Defence v attack
-
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
- Been Liked: 341 times
- Has Liked: 477 times
Defence v attack
Everyone's moaning about our defence , but we've only conceded 12 in 12 games and 3 of those were in one match . Our problem is not creating and scoring more at the other end . We have plenty of the ball without actually hurting teams .
-
- Posts: 6979
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: Defence v attack
Too slow getting it out to our pacy wide men
Why only 1 sub used ?
Why only 1 sub used ?
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
- Been Liked: 482 times
- Has Liked: 2292 times
Re: Defence v attack
Agreed but notwithstanding that we should still know how to set-out a plan to defend a lead for the closing minutes of a game.expoultryboy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:57 pmEveryone's moaning about our defence , but we've only conceded 12 in 12 games and 3 of those were in one match . Our problem is not creating and scoring more at the other end . We have plenty of the ball without actually hurting teams .
Re: Defence v attack
For the volume of possession we have, we don't work the defence enough. We pass it around safely and in front of the opposition. We settle for a safe, slow tempo and don't have the urgency to create.
We're also poor defensively considering we only have to actually defend for 20% of a game. That needs sorting, starting with the personnel.
So, issues at both ends of the pitch. Anyone sensible can see that.
We're also poor defensively considering we only have to actually defend for 20% of a game. That needs sorting, starting with the personnel.
So, issues at both ends of the pitch. Anyone sensible can see that.
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: Defence v attack
If you look at our attacks...
Rodriguez isn't getting in the box enough.
Tella isn't a left winger, I'm not sure why he is spending so much (ineffective) time out there.
It's clearly part of a game plan but that plan isn't creating enough clear cut opportunities at present
Rodriguez isn't getting in the box enough.
Tella isn't a left winger, I'm not sure why he is spending so much (ineffective) time out there.
It's clearly part of a game plan but that plan isn't creating enough clear cut opportunities at present
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: Defence v attack
If you have the ball that much you have to be creating and scoring far more than we do.
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Defence v attack
VK can't win can he makes changes in the Cardiff game and folk complain, doesn't make changes tonight and still folk complain.Woodleyclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 9:58 pmToo slow getting it out to our pacy wide men
Why only 1 sub used ?
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
Re: Defence v attack
We don't penetrate enough and we haven't got any proper defenders, it's frustrating and quite frankly I'm finding it all a bit boring now.
All that possession but it's the same old backwards safe passes.
Cullen for me needs dropping
All that possession but it's the same old backwards safe passes.
Cullen for me needs dropping
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Defence v attack
Agreed especially when you wouldn't back us to keep a clean sheet.Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:11 pmIf you have the ball that much you have to be creating and scoring far more than we do.
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud
-
- Posts: 7413
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2326 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Defence v attack
This user liked this post: ervi34
-
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:52 am
- Been Liked: 171 times
- Has Liked: 44 times
- Location: Todmorden
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: Defence v attack
I can't see any reason to drop Cullen.
He and Cork were excellent. Cullen hardly lost a ball all night and was constantly available.
If we are looking for a problem to solve it is that we rarely put the oppositions' CBs under any pressure.
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Defence v attack
I said on here many times before the season started that we needed two Championship quality strikers, we didn’t sign any and it is showing. We have a lot of very similar forward players, tricky, lightweight but no power. On the defence, I have also said on here many times, we need to play Beyer at centre back with Charlie in his best position at left back. Vitinho and Maatsen will never be left backs whilst they have holes in their arrises.
Re: Defence v attack
I'd rather he lost the ball 2/3 times because he'd attempted to pass a ball forward, we won't win football matches passing the ball backwards. Several times he has the chance to play someone in and turns back and goes safe.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:17 pmI can't see any reason to drop Cullen.
He and Cork were excellent. Cullen hardly lost a ball all night and was constantly available.
If we are looking for a problem to solve it is that we rarely put the oppositions' CBs under any pressure.
