Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
-
- Posts: 18036
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4075 times
- Has Liked: 1854 times
Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
And this is in no way a dig at Trafs, who was otherwise excellent in the air tonight with his catches.
But Muric would have claimed that, the Luton forwards wouldn't have got a look in.
Sorry, but there it is.
But Muric would have claimed that, the Luton forwards wouldn't have got a look in.
Sorry, but there it is.
This user liked this post: Superjohnnyfrancis
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
No chance.
-
- Posts: 7413
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2326 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
He’d have done the exact same thing
-
- Posts: 396
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:11 am
- Been Liked: 120 times
- Has Liked: 54 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
The same Muric that was like a dog chasing a balloon on numerous occasions last season?We conceded 5 at Sheff united because they targeted Muric.Some people have very short memories.
-
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 2899 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
Would Muric have made that save in the first half?
-
- Posts: 18036
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4075 times
- Has Liked: 1854 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
Nope, wrong.
To me, that particular incident was all about body strength, which Muric has in spades, but JT doesn't.
Like i say, not having a go at Trafs, who otherwise had a good game. But this one incident would have gone the other way with Muric.
To me, that particular incident was all about body strength, which Muric has in spades, but JT doesn't.
Like i say, not having a go at Trafs, who otherwise had a good game. But this one incident would have gone the other way with Muric.
-
- Posts: 3072
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1102 times
- Has Liked: 857 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
Have you seen the size of Adebayo?ElectroClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:54 pmNope, wrong.
To me, that particular incident was all about body strength, which Muric has in spades, but JT doesn't.
Like i say, not having a go at Trafs, who otherwise had a good game. But this one incident would have gone the other way with Muric.
-
- Posts: 2140
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
I doubt Muric would have dived onto the floor in front of an attacker, probably caught it easily.
-
- Posts: 2511
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
- Been Liked: 1666 times
- Has Liked: 2984 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
You think Muric would in someway have magically passed through the brick outhouse that is Adebayo ?
-
- Posts: 6697
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1705 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
Thought Trafford played well, but he was bullied for that goal. It reminded me of Trossards goal against us at Arsenal
-
- Posts: 18036
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4075 times
- Has Liked: 1854 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
Yeah.
He's roughly matched with Muric, I'd say.
But Muric can use his arms, which he would have done.
QED
-
- Posts: 2511
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
- Been Liked: 1666 times
- Has Liked: 2984 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
He couldn't get near enough to use his arms because Adebayo did an NFL-level block on him aka obstruction in football language.
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1
-
- Posts: 7473
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2262 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
Irrespective of that incident, we'd have been better in possession and dominated the game more with Muric between the sticks. So painfully obvious.
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
Muric is our best all round goalkeeper, not by a tiny margin by an absolute country mile but our board see Trafford as the gravy train.
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
Think Trafford will become a good player ...but he was not a first choice Premier league goalkeeper this season
Agree with the manager Muric needed to be ugraded but not this goalkeeper for £19m
Agree with the manager Muric needed to be ugraded but not this goalkeeper for £19m
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
Routine for any keeper
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
Its a clear foul. No more needs to be said.
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1
-
- Posts: 3072
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1102 times
- Has Liked: 857 times
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
If it doesn’t go in it’s given as a foul. Same sh*t different week.ElectroClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:59 pmYeah.
He's roughly matched with Muric, I'd say.
But Muric can use his arms, which he would have done.
QED
Re: Sorry, But Muric Keeps That Out
I thnik perhaps the argument is that if Muric played NFL, he would score a TD every time because no-one is big enough to block him.Stalbansclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 11:01 pmHe couldn't get near enough to use his arms because Adebayo did an NFL-level block on him aka obstruction in football language.