MOTD
-
- Posts: 30717
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11060 times
- Has Liked: 5663 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: MOTD
so they didn't show the biggest chance of the game ?? sounds about right, I bet he got a right bollocking for not putting that away, very poor miss and could well have won us the game
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: MOTD
Yep, got to be tucking those away. They didn't even show a replay on my stream though, so I've not seen it back. Think they played it down because the flag went up and it wouldn't have counted, but that would surely have gone to VAR as a possible pass back?
Hopefully saving all his goals for Spurs.
Hopefully saving all his goals for Spurs.
-
- Posts: 3784
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1831 times
- Has Liked: 2635 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: MOTD
It would have counted though because the referee correctly gave a goal kick for the miss and not a free kick for offside.NewClaret wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 10:08 amYep, got to be tucking those away. They didn't even show a replay on my stream though, so I've not seen it back. Think they played it down because the flag went up and it wouldn't have counted, but that would surely have gone to VAR as a possible pass back?
Hopefully saving all his goals for Spurs.
Never mind ---a point well earned which was good for us and not too good for them!
-
- Posts: 4294
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 1600 times
- Has Liked: 679 times
Re: MOTD
This is what counts...
- Attachments
-
- C6FCB6B0-AD81-4B43-87CA-E31FBE994AFC.jpeg (203.28 KiB) Viewed 5332 times
-
- Posts: 4294
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 1600 times
- Has Liked: 679 times
Re: MOTD
Could we finish top of the clean sheet table? That would be mightily impressive for our defence.
This user liked this post: KateR
-
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:23 am
- Been Liked: 495 times
- Has Liked: 219 times
Re: MOTD
Did we get a mention on MOTD? I thought it was all about how Newcastle can’t score with Shearer spouting his usual stuff.
These 2 users liked this post: MT03ALG Gordaleman
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: MOTD
The girls in the laundry deserve a bonus for all those clean sheets
-
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1040 times
- Has Liked: 2041 times
Re: MOTD
I thought the pundits insight in to our superb defensive display was on the money and well worth a watch
*sarcasm is hard to do when typed
*sarcasm is hard to do when typed
These 2 users liked this post: MT03ALG KateR
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: MOTD
I Love the Defensive side of our game.. love it. Once upon a time that late charge from Newcastle resulted in a defeat. Great stuff frustrating the opposition.
This user liked this post: Goddy
-
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 192 times
- Has Liked: 694 times
- Location: Nottingham
Re: MOTD
Have to say I thought the MOTD coverage was abysmal. I think there was only one clip where Burnley had the ball which they showed. Gave the impression that Newcastle were dominant - they weren't (in my view).
Also, the penalty shout in the first half wasn't shown. Newcastle fans I spoke to after the game, who had a better view than me, said it was a nailed on pen when Jay-Rod was blocked off. They were very concerned about it going to VAR.
As others have said, I wanted to see the 'offside call' again. I wasn't sure if the ref blew for the offside (which was why Jay-Rod's effort was so poor) or whether he could/should have gone on to score (hopefully) and then worried about the offside). Again, the Geordies I spoke to all thought it was a back pass so wouldn't have complained if no offside was called.
Couldn't be bothered showing Wood's chance (heading wide).
Also, again as WELLERNUT has mentioned, why no punditry on how fantastic that defensive display was, is totally beyond me.
Utter, utter drivel from the BBC and the MOTD team.
Sorry guys, rant over...….
Also, the penalty shout in the first half wasn't shown. Newcastle fans I spoke to after the game, who had a better view than me, said it was a nailed on pen when Jay-Rod was blocked off. They were very concerned about it going to VAR.
As others have said, I wanted to see the 'offside call' again. I wasn't sure if the ref blew for the offside (which was why Jay-Rod's effort was so poor) or whether he could/should have gone on to score (hopefully) and then worried about the offside). Again, the Geordies I spoke to all thought it was a back pass so wouldn't have complained if no offside was called.
