Trafford
-
- Posts: 5800
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Trafford
15 million wow. Really struggling to see how he is better than Muric.
Re: Trafford
Not many GK do well at a young age, but VK must see something in him.
So long as we didn't guarantee him a regular first team place if he signed for us.
It's been a tough 3 games, he doesn't seem as good on the ball as Muric.. but I think Muric would have let in alot too with our defending in-front of him.
I think he's definitely got potential, coming from City and his record for the England youth team.. but sometimes you need more than potential in the PL.
I'll judge him against some of the 'easier' teams.
So long as we didn't guarantee him a regular first team place if he signed for us.
It's been a tough 3 games, he doesn't seem as good on the ball as Muric.. but I think Muric would have let in alot too with our defending in-front of him.
I think he's definitely got potential, coming from City and his record for the England youth team.. but sometimes you need more than potential in the PL.
I'll judge him against some of the 'easier' teams.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 9 times
Re: Trafford
He’s not better than Muric. He is a development player and should be used as such. Can’t believe how easily the good things of last season were so easily thrown over board. Muric, Brownhill, Taylor. Also in the transfers. Throwing 15 mio on Berge but not paying this for Tella who was the best attacking player. Sorry for the negativity but we had a good thing going and ruined it by acting like Chelsea and their owner. Buying loads of players but not building an actual team and not trusting the lads that were performing last season.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
You don’t think Trafford would have done the exact same?helmclaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:17 pmApart from Muric playing a massive part of a Championship winning team?
Let’s not kid ourselves we would have won the championship with Peacock Farrell in net all season.
-
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3169 times
- Has Liked: 6777 times
Re: Trafford
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:29 pmYou don’t think Trafford would have done the exact same?
Let’s not kid ourselves we would have won the championship with Peacock Farrell in net all season.
I'm not so sure about that.
Muric's distribution was a major factor in our tactics and, consequently, our results.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
Peacock farrel (even though a smaller number of games to get data from) had a better win rate and a better clean sheet rate.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:33 pmI'm not so sure about that.
Muric's distribution was a major factor in our tactics and, consequently, our results.
I don’t think it’s out of the question to suggest that we would have still ran away with the league.
Re: Trafford
Muric is the better goalkeeper right now.
How do we know this? Because we have eyes.
How do we know this? Because we have eyes.
This user liked this post: helmclaret
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
BPF would never have had the calmness that Muric showed last season.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:29 pmYou don’t think Trafford would have done the exact same?
Let’s not kid ourselves we would have won the championship with Peacock Farrell in net all season.
There was times when even our fans were having an heart attack, while Muric casually turned an attacking player.. passing it to a team-mate.
Re: Trafford
Must do.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:35 pmClearly you have better eyes than our premier league winning manager then
Muric will be back in against Forest on the 18th.
I feel for Trafford but he ain't ready.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
-
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3169 times
- Has Liked: 6777 times
Re: Trafford
Very possibly, but that doesn't detract from the fact that Muric's distribution was a major tactical factor in our success.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:34 pmPeacock farrel (even though a smaller number of games to get data from) had a better win rate and a better clean sheet rate.
I don’t think it’s out of the question to suggest that we would have still ran away with the league.
This user liked this post: Wembley09
-
- Posts: 6151
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2639 times
- Has Liked: 6474 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Trafford
By the way, you aren't in any position to get on your high horse about people questioning the manager's decisions after all the utter tripe you've posted down the years.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:38 pmI hope he does so we can finally end these nonsense threads
Muric is better right now. End of.
This user liked this post: Raconteur
-
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:44 am
- Been Liked: 170 times
- Has Liked: 45 times
Re: Trafford
BPF distribution was awful to
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
The messiah has spoken.
If Muric is our best keeper we might as well call it a day. There’s a reason the club spent 20m on Trafford. It’s because he’s light a day a better keeper.
I really hope Muric does start the next game in the league. He will struggle with the step up and we can finally end this nonsense
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 325 times
- Has Liked: 191 times
Re: Trafford
So you want Muric to be picked and then fail?
