Positives.

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
CoolClaret
Posts: 7472
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2260 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Positives.

Post by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:27 pm

Trying to be positive, it’s hard but it’s all we have.

- Berge looked genuinely good in that holding midfield role (kudos to ClaretSpice)

- Delcroix looks good and should start at LCB

- Muric can play those progressive passes against better opposition

- This was a cup game - still plenty to play for in the league

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:29 pm

I thought Berge looked really handy.

I actually thought Vitinho was our best attacking outlet

Tresor clearly has ability, but tactically something isn’t right with him

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2600
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 169 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Belgianclaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:29 pm

Foster to return soon

AGENT_CLARET
Posts: 3145
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
Been Liked: 1159 times
Has Liked: 1076 times

Re: Positives.

Post by AGENT_CLARET » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:30 pm

It was only 3

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30717
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11060 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Positives.

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:31 pm

Muric, tonight proved he is our number one by some distance. I'm trying hard to be patient with VK but if Trafford starts at the weekend I'll be questioning him like others already are.

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2600
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 169 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Belgianclaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:31 pm

Barstewards also lost

Florian
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 10:23 pm
Been Liked: 48 times
Has Liked: 17 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Florian » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:32 pm

Foster will be back instead of Jay who is done
Benson due back
Zarory getting minutes

Casper2
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 223 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Casper2 » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:33 pm

Berge played well first half but faded badly in the second .

alboclaret
Posts: 756
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:39 pm
Been Liked: 143 times
Has Liked: 103 times

Re: Positives.

Post by alboclaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:33 pm

Agree berge is a must,
I'm happy with muric int pegs.
Though redmond looked OK, needs game time though.
Same with larrsson

No new injuries.
No red cards
I didnt get a ticket.
This user liked this post: Jellybean

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Positives.

Post by RVclaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:34 pm

Felt Delcroix at lb suited the system more than Taylor
These 2 users liked this post: CoolClaret ClaretAL

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:34 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Felt Delcroix at lb suited the system more than Taylor
Do agree with that sentiment

CoolClaret
Posts: 7472
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2260 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: Positives.

Post by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:35 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Felt Delcroix at lb suited the system more than Taylor
Would you bring Chaz into LCB and Delcroix LB ?

Can't play AAD again, it's like a car crash at the moment for him
This user liked this post: jojomk1

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4075
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1508 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Swizzlestick » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:35 pm

Though toothless up top and crap at defending (both pretty crucial I realise!), we at least, generally, looked more like ourselves in terms of on the ball - Berge looked v good and I think if you can get Beyer, Foster and maybe Cork into this team, it has a bit more about it.

Muric has to remain number one, due to the above. Both are conceding, but we're in a rough patch and I think Traff needs taking out of it.

Casper2
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 223 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Casper2 » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:36 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:31 pm
Muric, tonight proved he is our number one by some distance. I'm trying hard to be patient with VK but if Trafford starts at the weekend I'll be questioning him like others already are.
I can’t see how you see Muric as number one , no presence in the six yard box , he’s a huge unit but doesn’t use it , also he flapped a couple of times.

bf2k
Posts: 1435
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
Been Liked: 336 times
Has Liked: 1516 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Positives.

Post by bf2k » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:38 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:29 pm
I thought Berge looked really handy.

I actually thought Vitinho was our best attacking outlet

Tresor clearly has ability, but tactically something isn’t right with him
I don’t think Tresor is suited out wide. He’d be in rotation with Amdouni for me.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7472
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2260 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: Positives.

Post by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:40 pm

Casper2 wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:36 pm
I can’t see how you see Muric as number one , no presence in the six yard box , he’s a huge unit but doesn’t use it , also he flapped a couple of times.
Flapped at one, bit of ring rust.

Claimed everything else that was claimable.
This user liked this post: CryerBFC

CryerBFC
Posts: 405
Joined: Wed May 27, 2020 8:29 am
Been Liked: 72 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Re: Positives.

Post by CryerBFC » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:40 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:29 pm
I thought Berge looked really handy.

I actually thought Vitinho was our best attacking outlet

Tresor clearly has ability, but tactically something isn’t right with him
Vitinho as the best attacking outlet? In the sense he had the full right hand side to go at with Tresor coming inside?

