Because when I moaned about Reading's time wasting, I was informed it was hypocritical of me due to being accepting of similar under Dyche. It wasn't stupid of me, it was caveating my opinion to try and avoid being criticised by the members of this messageboard who enjoy arguing. Clearly it didn't work as it has still happened . I know full well Dyche never did anything even remotely approaching last night (save for, perhaps/ish, Stoke City away in 2014, 1-2 win to us).
Rotherham
-
- Posts: 7179
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3606 times
- Has Liked: 1033 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Rotherham
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
-
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:09 pm
- Been Liked: 169 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: Rotherham
https://youtu.be/BO9Gpw3anOQ
Just to add to their misery, it was definitely their throw in before the 3rd goal as you can see in the video.
Just to add to their misery, it was definitely their throw in before the 3rd goal as you can see in the video.
-
- Posts: 8155
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3084 times
- Has Liked: 5066 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Rotherham
No it wasn't, no you can't.Flying Without Ings wrote: ↑Thu Nov 03, 2022 9:28 amhttps://youtu.be/BO9Gpw3anOQ
Just to add to their misery, it was definitely their throw in before the 3rd goal as you can see in the video.
It wasn't clear who that hit last, it ricocheted about and looked just as much that it could have bounced of Benson and hit their defender. The liner had a better view that either of us, and he gave it to us.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:46 am
- Been Liked: 78 times
- Has Liked: 2 times
Re: Rotherham
That's absolutely embarrassingclaretandy wrote: ↑Thu Nov 03, 2022 9:27 amhttps://twitter.com/The_RUFC/status/158 ... FLuxg&s=19
Some severe butt hurt here...
I'm loving how wound up other team's fans are getting this season.
-
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:09 pm
- Been Liked: 169 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: Rotherham
Doesn’t matter if the lino had a better view as the decision was wrong. Watch the footage again, it’s not hard to tell.Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Thu Nov 03, 2022 9:55 amNo it wasn't, no you can't.
It wasn't clear who that hit last, it ricocheted about and looked just as much that it could have bounced of Benson and hit their defender. The liner had a better view that either of us, and he gave it to us.
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2021 5:27 pm
- Been Liked: 100 times
- Has Liked: 89 times
Re: Rotherham
2 of their players laughing and joking when 2-1 up when their number 11 fell over and stayed down near the cricket field late on.
Not so much so after the final whistle. Karma
Not so much so after the final whistle. Karma
-
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2603 times
- Has Liked: 763 times
Re: Rotherham
It was their throw but earlier in the game the ball went out a foot over the line and we didn't get the throw, so rounds and swingabouts innit.
-
- Posts: 5883
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1698 times
- Has Liked: 2535 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
-
- Posts: 8155
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3084 times
- Has Liked: 5066 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Rotherham
I have watched the footage, and I still say it's anyone's guess who it hit last, to say it clearly comes off Benson is ridiculous.Flying Without Ings wrote: ↑Thu Nov 03, 2022 10:26 amDoesn’t matter if the lino had a better view as the decision was wrong. Watch the footage again, it’s not hard to tell.
This user liked this post: dsr
-
- Posts: 7179
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3606 times
- Has Liked: 1033 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Rotherham
Whilst watching highlights of the game on YouTube just now, I stumbled across the below (link), a Rotherham podcast.
Look, we all have a bit of bias towards our own club - it’s almost impossible not to have some no matter how hard we might try to see things as honestly and neutrally as possible. This takes the absolute biscuit though .
Don’t watch if you have any pencils nearby as you will snap them.
https://youtu.be/HGwr-DND3Yo
Look, we all have a bit of bias towards our own club - it’s almost impossible not to have some no matter how hard we might try to see things as honestly and neutrally as possible. This takes the absolute biscuit though .
Don’t watch if you have any pencils nearby as you will snap them.
https://youtu.be/HGwr-DND3Yo
Re: Rotherham
Yes the ref for all his faults wasn’t having any of the time wasting. We’ll done to him for adding the time he did in both halves.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro
Re: Rotherham
Good god all you people whining about the throw in ... you need to let it go ... it was not given to Rotherham ... It was awarded to Burnley end of story
The Ref was a nightmare for 90 minutes ... but didn't allow the blatant timewasting go unpunished ... he added 10+ minutes ... its a shame more refs didn't do this ...
The Ref was a nightmare for 90 minutes ... but didn't allow the blatant timewasting go unpunished ... he added 10+ minutes ... its a shame more refs didn't do this ...
Re: Rotherham
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/f ... ny-3906279
According to their manager they did not time waste
According to their manager they did not time waste
-
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 515 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Rotherham
They seemed decent level headed guys on their preview. However they have a seriously odd take on what happened.jedi_master wrote: ↑Thu Nov 03, 2022 10:50 pmWhilst watching highlights of the game on YouTube just now, I stumbled across the below (link), a Rotherham podcast.