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
I don’t want him to fail. But I know he will
-
- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 272 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Trafford
There’s a lot of over the top reactions this evening, although that’s something we’ve become accustomed to on this messageboard.
Trafford will be an excellent goalkeeper and will get a lot of England caps. His distribution is pretty decent and will only get better. If we wish to seek a return on players like this, they need to play and get experience. At the same time, the manager needs to make the right call with taking him out if it all gets a bit too much.
That might be a tad early right now 3 games in, but I’ll trust the manager to make that call.
Trafford did little wrong today.
Trafford will be an excellent goalkeeper and will get a lot of England caps. His distribution is pretty decent and will only get better. If we wish to seek a return on players like this, they need to play and get experience. At the same time, the manager needs to make the right call with taking him out if it all gets a bit too much.
That might be a tad early right now 3 games in, but I’ll trust the manager to make that call.
Trafford did little wrong today.
Re: Trafford
Yes the messiah has spoken, and he says Muric is the better keeper right now. End of.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:43 pmThe messiah has spoken.
If Muric is our best keeper we might as well call it a day. There’s a reason the club spent 20m on Trafford. It’s because he’s light a day a better keeper.
I really hope Muric does start the next game in the league. He will struggle with the step up and we can finally end this nonsense
Interesting that you want Muric to fail when he starts, though. Sums you up.
I like Trafford by the way, but he's not ready and the comment on him being "light a day a better keeper", whatever that actually means, is the only nonsense being spoken on this thread.
-
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3169 times
- Has Liked: 6777 times
Re: Trafford
For any one who doubts it:
Muric's anticipation and sharp, accurate, passing was unbelievably good.
This, of course applies only to the Championship level of football.
Whether he would be able to replicate this in the PL remains to be seen.
I wouldn't use his performances as a yardstick with which to measure Trafford's PL start
Muric's anticipation and sharp, accurate, passing was unbelievably good.
This, of course applies only to the Championship level of football.
Whether he would be able to replicate this in the PL remains to be seen.
I wouldn't use his performances as a yardstick with which to measure Trafford's PL start
-
- Posts: 5142
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1179 times
- Has Liked: 2923 times
Re: Trafford
Did he fail Wednesday against PL opposition?
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 628 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Trafford
What have you seen so far to say Trafford is light and day a better keeper than muric? No doubting the potential in Trafford but you are very much in the Taylor doesn’t suit the system camp. There is no chance right now Trafford is better suited to the system than MuricNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:43 pmThe messiah has spoken.
If Muric is our best keeper we might as well call it a day. There’s a reason the club spent 20m on Trafford. It’s because he’s light a day a better keeper.
I really hope Muric does start the next game in the league. He will struggle with the step up and we can finally end this nonsense
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 325 times
- Has Liked: 191 times
Re: Trafford
Joe Hart did little wrong when he was in the team, but the team didn’t function as well as it did with Heaton back in.MDWat wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:47 pmThere’s a lot of over the top reactions this evening, although that’s something we’ve become accustomed to on this messageboard.
Trafford will be an excellent goalkeeper and will get a lot of England caps. His distribution is pretty decent and will only get better. If we wish to seek a return on players like this, they need to play and get experience. At the same time, the manager needs to make the right call with taking him out if it all gets a bit too much.
That might be a tad early right now 3 games in, but I’ll trust the manager to make that call.
Trafford did little wrong today.
This user liked this post: Enola Gay
-
- Posts: 7477
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2265 times
- Has Liked: 2175 times
Re: Trafford
You’re mad for this mate.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:43 pmThe messiah has spoken.
If Muric is our best keeper we might as well call it a day. There’s a reason the club spent 20m on Trafford. It’s because he’s light a day a better keeper.
I really hope Muric does start the next game in the league. He will struggle with the step up and we can finally end this nonsense
The argument from ‘cost of transfer fee’ is just ********.
Just to show you how insane it is:
Ben Mee cost us what, around 300k?
Ben Gibson cost us what, around 15 mill?
Come on man
Last edited by CoolClaret on Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
I literally just said I don’t want him to fail.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:47 pmYes the messiah has spoken, and he says Muric is the better keeper right now. End of.