Shame that 9/10 he either turned back or lost the ball.

Casper2
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 223 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Casper2 » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:42 pm

CoolClaret wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:40 pm
Flapped at one, bit of ring rust.

Claimed everything else that was claimable.
Stuck on his line for corners

JR1882
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 171 times

Re: Positives.

Post by JR1882 » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:43 pm

Positives are Everton will be fit and ready for the weekend after that stroll in the park.

Ours? Not so sure!

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2600
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 169 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Belgianclaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:43 pm

ManU had two shots on goal tonight at home

Darthlaw
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 418 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: Positives.

Post by Darthlaw » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:43 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:31 pm
Muric, tonight proved he is our number one by some distance. I'm trying hard to be patient with VK but if Trafford starts at the weekend I'll be questioning him like others already are.
I just don’t see an argument for one which can’t be applied to the other.
Trafford concedes lots against the cream of the PL - The argument is to change him because ‘we can’t get any worse’ than Muric concedes three, despite doing little wrong.

Muric is better passing - We stick him in and have one shot on goal. I also appreciated his kick straight to Pickford at one point, although I did have a chuckle thinking I’m not sure Trafford can kick it that far.

Tonight has offered little conclusion in the Muric v Trafford debate but has certainly shown that changing the GK is merely rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Anthonini
Posts: 549
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2023 10:56 am
Been Liked: 208 times
Has Liked: 253 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Anthonini » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:45 pm

I think vitinho when fit plays alright though he has trouble linking up with the players ahead of him. He does do his job and when Roberts came in he looked even worse.

A good left and right back. A good defensive midfielder and a dangerous striker would give this team a makeover.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7472
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2260 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: Positives.

Post by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:45 pm

Casper2 wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:42 pm
Stuck on his line for corners
Out swingers going deep into the box?

No one is claiming them

jedi_master
Posts: 7179
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3606 times
Has Liked: 1033 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Positives.

Post by jedi_master » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:45 pm

- VK has surely seen enough tonight in Redmond, JBL, Muric and Delcroix for them to be given a go at the weekend.

- Berge was really good.

- Tresor had his best game for us so far.

- Minds beginning to get focussed I think on the prospects of Cullen, O’Shea and Vitinho at this level ahead of January. I don’t include Al-Dakhil as frankly I think he’s just done for confidence - he’s still a player I have a lot of faith in.

Anthonini
Posts: 549
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2023 10:56 am
Been Liked: 208 times
Has Liked: 253 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Anthonini » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:46 pm

JR1882 wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:43 pm
Positives are Everton will be fit and ready for the weekend after that stroll in the park.

Ours? Not so sure!
We can keep watching our Burnley team improve and they have to keep watching their horses?

scouseclaret
Posts: 2602
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: Positives.

Post by scouseclaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:48 pm

Berge played well, Del Croix looked decent, and Muric’s far quicker, crisper passing set up a couple of promising attacks. That might give us something to build on if VK will put him in the team, but overall we still look miles away from being competitive.

Sproggy
Posts: 1463
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:41 pm
Been Liked: 667 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Sproggy » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:49 pm

Darthlaw wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:43 pm
I just don’t see an argument for one which can’t be applied to the other.
Trafford concedes lots against the cream of the PL - The argument is to change him because ‘we can’t get any worse’ than Muric concedes three, despite doing little wrong.

Muric is better passing - We stick him in and have one shot on goal. I also appreciated his kick straight to Pickford at one point, although I did have a chuckle thinking I’m not sure Trafford can kick it that far.

Tonight has offered little conclusion in the Muric v Trafford debate but has certainly shown that changing the GK is merely rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Both keepers would look better with Beyer or Ekdal in front of them.
This user liked this post: Darthlaw

JR1882
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 171 times

Re: Positives.

Post by JR1882 » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:49 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:45 pm
- VK has surely seen enough tonight in Redmond, JBL, Muric and Delcroix for them to be given a go at the weekend.

- Berge was really good.

- Tresor had his best game for us so far.

