RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
-
- Posts: 9325
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Dean Whitestone v QPR
How to Score
A. Decision Making (including use of advantage) - out of 25
B. Consistency - out of 25
C. Fitness and Positioning - of 25
D. Control and Authority - out of 25
Please only Rate the Ref if you attended the game and only do so, after the game has ended. Thank you
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Absolute disgrace. Worst I’ve seen this season and that’s saying something, bearing in mind he didn’t have much to do. Utterly hopeless.
-
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 2899 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Just weak.
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Probably the worst - No sorry definitely the worst ref I have seen this season. Terrible time keeping, allowing blatant cheating / time wasting from keeper. Frustrated.
-
- Posts: 2536
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
A - 3
B - 3
C - 3
D - 3
No words for how bad he was.
-
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1040 times
- Has Liked: 2041 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
As bad as you will see. Added a total of 11 minutes when it should have been closer to 15. P!ss weak, odd decisions, the list of poor decisions is absolutely endless. Reffed like he was on glue
-
- Posts: 13271
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5175 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
A. 10
B. 19
C. 13
D. 3
B. 19
C. 13
D. 3
-
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 509 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Sadly had nothing to do as there was hardly any football played. The play acting was laughably weakly dealt with. I don't mind teams doing it when they're fighting for their lives and if there are no consequences then who can blame them.
So, in summary, the only thing he had to do was deal with the excessive time-wasting and he repeatedly did nothing.
A10
B20
C20
D5
So, in summary, the only thing he had to do was deal with the excessive time-wasting and he repeatedly did nothing.
A10
B20
C20
D5
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Farcical performance!
-
- Posts: 30720
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5663 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
in a season full of shite refs he's been the worst
-
- Posts: 5543
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2340 times
- Has Liked: 1405 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Cheers for removing my post.
-
- Posts: 5727
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2833 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
All the sympathy in the world with the decisions refs have to make in real time.
But when they fail to enforce the basics of the game, its indefensible. No football game that doesn't involve a serious injury should finish after 5 o clock and if it does, the ref is responsible. Not booking players for kicking the ball away, not nailing time wasting, indulging players going down with cramp in the first half- that's on the ref. He has to be stronger.
But when they fail to enforce the basics of the game, its indefensible. No football game that doesn't involve a serious injury should finish after 5 o clock and if it does, the ref is responsible. Not booking players for kicking the ball away, not nailing time wasting, indulging players going down with cramp in the first half- that's on the ref. He has to be stronger.
These 4 users liked this post: ClaretAL nil_desperandum simonclaret jjclaret
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Stamped his authority with the booking for time wasting in the 89th minute.
Really taught them a lesson.
Really taught them a lesson.
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
0 for everything.
While people are paying to watch a timed sport time wasting should be deemed a criminal act.
While people are paying to watch a timed sport time wasting should be deemed a criminal act.
This user liked this post: CoolClaret
-
- Posts: 2680
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:07 pm
- Been Liked: 781 times
- Has Liked: 1437 times
- Location: Mostly Europe
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
The only thing worse than the tramp on the touch line
-
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 547 times
- Has Liked: 51 times
-
- Posts: 7472
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2261 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
-
- Posts: 67926
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32551 times
- Has Liked: 5284 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
A. 11
B. 10
C. 14
D. 5
What should have been an easy game to referee, he turned into a complete nonsense with his inability to deal with the time wasting.
B. 10
C. 14
D. 5
What should have been an easy game to referee, he turned into a complete nonsense with his inability to deal with the time wasting.
-
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:25 am
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
12
12
17
3
12
17
3
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Shicker of a performace - the serial time wasting was beyond belief. For all their rolling around second half the trainer didn't come on once - shambolic.
10
12
12
3
10
12
12
3
-
- Posts: 2588
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
- Been Liked: 562 times
- Has Liked: 142 times
- Location: the ghost in the atom
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
A. Decision Making - 10
B. Consistency - 10
C. Fitness and Positioning - 15
D. Control and Authority - 5
Other than his complete lack of authority in establishing and controlling the time wasting and professional shithousery. He was OK. Probably should have been 2 more mins in first half and 6 more in 2nd half additional extra time to what was given
B. Consistency - 10
C. Fitness and Positioning - 15
D. Control and Authority - 5
Other than his complete lack of authority in establishing and controlling the time wasting and professional shithousery. He was OK. Probably should have been 2 more mins in first half and 6 more in 2nd half additional extra time to what was given
-
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:16 pm
- Been Liked: 170 times
- Has Liked: 119 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
A 5
B 5
C 10
D 5
8 minutes added could honestly have been 28. There was about 10-15 minutes of actual football played second half. They should have had three or four players booked for time wasting.
B 5
C 10
D 5
8 minutes added could honestly have been 28. There was about 10-15 minutes of actual football played second half. They should have had three or four players booked for time wasting.