Interesting that you want Muric to fail when he starts, though. Sums you up.
I like Trafford by the way, but he's not ready and the comment on him being "light a day a better keeper", whatever that actually means, is the only nonsense being spoken on this thread.
But I know he’s not good enough for the prem, he will fail and it finally end this pointless discussion.
It’s not nonsense though is it. I assume you think VK doesn’t know what he is doing then? If you think it’s so clear Muric is better
-
- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 272 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Trafford
I said exactly the same on the game today. Personally I’d have Muric in at the moment.helmclaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:50 pmJoe Hart did little wrong when he was in the team, but the team didn’t function as well as it did with Heaton back in.
These 2 users liked this post: helmclaret Enola Gay
Re: Trafford
Not Trafford’s fault, but he isn’t yet ready for Premier League football. He looks so nervous.
This one is on VInny and his coaching team.
This one is on VInny and his coaching team.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
In my opinion we lose by 6-7 if Muric is in goal today. He doesn’t make some of the top saves that Trafford does today.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:49 pmWhat have you seen so far to say Trafford is light and day a better keeper than muric? No doubting the potential in Trafford but you are very much in the Taylor doesn’t suit the system camp. There is no chance right now Trafford is better suited to the system than Muric
Re: Trafford
Take no ******* notice. Should change his username to Newcastle Brown because he must’ve been on it.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:50 pmYou’re mad for this mate.
The argument from ‘cost of transfer fee’ is just ********.
Just to show you how insane it is:
Ben Mee cost us what, around 300k?
Ben Gibson cost us what, around 15 mill?
Come on man
Last edited by BurnleyFC on Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Trafford
I always remember a comment from you on the Boro away thread on the night we won the league. When Muric did well to claim a corner, you commented "it's a miracle the bloke actually caught a ball".Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:51 pmI literally just said I don’t want him to fail.
But I know he’s not good enough for the prem, he will fail and it finally end this pointless discussion.
It’s not nonsense though is it. I assume you think VK doesn’t know what he is doing then? If you think it’s so clear Muric is better
When an agenda is as strong as this, it's hard to have a logical conversation with someone. Have a good evening pal.
These 2 users liked this post: boatshed bill helmclaret
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 628 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Trafford
What top saves did Trafford make? He made a regulation save in the first half against Maddison that every keeper would save. His distribution (which is key for how we play) isn’t good enough right nowNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:52 pmIn my opinion we lose by 6-7 if Muric is in goal today. He doesn’t make some of the top saves that Trafford does today.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
Clearly VK agrees with my sentiment given he’s quickly dropped him.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:53 pmI always remember a comment from you on the Boro away thread on the night we won the league. When Muric did well to claim a corner, you commented "it's a miracle the bloke actually caught a ball".
When an agenda is as strong as this, it's hard to have a logical conversation with someone. Have a good evening pal.
I will never ever understand the people calling for Muric. It’s like you watched a different player, he was liability for large swaithes last season against considerably worse opposition.
-
- Posts: 5800
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Trafford
You are replying to an internet troll.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:54 pmWhat top saves did Trafford make? He made a regulation save in the first half against Maddison that every keeper would save. His distribution (which is key for how we play) isn’t good enough right now
-
- Posts: 5142
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1179 times
- Has Liked: 2923 times
Re: Trafford
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:54 pmClearly VK agrees with my sentiment given he’s quickly dropped him.
I will never ever understand the people calling for Muric. It’s like you watched a different player, he was liability for large swaithes last season against considerably worse opposition.
Last edited by burnleymik on Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4406
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1259 times
- Has Liked: 1368 times
Re: Trafford
What is wrong with you today? You have completely got the wrong end of the stickVegas Claret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:21 pmhaha, I'll open whatever thread I want and discuss whatever I want and I wont complain about it, you on the other hand have seemingly opened this one up to complain about it, weird.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
Ok we are back to name calling. Why can’t people just discuss things
Re: Trafford
That's some assumption NewcastleClaret.