- Minds beginning to get focussed I think on the prospects of Cullen, O’Shea and Vitinho at this level ahead of January. I don’t include Al-Dakhil as frankly I think he’s just done for confidence - he’s still a player I have a lot of faith in.
Redmond? Tresor? I thought both were gash tonight. We didn’t have a shot, they created nothing between them.

JR1882
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 171 times

Re: Positives.

Post by JR1882 » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:50 pm

Anthonini wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:46 pm
We can keep watching our Burnley team improve and they have to keep watching their horses?
I’m Not watching our team improve, I’ve watched it be dismantled and ship goals?

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Positives.

Post by MACCA » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:50 pm

Against Man City that was the worst we will play this season once we gel.

Our expected goals were 0.03.

Add another winger or 2 and we should start creating more chances.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5379
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1655 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: Positives.

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:51 pm

Very happy with Tresor, Delcroix, Muric, Redmond and Berge tonight. I say that because all have had their right to start questioned in recent weeks.

Burnley fans moaning about how hard it is to score against Dyche once he gets his nose in front would be the peak of hypocrisy, so I won’t go there. I’ll just say their defending was exceptional and from 2-0 the match was over, prior to that we were good.
This user liked this post: thomaspaine

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 8528
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 2889 times
Has Liked: 1763 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Wile E Coyote » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:55 pm

i predicted correct score and tarks first scorer, so silver linings and all that.

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 2597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 674 times
Has Liked: 244 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Jakubs Tash » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:56 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:29 pm
I actually thought Vitinho was our best attacking outlet
Vitinho was dreadful again.

He saw plenty of the ball in good areas but the move generally broke down because of his lack of quality/pace/ability. Our ball retention was let down by his play - he often gave the ball away with poor passing.

A terribly overrated footballer and a huge weak link whenever he plays.
These 3 users liked this post: CryerBFC IAmAClaret Burnley1989

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Positives.

Post by RVclaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:57 pm

Jakubs Tash wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:56 pm
Vitinho was dreadful again.

He saw plenty of the ball in good areas but the move generally broke down because of his lack of quality/pace/ability. Our ball retention was let down by his play - he often gave the ball away with poor passing.

A terribly overrated footballer and a huge weak link whenever he plays.
Agree with absolutely everything here. Has zero football brain.

KRBFC
Posts: 18146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Positives.

Post by KRBFC » Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:59 pm

Vitinho cost us the second goal, AGAIN. We may as well just boot it into our own net at the start and give them the free Vitinho goal.

DCWat
Posts: 9336
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4143 times
Has Liked: 3606 times

Re: Positives.

Post by DCWat » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:01 pm

CoolClaret wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:27 pm
Trying to be positive, it’s hard but it’s all we have.

- Berge looked genuinely good in that holding midfield role (kudos to ClaretSpice)

- Delcroix looks good and should start at LCB

- Muric can play those progressive passes against better opposition

- This was a cup game - still plenty to play for in the league
If Berge can carry on in that vein, we might have sorted a part of the defensive midfield issues.

If so, I’ll be the first to admit that I was wrong with not seeing him as a holder. As you say, kudos to ClaretSpice.

Plenty other problems to resolve but that’s a step in the right direction.

Squazo
Posts: 199
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2022 8:30 pm
Been Liked: 73 times
Has Liked: 42 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Squazo » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:01 pm

atmosphere was electric win or lose we’re on the booze

Burnley1989
Posts: 7413
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2326 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Burnley1989 » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:02 pm

CoolClaret wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:27 pm
Trying to be positive, it’s hard but it’s all we have.

- Berge looked genuinely good in that holding midfield role (kudos to ClaretSpice)

- Delcroix looks good and should start at LCB

- Muric can play those progressive passes against better opposition

- This was a cup game - still plenty to play for in the league
Agree with most of that but I don’t feel Delcroix looks a footballers cousin, really don’t see anything in him

Burnley1989
Posts: 7413
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2326 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Burnley1989 » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:04 pm

CryerBFC wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:40 pm
Vitinho as the best attacking outlet? In the sense he had the full right hand side to go at with Tresor coming inside?

