centre.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

KRBFC
Posts: 18146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by KRBFC » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:37 pm

Rodriguez isolated, never enough men in the box to cross it to. Brownhill isn't a number 10, he's a central midfielder, he's not KDB, not even the same kind of player. Brownhill doesn't really possess any of the typical number 10 qualities. He's out of position. Spends far too much time out on the right wing too playing triangles with Roberts and Benson when he should be in the box for a cross. It's our biggest issue atm.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15275
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:38 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:37 pm
Rodriguez isolated, never enough men in the box to cross it to. Brownhill isn't a number 10, he's a central midfielder, he's not KDB, not even the same kind of player. Brownhill doesn't really possess any of the typical number 10 qualities. He's out of position. Spends far too much time out on the right wing too playing triangles with Roberts and Benson when he should be in the box for a cross. It's our biggest issue atm.
M.O.M tonight, though i'm really not sure how.

KRBFC
Posts: 18146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by KRBFC » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:42 pm

If you think of a number 10, you think the ability to pass through the eye of a needle, split a defence with 1 cute pass. The dribbling ability to go past a defender then pass through. Most importantly in that role is the ability to find space on the pitch, good number 10's are ALWAYS somehow in space, it's not a coincidence. I don't think it's something you can teach either
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

KRBFC
Posts: 18146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by KRBFC » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:44 pm

We don't have that pace, drive and ability to beat a man through the middle of the pitch. Just ends up being slowly passed around before hoping a wide player can produce something. You can see why O'Hare was wanted. We dont have that cuteness in the middle of the pitch either, think an Aldi version of David Silva, Ozil. Someone to make something happen centrally from that 10 spot

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:45 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:44 pm
We don't have that pace, drive and ability to beat a man through the middle of the pitch. Just ends up being slowly passed around before hoping a wide player can produce something. You can see why O'Hare was wanted. We dont have that cuteness in the middle of the pitch either, think an Aldi version of David Silva, Ozil. Someone to make something happen centrally from that 10 spot
Couldn’t agree more, we don’t have any guile in the middle of the pitch

KRBFC
Posts: 18146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by KRBFC » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:47 pm

As well as Cork has done, I think Cullen is too important to the system, so I'd drop Cork and play Brownhill deeper, use Brownhill's best attributes like his work rate, up and down legs.

claretspice
Posts: 5727
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by claretspice » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:47 pm

I'd have gone 442 for the final 20 minutes tonight- Tella or Zaroury playing off Jay, allow Jay to drop in as the 10 to link the game, and dropped Brownhill back into midfield with Cork or Cullen. You could have made an argument for it actually at half time.

First half, very much like at Preston, the Vitinho/Tella/Cullen axis down the left inevitably looked inside too much and we became too narrow. I'm struggling to understand why we don't ever swap the wingers over and let them have a crack on the opposite side (I say that as a general fab of inverted wingers - but where the full back offers the real width).

KRBFC
Posts: 18146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by KRBFC » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:48 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:45 pm
Couldn’t agree more, we don’t have any guile in the middle of the pitch
We have 2 David Jones' in the middle with Dean Marney advanced behind a striker.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:49 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:48 pm
We have 2 David Jones' in the middle with Dean Marney advanced behind a striker.
Yep pretty accurate.

NewClaret
Posts: 13519
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3837 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by NewClaret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:50 pm

bumba wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:13 pm
We don't penetrate enough and we haven't got any proper defenders, it's frustrating and quite frankly I'm finding it all a bit boring now.
All that possession but it's the same old backwards safe passes.
Cullen for me needs dropping
Feel exactly the same. Have to be honest, after Saturday I’ve had zero enthusiasm for this match all day. I’m going Coventry at the weekend and likewise can’t get excited about it.

Passing the ball backwards is as anti-football as hoofing it in my opinion. VK says he wants us to be entertained but we’re creating very few goal scoring opportunities and I’m
struggling to find it entertaining.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15275
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:50 pm

It's about 40 years since i played a decent game of football, but prior to that:
every manager I've known at any level gets the CF to "work" the CBs. We don't.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:52 pm

It’s been our problem for seasons, creativity in midfield is none existent.

Sproggy
Posts: 1463
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:41 pm
Been Liked: 667 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Sproggy » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:52 pm

bumba wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:24 pm
I'd rather he lost the ball 2/3 times because he'd attempted to pass a ball forward, we won't win football matches passing the ball backwards. Several times he has the chance to play someone in and turns back and goes safe.
We need some penetration not this tippy tappy boring stuff that's so predictable and easy to play against
Roberts must have overlapped Benson 10 times in the first half only for Benson to cut back inside and play the safe pass. We definitely need to take a few more risks in the final 3rd.

