that's the model mate, lets hope that's what they do. No way Kompany comes here if he's been told there is no money to spend
Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
-
- Posts: 30717
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11060 times
- Has Liked: 5663 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
The annual accounts are quite good for retrospectively checking the transfer fees, because they give totals for the spending and receipts. They don't tend to be a million miles out.fidelcastro wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pmIt's also worth mentioning that with transfer fees being officially 'undisclosed', there's bound to be stuff we don't here about and the reported fees are, in many cases, speculation and guess work.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
The problems is there is an entire message board of threads that can be discussed in.
I don't want to scroll through 5+ pages a day to find we aren't linked with anyone new.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Or, being cynical, waiting to announce it just after the Collins sale is confirmed.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:03 pmI suspect we are waiting for nothing more than media getting the interviews and pics done
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Wolves reporter suggesting the Collins deal is done and dusted, just waiting announcements now.
Could be the case we announce Cullen just after it…
Could be the case we announce Cullen just after it…
-
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 584 times
- Has Liked: 115 times
-
- Posts: 16902
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6967 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
With all due respect this probably isn’t the place for you to check our transfer links then. Surely a media outlet would be better than a messageboard, where by default there is some content that interests you and some that doesn’t.
Either way, it would take 30 seconds to skim through a page of this thread to look out for any links.
Just as it’s unrealistic to expect absolutely no financial discussions on a thread about transfer rumours, it’s also unrealistic to expect absolutely no general conversation around the subject of transfers.
This user liked this post: RVclaret
-
- Posts: 5727
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2833 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
One point on the Collins fee.
Depending on exactly what the sell on fee with Stoke bites on, and how it is structured, we may well have a vested interest in the initial up front headline fee being lower, and the contingent payments being higher. And we don't know if we've got a generous sell-on out of Wolves (possible these days even in the case of a £20m payment).
Depending on exactly what the sell on fee with Stoke bites on, and how it is structured, we may well have a vested interest in the initial up front headline fee being lower, and the contingent payments being higher. And we don't know if we've got a generous sell-on out of Wolves (possible these days even in the case of a £20m payment).
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Agreed, this is a fans message board. For anyone who just want's links why don't you try something like News Now- Link below. That site literally has all the articles on Burnley and any links however tenuous they may be.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:16 pmWith all due respect this probably isn’t the place for you to check our transfer links then. Surely a media outlet would be better than a messageboard, where by default there is some content that interests you and some that doesn’t.
Either way, it would take 30 seconds to skim through a page of this thread to look out for any links.
Just as it’s unrealistic to expect absolutely no financial discussions on a thread about transfer rumours, it’s also unrealistic to expect absolutely no general conversation around the subject of transfers.
https://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Footb ... ip/Burnley
This user liked this post: Rileybobs
-
- Posts: 7362
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2220 times
- Has Liked: 2211 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
If you say so.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I do - the figures often come from very reliable sources
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Nixon says that we turned down the 20.5m bid yesterday, so it has to be more than that.
-
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 584 times
- Has Liked: 115 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Maybe Stoke will do a Luton and we will find out the fee from them.
-
- Posts: 16902
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6967 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not necessarily. The structure of the deal may just have changed.claretandy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:28 pmNixon says that we turned down the 20.5m bid yesterday, so it has to be more than that.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Some sites saying he is having his medical. No idea who to believe
-
- Posts: 7362
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2220 times
- Has Liked: 2211 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Strange how we don't hear about sell on fees and clauses in contracts until the player has gone or going. If we don't find out about that, then how can we trust the actual fee we paid in the first place?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:27 pmI do - the figures often come from very reliable sources
Personally, I'd make the disclosure of transfer fees compulsory.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Or we are getting more of it up front which will be important to usclaretandy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:28 pmNixon says that we turned down the 20.5m bid yesterday, so it has to be more than that.
-
- Posts: 2499
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1031 times
- Has Liked: 280 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not a rumour but on the assumption Collins is going I think a great move would be to bring in Gary Cahill on a 12 month deal. He’s a free agent and even paying him £50k a week would only cost us £2.5m. His experience on and off the pitch would be great for the new young defenders and his previous time at the club is an added bonus.
If we can keep Dwight the big gap remains signing a striker. Finding a 20 plus goal scorer was always going to be the hardest task - especially with the budget constraints we now seem to be working within. Hopefully VK is trying to mitigate some of this by targeting more goals from our midfield with the likes of Twine and going for O’Hare. If one (or even 2) of our midfielders can get double figure goals this season then a striker who gets between 10 and 15 maybe enough for now.
Lots of twists and turns left in this transfer window I’m guessing and right now I’m pretty split down the middle of excitement at seeing new players / new style and then the obvious trepidation of losing so many of our best players and the implications financially of the club having a poor season next year. I’m pretty sure that’s how in truth the majority of our supporters are currently feeling too.
If we can keep Dwight the big gap remains signing a striker. Finding a 20 plus goal scorer was always going to be the hardest task - especially with the budget constraints we now seem to be working within. Hopefully VK is trying to mitigate some of this by targeting more goals from our midfield with the likes of Twine and going for O’Hare. If one (or even 2) of our midfielders can get double figure goals this season then a striker who gets between 10 and 15 maybe enough for now.