Last edited by fungus_the_bogeyman on Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1165 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
- Location: your mum
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Genuinely difficult to imagine how he might have reffed differently if he'd been paid off by QPR. Say what you want about VAR, I am looking forward to at least having competent refs more often next season.
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Shocking today. No grip of the game or the ludicrous time wasting.
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 3:39 pm
- Been Liked: 108 times
- Has Liked: 130 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Referees like that, will have the game done away with. Whilst, QPR’s time wasting was farcical, they were allowed to get away with it, by a referee who exerted no authority whatsoever.
Their goalkeeper should have been booked in the first half and that would have set the tone. Somebody should tell him that simply keep pointing at his watch, does nothing to stop the time wasting.
As infuriating a game as I’ve been to in a long long time.
Their goalkeeper should have been booked in the first half and that would have set the tone. Somebody should tell him that simply keep pointing at his watch, does nothing to stop the time wasting.
As infuriating a game as I’ve been to in a long long time.
This user liked this post: jos
-
- Posts: 2600
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 699 times
- Has Liked: 362 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
My scores accurately reflect what I think. Any higher and it would not reflect his control of the game. It didn't exist.
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Never understand why refs don’t stamp out time wasting by having a word early on and then start carding
That should stop it in the first half
As others have said there was very little to referee
That should stop it in the first half
As others have said there was very little to referee
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Absolute disgrace of a performance and therefore an absolute disgrace of a football match.
Puts me off wanting to watch.
Puts me off wanting to watch.
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
It’s a similar problem in the premier league too, as you quite rightly say, it should be an easy problem to solve.
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 506 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
10
5
10
0
Mainly through a lack of action he was complicit in the time wasting. A booking in the 89th minute does nothing exceot gobble up more seconds.
He could also be awarded an assist for the corner they scored from. Players fouling the keeper and he stops the taking of it. Why refs don't just let the corner go and penalise the offending team is beyond me.
5
10
0
Mainly through a lack of action he was complicit in the time wasting. A booking in the 89th minute does nothing exceot gobble up more seconds.
He could also be awarded an assist for the corner they scored from. Players fouling the keeper and he stops the taking of it. Why refs don't just let the corner go and penalise the offending team is beyond me.
-
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
- Been Liked: 1132 times
- Has Liked: 302 times
- Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
A. Decision Making.. 3 he failed to make any until the 89th minute.
B. Consistency.. 15. Consistently absent
C. Fitness and Positioning.. 5
D. Control and Authority.. -5
Him and QPR where a disgrace.
B. Consistency.. 15. Consistently absent
C. Fitness and Positioning.. 5
D. Control and Authority.. -5
Him and QPR where a disgrace.
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
A.7
B. 20 this is the only one he can double figures ... consistently POOOOOOR
C. 8
D. 3
B. 20 this is the only one he can double figures ... consistently POOOOOOR
C. 8
D. 3
-
- Posts: 4447
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1165 times
- Has Liked: 1303 times
-
- Posts: 5379
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1655 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
5
5
10
5
Refs have cost us wins now in our last 2 games. First the handball not given at Rotherham that could have been 0-2 then today. The team were definitely affected by the antics and if stamped out early I think we would have won comfortably. I can’t blame QPR for trying, though it took cheating to whole new levels, the officials were mainly to blame for the farce the game became.
5
10
5
Refs have cost us wins now in our last 2 games. First the handball not given at Rotherham that could have been 0-2 then today. The team were definitely affected by the antics and if stamped out early I think we would have won comfortably. I can’t blame QPR for trying, though it took cheating to whole new levels, the officials were mainly to blame for the farce the game became.
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Utterly pathetic and should be no where near refereeing in the second tier. How much are these lot paid? I fancy a go.
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
-
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 993 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
I hear people say it's time wasting, that is only a small element of what went on today.
The major reason for employing the tactics of going down 'injured', returning the ball into play slowly and kicking the ball away is more about breaking up play and not allowing us to get any momentum going. Adding on whatever amount of time at the end does not stop this happening.
The way to nip it in the bud is to warn teams early on that players will start to be booked if it continues, a caution on eighty eight minutes is laughable and completely toothless.
The reasons why the law makers are thinking about bringing in stop clocks etc is because the man in the middle is unable and unwilling to use the tools at his disposal to prevent this happening.
The major reason for employing the tactics of going down 'injured', returning the ball into play slowly and kicking the ball away is more about breaking up play and not allowing us to get any momentum going. Adding on whatever amount of time at the end does not stop this happening.
The way to nip it in the bud is to warn teams early on that players will start to be booked if it continues, a caution on eighty eight minutes is laughable and completely toothless.
The reasons why the law makers are thinking about bringing in stop clocks etc is because the man in the middle is unable and unwilling to use the tools at his disposal to prevent this happening.