We need some penetration not this tippy tappy boring stuff that's so predictable and easy to play against
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: Defence v attack
Actually I get that.bumba wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:24 pmI'd rather he lost the ball 2/3 times because he'd attempted to pass a ball forward, we won't win football matches passing the ball backwards. Several times he has the chance to play someone in and turns back and goes safe.
We need some penetration not this tippy tappy boring stuff that's so predictable and easy to play against
I do think his main roll is to receive the out-ball, something he does really well
his 2nd job appears to be filling inon the left when Maatsen/Vitinho attack from left back...something else he does well.
Re: Defence v attack
We do our best work out wide, we need the pace and penetration down the centre.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
Re: Defence v attack
Rodriguez isolated, never enough men in the box to cross it to. Brownhill isn't a number 10, he's a central midfielder, he's not KDB, not even the same kind of player. Brownhill doesn't really possess any of the typical number 10 qualities. He's out of position. Spends far too much time out on the right wing too playing triangles with Roberts and Benson when he should be in the box for a cross. It's our biggest issue atm.
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: Defence v attack
M.O.M tonight, though i'm really not sure how.KRBFC wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:37 pmRodriguez isolated, never enough men in the box to cross it to. Brownhill isn't a number 10, he's a central midfielder, he's not KDB, not even the same kind of player. Brownhill doesn't really possess any of the typical number 10 qualities. He's out of position. Spends far too much time out on the right wing too playing triangles with Roberts and Benson when he should be in the box for a cross. It's our biggest issue atm.
Re: Defence v attack
If you think of a number 10, you think the ability to pass through the eye of a needle, split a defence with 1 cute pass. The dribbling ability to go past a defender then pass through. Most importantly in that role is the ability to find space on the pitch, good number 10's are ALWAYS somehow in space, it's not a coincidence. I don't think it's something you can teach either
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
Re: Defence v attack
We don't have that pace, drive and ability to beat a man through the middle of the pitch. Just ends up being slowly passed around before hoping a wide player can produce something. You can see why O'Hare was wanted. We dont have that cuteness in the middle of the pitch either, think an Aldi version of David Silva, Ozil. Someone to make something happen centrally from that 10 spot
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Defence v attack
Couldn’t agree more, we don’t have any guile in the middle of the pitchKRBFC wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:44 pmWe don't have that pace, drive and ability to beat a man through the middle of the pitch. Just ends up being slowly passed around before hoping a wide player can produce something. You can see why O'Hare was wanted. We dont have that cuteness in the middle of the pitch either, think an Aldi version of David Silva, Ozil. Someone to make something happen centrally from that 10 spot
Re: Defence v attack
As well as Cork has done, I think Cullen is too important to the system, so I'd drop Cork and play Brownhill deeper, use Brownhill's best attributes like his work rate, up and down legs.
-
- Posts: 5727
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2833 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: Defence v attack
I'd have gone 442 for the final 20 minutes tonight- Tella or Zaroury playing off Jay, allow Jay to drop in as the 10 to link the game, and dropped Brownhill back into midfield with Cork or Cullen. You could have made an argument for it actually at half time.
First half, very much like at Preston, the Vitinho/Tella/Cullen axis down the left inevitably looked inside too much and we became too narrow. I'm struggling to understand why we don't ever swap the wingers over and let them have a crack on the opposite side (I say that as a general fab of inverted wingers - but where the full back offers the real width).
First half, very much like at Preston, the Vitinho/Tella/Cullen axis down the left inevitably looked inside too much and we became too narrow. I'm struggling to understand why we don't ever swap the wingers over and let them have a crack on the opposite side (I say that as a general fab of inverted wingers - but where the full back offers the real width).
Re: Defence v attack
We have 2 David Jones' in the middle with Dean Marney advanced behind a striker.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:45 pmCouldn’t agree more, we don’t have any guile in the middle of the pitch
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
-
- Posts: 13519
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3837 times
Re: Defence v attack
Feel exactly the same. Have to be honest, after Saturday I’ve had zero enthusiasm for this match all day. I’m going Coventry at the weekend and likewise can’t get excited about it.
