Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Murger
Posts: 4276
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1245 times
Has Liked: 847 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Murger » Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:59 pm

Robbie_painter wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:58 pm
You said look how they’re doing so I did and they’re getting pumped,you never mentioned the table.
Are you serious? They are comfortably staying up. We are getting tubbed every game. Yet they lose today and it’s somehow proof they’re no better than VK?

xxmunkyennuixx
Posts: 267
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:38 am
Been Liked: 74 times
Has Liked: 142 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by xxmunkyennuixx » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:00 pm

The starting back four is a major positive. Much better. The VAR non-decision is poor and we need to make a big deal out of it as a club. Forest, Bournemouth, Villa, Liverpool, West Ham Luton have all seen bad decisions that have majorly cost us.

jojomk1
Posts: 4852
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 855 times
Has Liked: 584 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by jojomk1 » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:00 pm

burnleymik wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:58 pm
We were competitive for 70 mins. Esteve injury was big and caution was the right thing.

We had a real mixture of performances out there individually.

Loads of positives to build on, but some thins VK absolutely has to change because they just are not working.

We did well.
Good summary

Based on today, I wouldn't start Brownhill, Ramsey and Amdouni next week

But VK likely will
This user liked this post: burnleymik

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by RVclaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:01 pm

Story of our season really. Outdone in both boxes despite matching our opponent in the middle. Individual mistakes, unlucky with a VAR decision and sadly why we won’t stay up.

Kilson810
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 836 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Kilson810 » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:01 pm

Overall a decent performance away at a top side. Shame we don't turn up like that in the more winnable games. Individual errors yet again.

If only VK could bring himself to drop Trafford or Amdouni, or make subs when it's clear they are needed (not when the game is already gone).
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret

fidelcastro
Posts: 7362
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:01 pm

jojomk1 wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:58 pm
Not bottom and still only 7 points from 17th
Yes, but we need to win games in order to make up that deficit.

FCBurnley
Posts: 9862
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2002 times
Has Liked: 1149 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by FCBurnley » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:02 pm

claretburns wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:48 pm
Will be banned from the touchline next week against Arsenal.
Might be a good thing.

123EasyasBFC
Posts: 3122
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 621 times
Has Liked: 184 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by 123EasyasBFC » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:03 pm

Minus the missed chances the 3 new boys and Berge played excellent today

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3553
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 656 times
Has Liked: 2899 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Burnley Ace » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:05 pm

Benson had some great moments playing against weak teams in the Championship, to imagine he’s going to rip it up against Liverpool is just childish fantasy

HahaYeah
Posts: 2194
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 11:33 am
Been Liked: 358 times
Has Liked: 330 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by HahaYeah » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:05 pm

Pretty good performance on the whole.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7465
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2258 times
Has Liked: 2172 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by CoolClaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:07 pm

Burnley Ace wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:05 pm
Benson had some great moments playing against weak teams in the Championship, to imagine he’s going to rip it up against Liverpool is just childish fantasy
Stop misappropriating people's points.

No one is expecting him to single handedly destroy Liverpool, more that he could have a go and cause them problems.

Berge done well today, he was in the Champ last season!

Murger
Posts: 4276
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1245 times
Has Liked: 847 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Murger » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:07 pm

Burnley Ace wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:05 pm
Benson had some great moments playing against weak teams in the Championship, to imagine he’s going to rip it up against Liverpool is just childish fantasy
Maybe he can’t do it against Liverpool. But how do we know?

spt_claret
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 463 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by spt_claret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:08 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:53 pm
We’re playing away against Liverpool mate, where’s the perspective? We’re a newly promoted side losing 3-1 at Anfield.

Where’s the shock or surprise? We’ve done really well today and competed, missed two huge chances to make it 2-2
I agree mostly but I think the frustration comes from the fact that yes, today we were right in it and we've had good chances spurned and yes, regardless of Trafford/Amdouni making mistakes their second goal had a blatant foul on Ramsay which it's absurd wasn't given.... but we still don't seem to learn. Trafford once again has his bizarre mix of great saves and costly mistakes while our play style remains geared more towards Muric's style- if Trafford is #1 why not play to his strengths more, which aren't passing through the lines or being on the ball. We're chasing a game with a proven impact sub on the bench, prep defensive subs instead, and stick with those even when the defecit widens. Fofana last week and City are basically the only times I can think of that a sub has positively impacted the game.

