Playing for England is probably a significant objective for him.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 2:57 pmSo if we both agree it's likely they won't, what's the disagreement about?
They'd boost his England chances, but that's it.
James Tarkowski
Re: James Tarkowski
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: James Tarkowski
I don’t think it’s necessarily about the money for JT he’s not got long left really to further his ambitions, some people don’t really get you could throw whatever amount of money his way he still wouldn’t stop because of the stature of the club & the limitations, the clock is ticking for him to do something sooner being more preferable whilst he’s young enough to retain the performance levels in keeping with the standards required for PL football.FCBurnley wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 2:57 pmTarks and Mee could play together at Burnley for at least another 5 seasons. With Pope they are the bedrock of our team. So why not make them financially happy and then build the team round them. We already have quality players in Taylor Brownhill an McNeil. So that’s over half the team. We have 4 strikers who are normally good enough and decent midfielders when fit. So we are not far off having a very good team. Maybe a top quality rb and midfielder would do the trick. So not a massive investment required with a bit of income from a few sales.
Re: James Tarkowski
We do agree that it's likely they won't, but that wasn't the question, it was are they more likely to get into the CL than we are. I said they are, you disagreed.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 2:57 pmSo if we both agree it's likely they won't, what's the disagreement about?
They'd boost his England chances, but that's it.
Pretty funny by the way that FactualFrank has me blocked but likes every post that disagrees with me
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: James Tarkowski
I'm mainly seeing your posts when people reply in the quote. What is also pretty funny is that after GodIsADeeJay81 totally put you back in your box, you decided to bring me into this. That says everything.Tall Paul wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 3:06 pmWe do agree that it's likely they won't, but that wasn't the question, it was are they more likely to get into the CL than we are. I said they are, you disagreed.
Pretty funny by the way that FactualFrank has me blocked but likes every post that disagrees with me
Re: James Tarkowski
In what way did he "put me back in my box"? It's Factual, Frank that West Ham are more likely to make the CL than we are.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 3:28 pmI'm mainly seeing your posts when people reply in the quote. What is also pretty funny is that after GodIsADeeJay81 totally put you back in your box, you decided to bring me into this. That says everything.
How did you see my post mentioning you anyway, nobody had quoted it? And what exactly does it say that I brought you into this?
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: James Tarkowski
1. People can quote you - I see what you've posted in their quote, in their reply.
2. Erm... is this a trick question? All I did was like a few posts and you posted: "Pretty funny by the way that FactualFrank has me blocked but likes every post that disagrees with me" - that is bringing me into it.
I don't like you. So don't bring me into any of your further posts, when it's not warranted.
-
- Posts: 2925
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
- Been Liked: 804 times
- Has Liked: 1513 times
- Location: France
Re: James Tarkowski
I see where you’re coming from. However, it appears recently that Mr. Moyes is having a positive impact there and things are looking up for the hammers. Plus, as noted above he really will improve his chances of European football, and he’d be playing with higher calibre of player.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 2:37 pmNot at all, I just don't believe the hype about West Ham that's all.
I don't recall them ever doing much of note tbh.
Hardly a regular at winning trophies or finishing top 6.
Leicester would be a clear step up, like we were from Brentford.
West Ham would be a step up in wages....
Re: James Tarkowski
1. Nobody quoted my post that mentioned you. How did you see it if you have me blocked?FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 3:58 pm1. People can quote you - I see what you've posted in their quote, in their reply.
2. Erm... is this a trick question? All I did was like a few posts and you posted: "Pretty funny by the way that FactualFrank has me blocked but likes every post that disagrees with me" - that is bringing me into it.
I don't like you. So don't bring me into any of your further posts, when it's not warranted.
2. I didn't ask how I was bringing you into it. You said that my bringing you into it says it all. What does it say?
I'll do what I want and you can't stop me.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: James Tarkowski
Your brain isn't getting this, is it?
When somebody quotes you - I see their post. In their post I see your post as they have quoted it. So I see your post that they have replied to. It's really not difficult to grasp.
Re: James Tarkowski
Show me where anyone (not yourself) quoted my post that mentioned you.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 4:05 pmYour brain isn't getting this, is it?
When somebody quotes you - I see their post. In their post I see your post as they have quoted it. So I see your post that they have replied to. It's really not difficult to grasp.
Then "get back in your box".
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: James Tarkowski
Only one person being thick here.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 4:12 pmOh my word. I've just explained it to you. There's thick and then there's you.
I'll try again. You have me blocked and said that only see my posts when somebody quotes them. How did you see my post that mentioned you when NOBODY QUOTED IT.
