RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
jdrobbo
Posts: 9325
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4843 times
Has Liked: 947 times
Location: Leeds

RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by jdrobbo » Sat Apr 22, 2023 4:55 pm

Image

Dean Whitestone v QPR

How to Score
A. Decision Making (including use of advantage) - out of 25
B. Consistency - out of 25
C. Fitness and Positioning - of 25
D. Control and Authority - out of 25


Please only Rate the Ref if you attended the game and only do so, after the game has ended. Thank you

Commy
Posts: 2533
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 469 times
Has Liked: 43 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Commy » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:05 pm

This will be good.
This user liked this post: Burnley Ace

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by RVclaret » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:06 pm

Absolute disgrace. Worst I’ve seen this season and that’s saying something, bearing in mind he didn’t have much to do. Utterly hopeless.

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3553
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 656 times
Has Liked: 2899 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Burnley Ace » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:12 pm

Just weak.

Philss_99
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:49 pm
Been Liked: 9 times
Has Liked: 17 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Philss_99 » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:13 pm

Probably the worst - No sorry definitely the worst ref I have seen this season. Terrible time keeping, allowing blatant cheating / time wasting from keeper. Frustrated.

MDWat
Posts: 2536
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
Been Liked: 879 times
Has Liked: 271 times
Location: Bradford
Contact:

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by MDWat » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:13 pm

:lol:

A - 3
B - 3
C - 3
D - 3

No words for how bad he was.

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3468
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1040 times
Has Liked: 2041 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:14 pm

As bad as you will see. Added a total of 11 minutes when it should have been closer to 15. P!ss weak, odd decisions, the list of poor decisions is absolutely endless. Reffed like he was on glue

Rowls
Posts: 13271
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5102 times
Has Liked: 5175 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Rowls » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:16 pm

A. 10
B. 19
C. 13
D. 3

JimmyRobbo
Posts: 2625
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
Been Liked: 509 times
Has Liked: 886 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by JimmyRobbo » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:19 pm

Sadly had nothing to do as there was hardly any football played. The play acting was laughably weakly dealt with. I don't mind teams doing it when they're fighting for their lives and if there are no consequences then who can blame them.

So, in summary, the only thing he had to do was deal with the excessive time-wasting and he repeatedly did nothing.

A10
B20
C20
D5

Caballo
Posts: 1130
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:31 am
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 433 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Caballo » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:20 pm

Farcical performance!

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30720
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11061 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:21 pm

in a season full of shite refs he's been the worst

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 5543
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2340 times
Has Liked: 1405 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by gandhisflipflop » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:23 pm

Cheers for removing my post.

claretspice
Posts: 5727
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by claretspice » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:35 pm

All the sympathy in the world with the decisions refs have to make in real time.

But when they fail to enforce the basics of the game, its indefensible. No football game that doesn't involve a serious injury should finish after 5 o clock and if it does, the ref is responsible. Not booking players for kicking the ball away, not nailing time wasting, indulging players going down with cramp in the first half- that's on the ref. He has to be stronger.
These 4 users liked this post: ClaretAL nil_desperandum simonclaret jjclaret

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10329
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3342 times
Has Liked: 1964 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:44 pm

Stamped his authority with the booking for time wasting in the 89th minute.
Really taught them a lesson.

fanzone
Posts: 809
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:00 pm
Been Liked: 228 times
Has Liked: 65 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by fanzone » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:48 pm

0 for everything.

While people are paying to watch a timed sport time wasting should be deemed a criminal act.
This user liked this post: CoolClaret

Burnleyareback2
Posts: 2680
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:07 pm
Been Liked: 781 times
Has Liked: 1437 times
Location: Mostly Europe

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Burnleyareback2 » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:49 pm

The only thing worse than the tramp on the touch line

Hedontplayforyou
Posts: 2340
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
Been Liked: 547 times
Has Liked: 51 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Hedontplayforyou » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:52 pm

Shite

CoolClaret
Posts: 7472
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2261 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by CoolClaret » Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:54 pm

fanzone wrote:
Sat Apr 22, 2023 5:48 pm
0 for everything.

While people are paying to watch a timed sport time wasting should be deemed a criminal act.
Exactly, ultimately the fans are loosing out.