I can gladly accept putting up a valiant fight for survival but failing. I'd rather not accept resignation to relegation, but can accept that this is still WIP and provided we retain the majority of this team we should in theory comfortably bounce back and be more seasoned next time. But there's basic errors we don't learn from and a lot of issues regarding approach or decision making that feel one step forward, two steps back

That's the frustration. Just because some people feel that frustration and you don't doesn't make them anti-BFC boo boys. You'd get frustrated by 2 games without a win under Dyche, surely you can understand that criticism and frustration doesn't equal being a boo boy waiting for failure?
Last edited by spt_claret on Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: burnleymik

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6977
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:08 pm

Benny would have been a better option than Ramsey, what our scouts saw in him is a complete mystery

boyyanno
Posts: 1643
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 516 times
Has Liked: 117 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by boyyanno » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:14 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:53 pm
We’re playing away against Liverpool mate, where’s the perspective? We’re a newly promoted side losing 3-1 at Anfield.

Where’s the shock or surprise? We’ve done really well today and competed, missed two huge chances to make it 2-2
Perspective works both ways. We were playing Liverpool yes, but:

We are also joint bottom of the league after 24 games.

It's not been good enough. You slagged Dyche when he was doing much better than this so can you stop with the hypocritical crap.
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Elizabeth » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:15 pm

Young inexperienced players should not be targeted for these defeats. There has to be the big question as why so many of them have been thrown together at the same time.
That undoubtedly will be the reason we are relegated. I know there is a small number who can stomach this but I believe the majority of us are very fed up with it
This user liked this post: AGENT_CLARET

Somethingfishy
Posts: 2594
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 515 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Somethingfishy » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:15 pm

jojomk1 wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:00 pm
Good summary

Based on today, I wouldn't start Brownhill, Ramsey and Amdouni next week

But VK likely will
Brownhill and Amdouni shouldn't be near the team. Theyve both been poor all season. Amdouni disappeared after a decent start to the game..as he often does. Ramsay isn't ready.

I thought we did well today in general and were a lot more competitive than I thought we would be. Missed big chances at key moments and the non VAR decision for their second changed the game at that time.
The biggest plus was the defence and how much more solid we looked with the new guys both starting. Assignon is a major upgrade from where we were and looks a good signing. Esteve looked assured and confident and I only hope his injury isn't too bad.
Last edited by Somethingfishy on Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: xxmunkyennuixx

123EasyasBFC
Posts: 3122
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 621 times
Has Liked: 184 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by 123EasyasBFC » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:16 pm

Actually thought Ramsey played well today
This user liked this post: spt_claret

boatshed bill
Posts: 15270
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6768 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:18 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:15 pm
Young inexperienced players should not be targeted for these defeats. There has to be the big question as why so many of them have been thrown together at the same time.
That undoubtedly will be the reason we are relegated. I know there is a small number who can stomach this but I believe the majority of us are very fed up with it
Yes, you deserve so much better.

warksclaret
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by warksclaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:39 pm

When we inevitably go down its not games like this we reflect on but some shambolic performances, mistakes and chances missed against the likes of Palace, Bournemouth, WHU, Fulham, Brentford, Luton and a few more.

Appears we have today discovered our best back four. Forget the numerous mistakes made all year, and VAR had we had two to three genuine goal scorers all season we would have been higher up the table. With goal scorers you can play badly and still win. Could easily have drawn both games v Liverpool and taken points off other teams

Foshiznik
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 723 times
Has Liked: 2035 times
Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Foshiznik » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:43 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:39 pm
When we inevitably go down its not games like this we reflect on but some shambolic performances, mistakes and chances missed against the likes of Palace, Bournemouth, WHU, Fulham, Brentford, Luton and a few more.

Appears we have today discovered our best back four. Forget the numerous mistakes made all year, and VAR had we had two to three genuine goal scorers all season we would have been higher up the table. With goal scorers you can play badly and still win. Could easily have drawn both games v Liverpool and taken points off other teams
If only natural proven goalscorers didn’t cost north of £50m plus…
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

warksclaret
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by warksclaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:56 pm

Foshiznik wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:43 pm
If only natural proven goalscorers didn’t cost north of £50m plus…
They don't all cost £50m plus , unless you are either Chelsea or Man Utd. We could have got Tella for circa £20m, and maybe even got Palmer on loan in August had VK used his influence. Archer at Sheff Utd was availble for £18m-pretty certain he would have brought more to us than both Ramsey and Tresor, and I have seen him tear Villa apart one game and play well in others for Sheffield. Where theres a will thers a way. Thats before we even started looking overseas

boatshed bill
Posts: 15270
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6768 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:59 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:56 pm
They don't all cost £50m plus , unless you are either Chelsea or Man Utd. We could have got Tella for circa £20m, and maybe even got Palmer on loan in August had VK used his influence. Archer at Sheff Utd was availble for £18m-pretty certain he would have brought more to us than both Ramsey and Tresor, and I have seen him tear Villa apart one game and play well in others for Sheffield. Where theres a will thers a way. Thats before we even started looking overseas

How do you know we didn't try and those players didn't turn us down?