Last edited by Tall Paul on Sat Jan 23, 2021 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: James Tarkowski
Ok... we'll leave it at that. Enjoy the rest of your day
This user liked this post: Raggus
Re: James Tarkowski
Well done, I know it can be hard to admit that you were wrong.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 4:15 pmOk... we'll leave it at that. Enjoy the rest of your day
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: James Tarkowski
How long West Ham continue to do well for is debatable but as things currently stand they are doing something right, it’s an anomaly of a season for them so far as usually there are perennial strugglers near the bottom but are always too good to go. It don’t think the recent form will kickstart into a continuing trend for them, it won’t be sustainable season after season without serious investment.chekhov wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 3:58 pmI see where you’re coming from. However, it appears recently that Mr. Moyes is having a positive impact there and things are looking up for the hammers. Plus, as noted above he really will improve his chances of European football, and he’d be playing with higher calibre of player.
Last edited by Jakubclaret on Sat Jan 23, 2021 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: James Tarkowski
I will. You can go back to ignoring me and your weird obsession of liking every post disagreeing with me now.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
-
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: James Tarkowski
Exactly this.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 4:20 pmHow long West Ham continue to do well for is debatable but as things currently stand they are doing something right, it’s an anomaly of a season for them so far as usually there are perennial strugglers near the bottom but are always too good to go. It don’t think the recent form will kickstart into a continuing trend for them, it won’t be sustainable season after season without serious investment.
-
- Posts: 4600
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1020 times
- Has Liked: 3162 times
Re: James Tarkowski
DEPRESSING!....... the bickering ruins every topic on here.
Re: James Tarkowski
Nobody would pay that much in the summer window for him so they definitely wont when he has less than a year remaining on his contract
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: James Tarkowski
What's your thoughts though - get £20-25 million (after the amount we pay for Brentford) now - or let him help us stay in the Premier League this season and next, but walk away for free.
I guess it's down to who we can bring in. We're knackered if Tarky leaves and we don't replace him.
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: James Tarkowski
Not every topic, Taffy, but the bickering, along with the odd sly political dig, is starting to creep in again.
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: James Tarkowski
Just after both posters had agreed on a truce, somebody else pops along to reignite something which had disappeared.
-
- Posts: 2925
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
- Been Liked: 804 times
- Has Liked: 1513 times
- Location: France
Re: James Tarkowski
Hey folks, it’s not important to be right. It doesn’t matter, nobody cares.
Try this:
Respect the person who disagrees with you.
If they are disrespectful they may be feeling threatened or vulnerable. Therefore, show compassion, don’t respond in kind. Rather show them some love, you can even like their post.
You might be surprised that your interactions will improve and you and your views will be more respected. And you’ll feel better. Honest.
Try this:
Respect the person who disagrees with you.
If they are disrespectful they may be feeling threatened or vulnerable. Therefore, show compassion, don’t respond in kind. Rather show them some love, you can even like their post.
You might be surprised that your interactions will improve and you and your views will be more respected. And you’ll feel better. Honest.
This user liked this post: Jakubclaret
-
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
- Been Liked: 908 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
- Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC
Re: James Tarkowski
you all seem to be missing some out-of-the-box thinking.
He can choose to move abroad to a club almost guaranteed to see CL football, as well as do his England chances no harm.... it needn't be the PL Top Six Society
He can choose to move abroad to a club almost guaranteed to see CL football, as well as do his England chances no harm.... it needn't be the PL Top Six Society
Re: James Tarkowski
How much of that money will be reinvested and on who I’d absolutely take Phil Jones as his replacementFactualFrank wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 4:56 pmWhat's your thoughts though - get £20-25 million (after the amount we pay for Brentford) now - or let him help us stay in the Premier League this season and next, but walk away for free.
I guess it's down to who we can bring in. We're knackered if Tarky leaves and we don't replace him.
This user liked this post: BurnleyFC
Re: James Tarkowski
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again - Phil Jones would be a great fit for us. I hope it happens in this transfer window.
Craig Dawson has also looked quality at West Ham so it’s no surprise we chased him for so long.
Craig Dawson has also looked quality at West Ham so it’s no surprise we chased him for so long.
Last edited by BurnleyFC on Sat Jan 23, 2021 9:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: James Tarkowski
You don’t keep a player against their will. Certainly not one that has been so immense.
In recent years we have developed lots of talent, and as a club, we’re probably seen as a good stepping stone. It’s a win win when we sell for a profit, which then funds the next acquisition.
If we suddenly stand in the way of players from progressing, it all comes crashing down.
If and when Tarks goes, there shouldn’t be any hard feelings. It’s his career and his perogative.
In recent years we have developed lots of talent, and as a club, we’re probably seen as a good stepping stone. It’s a win win when we sell for a profit, which then funds the next acquisition.
If we suddenly stand in the way of players from progressing, it all comes crashing down.
If and when Tarks goes, there shouldn’t be any hard feelings. It’s his career and his perogative.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: James Tarkowski
Back on subject, as it's drifted a lot throughout, like you say, if somebody doesn't want to be here - they go. It's as simple as that. But that of course depends on a lot of factors. It sounds like Tarky likes playing for Dyche and just wants to move for a better deal whenever the opportunity arises.TsarBomba wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 9:08 pmYou don’t keep a player against their will. Certainly not one that has been so immense.