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10919
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5563 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by TheFamilyCat » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:53 pm

Bordeauxclaret wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:11 pm
If you have the ball that much you have to be creating and scoring far more than we do.
Particularly when you factor in the number of attacking players we have (granted they aren't all fit at present).
This user liked this post: Bordeauxclaret

jrgbfc
Posts: 8511
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2108 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by jrgbfc » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:53 pm

I agree with those who say Cork and Cullen are too similar. Dropping Brownhill back there or giving Bastien a go would offer us more drive, it's painful to watch at times.
Tella really needs to get closer to Jay as well, they were nowhere near each other tonight which resulted in Jay dropping deeper and deeper.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5797
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1884 times
Has Liked: 841 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:54 pm

We don’t need to be playing three central midfielders against teams like Stoke. Like watching a training ground routine tonight everything safety first apart from the few minutes which led to the goal.

NewClaret
Posts: 13519
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3837 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by NewClaret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:55 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:42 pm
If you think of a number 10, you think the ability to pass through the eye of a needle, split a defence with 1 cute pass. The dribbling ability to go past a defender then pass through. Most importantly in that role is the ability to find space on the pitch, good number 10's are ALWAYS somehow in space, it's not a coincidence. I don't think it's something you can teach either
I actually don’t know what system we play. Some times we have a line of four (Brownhill pushed up) against the back line. Others there’s nobody in a forward position at all and Jay is playing in midfield. I just can’t work it out. But I do know it’s not working.

I think playing two deep lying CM’s against teams that sit back doesn’t feel a great decision, but equally think Cork & Cullen are consistently our best players. Hard to drop.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15275
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:56 pm

jrgbfc wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:53 pm
I agree with those who say Cork and Cullen are too similar. Dropping Brownhill back there or giving Bastien a go would offer us more drive, it's painful to watch at times.
Tella really needs to get closer to Jay as well, they were nowhere near each other tonight which resulted in Jay dropping deeper and deeper.
Totally agree about Tella/Jay.
but if Brownhill isn't working why drop either Cullen or Cork?

NewClaret
Posts: 13519
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3837 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by NewClaret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:57 pm

Steve-Harpers-perm wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:54 pm
We don’t need to be playing three central midfielders against teams like Stoke. Like watching a training ground routine tonight everything safety first apart from the few minutes which led to the goal.
There was one point in the first where a bad tackle went in, crowd got riled, we upped the tempo and created something. Shows it can be done but we’re ordinarily just building up at snails pace 😴😴😴

expoultryboy
Posts: 1627
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
Been Liked: 341 times
Has Liked: 477 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by expoultryboy » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:57 pm

Hopefully when fit , Twine will be our much needed No10

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10919
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5563 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by TheFamilyCat » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:59 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:50 pm
Feel exactly the same. Have to be honest, after Saturday I’ve had zero enthusiasm for this match all day. I’m going Coventry at the weekend and likewise can’t get excited about it.

Passing the ball backwards is as anti-football as hoofing it in my opinion. VK says he wants us to be entertained but we’re creating very few goal scoring opportunities and I’m
struggling to find it entertaining.
Do summat else instead then, you miserable sod.

jrgbfc
Posts: 8511
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2108 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by jrgbfc » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:00 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:56 pm
Totally agree about Tella/Jay.
but if Brownhill isn't working why drop either Cullen or Cork?
I just feel they're a bit too similar. Both neat and tidy, safety first. I think Brownhill would be better playing a more box to box role as well. We don't need two holding midfielders in games like tonight.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5797
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1884 times
Has Liked: 841 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:01 pm

expoultryboy wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:57 pm
Hopefully when fit , Twine will be our much needed No10
Twine gets better each passing week he doesn’t play!

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:07 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:50 pm
Feel exactly the same. Have to be honest, after Saturday I’ve had zero enthusiasm for this match all day. I’m going Coventry at the weekend and likewise can’t get excited about it.

Passing the ball backwards is as anti-football as hoofing it in my opinion. VK says he wants us to be entertained but we’re creating very few goal scoring opportunities and I’m
struggling to find it entertaining.
Bloody hell. RV and KSR will be along soon to give you a right telling off.

I got rinsed for saying the exact same thing earlier. This in my opinion is the worst type of football to watch. It sucks the enjoyment out of the game.

KRBFC
Posts: 18146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by KRBFC » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:07 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:55 pm
I actually don’t know what system we play. Some times we have a line of four (Brownhill pushed up) against the back line. Others there’s nobody in a forward position at all and Jay is playing in midfield. I just can’t work it out. But I do know it’s not working.

I think playing two deep lying CM’s against teams that sit back doesn’t feel a great decision, but equally think Cork & Cullen are consistently our best players. Hard to drop.
Cork Cullen
Benson Brownhill Tella
Jrod

the midfield 2 of Cork/Cullen are similar, lacks legs and energy. Brownhill doesn't beat a man, can't split a defence with a pass. He's just never a number 10, he's a very good Championship box to box midfielder though with legs and energy.

Hedontplayforyou
Posts: 2340
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
Been Liked: 547 times
Has Liked: 51 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Hedontplayforyou » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:33 pm

Play the ball in behind more and use the pace of Tella , and I think the time has come to drop one of the three central midfielders out to accommodate more creativity/craft. How Brownhill got MOTM tonight is beyond me . I think he neee to be dropped deeper alongside Cullen.