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 863 times
Has Liked: 1097 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Boss Hogg » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:01 pm

claretburns wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:48 pm
Will be banned from the touchline next week against Arsenal.
It might help us.
This user liked this post: Wokingclaret

warksclaret
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by warksclaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:04 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:59 pm
How do you know we didn't try and those players didn't turn us down?
I think we did with Tella but clearly would not go to a certain value. And I am pretty certain before a ball was kicked this season that Archer given the choice would have preferred us to Sheff Utd. But lets face it neither of us know. My point being that you dont need £50m a player when acquiring good forwards

boatshed bill
Posts: 15270
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6768 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:12 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:04 pm
I think we did with Tella but clearly would not go to a certain value. And I am pretty certain before a ball was kicked this season that Archer given the choice would have preferred us to Sheff Utd. But lets face it neither of us know. My point being that you dont need £50m a player when acquiring good forwards
Not sure there's any evidence that either would have signed for burnley.
Not sure how many strikers at under £25m would be any better than what we have.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Elizabeth » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:12 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:18 pm
Yes, you deserve so much better.
Better than you bill

boatshed bill
Posts: 15270
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6768 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:15 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:12 pm
Better than you bill
So what do I deserve?

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11539
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3193 times
Has Liked: 1873 times
Contact:

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by wilks_bfc » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:16 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:56 pm
They don't all cost £50m plus , unless you are either Chelsea or Man Utd. We could have got Tella for circa £20m, and maybe even got Palmer on loan in August had VK used his influence. Archer at Sheff Utd was availble for £18m-pretty certain he would have brought more to us than both Ramsey and Tresor, and I have seen him tear Villa apart one game and play well in others for Sheffield. Where theres a will thers a way. Thats before we even started looking overseas

You honesty think we’d have got Palmer on loan when City knew they could sell him and get £40m?

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6977
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:21 pm

We missed Foster so why didn't he play Jay upfront and move Amoundi in mf behind the front two.

Kilson810
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 836 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Kilson810 » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:24 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:21 pm
We missed Foster so why didn't he play Jay upfront and move Amoundi in mf behind the front two.
Because Amdouni has to play every week :lol:

boatshed bill
Posts: 15270
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6768 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:49 pm

Is it possible that VK is contractually bound to play Fofana ?

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by taio » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:51 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:49 pm
Is it possible that VK is contractually bound to play Fofana ?
Anything is possible contractually providing the two parties agree. Very unlikely though I'd have thought.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15270
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6768 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:53 pm

taio wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:51 pm
Anything is possible contractually providing the two parties agree. Very unlikely though I'd have thought.
The other possibility is that 2 changes, Fofana and Rodriguez for Foster and Amdouni, is too much.

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by taio » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:57 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:53 pm
The other possibility is that 2 changes, Fofana and Rodriguez for Foster and Amdouni, is too much.
Much more likely than us being contractually bound.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Elizabeth » Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:59 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:15 pm
So what do I deserve?
Whatever you want , hope it's more than I'm getting from this season

boatshed bill
Posts: 15270
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6768 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:02 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:59 pm
Whatever you want , hope it's more than I'm getting from this season
I don't know how old you are, but I started going to league football matches at 11 years old. There wasn't much live football on TV in 1962, getting to a real match was the "reward", the result was a bonus.
I guess I'm still a bit like that now.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Elizabeth » Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:17 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:02 pm
I don't know how old you are, but I started going to league football matches at 11 years old. There wasn't much live football on TV in 1962, getting to a real match was the "reward", the result was a bonus.
I guess I'm still a bit like that now.
Just so you know , I'm of a similar age not that it should matter.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15270
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6768 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:26 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:17 pm
Just so you know , I'm of a similar age not that it should matter.
Then perhaps you can remember the joy of just getting to a league match.
It's all about money now, and far too analytical for it's own good.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Elizabeth » Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:37 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:26 pm
Then perhaps you can remember the joy of just getting to a league match.
It's all about money now, and far too analytical for it's own good.
I think you have summed up our club under it's present management and ownership very well

boatshed bill
Posts: 15270
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6768 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:52 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:37 pm
I think you have summed up our club under it's present management and ownership very well