-
- Posts: 3632
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
- Been Liked: 897 times
- Has Liked: 1104 times
- Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
A. 10
B. 19
C. 13
D. 10
B. 19
C. 13
D. 10
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Not going to rate him but there have been worse referees than this clown this season. Very little authority. Even late on QPR players were getting on his case after freekicks given to waste time.
-
- Posts: 16913
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6969 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
I was about to post the same. The time is supposedly added on at the end, but the game was just broken up for a stoppage every time the ball went dead. It led to such a disjointed second half which obviously benefited QPR, and in their position I can’t blame them for taking advantage of such a weak referee. 8 minutes was less than what should have been added on, but the reality is the referee should never be in a position where 8 minutes is required as additional time unless there has been a serious injury or two.Goody1975 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 22, 2023 8:50 pmI hear people say it's time wasting, that is only a small element of what went on today.
The major reason for employing the tactics of going down 'injured', returning the ball into play slowly and kicking the ball away is more about breaking up play and not allowing us to get any momentum going. Adding on whatever amount of time at the end does not stop this happening.
The way to nip it in the bud is to warn teams early on that players will start to be booked if it continues, a caution on eighty eight minutes is laughable and completely toothless.
The reasons why the law makers are thinking about bringing in stop clocks etc is because the man in the middle is unable and unwilling to use the tools at his disposal to prevent this happening.
-
- Posts: 4075
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1508 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Never usually comment on refs as it’s a tough gig but my god, the complete lack of authority today was astonishing. You knew from the first few minutes that he wasn’t going to take control of the game and that basically gave QPR the green light to take it easy and start disrupting the game with feigned injury. He did nothing to stop it and it ruined the game and gave them an advantage which they capitalised on.
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Well supported by a blind linesman.
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
The way to stop it is to insist that any player who holds the game up through injury, has to go off and not return until the next break in play. Rough on those who are genuinely injured, but that's less than 10% of "injury" holdups. If the players are going to collectively cheat, then they will have to be collectively punished.Goody1975 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 22, 2023 8:50 pmI hear people say it's time wasting, that is only a small element of what went on today.
The major reason for employing the tactics of going down 'injured', returning the ball into play slowly and kicking the ball away is more about breaking up play and not allowing us to get any momentum going. Adding on whatever amount of time at the end does not stop this happening.
The way to nip it in the bud is to warn teams early on that players will start to be booked if it continues, a caution on eighty eight minutes is laughable and completely toothless.
The reasons why the law makers are thinking about bringing in stop clocks etc is because the man in the middle is unable and unwilling to use the tools at his disposal to prevent this happening.
This leaving the field would also apply to those players who say they don't need the trainer but still manage to hold the game up while they struggle to their one remaining foot. (Which then miraculously recovers.) If a player is inured, the ref asks him if he needs treatment, and if not, the game goes on with or without him. If the man is not injured, then restart the game.. There is no need to wait for an uninjured man to get over his non-injury.
These 2 users liked this post: DCWat Woodleyclaret
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Have a clock which stops when they go down. Everyone will know how much time is due then.
-
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3087 times
- Has Liked: 5071 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
I don't think I've ever seen a referee demand a freekick be moved 5 yards to be taken from the exact spot of the foul, when the free kick was in our own penalty area. He was nearly as bad for time wasting as they were.
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:23 pm
- Been Liked: 76 times
- Has Liked: 224 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
QPR played him like an old fiddle and he lapped it up willinglyColburn_Claret wrote: ↑Sun Apr 23, 2023 4:05 amI don't think I've ever seen a referee demand a freekick be moved 5 yards to be taken from the exact spot of the foul, when the free kick was in our own penalty area. He was nearly as bad for time wasting as they were.
-
- Posts: 6979
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
Diabolical,how this gutless fool ever got on the league list is a total mystery
Ignored play acting and time wasting by QPR
We need 20 mins added time.
Ignored play acting and time wasting by QPR
We need 20 mins added time.
-
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1766 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR
I’ve always had a bit of an issue with that in the case of genuine injuries though. If you’re hit by a poor tackle, it seems slightly unfair that your team have to play with 10 men for a short spell of the physio had had to come on.dsr wrote: ↑Sun Apr 23, 2023 12:23 amThe way to stop it is to insist that any player who holds the game up through injury, has to go off and not return until the next break in play. Rough on those who are genuinely injured, but that's less than 10% of "injury" holdups. If the players are going to collectively cheat, then they will have to be collectively punished.
This leaving the field would also apply to those players who say they don't need the trainer but still manage to hold the game up while they struggle to their one remaining foot. (Which then miraculously recovers.) If a player is inured, the ref asks him if he needs treatment, and if not, the game goes on with or without him. If the man is not injured, then restart the game.. There is no need to wait for an uninjured man to get over his non-injury.