Look, we all have a bit of bias towards our own club - it’s almost impossible not to have some no matter how hard we might try to see things as honestly and neutrally as possible. This takes the absolute biscuit though .
Don’t watch if you have any pencils nearby as you will snap them.
https://youtu.be/HGwr-DND3Yo
The older guy blaming the referee for getting Bramall sent off because of the silly first booking."He gave himself a decision to make". No he didn't. The player knew he was on a yellow and gave the ref the decision to make. How about blaming your own player?
They have a serious inferiority complex too. Proper little club syndrome. Woe is us. Worlds against us in the "big" league attitude.
At no point do they concede they did anything wrong. All accounted for..all the refs fault..all our "big club" cheating.
It really is quite a remarkable view of the game.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Rotherham
Have to contribute to this thread as many of the Rotherham comments on the BBC report were constantly insisting we are only romping away with the league due to our parachute payments, and many Burnley fans were having to inform them that the reason we were able to recruit as many players as we did in the summer was mainly due to selling several high earners for big bucks.
And if the PP were a guarantee of success than every club which received them would be strolling back to the Prem, however as we well know this isn't the case.
They also were adamant that we are only a stepping stone for Vincent Kompany, I suspect we all know he'll go on to bigger things without Rotherham fans needing to point it out.
I always thought Rotherham were one of the more sensible fanbases but seemingly not if those comments are anything to go by.
And if the PP were a guarantee of success than every club which received them would be strolling back to the Prem, however as we well know this isn't the case.
They also were adamant that we are only a stepping stone for Vincent Kompany, I suspect we all know he'll go on to bigger things without Rotherham fans needing to point it out.
I always thought Rotherham were one of the more sensible fanbases but seemingly not if those comments are anything to go by.
-
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 515 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Rotherham
As an overall view of all the post match analysis from their fans, they come across as having a serious case of little club syndrome. That the Championship to them is what the Prem was to us. Bigger club bias..unfair advantages etctiger76 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 04, 2022 4:47 pmHave to contribute to this thread as many of the Rotherham comments on the BBC report were constantly insisting we are only romping away with the league due to our parachute payments, and many Burnley fans were having to inform them that the reason we were able to recruit as many players as we did in the summer was mainly due to selling several high earners for big bucks.
And if the PP were a guarantee of success than every club which received them would be strolling back to the Prem, however as we well know this isn't the case.
They also were adamant that we are only a stepping stone for Vincent Kompany, I suspect we all know he'll go on to bigger things without Rotherham fans needing to point it out.
I always thought Rotherham were one of the more sensible fanbases but seemingly not if those comments are anything to go by.
Perhaps the view of our status has changed over the last few years and these clubs see us as a big scalp now. Takes some getting used to when in the past teams like Rotherham were often our equals and competing evenly with us. Runners up to us in our 4th division winning season for example.
-
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
- Been Liked: 908 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
- Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC
Re: Rotherham
if you slow it down to 25% you can clearly see it came of Benson. Irrespective, their player should have defended, not let Benson have it for free from the resulting throwColburn_Claret wrote: ↑Thu Nov 03, 2022 9:55 amNo it wasn't, no you can't.
It wasn't clear who that hit last, it ricocheted about and looked just as much that it could have bounced of Benson and hit their defender. The liner had a better view that either of us, and he gave it to us.
-
- Posts: 8155
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3084 times
- Has Liked: 5066 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:12 pm
- Been Liked: 473 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Rotherham
….and it would have been immaterial if Wes Harding had done his job rather than arguing the toss….
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Rotherham
Exactly! why bother arguing with an official who isn't going to change his mind.Culmclaret wrote: ↑Fri Nov 04, 2022 6:40 pm….and it would have been immaterial if Wes Harding had done his job rather than arguing the toss….
Re: Rotherham
Ref and linesman can only give what they can see,in a split second at the time,you get some right you get some wrong sometimes,this time in our favour!
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Rotherham
Somethingfishy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 04, 2022 4:55 pmAs an overall view of all the post match analysis from their fans, they come across as having a serious case of little club syndrome. That the Championship to them is what the Prem was to us. Bigger club bias..unfair advantages etc
Perhaps the view of our status has changed over the last few years and these clubs see us as a big scalp now. Takes some getting used to when in the past teams like Rotherham were often our equals and competing evenly with us. Runners up to us in our 4th division winning season for example.
Nowt more to expect from South Yorkshire folk their all as thick as pig ****
Re: Rotherham
We’re not a big scalp in the Championship, we are THE biggest scalp this season at least.