I'd like to see the actual statistics today regarding the time that ball was actually in play

ClaretTony
Posts: 67926
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32551 times
Has Liked: 5284 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by ClaretTony » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:01 pm

A. 11
B. 10
C. 14
D. 5

What should have been an easy game to referee, he turned into a complete nonsense with his inability to deal with the time wasting.

Beagleheart
Posts: 290
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:25 am
Been Liked: 22 times
Has Liked: 35 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Beagleheart » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:03 pm

12
12
17
3

Luppy
Posts: 214
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 2:46 pm
Been Liked: 56 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Luppy » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:10 pm

Shicker of a performace - the serial time wasting was beyond belief. For all their rolling around second half the trainer didn't come on once - shambolic.

10
12
12
3

Goalposts
Posts: 2588
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
Been Liked: 562 times
Has Liked: 142 times
Location: the ghost in the atom

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Goalposts » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:14 pm

A. Decision Making - 10
B. Consistency - 10
C. Fitness and Positioning - 15
D. Control and Authority - 5

Other than his complete lack of authority in establishing and controlling the time wasting and professional shithousery. He was OK. Probably should have been 2 more mins in first half and 6 more in 2nd half additional extra time to what was given

fungus_the_bogeyman
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:16 pm
Been Liked: 170 times
Has Liked: 119 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by fungus_the_bogeyman » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:18 pm

A 5
B 5
C 10
D 5

8 minutes added could honestly have been 28. There was about 10-15 minutes of actual football played second half. They should have had three or four players booked for time wasting.
Last edited by fungus_the_bogeyman on Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2116
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1165 times
Has Liked: 94 times
Location: your mum

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by daveisaclaret » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:20 pm

Genuinely difficult to imagine how he might have reffed differently if he'd been paid off by QPR. Say what you want about VAR, I am looking forward to at least having competent refs more often next season.

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 863 times
Has Liked: 1097 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Boss Hogg » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:22 pm

Shocking today. No grip of the game or the ludicrous time wasting.

The Hung Juror
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 3:39 pm
Been Liked: 108 times
Has Liked: 130 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by The Hung Juror » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:28 pm

Referees like that, will have the game done away with. Whilst, QPR’s time wasting was farcical, they were allowed to get away with it, by a referee who exerted no authority whatsoever.

Their goalkeeper should have been booked in the first half and that would have set the tone. Somebody should tell him that simply keep pointing at his watch, does nothing to stop the time wasting.

As infuriating a game as I’ve been to in a long long time.
This user liked this post: jos

Roosterbooster
Posts: 2600
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 699 times
Has Liked: 362 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Roosterbooster » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:32 pm

gandhisflipflop wrote:
Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:18 pm
I rated the same and post was removed
My scores accurately reflect what I think. Any higher and it would not reflect his control of the game. It didn't exist.

mdd2
Posts: 6028
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by mdd2 » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:35 pm

Never understand why refs don’t stamp out time wasting by having a word early on and then start carding
That should stop it in the first half
As others have said there was very little to referee

ksrclaret
Posts: 6927
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2570 times
Has Liked: 771 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by ksrclaret » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:37 pm

Absolute disgrace of a performance and therefore an absolute disgrace of a football match.

Puts me off wanting to watch.

jos
Posts: 1465
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:02 pm
Been Liked: 237 times
Has Liked: 306 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by jos » Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:39 pm

mdd2 wrote:
Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:35 pm
Never understand why refs don’t stamp out time wasting by having a word early on and then start carding
That should stop it in the first half
As others have said there was very little to referee
It’s a similar problem in the premier league too, as you quite rightly say, it should be an easy problem to solve.

what_no_pies
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 506 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by what_no_pies » Sat Apr 22, 2023 7:12 pm

10
5
10
0

Mainly through a lack of action he was complicit in the time wasting. A booking in the 89th minute does nothing exceot gobble up more seconds.

He could also be awarded an assist for the corner they scored from. Players fouling the keeper and he stops the taking of it. Why refs don't just let the corner go and penalise the offending team is beyond me.