Couldn't be bothered showing Wood's chance (heading wide).
Also, again as WELLERNUT has mentioned, why no punditry on how fantastic that defensive display was, is totally beyond me.
Utter, utter drivel from the BBC and the MOTD team.
Sorry guys, rant over...….
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 605 times
Re: MOTD
You're assuming they are girls?Top Claret wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 12:00 pmThe girls in the laundry deserve a bonus for all those clean sheets
Re: MOTD
watched it last night, did not know the result at the time,I thought mmmm, watched it back this morning with interest and I think I'm right in saying the only time the mentioned Burnley when the said that Newcastle could not find a way through the Burnley defense, rubbish reporting of the worst kind,THEWELLERNUT70 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 12:32 pmI thought the pundits insight in to our superb defensive display was on the money and well worth a watch
*sarcasm is hard to do when typed
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: MOTD
Just watched it back. Agree it would have counted. Hard to beat the keeper from the edge of the box when he is well positioned.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 10:24 amIt would have counted though because the referee correctly gave a goal kick for the miss and not a free kick for offside.
Never mind ---a point well earned which was good for us and not too good for them!
He also made a tackle from Ritchie that saved us a goal, so more than makes up for it for me.
We were poor on reflection; sign of a good team - picking up points when playing poorly.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: MOTD
Defending well is part of a team performance so find it very difficult that anyone should consider it a poor performance. We picked up a point having defended really well.
As for Match of the Day, that was an absolute disgrace on Saturday and all designed so Shearer could talk about Newcastle.
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: MOTD
Lets hope we win the clean sheets league, now that would be a great achievement
Re: MOTD
Lineker doesn’t like us and the little jug eared t-wat if he got it all his own way would spend the whole programme talking about his beloved Leicester and interviewing Klopp or Mourinho.
Shearer is a bottler - he tried at management and failed miserably. He’s decided now to spend the rest of his life criticising Newcastle without suggesting anything positive. Bruce’s record is every bit as good as Benitez so far. They look like they are not going down - and destined for another year of mediocrity until their owner decides to sell up - until then why doesn’t the prodigal son do something more positive and suggest his services free of charge in helping the club with buying and developing players starting with their goal shy forwards ?
The coverage or lack of it of Burnley on Saturday was embarrassing - how they can choose not to show the best chance of the game is beyond me....and rather than give Shearer a platform to spout his crap highlight a couple of burnley players with a shout to make the Euros - Tarks and Taylor. A comparison between Taylor and Danny Rose would have been great as Rose was awful. Or show why Nick Pope is a far better keeper than Pickford ?
Shearer is a bottler - he tried at management and failed miserably. He’s decided now to spend the rest of his life criticising Newcastle without suggesting anything positive. Bruce’s record is every bit as good as Benitez so far. They look like they are not going down - and destined for another year of mediocrity until their owner decides to sell up - until then why doesn’t the prodigal son do something more positive and suggest his services free of charge in helping the club with buying and developing players starting with their goal shy forwards ?
The coverage or lack of it of Burnley on Saturday was embarrassing - how they can choose not to show the best chance of the game is beyond me....and rather than give Shearer a platform to spout his crap highlight a couple of burnley players with a shout to make the Euros - Tarks and Taylor. A comparison between Taylor and Danny Rose would have been great as Rose was awful. Or show why Nick Pope is a far better keeper than Pickford ?
Re: MOTD
You should have watched MOTD2, which was even worse. It's as if they'd wiped Nick Pope's existence off the face of the earth!ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 9:06 amDefending well is part of a team performance so find it very difficult that anyone should consider it a poor performance. We picked up a point having defended really well.
As for Match of the Day, that was an absolute disgrace on Saturday and all designed so Shearer could talk about Newcastle.
Re: MOTD
I think that analysis is spot on.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 9:06 am
As for Match of the Day, that was an absolute disgrace on Saturday and all designed so Shearer could talk about Newcastle.