NewClaret
Posts: 13519
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3837 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by NewClaret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:35 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:07 pm
Cork Cullen
Benson Brownhill Tella
Jrod

the midfield 2 of Cork/Cullen are similar, lacks legs and energy. Brownhill doesn't beat a man, can't split a defence with a pass. He's just never a number 10, he's a very good Championship box to box midfielder though with legs and energy.
Can’t agree with your comment that they lack legs and energy. I think they’re EVERYWHERE. And to be honest if I were a Stoke fan, I’d be purring at having one of them, not both.

The issue is Brownhill for me. As you say, doesn’t turn, not creative, not a 10. Not to say he deserves dropping either though.

When Twine is back I might play Brownhill in the Cullen/Cork role but ask him to be more box to box, with Twine as a 10. Would work better at home when teams will sit back.

NewClaret
Posts: 13519
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3837 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by NewClaret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:42 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:07 pm
Bloody hell. RV and KSR will be along soon to give you a right telling off.

I got rinsed for saying the exact same thing earlier. This in my opinion is the worst type of football to watch. It sucks the enjoyment out of the game.
I think worst type of football to watch is a tad excessive. I’d rather watch this than “low block, 25% possession, hit it long & try to nick something” Dycheball.

My issue is that it’s not great to be at 0-0 or even 1-0 up and play such laxidazical football without any real attempt to score. There was one point in the 2nd I thought Cork should’ve released it up the right quickly and he took too long. Drives me crazy. Crack on, score a couple and then I can watch you pass it around.

We have to find a way to turn the possession in to goals because at the moment we don’t look like scoring anywhere near enough.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15275
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:44 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:42 pm


We have to find a way to turn the possession in to goals because at the moment we don’t look like scoring anywhere near enough.
Perfectly put.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2260 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by CoolClaret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:47 pm

It’s getting rather repetitive

For me -and I’ve been saying it for the past five-seven games or so, we need to be more pragmatic.

Swap Cullen for a striker(or play Tella dedicated striker and Zaroury on the left) with Brownhill dropping into midfield & Chaz to left back with Lowton coming back in at right back.

Lowts-THB-Beyer-Taylor
———Cork-Brownhill

All of a sudden we won’t look small in both boxes and have a bit more know now in now to see off games.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5379
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1655 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:51 pm

We take so many risks when we have the ball, at times Jack is in a midfield one, with Cullen at left back and Vitinho / Maatsen at left wing. That is no doubt intended to overload their defence but the trouble with it is that if we try a risky pass and lose the ball, they then have a chance to break in numbers with only Jack guarding the back four. So I don’t think we are too cautious.

We could be on 36 points, only West Brom have we deserved to lose, say a couple of draw was deserved too, so that would be 29 points and well clear at the top. What has cost us has been sloppy defending at vital times by young players, and sloppy tactics by a young manager at times. We’re also missing a few young forward players who are all injured. I don’t see a major problem.

We’ll iron it out with a bit of experience, I’m sure of it.

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3233
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1768 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by arise_sir_charge » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:54 pm

Brownhill is the issue, he plays in straight lines or the way he’s facing, that’s not what a number 10 needs to do.

Put a young Robbie Blake in that role end we are a completely different kettle of fish.
This user liked this post: NewClaret

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8158
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 5070 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Defence v attack

Post by Colburn_Claret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:55 pm

50% of our play is excellent, another 15% very good, and another 20% ok.
The other 15% is very poor. An awful lot of talent on the pitch, but not a lot of nous, and it's all over the pitch.

It's best to think of in terms of tennis. Anyone can lose a set to a well played winner, but when you're losing sets to unforced errors it's not good enough. We keep throwing away results, not because the opposition play a blinder, or score a worldy, but we make stupid, unnecessary decisions, at both ends of the pitch. Its all self inflicted, and that is what is so frustrating.
The other problem is we don't seem to learn from the mistakes, because we make the same mistakes again and again.

We still look a very good team, at times the best in the league, but it all could be for nothing, if VK and the coaches don't sort it out.

NewClaret
Posts: 13519
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3837 times

Re: Defence v attack

Post by NewClaret » Thu Oct 06, 2022 12:05 am

Colburn_Claret wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:55 pm
We still look a very good team, at times the best in the league, but it all could be for nothing, if VK and the coaches don't sort it out.
I got pelters last week for this but this is exactly how I feel.

We might be the best team in the league. Certainly the best squad I think. But I see us as finishing mid table despite that talent because we’re not playing well enough to beat teams, which is frustrating.

These dropped points will certainly cost us.

Sense we’re in the weird position of needing to change & leave some great players on the bench in order to find the best team. Convinced after tonight that we need Taylor LB and at some point a proper 10 (Brownhill dropped or to replace one of Cork/Cullen),

Post Reply