Passing the ball backwards is as anti-football as hoofing it in my opinion. VK says he wants us to be entertained but we’re creating very few goal scoring opportunities and I’m
struggling to find it entertaining.
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: Defence v attack
It's about 40 years since i played a decent game of football, but prior to that:
every manager I've known at any level gets the CF to "work" the CBs. We don't.
every manager I've known at any level gets the CF to "work" the CBs. We don't.
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Defence v attack
It’s been our problem for seasons, creativity in midfield is none existent.
Re: Defence v attack
Roberts must have overlapped Benson 10 times in the first half only for Benson to cut back inside and play the safe pass. We definitely need to take a few more risks in the final 3rd.bumba wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:24 pmI'd rather he lost the ball 2/3 times because he'd attempted to pass a ball forward, we won't win football matches passing the ball backwards. Several times he has the chance to play someone in and turns back and goes safe.
We need some penetration not this tippy tappy boring stuff that's so predictable and easy to play against
-
- Posts: 10919
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5563 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Defence v attack
Particularly when you factor in the number of attacking players we have (granted they aren't all fit at present).Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:11 pmIf you have the ball that much you have to be creating and scoring far more than we do.
This user liked this post: Bordeauxclaret
Re: Defence v attack
I agree with those who say Cork and Cullen are too similar. Dropping Brownhill back there or giving Bastien a go would offer us more drive, it's painful to watch at times.
Tella really needs to get closer to Jay as well, they were nowhere near each other tonight which resulted in Jay dropping deeper and deeper.
Tella really needs to get closer to Jay as well, they were nowhere near each other tonight which resulted in Jay dropping deeper and deeper.
-
- Posts: 5797
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Defence v attack
We don’t need to be playing three central midfielders against teams like Stoke. Like watching a training ground routine tonight everything safety first apart from the few minutes which led to the goal.
-
- Posts: 13519
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3837 times
Re: Defence v attack
I actually don’t know what system we play. Some times we have a line of four (Brownhill pushed up) against the back line. Others there’s nobody in a forward position at all and Jay is playing in midfield. I just can’t work it out. But I do know it’s not working.KRBFC wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:42 pmIf you think of a number 10, you think the ability to pass through the eye of a needle, split a defence with 1 cute pass. The dribbling ability to go past a defender then pass through. Most importantly in that role is the ability to find space on the pitch, good number 10's are ALWAYS somehow in space, it's not a coincidence. I don't think it's something you can teach either
I think playing two deep lying CM’s against teams that sit back doesn’t feel a great decision, but equally think Cork & Cullen are consistently our best players. Hard to drop.
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: Defence v attack
Totally agree about Tella/Jay.jrgbfc wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:53 pmI agree with those who say Cork and Cullen are too similar. Dropping Brownhill back there or giving Bastien a go would offer us more drive, it's painful to watch at times.
Tella really needs to get closer to Jay as well, they were nowhere near each other tonight which resulted in Jay dropping deeper and deeper.
but if Brownhill isn't working why drop either Cullen or Cork?
-
- Posts: 13519
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3837 times
Re: Defence v attack
There was one point in the first where a bad tackle went in, crowd got riled, we upped the tempo and created something. Shows it can be done but we’re ordinarily just building up at snails paceSteve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:54 pmWe don’t need to be playing three central midfielders against teams like Stoke. Like watching a training ground routine tonight everything safety first apart from the few minutes which led to the goal.
-
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
- Been Liked: 341 times
- Has Liked: 477 times
Re: Defence v attack
Hopefully when fit , Twine will be our much needed No10
-
- Posts: 10919
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5563 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Defence v attack
Do summat else instead then, you miserable sod.NewClaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:50 pmFeel exactly the same. Have to be honest, after Saturday I’ve had zero enthusiasm for this match all day. I’m going Coventry at the weekend and likewise can’t get excited about it.
Passing the ball backwards is as anti-football as hoofing it in my opinion. VK says he wants us to be entertained but we’re creating very few goal scoring opportunities and I’m
struggling to find it entertaining.