Re: MOTD
Spot on. It was unbelievable.
Ignore Burnley Monopoly.
Pass Pope and Go straight to Henderson !
Why would they not show a comparison between Pickford, Pope and Henderson on errors leading to goal, saves made, clean sheets etc ? It’s really not that difficult to research a brief 2 minute piece of analysis which is actually meaningful.
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: MOTD
Match of the Day isn’t there to show highlights of a match but to show edits that support the “story” that the producers want to present.
If you want non-biased, even handed coverage of the match - then forget MOTD
If you want non-biased, even handed coverage of the match - then forget MOTD
-
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:48 am
- Been Liked: 639 times
- Has Liked: 441 times
- Location: London
Re: MOTD
The only people Nick Pope needs to impress are Sean Dyche and Gareth Southgate, and given the latter watched both Pope and Pickford over the weekend, it doesn't matter that the regular one-eyed analysis on MOTD regularly ignores Burnley.
Actually, I'm beginning to like the fact that we are always overlooked on MOTD and - once in a blue moon - get a bit of grudging credit on MOTD2 from the likes of Danny Murphy and Jermaine Jenas. I think it fuels our siege mentality and possibly benefits the team.
Actually, I'm beginning to like the fact that we are always overlooked on MOTD and - once in a blue moon - get a bit of grudging credit on MOTD2 from the likes of Danny Murphy and Jermaine Jenas. I think it fuels our siege mentality and possibly benefits the team.
This user liked this post: Foshiznik
-
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 723 times
- Has Liked: 2035 times
- Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100
Re: MOTD
Bang on the money.Sausage wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:28 pmThe only people Nick Pope needs to impress are Sean Dyche and Gareth Southgate, and given the latter watched both Pope and Pickford over the weekend, it doesn't matter that the regular one-eyed analysis on MOTD regularly ignores Burnley.
Actually, I'm beginning to like the fact that we are always overlooked on MOTD and - once in a blue moon - get a bit of grudging credit on MOTD2 from the likes of Danny Murphy and Jermaine Jenas. I think it fuels our siege mentality and possibly benefits the team.
-
- Posts: 1856
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
- Been Liked: 540 times
- Has Liked: 188 times
- Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk
Re: MOTD
No one ikes us, but some of us get upset a bit when they don't.
Somehow it doesn't scan quite as well
Somehow it doesn't scan quite as well
This user liked this post: Greenmile
-
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1040 times
- Has Liked: 2041 times
Re: MOTD
Match Of The Day doing their best to expunge Burnley from the Premier League.
On Saturday not even the team name was mentioned in analysis (if they could omit any match footage I'm sure they would). Its a pretty special effort to not even mention the name of the team that currently sit above their opponents on Saturday, and for that matter Arsenal too, as well as being a mere 3 points off a Champions League spot currently. The only comment being from old crisp shagging jug eared adulterer mocking Dyches voice.
Then on Sunday the race for the England number 1 spot is between Pickford and Henderson, forget the lad who currently leads the race for the Golden Glove award, who currently statistically is the best English keeper atm and who has actually got an England cap.
Its frankly pathetic imo.
But obviously we dont fit the Premier League team profile. We live within our means and dont stiff small companies by going into administration because we've spent big on overhyped **** players, we are the smallest club to attain Premier League status and we rarely roll over and have our bellies tickled because the bigger clubs want us too.
It's a hell of a long shot I know, but I'd love us to finish 5th and see what the bunch of cockends do
RANT OVER
On Saturday not even the team name was mentioned in analysis (if they could omit any match footage I'm sure they would). Its a pretty special effort to not even mention the name of the team that currently sit above their opponents on Saturday, and for that matter Arsenal too, as well as being a mere 3 points off a Champions League spot currently. The only comment being from old crisp shagging jug eared adulterer mocking Dyches voice.