In recent years we have developed lots of talent, and as a club, we’re probably seen as a good stepping stone. It’s a win win when we sell for a profit, which then funds the next acquisition.
If we suddenly stand in the way of players from progressing, it all comes crashing down.
If and when Tarks goes, there shouldn’t be any hard feelings. It’s his career and his perogative.
-
- Posts: 15107
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3137 times
- Has Liked: 6682 times
Re: James Tarkowski
Quite right< Frank.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 9:11 pmBack on subject, as it's drifted a lot throughout, like you say, if somebody doesn't want to be here - they go. It's as simple as that. But that of course depends on a lot of factors. It sounds like Tarky likes playing for Dyche and just wants to move for a better deal whenever the opportunity arises.
I'd say it's not so much that he doesn't want to be here, more like he'd like to be somewhere else.
Quite where that might be remains to be seen, perhaps abroad?
-
- Posts: 3891
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 826 times
- Has Liked: 1307 times
- Location: burnley
Re: James Tarkowski
Dawson was a no brainer last window.
-
- Posts: 6586
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1778 times
- Has Liked: 1773 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: James Tarkowski
Actually, probably our worst player last night.
Not at his best.
Not at his best.
This user liked this post: Frenchclaret
-
- Posts: 1682
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 2:21 pm
- Been Liked: 462 times
- Has Liked: 2398 times
Re: James Tarkowski
I'd give my right bo***ck for Tarks to stay
-
- Posts: 8049
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2415 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
Re: James Tarkowski
Are you sure? You do know Brady and Brownhill were on the pitch, don't you? Apart from which, Tarks made some important challenges in and around our box, whilst on a yellow card.dougcollins wrote: ↑Thu Jan 28, 2021 10:53 amActually, probably our worst player last night.
Not at his best.
-
- Posts: 2587
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 672 times
- Has Liked: 244 times
Re: James Tarkowski
He was certainly below par but played much better once we got our noses in front. Everyone is allowed an indifferent game after so many big performances.
Re: James Tarkowski
With Stones finding form and playing for City, Tarks drops further in the England thinking, no idea how Mings is ahead of him, however, if that is the case the only reasons to leave are for European football, better team and more money. Who knows, win the FA Cup and tick Europa League, Alan buys 3 decent players tick and then Alan says how about this as a new contract James and tick, Tarks stays, Ben is happy and we all live happily ever after.
-
- Posts: 13222
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3037 times
- Has Liked: 3759 times
Re: James Tarkowski
No idea how Mings is ahead of him either. Whenever Dyche is questioned, he's always very respectful about it being Southgate's decision, etc - wish he'd be a bit more vocal and apply some pressure.vinrogue wrote: ↑Thu Jan 28, 2021 11:15 amWith Stones finding form and playing for City, Tarks drops further in the England thinking, no idea how Mings is ahead of him, however, if that is the case the only reasons to leave are for European football, better team and more money. Who knows, win the FA Cup and tick Europa League, Alan buys 3 decent players tick and then Alan says how about this as a new contract James and tick, Tarks stays, Ben is happy and we all live happily ever after.
-
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 1:35 pm
- Been Liked: 84 times
- Has Liked: 247 times
Re: James Tarkowski
JT is utterly fearless, timing good rarely makes a mistake.
Probably my favourite centre half of all time @ BFCand that includes chopper Waldron and Ben Mee.
I am content to value what he is doing now. I believe he has been nurtured well, and will be an asset to any club in Europe or the UK. Although I would prefer him to stay.
A note of caution for James is: be careful which club you go to - if you decide to Leave. Tell your agent to get stuffed and listen to SD, OGS , JM or the excellent City manager.
Probably my favourite centre half of all time @ BFCand that includes chopper Waldron and Ben Mee.
I am content to value what he is doing now. I believe he has been nurtured well, and will be an asset to any club in Europe or the UK. Although I would prefer him to stay.
A note of caution for James is: be careful which club you go to - if you decide to Leave. Tell your agent to get stuffed and listen to SD, OGS , JM or the excellent City manager.
-
- Posts: 545
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:42 am
- Been Liked: 184 times
- Has Liked: 601 times
- Location: Dordogne/Fenland
Re: James Tarkowski
Probably feeling the effects from his appearance on Sunday. Remember, only 3players played both full games. He has had a concentrated few weeks of games. My worry is next Sunday!dougcollins wrote: ↑Thu Jan 28, 2021 10:53 amActually, probably our worst player last night.
Not at his best.
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: James Tarkowski
Rubbish.. Tarkowski was the only player we had who could live with Grealish.dougcollins wrote: ↑Thu Jan 28, 2021 10:53 amActually, probably our worst player last night.
Not at his best.
Brownhill, Brady, Westwood, Rodriguez and Lowton all had lower marks
-
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 1:35 pm
- Been Liked: 84 times
- Has Liked: 247 times
Re: James Tarkowski
Which game were you watching last night?dougcollins wrote: ↑Thu Jan 28, 2021 10:53 amActually, probably our worst player last night.
Not at his best.