Maybe Muric would have cancelled out some of Spurs pressure with assurance on the ball.. breaking up more of their attacks.
Maybe Muric would have cancelled out some of Spurs pressure with assurance on the ball.. breaking up more of their attacks.
-
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1512 times
- Has Liked: 583 times
Re: Trafford
Careful you might get called out for ‘bullying’ for arguing against this drivel.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
Potentially but from what I saw today I don’t think it would have mattered who was in goal.
We have much much bigger issues than which keeper is in net facing 15-16 shots per game
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 628 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Trafford
The game is all about opinions but for home much you in the past have mentioned certain players not suiting the system, mainly Taylor and brownhill, I can’t believe you have watched Trafford in 3 games albeit against better opposition as being better suited to the system than MuricNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:52 pmIn my opinion we lose by 6-7 if Muric is in goal today. He doesn’t make some of the top saves that Trafford does today.
Re: Trafford
Its best just to ignore this poster however difficult that might be.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:53 pmI always remember a comment from you on the Boro away thread on the night we won the league. When Muric did well to claim a corner, you commented "it's a miracle the bloke actually caught a ball".
When an agenda is as strong as this, it's hard to have a logical conversation with someone. Have a good evening pal.
He says he is Burnley fan but never goes to any games and yet somehow knows more about our team than anyone else!
These 2 users liked this post: ksrclaret Raconteur
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
I think he is better suited, predominantly because a keeper in the premier league has to be able to do more than pass.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:59 pmThe game is all about opinions but for home much you in the past have mentioned certain players not suiting the system, mainly Taylor and brownhill, I can’t believe you have watched Trafford in 3 games albeit against better opposition as being better suited to the system than Muric
I think this is why VK signed him. His distribution is to a high enough standard and his keeping ability is better than Murics. We are facing north of 15 shots a game, our keeper has to be a top shot stopper and from what I have seen Trafford definitely is.
-
- Posts: 30736
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11063 times
- Has Liked: 5668 times
- Location: clue is in the title
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
Foe me then. It’s really not difficult.
Apologies for living so far away Targetman il move closer to the turf so I can attend every game
-
- Posts: 4406
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1259 times
- Has Liked: 1368 times
Re: Trafford
I’ve a suggestion for you. Let him play without constantly getting on his back. He’s good enough to be Kompany’s choice.roperclaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 9:54 pmIt is absolutely not Scapegoating to think Muric is better than Trafford. (Which I do bye the way as it stands). That’s not to say Trafford won’t go on to be better than Muric long term, but that is not a reason to keep playing him now.
Your opinion doesn’t matter , like others you like to dress your criticism up
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 628 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Trafford
I don’t know what game you watched today then if you think his distribution was at a good enough standard and I’m waiting for you to point out which massive saves Trafford made today that muric wouldn’t of doneNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:04 pmI think he is better suited, predominantly because a keeper in the premier league has to be able to do more than pass.
I think this is why VK signed him. His distribution is to a high enough standard and his keeping ability is better than Murics. We are facing north of 15 shots a game, our keeper has to be a top shot stopper and from what I have seen Trafford definitely is.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Trafford
The one in the first half diving to his left, not sure who shot.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:07 pmI don’t know what game you watched today then if you think his distribution was at a good enough standard and I’m waiting for you to point out which massive saves Trafford made today that muric wouldn’t of done
But Muric wouldn’t have got to that.
When highlights come out il time stamp
-
- Posts: 4406
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1259 times
- Has Liked: 1368 times
Re: Trafford
Ok Vegas , I thought it was not like youVegas Claret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:05 pmyep, I just re-read what you actually put rather than what I thought you put. Apologies !!
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
-
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3169 times
- Has Liked: 6777 times
Re: Trafford
Distribution...OKNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:04 pmI think he is better suited, predominantly because a keeper in the premier league has to be able to do more than pass.
I think this is why VK signed him. His distribution is to a high enough standard and his keeping ability is better than Murics. We are facing north of 15 shots a game, our keeper has to be a top shot stopper and from what I have seen Trafford definitely is.
Anticipation, and quick passing: not a patch on Muric's