Re: Defence v attack
I just feel they're a bit too similar. Both neat and tidy, safety first. I think Brownhill would be better playing a more box to box role as well. We don't need two holding midfielders in games like tonight.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:56 pmTotally agree about Tella/Jay.
but if Brownhill isn't working why drop either Cullen or Cork?
-
- Posts: 5797
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Defence v attack
Twine gets better each passing week he doesn’t play!expoultryboy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:57 pmHopefully when fit , Twine will be our much needed No10
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Defence v attack
Bloody hell. RV and KSR will be along soon to give you a right telling off.NewClaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:50 pmFeel exactly the same. Have to be honest, after Saturday I’ve had zero enthusiasm for this match all day. I’m going Coventry at the weekend and likewise can’t get excited about it.
Passing the ball backwards is as anti-football as hoofing it in my opinion. VK says he wants us to be entertained but we’re creating very few goal scoring opportunities and I’m
struggling to find it entertaining.
I got rinsed for saying the exact same thing earlier. This in my opinion is the worst type of football to watch. It sucks the enjoyment out of the game.
Re: Defence v attack
Cork CullenNewClaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:55 pmI actually don’t know what system we play. Some times we have a line of four (Brownhill pushed up) against the back line. Others there’s nobody in a forward position at all and Jay is playing in midfield. I just can’t work it out. But I do know it’s not working.
I think playing two deep lying CM’s against teams that sit back doesn’t feel a great decision, but equally think Cork & Cullen are consistently our best players. Hard to drop.
Benson Brownhill Tella
Jrod
the midfield 2 of Cork/Cullen are similar, lacks legs and energy. Brownhill doesn't beat a man, can't split a defence with a pass. He's just never a number 10, he's a very good Championship box to box midfielder though with legs and energy.
-
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 547 times
- Has Liked: 51 times
Re: Defence v attack
Play the ball in behind more and use the pace of Tella , and I think the time has come to drop one of the three central midfielders out to accommodate more creativity/craft. How Brownhill got MOTM tonight is beyond me . I think he neee to be dropped deeper alongside Cullen.
-
- Posts: 13519
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3837 times
Re: Defence v attack
Can’t agree with your comment that they lack legs and energy. I think they’re EVERYWHERE. And to be honest if I were a Stoke fan, I’d be purring at having one of them, not both.KRBFC wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:07 pmCork Cullen
Benson Brownhill Tella
Jrod
the midfield 2 of Cork/Cullen are similar, lacks legs and energy. Brownhill doesn't beat a man, can't split a defence with a pass. He's just never a number 10, he's a very good Championship box to box midfielder though with legs and energy.
The issue is Brownhill for me. As you say, doesn’t turn, not creative, not a 10. Not to say he deserves dropping either though.
When Twine is back I might play Brownhill in the Cullen/Cork role but ask him to be more box to box, with Twine as a 10. Would work better at home when teams will sit back.
-
- Posts: 13519
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3837 times
Re: Defence v attack
I think worst type of football to watch is a tad excessive. I’d rather watch this than “low block, 25% possession, hit it long & try to nick something” Dycheball.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:07 pmBloody hell. RV and KSR will be along soon to give you a right telling off.
I got rinsed for saying the exact same thing earlier. This in my opinion is the worst type of football to watch. It sucks the enjoyment out of the game.
My issue is that it’s not great to be at 0-0 or even 1-0 up and play such laxidazical football without any real attempt to score. There was one point in the 2nd I thought Cork should’ve released it up the right quickly and he took too long. Drives me crazy. Crack on, score a couple and then I can watch you pass it around.
We have to find a way to turn the possession in to goals because at the moment we don’t look like scoring anywhere near enough.
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
-
- Posts: 7469
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2260 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Defence v attack
It’s getting rather repetitive
For me -and I’ve been saying it for the past five-seven games or so, we need to be more pragmatic.
Swap Cullen for a striker(or play Tella dedicated striker and Zaroury on the left) with Brownhill dropping into midfield & Chaz to left back with Lowton coming back in at right back.