Shame that 9/10 he either turned back or lost the ball.
I thought he was poor, he’s nowhere near good enough at this level, has no idea where to go with the ball.
I felt the same last season though, he’s an ok utility player but I don’t see any real strength he has.

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 2597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 674 times
Has Liked: 244 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Jakubs Tash » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:05 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:45 pm
- VK has surely seen enough tonight in Redmond, JBL, Muric and Delcroix for them to be given a go at the weekend.

- Berge was really good.

- Tresor had his best game for us so far.
Muric’s passing was so much better and a Redmond showed glimpses of being able to look after the ball but didn’t threaten. Delcroix was steady and, I agree, Berge was very good.

JBL, though, did nothing. I’m not sure where you get your opinion of him from? Did I miss something?

And Tresor…..what did he do well tonight? Beat his man? Put a good corner in? Play some incisive passes? Create some openings? Close down his opponent with great energy? Look remotely interested?
Or none of the above?

bumba
Posts: 3136
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: Positives.

Post by bumba » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:05 pm

Belgianclaret wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:29 pm
Foster to return soon
Heard at the game he was out for a while with mental health issues again, hope it's not true

Pickles
Posts: 3612
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:10 pm
Been Liked: 1392 times
Has Liked: 1226 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Pickles » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:07 pm

CryerBFC wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:40 pm
Vitinho as the best attacking outlet?
More like factory outlet.

(Sorry this is supposed to be positive, I know I know!)
Last edited by Pickles on Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: CryerBFC

CoolClaret
Posts: 7472
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2260 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: Positives.

Post by CoolClaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:07 pm

bumba wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:05 pm
Heard at the game he was out for a while with mental health issues again, hope it's not true
Sounds like bullshit

Eloise Laws
Posts: 933
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:28 am
Been Liked: 330 times
Has Liked: 254 times

Re: Positives.

Post by Eloise Laws » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:08 pm

Tomorrow is another day, and I shall post the next Food Count :D

bumba
Posts: 3136
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: Positives.

Post by bumba » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:11 pm

CoolClaret wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:07 pm
Sounds like bullshit
I hope it is, we need him back Saturday

jedi_master
Posts: 7179
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3606 times
Has Liked: 1033 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Positives.

Post by jedi_master » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:12 pm

Jakubs Tash wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:05 pm
Muric’s passing was so much better and a Redmond showed glimpses of being able to look after the ball but didn’t threaten. Delcroix was steady and, I agree, Berge was very good.

JBL, though, did nothing. I’m not sure where you get your opinion of him from? Did I miss something?

And Tresor…..what did he do well tonight? Beat his man? Put a good corner in? Play some incisive passes? Create some openings? Close down his opponent with great energy? Look remotely interested?
Or none of the above?
A lot of what Tresor tried did not come off, granted. I personally felt he was involved in the game for the entirety of it though and did not hide. One of my biggest criticisms of him in his performances before today were simply that he looked uninterested and faded fast. At the very least I saw effort today.

JBL in the first half I felt did very well down the left and created some good opportunities at the byline with his link ups with Redmond.

I may well be clutching at straws, but what else can we do!

scouseclaret
Posts: 2602
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: Positives.

Post by scouseclaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:12 pm

We all see different things. I thought Redmond was awful, and Tresor was all fancy tricks before inevitably giving the ball away. I’m sure a lot of our tricky little wingers looked great in the Belgium league, but if Tresor was its player of the year, it’s clearly a pretty poor standard. Too many of our players are not fast enough, strong enough or streetwise enough to cut it in this league.

NewClaret
Posts: 13520
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3837 times

Re: Positives.

Post by NewClaret » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:31 pm

Casper2 wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:42 pm
Stuck on his line for corners
Didn’t watch the game but Muric could’ve sat in the stands and held a greater presence than Trafford at corners. Absolute nonsense statement.

MT03ALG
Posts: 2093
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
Been Liked: 430 times
Has Liked: 4571 times
Location: COTTON TREE

Re: Positives.

Post by MT03ALG » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:34 pm

I had choir practice tonight

GetIntoEm
Posts: 649
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 153 times
Has Liked: 49 times

Re: Positives.

Post by GetIntoEm » Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:34 pm

I thought we started ok and the goal took the wind out of our sails

Post Reply