Lots of twists and turns left in this transfer window I’m guessing and right now I’m pretty split down the middle of excitement at seeing new players / new style and then the obvious trepidation of losing so many of our best players and the implications financially of the club having a poor season next year. I’m pretty sure that’s how in truth the majority of our supporters are currently feeling too.
-
- Posts: 5378
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1655 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Sorry to make a boring financial point but there is also a tax angle too, which is going up to 25% soon so I’ll use that % as an example. If (say) we sell a player for £20m we would pay tax on that profit of £5m and only end up with £15m (obviously reinvesting some of it is then an option too but lets ignore that for now).
If (say) Stoke get £4m of that £20m, the tax would be £4m and the club ends up with £12m. So the difference is £3m not £4m. It isn’t as bad as it seems.
None of us know the ‘live’ accounts and this is a crude example not a factual debate (please no), but suffice to say there are more variables at play, and an active trading strategy cam help minimise cash paid out to HMRC which from the club’s perspective is wasted money.
If (say) Stoke get £4m of that £20m, the tax would be £4m and the club ends up with £12m. So the difference is £3m not £4m. It isn’t as bad as it seems.
None of us know the ‘live’ accounts and this is a crude example not a factual debate (please no), but suffice to say there are more variables at play, and an active trading strategy cam help minimise cash paid out to HMRC which from the club’s perspective is wasted money.
-
- Posts: 5543
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2340 times
- Has Liked: 1405 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Need to focus now on our attacking options. A winger or two, a pacy striker and a goalkeeper (2 if Hennessy leaves)
This user liked this post: tiger76
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I doubt we'll be paying any tax on profits any time soon. Almost certainly not this season anyway.CrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:38 pmSorry to make a boring financial point but there is also a tax angle too, which is going up to 25% soon so I’ll use that % as an example. If (say) we sell a player for £20m we would pay tax on that profit of £5m and only end up with £15m (obviously reinvesting some of it is then an option too but lets ignore that for now).
If (say) Stoke get £4m of that £20m, the tax would be £4m and the club ends up with £12m. So the difference is £3m not £4m. It isn’t as bad as it seems.
None of us know the ‘live’ accounts and this is a crude example not a factual debate (please no), but suffice to say there are more variables at play, and an active trading strategy cam help minimise cash paid out to HMRC which from the club’s perspective is wasted money.
-
- Posts: 6530
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 982 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
gandhisflipflop wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:39 pmNeed to focus now on our attacking options. A winger or two, a pacy striker and a goalkeeper (2 if Hennessy leaves)
Just got to hope that they finally noticed we were among the bottom 3 lowest scoring teams in the PL for the past 2 seasons.
Very optimistic to think that we will be grinding out 1-0 wins with such an inexperienced back line so scoring goals will become even more of a priority this season.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Firstly, I know which of the two players I would want to go straight into the first team.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:43 pmMy mentioning of Tarks being free is not a red herring, it is to illustrate that any club in the league could have acquired him on a free transfer. Yet the best deal on the table was from a club that only just survived relegation. Tarkowski is a better player than Collins. So again, talks of Collins definitely being a top 6 player worth £60m+ in future is pure hyperbole. This place has gone mad with wild and unsubstantiated claims.
There are also other factors: Everton may be short of money to spend; Tarkowski may have wanted to stay in the north west; he may have got a nice signing on fee.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
So we're selling anybody who is saleable. That is who we can get a half decent fee for. The door hasn't closed yet, so we could end up raking in @£90 million and replaceing the outgoigs with £10 million incomings. It should pay off the debt I suppose, but doesn't bode well for this season.
-
- Posts: 8155
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3084 times
- Has Liked: 5066 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Nothing to do with Burnley at present, but all transfers should be transparent. I'd also like to see them cash only. It's swings and roundabouts, one deal you lose, the next deal you gain, but overall it would stop a lot of the outrageous transfers that go on. Which in turn would, I hope, reduce all transfers. Get teams to start living within their means, rather than living on the never, never.fidelcastro wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:32 pmStrange how we don't hear about sell on fees and clauses in contracts until the player has gone or going. If we don't find out about that, then how can we trust the actual fee we paid in the first place?
Personally, I'd make the disclosure of transfer fees compulsory.
-
- Posts: 30717
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11060 times
- Has Liked: 5663 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
We've replaced Collins with the more experienced England Under 21 captain this season, every chance we wont miss him whatsoever.
These 7 users liked this post: Zlatan RVclaret Burnley Ace buzzclarets79 Quicknick BertiesBeehole mybloodisclaret
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
No where near the same quality of player. Plus THB was brought in to replace the various other players that have left.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:23 pmWe've replaced Collins with the more experienced England Under 21 captain this season, every chance we wont miss him whatsoever.
Collins was Tarks replacement
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2021 8:36 pm
- Been Liked: 299 times
- Has Liked: 176 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Stop talking sense will you? You’re supposed to apoplectic with rage.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:23 pmWe've replaced Collins with the more experienced England Under 21 captain this season, every chance we wont miss him whatsoever.