Lowts-THB-Beyer-Taylor
———Cork-Brownhill
All of a sudden we won’t look small in both boxes and have a bit more know now in now to see off games.
For me -and I’ve been saying it for the past five-seven games or so, we need to be more pragmatic.
Swap Cullen for a striker(or play Tella dedicated striker and Zaroury on the left) with Brownhill dropping into midfield & Chaz to left back with Lowton coming back in at right back.
Lowts-THB-Beyer-Taylor
———Cork-Brownhill
All of a sudden we won’t look small in both boxes and have a bit more know now in now to see off games.
-
- Posts: 5379
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1655 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
Re: Defence v attack
We take so many risks when we have the ball, at times Jack is in a midfield one, with Cullen at left back and Vitinho / Maatsen at left wing. That is no doubt intended to overload their defence but the trouble with it is that if we try a risky pass and lose the ball, they then have a chance to break in numbers with only Jack guarding the back four. So I don’t think we are too cautious.
We could be on 36 points, only West Brom have we deserved to lose, say a couple of draw was deserved too, so that would be 29 points and well clear at the top. What has cost us has been sloppy defending at vital times by young players, and sloppy tactics by a young manager at times. We’re also missing a few young forward players who are all injured. I don’t see a major problem.
We’ll iron it out with a bit of experience, I’m sure of it.
We could be on 36 points, only West Brom have we deserved to lose, say a couple of draw was deserved too, so that would be 29 points and well clear at the top. What has cost us has been sloppy defending at vital times by young players, and sloppy tactics by a young manager at times. We’re also missing a few young forward players who are all injured. I don’t see a major problem.
We’ll iron it out with a bit of experience, I’m sure of it.
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Defence v attack
Brownhill is the issue, he plays in straight lines or the way he’s facing, that’s not what a number 10 needs to do.
Put a young Robbie Blake in that role end we are a completely different kettle of fish.
Put a young Robbie Blake in that role end we are a completely different kettle of fish.
This user liked this post: NewClaret
-
- Posts: 8158
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3087 times
- Has Liked: 5070 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Defence v attack
50% of our play is excellent, another 15% very good, and another 20% ok.
The other 15% is very poor. An awful lot of talent on the pitch, but not a lot of nous, and it's all over the pitch.
It's best to think of in terms of tennis. Anyone can lose a set to a well played winner, but when you're losing sets to unforced errors it's not good enough. We keep throwing away results, not because the opposition play a blinder, or score a worldy, but we make stupid, unnecessary decisions, at both ends of the pitch. Its all self inflicted, and that is what is so frustrating.
The other problem is we don't seem to learn from the mistakes, because we make the same mistakes again and again.
We still look a very good team, at times the best in the league, but it all could be for nothing, if VK and the coaches don't sort it out.
The other 15% is very poor. An awful lot of talent on the pitch, but not a lot of nous, and it's all over the pitch.
It's best to think of in terms of tennis. Anyone can lose a set to a well played winner, but when you're losing sets to unforced errors it's not good enough. We keep throwing away results, not because the opposition play a blinder, or score a worldy, but we make stupid, unnecessary decisions, at both ends of the pitch. Its all self inflicted, and that is what is so frustrating.
The other problem is we don't seem to learn from the mistakes, because we make the same mistakes again and again.
We still look a very good team, at times the best in the league, but it all could be for nothing, if VK and the coaches don't sort it out.
-
- Posts: 13519
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3837 times
Re: Defence v attack
I got pelters last week for this but this is exactly how I feel.Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:55 pmWe still look a very good team, at times the best in the league, but it all could be for nothing, if VK and the coaches don't sort it out.
We might be the best team in the league. Certainly the best squad I think. But I see us as finishing mid table despite that talent because we’re not playing well enough to beat teams, which is frustrating.
These dropped points will certainly cost us.
Sense we’re in the weird position of needing to change & leave some great players on the bench in order to find the best team. Convinced after tonight that we need Taylor LB and at some point a proper 10 (Brownhill dropped or to replace one of Cork/Cullen),