Then on Sunday the race for the England number 1 spot is between Pickford and Henderson, forget the lad who currently leads the race for the Golden Glove award, who currently statistically is the best English keeper atm and who has actually got an England cap.
Its frankly pathetic imo.
But obviously we dont fit the Premier League team profile. We live within our means and dont stiff small companies by going into administration because we've spent big on overhyped **** players, we are the smallest club to attain Premier League status and we rarely roll over and have our bellies tickled because the bigger clubs want us too.
It's a hell of a long shot I know, but I'd love us to finish 5th and see what the bunch of cockends do
RANT OVER
These 2 users liked this post: Bertiebeehead BOYSIE31
-
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1040 times
- Has Liked: 2041 times
-
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:59 pm
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 77 times
Re: MOTD
We actually pay them to spout that shite as wellTHEWELLERNUT70 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:31 pmhttps://mobile.twitter.com/lukedempsey8 ... 80256?s=21
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: MOTD
When you watch it back though, they created a lot of chances - 21 attempts and could really have had 3 or 4 goals. I think we created 2 half chances (Wood header & JRod - if you accept a 1 on 1 outside the box is a half chance).ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 9:06 amDefending well is part of a team performance so find it very difficult that anyone should consider it a poor performance. We picked up a point having defended really well.
As for Match of the Day, that was an absolute disgrace on Saturday and all designed so Shearer could talk about Newcastle.
We defended very well, yes, but when we are playing well as a team we have more possession, control of the ball, and concede less chances.
Like I say though - good to be picking up points in those games.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: MOTD
They didn’t create a lot of chances though. Shelvey firing in shots from 30 yards plus hardly constitutes a chance. Not sure how you think they could have had three or four.NewClaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:59 pmWhen you watch it back though, they created a lot of chances - 21 attempts and could really have had 3 or 4 goals. I think we created 2 half chances (Wood header & JRod - if you accept a 1 on 1 outside the box is a half chance).
We defended very well, yes, but when we are playing well as a team we have more possession, control of the ball, and concede less chances.
Like I say though - good to be picking up points in those games.
Re: MOTD
I saw the stats and wondered what game the analyser watchedClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 2:11 pmThey didn’t create a lot of chances though. Shelvey firing in shots from 30 yards plus hardly constitutes a chance. Not sure how you think they could have had three or four.
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: MOTD
So I’m going for:
Ritchie unmarked free header in first half. Just wide but should have been on target and scored.
Almiron shot after Shelvey long shot from corner, blocked by Tarks.
Ritchie shot deflected on to base of post by JRod.
Ritchie long range shot towards the end, few inches away from top corner.
Ritchie unmarked free header in first half. Just wide but should have been on target and scored.
Almiron shot after Shelvey long shot from corner, blocked by Tarks.
Ritchie shot deflected on to base of post by JRod.
Ritchie long range shot towards the end, few inches away from top corner.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: MOTD
You go for them then if you consider all those chances - first was no more than a half chance and the next two hardly at all. The last one is a good shot that goes wide but hardly a chance. We restricted them to virtually nothing because we defended well.NewClaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 2:21 pmSo I’m going for:
Ritchie unmarked free header in first half. Just wide but should have been on target and scored.
Almiron shot after Shelvey long shot from corner, blocked by Tarks.
Ritchie shot deflected on to base of post by JRod.
Ritchie long range shot towards the end, few inches away from top corner.
Re: MOTD
Our weekend coverage on MOTD was undoubtedly poor, it’s something the producer needs to sort out as Shearer does this a lot when he’s on and commenting on Newcastle games.
That said, I think our coverage on MOTD this season has generally been fine. I think part of the problem is that we don’t play in games that generally have lots of chances and pretty much everything they can say about us has been said.
That said, I think our coverage on MOTD this season has generally been fine. I think part of the problem is that we don’t play in games that generally have lots of chances and pretty much everything they can say about us has been said.