RammyClaret61
Posts: 3106
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1132 times
Has Liked: 302 times
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by RammyClaret61 » Sat Apr 22, 2023 7:23 pm

A. Decision Making.. 3 he failed to make any until the 89th minute.
B. Consistency.. 15. Consistently absent
C. Fitness and Positioning.. 5
D. Control and Authority.. -5

Him and QPR where a disgrace.

Bosscat
Posts: 25654
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8538 times
Has Liked: 18286 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Bosscat » Sat Apr 22, 2023 7:37 pm

A.7
B. 20 this is the only one he can double figures ... consistently POOOOOOR
C. 8
D. 3

Cirrus_Minor
Posts: 4447
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 1165 times
Has Liked: 1303 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Cirrus_Minor » Sat Apr 22, 2023 7:59 pm

8
8
16
2

Sproggy
Posts: 1463
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:41 pm
Been Liked: 667 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Sproggy » Sat Apr 22, 2023 8:15 pm

7
3
20
3

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5379
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1655 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Sat Apr 22, 2023 8:16 pm

5
5
10
5

Refs have cost us wins now in our last 2 games. First the handball not given at Rotherham that could have been 0-2 then today. The team were definitely affected by the antics and if stamped out early I think we would have won comfortably. I can’t blame QPR for trying, though it took cheating to whole new levels, the officials were mainly to blame for the farce the game became.

Pickles
Posts: 3612
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:10 pm
Been Liked: 1392 times
Has Liked: 1226 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Pickles » Sat Apr 22, 2023 8:31 pm

Utterly pathetic and should be no where near refereeing in the second tier. How much are these lot paid? I fancy a go.

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10329
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3342 times
Has Liked: 1964 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sat Apr 22, 2023 8:38 pm

Pickles wrote:
Sat Apr 22, 2023 8:31 pm
Utterly pathetic and should be no where near refereeing in the second tier. How much are these lot paid? I fancy a go.
I think it’s ‘who you know’ in the refereeing fraternity.

Goody1975
Posts: 2910
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 993 times
Has Liked: 265 times
Location: Burnley

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Goody1975 » Sat Apr 22, 2023 8:50 pm

I hear people say it's time wasting, that is only a small element of what went on today.

The major reason for employing the tactics of going down 'injured', returning the ball into play slowly and kicking the ball away is more about breaking up play and not allowing us to get any momentum going. Adding on whatever amount of time at the end does not stop this happening.

The way to nip it in the bud is to warn teams early on that players will start to be booked if it continues, a caution on eighty eight minutes is laughable and completely toothless.

The reasons why the law makers are thinking about bringing in stop clocks etc is because the man in the middle is unable and unwilling to use the tools at his disposal to prevent this happening.

bfcmik
Posts: 3632
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
Been Liked: 897 times
Has Liked: 1104 times
Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by bfcmik » Sat Apr 22, 2023 9:02 pm

A. 10
B. 19
C. 13
D. 10

shulgin
Posts: 269
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:32 pm
Been Liked: 57 times
Has Liked: 38 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by shulgin » Sat Apr 22, 2023 9:55 pm

Not going to rate him but there have been worse referees than this clown this season. Very little authority. Even late on QPR players were getting on his case after freekicks given to waste time.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16913
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6969 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Apr 22, 2023 10:18 pm

Goody1975 wrote:
Sat Apr 22, 2023 8:50 pm
I hear people say it's time wasting, that is only a small element of what went on today.

The major reason for employing the tactics of going down 'injured', returning the ball into play slowly and kicking the ball away is more about breaking up play and not allowing us to get any momentum going. Adding on whatever amount of time at the end does not stop this happening.

The way to nip it in the bud is to warn teams early on that players will start to be booked if it continues, a caution on eighty eight minutes is laughable and completely toothless.

The reasons why the law makers are thinking about bringing in stop clocks etc is because the man in the middle is unable and unwilling to use the tools at his disposal to prevent this happening.
I was about to post the same. The time is supposedly added on at the end, but the game was just broken up for a stoppage every time the ball went dead. It led to such a disjointed second half which obviously benefited QPR, and in their position I can’t blame them for taking advantage of such a weak referee. 8 minutes was less than what should have been added on, but the reality is the referee should never be in a position where 8 minutes is required as additional time unless there has been a serious injury or two.