Well, that is your interpretation.

alwaysaclaret
Posts: 1394
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 443 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by alwaysaclaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:15 pm

claretburns wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:48 pm
Will be banned from the touchline next week against Arsenal.
Maybe it will give him chance to see a game in a proper light, and realise where he's gone wrong, oh well we can hope.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15270
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6768 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:17 pm

alwaysaclaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:15 pm
Maybe it will give him chance to see a game in a proper light, and realise where he's gone wrong, oh well we can hope.
Perhaps he'll get to sit next to one of our resident experts who can put him right on just about everything he's doing wrong.
What a bonus!! :D

warksclaret
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by warksclaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:38 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:16 pm
You honesty think we’d have got Palmer on loan when City knew they could sell him and get £40m?
They got £40m because it was Chelsea who are absolutely mugs when you look at what they play for players without any negotiation. Yes I think it was possible in Summer to have got him on loan. A good loan with us could have really pushed up his value and City would have benefitted. There was even a lot of talk in us being interested in him at the time

NewClaret
Posts: 13517
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3114 times
Has Liked: 3836 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by NewClaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:46 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:38 pm
They got £40m because it was Chelsea who are absolutely mugs when you look at what they play for players without any negotiation. Yes I think it was possible in Summer to have got him on loan. A good loan with us could have really pushed up his value and City would have benefitted. There was even a lot of talk in us being interested in him at the time
Do you think he’d have wanted to join us with Chelsea interested?

warksclaret
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by warksclaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:02 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:46 pm
Do you think he’d have wanted to join us with Chelsea interested?
NO and you know that. Chelsea showed interest in him, but only 6 months later than when we should have tried to get him.They showed no interest in him last Summer that we know of. My point is there are strikers about and we should have gone for goal scorers rater than have a collection of around 8 wide players and 6 centre halves if you include Charlie Taylor who played there last season and Egan Riley who was still with us.As I have said before you can play bad and still win with goal scorers. To start with Foster and Rodriguez only is criminal, and Obefomi was injured and ended up getting about 30 minutes game time all season

NewClaret
Posts: 13517
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3114 times
Has Liked: 3836 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by NewClaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:29 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:02 pm
NO and you know that. Chelsea showed interest in him, but only 6 months later than when we should have tried to get him.They showed no interest in him last Summer that we know of. My point is there are strikers about and we should have gone for goal scorers rater than have a collection of around 8 wide players and 6 centre halves if you include Charlie Taylor who played there last season and Egan Riley who was still with us.As I have said before you can play bad and still win with goal scorers. To start with Foster and Rodriguez only is criminal, and Obefomi was injured and ended up getting about 30 minutes game time all season
So you’re saying we should’ve tried to sign Cole Palmer 6 months earlier than the summer, so last January? To play in the championship?
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

warksclaret
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by warksclaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:00 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:29 pm
So you’re saying we should’ve tried to sign Cole Palmer 6 months earlier than the summer, so last January? To play in the championship?
No not at all-not sure why you said that. I am saying last Summer, following our promotion, we should have tried to strengthen our strikers, rather than being obsessed with recruiting wide payers, and centre halves.Chelsea only went for Palmer 6 months later. Palmer is simply a striker we could have looked at, and I gave earlier, several other options which we may or may not have looked at . Surely you cannot have been happy coming into the PL relying on Foster (who has only come good this season, with no guarrantee that he would), and the ageing Rodriguez,who hardly played in the second half of our Championship season.

Casper2
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 223 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by Casper2 » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:04 pm

Burnley Ace wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:05 pm
Benson had some great moments playing against weak teams in the Championship, to imagine he’s going to rip it up against Liverpool is just childish fantasy
Our best player in the cup at Old Trafford last season plus was decent at Bournemouth

DingleDangle
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:17 pm
Been Liked: 38 times
Has Liked: 113 times

Re: Today’s thread - Liverpool v Burnley

Post by DingleDangle » Sun Feb 11, 2024 2:09 pm

CoolClaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 2:07 pm
**** off VK

This season, and this ******* team selection is a joke and I'm sick of it.

This team simply CANNOT HAVE BEEN selected for footballing reasons.
This from the match thread yesterday. Whether you want him gone or not, you're quite clearly not a fan of his this season (fickle?). I know things aren't going great this season, but you're definitely putting the boot in and being very critical of certain young players (Trafford, Amdouni for example), rather than thinking about giving the manager and some players time to adapt to the Premier League and supporting them instead.

However, you never answered my last question on my post?

Post Reply