Last edited by martin_p on Mon Mar 02, 2020 2:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3784
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1831 times
- Has Liked: 2635 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: MOTD
Having read this I really do wonder if we did play Newcastle on Saturday! This was the 'report' in the hard copy today!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... -2015.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... -2015.html
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: MOTD
Not disputing we defended well. Better than well, in fact. Do feel they had lots of chances to score though and, on another day, could have scored any of the above.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 2:27 pmYou go for them then if you consider all those chances - first was no more than a half chance and the next two hardly at all. The last one is a good shot that goes wide but hardly a chance. We restricted them to virtually nothing because we defended well.
Overall, it wasn’t one of our better performances though - surely we agree on that? If it had have been, we’d have dictated more of the play (other than spell in the first half where we looked on it) and generally defended higher up the pitch so those chances wouldn’t have been created?!
In my view, weakest performance of the recent unbeaten run, potentially since Villa although we were better in the second half in that game.
Not unhappy though - sign of a good team!
-
- Posts: 18028
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4075 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: MOTD
Nick Pope was far busier against Bournemouth than Newcastle, made three or four superb stops.
On Saturday, we shut off all routes through to goal, and Pope didn't have to worry, for the most part.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: MOTD
He made one save, not too long from the end, when it was straight at him but on the ground. Given he might have been unsighted, I thought that was a really good save, but otherwise he had very little to do and, for balance, neither did Dúbravka.ElectroClaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 3:32 pmNick Pope was far busier against Bournemouth than Newcastle, made three or four superb stops.
On Saturday, we shut off all routes through to goal, and Pope didn't have to worry, for the most part.
-
- Posts: 8155
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3084 times
- Has Liked: 5066 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: MOTD
TBF it's far more interesting than the match. Newcastles poor run is a lot bigger story than Saturdays match report which is probably why journalists and Shearer concentrate on that. I don't mind going under the radar. Saturday was a great point, a great defensive display, but disappointing going forward. No big deal, we are still Burnley , and still not going to win every game.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 2:52 pmHaving read this I really do wonder if we did play Newcastle on Saturday! This was the 'report' in the hard copy today!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... -2015.html
This user liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46
-
- Posts: 3784
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1831 times
- Has Liked: 2635 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: MOTD
In their last four home games, Newcastle have registered 48 shots with 13 on target but have scored only 1 goal in a win against Chelsea. They were beaten 0-3 by Leicester and have had two 0-0 draws.
Going off those figures it would appear that "on another day" they may well not have scored ---who knows?
A point for us which was worth more to us than the point that Toon got. We did what we had to do in a very efficient team performance,
Going off those figures it would appear that "on another day" they may well not have scored ---who knows?
A point for us which was worth more to us than the point that Toon got. We did what we had to do in a very efficient team performance,
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: MOTD
Fair point - Bournemouth did have more clear cut chances and Pope came to our rescue.ElectroClaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 3:32 pmNick Pope was far busier against Bournemouth than Newcastle, made three or four superb stops.
On Saturday, we shut off all routes through to goal, and Pope didn't have to worry, for the most part.
In that game we started dreadfully, worse than any part in the Newcastle game as you say, but finished much stronger, so you forget about it. Probably the opposite in the Newcastle game (although we didn’t create the chances Bournemouth did against us), so you remember it more when you’ve been on the back foot all second half.
-
- Posts: 13518
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3115 times
- Has Liked: 3836 times
Re: MOTD
True. Said to my son before the game that their problem was scoring goals and so it turned out. You’re right, we may still be playing now & they wouldn’t have scored.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 3:46 pmIn their last four home games, Newcastle have registered 48 shots with 13 on target but have scored only 1 goal in a win against Chelsea. They were beaten 0-3 by Leicester and have had two 0-0 draws.
Going off those figures it would appear that "on another day" they may well not have scored ---who knows?
A point for us which was worth more to us than the point that Toon got. We did what we had to do in a very efficient team performance,
Got a point, which as others have said is a good result away in the PL. Take it & bring on Spurs!