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4075
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1508 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Swizzlestick » Sat Apr 22, 2023 11:34 pm

Never usually comment on refs as it’s a tough gig but my god, the complete lack of authority today was astonishing. You knew from the first few minutes that he wasn’t going to take control of the game and that basically gave QPR the green light to take it easy and start disrupting the game with feigned injury. He did nothing to stop it and it ruined the game and gave them an advantage which they capitalised on.

Sozturf7
Posts: 415
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2018 9:48 am
Been Liked: 89 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Sozturf7 » Sat Apr 22, 2023 11:51 pm

Well supported by a blind linesman.

dsr
Posts: 15241
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4579 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by dsr » Sun Apr 23, 2023 12:23 am

Goody1975 wrote:
Sat Apr 22, 2023 8:50 pm
I hear people say it's time wasting, that is only a small element of what went on today.

The major reason for employing the tactics of going down 'injured', returning the ball into play slowly and kicking the ball away is more about breaking up play and not allowing us to get any momentum going. Adding on whatever amount of time at the end does not stop this happening.

The way to nip it in the bud is to warn teams early on that players will start to be booked if it continues, a caution on eighty eight minutes is laughable and completely toothless.

The reasons why the law makers are thinking about bringing in stop clocks etc is because the man in the middle is unable and unwilling to use the tools at his disposal to prevent this happening.
The way to stop it is to insist that any player who holds the game up through injury, has to go off and not return until the next break in play. Rough on those who are genuinely injured, but that's less than 10% of "injury" holdups. If the players are going to collectively cheat, then they will have to be collectively punished.

This leaving the field would also apply to those players who say they don't need the trainer but still manage to hold the game up while they struggle to their one remaining foot. (Which then miraculously recovers.) If a player is inured, the ref asks him if he needs treatment, and if not, the game goes on with or without him. If the man is not injured, then restart the game.. There is no need to wait for an uninjured man to get over his non-injury.
These 2 users liked this post: DCWat Woodleyclaret

Commy
Posts: 2533
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 469 times
Has Liked: 43 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Commy » Sun Apr 23, 2023 2:53 am

Have a clock which stops when they go down. Everyone will know how much time is due then.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8159
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 5071 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Colburn_Claret » Sun Apr 23, 2023 4:05 am

I don't think I've ever seen a referee demand a freekick be moved 5 yards to be taken from the exact spot of the foul, when the free kick was in our own penalty area. He was nearly as bad for time wasting as they were.

Stacky_claret
Posts: 271
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:23 pm
Been Liked: 76 times
Has Liked: 224 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Stacky_claret » Sun Apr 23, 2023 6:26 am

Colburn_Claret wrote:
Sun Apr 23, 2023 4:05 am
I don't think I've ever seen a referee demand a freekick be moved 5 yards to be taken from the exact spot of the foul, when the free kick was in our own penalty area. He was nearly as bad for time wasting as they were.
QPR played him like an old fiddle and he lapped it up willingly

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6979
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sun Apr 23, 2023 7:06 am

Diabolical,how this gutless fool ever got on the league list is a total mystery
Ignored play acting and time wasting by QPR
We need 20 mins added time.

agreenwood
Posts: 3175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1766 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Dean Whitestone v QPR

Post by agreenwood » Sun Apr 23, 2023 7:07 am

dsr wrote:
Sun Apr 23, 2023 12:23 am
The way to stop it is to insist that any player who holds the game up through injury, has to go off and not return until the next break in play. Rough on those who are genuinely injured, but that's less than 10% of "injury" holdups. If the players are going to collectively cheat, then they will have to be collectively punished.

This leaving the field would also apply to those players who say they don't need the trainer but still manage to hold the game up while they struggle to their one remaining foot. (Which then miraculously recovers.) If a player is inured, the ref asks him if he needs treatment, and if not, the game goes on with or without him. If the man is not injured, then restart the game.. There is no need to wait for an uninjured man to get over his non-injury.
I’ve always had a bit of an issue with that in the case of genuine injuries though. If you’re hit by a poor tackle, it seems slightly unfair that your team have to play with 10 men for a short spell of the physio had had to come on.

Post Reply