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Club have confirmed Collins is gone.
Wonder if Cullen will be announced shortly.
Wonder if Cullen will be announced shortly.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Who have we replaced Tarks and Mee with ?Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:23 pmWe've replaced Collins with the more experienced England Under 21 captain this season, every chance we wont miss him whatsoever.
-
- Posts: 30717
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11060 times
- Has Liked: 5663 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I think I'll trust the opinion of one the best central defenders in Premier League history over someone on here who quite frankly would complain if he won 500 million on the lottery that it wasn't 501.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:26 pmNo where near the same quality of player. Plus THB was brought in to replace the various other players that have left.
Collins was Tarks replacement
This user liked this post: RVclaret
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Defence really worries me again now.
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Please can you forward me the link where Kompany says that THB is Collins replacement? Or are you just talking shiteVegas Claret wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:32 pmI think I'll trust the opinion of one the best central defenders in Premier League history over someone on here who quite frankly would complain if he won 500 million on the lottery that it wasn't 501.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I think THB, McNally and Egan Riley are all replacements, so to speak, for the 3 that have departed.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:34 pmPlease can you forward me the link where Kompany says that THB is Collins replacement? Or are you just talking shite
-
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 2899 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
People seem to forget that, if it wasn’t for injury, Collins wouldn’t have had more than a few games.
-
- Posts: 5378
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1655 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Feels important now to keep Roberts and Taylor and then play Egan Riley or McNally alongside HB in a back four. That could be solid at this level with good options raiding forward and Cullen dropping back to make a three.
I have a really good feeling about Egan Riley, probably better at right back but like his mentor Walker can play both. Not sure due to his age I would chop and change his position all the time.
Having written that, I’m content while not delighted with today’s news.
I have a really good feeling about Egan Riley, probably better at right back but like his mentor Walker can play both. Not sure due to his age I would chop and change his position all the time.
Having written that, I’m content while not delighted with today’s news.
-
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 372 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Doesn’t take a genius to work it out.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:34 pmPlease can you forward me the link where Kompany says that THB is Collins replacement? Or are you just talking shite
Wolves we’re first credited with interest in mid-June, first broken by Nixon. We then proceeded to recruit 3 centre backs.
Collins hasn’t taken part in any of our preseason, despite other international players like Roberts and Cornet being back.
The club obviously knew he was going and went ahead with the recruitment based on that.
The only reason it’s taken from mid-June to now is almost certainly because Collins was waiting to see if any other clubs were interested.
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Our defense has been massively downgraded. We've lost two England Internationals and arguably the best defensive prospect we've had since Cahill on loan. We're back to needing a quality spine imo, Goalkeeper, Defender, Midfielder and Striker.
We need established quality and we have no excuse not to pay for it now. Over to you Alan Pace.
We need established quality and we have no excuse not to pay for it now. Over to you Alan Pace.
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
But THB was never brought in to replace Collins was he? He plays Left CB for a start. So in reality they have brought in one of McNally or Egan Riley as his replacement.UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:46 pmDoesn’t take a genius to work it out.
Wolves we’re first credited with interest in mid-June, first broken by Nixon. We then proceeded to recruit 3 centre backs.
Collins hasn’t taken part in any of our preseason, despite other international players like Roberts and Cornet being back.
The club obviously knew he was going and went ahead with the recruitment based on that.
The only reason it’s taken from mid-June to now is almost certainly because Collins was waiting to see if any other clubs were interested.
Vegas saying otherwise is just twisting the truth to fit an agenda.
-
- Posts: 6696
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1705 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Now for two new serious strikers to prevent these young defenders coming under the same pressure as last season
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I think we could do with VK coming out of retirement at the moment! Seriously, I’d like to see an experienced centre half come in.
-
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 298 times
- Has Liked: 781 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Don't worry we have Longy
This user liked this post: Pearcey
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Jason O’Connor is saying the final fee is confirmed at 20.65m
-
- Posts: 6906
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
He's younger than Gary Cahill..
This user liked this post: Pearcey
-
- Posts: 6906
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Good to see we turned down £20m and only sold when Wolves came back with a significantly improved offerNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:56 pmJason O’Connor is saying the final fee is confirmed at 20.65m
This user liked this post: Elizabeth
-
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2603 times
- Has Liked: 763 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Love this idea that players can only be a direct replacement for another. We knew we were losing 3 centre halves and we've signed 3. Get out of your FIFA mindsets lads.
These 2 users liked this post: Vegas Claret BertiesBeehole
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1756 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
He also says Collins agent had a relegation release clause built into that contract, so presumably Wolves triggered it. Which would also suggest Collins didn’t intend to stick around if we were ever relegated.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:56 pmJason O’Connor is saying the final fee is confirmed at 20.65m
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
He is usually very accurate tbh. So I assume there was oneagreenwood wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 5:04 pmHe also says Collins agent had a relegation release clause built into that contract, so presumably Wolves triggered it. Which would also suggest Collins didn’t intend to stick around if we were ever relegated.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
This user liked this post: longsidepies