Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Vegas Claret
Posts: 30717
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11060 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:03 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 10:09 am
Good business for who? MSD? Garlick?

It's only good business if we reinvest some of the cash in quality, if this money enables us to get a proper striker, O'Hare and a goalkeeper, fair enough.
that's the model mate, lets hope that's what they do. No way Kompany comes here if he's been told there is no money to spend

dsr
Posts: 15241
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4579 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dsr » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:04 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
It's also worth mentioning that with transfer fees being officially 'undisclosed', there's bound to be stuff we don't here about and the reported fees are, in many cases, speculation and guess work.
The annual accounts are quite good for retrospectively checking the transfer fees, because they give totals for the spending and receipts. They don't tend to be a million miles out.

Steddyman
Posts: 2406
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:45 pm
Been Liked: 625 times
Has Liked: 492 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Steddyman » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:08 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:02 pm
When there are rumours they are discussed. When there aren’t rumours other things are discussed. What’s the problem?
The problems is there is an entire message board of threads that can be discussed in.

I don't want to scroll through 5+ pages a day to find we aren't linked with anyone new.

DCWat
Posts: 9336
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4143 times
Has Liked: 3606 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by DCWat » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:08 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:03 pm
I suspect we are waiting for nothing more than media getting the interviews and pics done
Or, being cynical, waiting to announce it just after the Collins sale is confirmed.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:14 pm

Wolves reporter suggesting the Collins deal is done and dusted, just waiting announcements now.

Could be the case we announce Cullen just after it…

PremierLeagueClass
Posts: 1309
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 584 times
Has Liked: 115 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by PremierLeagueClass » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:15 pm

DCWat wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:08 pm
Or, being cynical, waiting to announce it just after the Collins sale is confirmed.
That’s what I would do if it was me calling the shots.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16902
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6967 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:16 pm

Steddyman wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:08 pm
The problems is there is an entire message board of threads that can be discussed in.

I don't want to scroll through 5+ pages a day to find we aren't linked with anyone new.
With all due respect this probably isn’t the place for you to check our transfer links then. Surely a media outlet would be better than a messageboard, where by default there is some content that interests you and some that doesn’t.

Either way, it would take 30 seconds to skim through a page of this thread to look out for any links.

Just as it’s unrealistic to expect absolutely no financial discussions on a thread about transfer rumours, it’s also unrealistic to expect absolutely no general conversation around the subject of transfers.
This user liked this post: RVclaret

claretspice
Posts: 5727
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretspice » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:18 pm

One point on the Collins fee.

Depending on exactly what the sell on fee with Stoke bites on, and how it is structured, we may well have a vested interest in the initial up front headline fee being lower, and the contingent payments being higher. And we don't know if we've got a generous sell-on out of Wolves (possible these days even in the case of a £20m payment).

boyyanno
Posts: 1643
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 516 times
Has Liked: 117 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boyyanno » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:25 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:16 pm
With all due respect this probably isn’t the place for you to check our transfer links then. Surely a media outlet would be better than a messageboard, where by default there is some content that interests you and some that doesn’t.

Either way, it would take 30 seconds to skim through a page of this thread to look out for any links.

Just as it’s unrealistic to expect absolutely no financial discussions on a thread about transfer rumours, it’s also unrealistic to expect absolutely no general conversation around the subject of transfers.
Agreed, this is a fans message board. For anyone who just want's links why don't you try something like News Now- Link below. That site literally has all the articles on Burnley and any links however tenuous they may be.

https://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Footb ... ip/Burnley
This user liked this post: Rileybobs

fidelcastro
Posts: 7362
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:26 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:03 pm
Hardly guesswork - usually very, very accurate.
If you say so.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67902
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32546 times
Has Liked: 5279 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:27 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:26 pm
If you say so.
I do - the figures often come from very reliable sources

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretandy » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:28 pm

Nixon says that we turned down the 20.5m bid yesterday, so it has to be more than that.

PremierLeagueClass
Posts: 1309
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 584 times
Has Liked: 115 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by PremierLeagueClass » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:31 pm

Maybe Stoke will do a Luton and we will find out the fee from them.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16902
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6967 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:31 pm

claretandy wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:28 pm
Nixon says that we turned down the 20.5m bid yesterday, so it has to be more than that.
Not necessarily. The structure of the deal may just have changed.

lrac
Posts: 519
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:51 pm
Been Liked: 106 times
Has Liked: 283 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by lrac » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:32 pm

Some sites saying he is having his medical. No idea who to believe

fidelcastro
Posts: 7362
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:32 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:27 pm
I do - the figures often come from very reliable sources
Strange how we don't hear about sell on fees and clauses in contracts until the player has gone or going. If we don't find out about that, then how can we trust the actual fee we paid in the first place?

Personally, I'd make the disclosure of transfer fees compulsory.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67902
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32546 times
Has Liked: 5279 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:32 pm

claretandy wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:28 pm
Nixon says that we turned down the 20.5m bid yesterday, so it has to be more than that.
Or we are getting more of it up front which will be important to us

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:33 pm

lrac wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:32 pm
Some sites saying he is having his medical. No idea who to believe
As I just posted, Wolves main reporter said the deal is done and dusted and just waiting on announcements

Big Vinny K
Posts: 2499
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1031 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Big Vinny K » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:35 pm

Not a rumour but on the assumption Collins is going I think a great move would be to bring in Gary Cahill on a 12 month deal. He’s a free agent and even paying him £50k a week would only cost us £2.5m. His experience on and off the pitch would be great for the new young defenders and his previous time at the club is an added bonus.

If we can keep Dwight the big gap remains signing a striker. Finding a 20 plus goal scorer was always going to be the hardest task - especially with the budget constraints we now seem to be working within. Hopefully VK is trying to mitigate some of this by targeting more goals from our midfield with the likes of Twine and going for O’Hare. If one (or even 2) of our midfielders can get double figure goals this season then a striker who gets between 10 and 15 maybe enough for now.

Lots of twists and turns left in this transfer window I’m guessing and right now I’m pretty split down the middle of excitement at seeing new players / new style and then the obvious trepidation of losing so many of our best players and the implications financially of the club having a poor season next year. I’m pretty sure that’s how in truth the majority of our supporters are currently feeling too.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5378
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1655 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:38 pm

Sorry to make a boring financial point but there is also a tax angle too, which is going up to 25% soon so I’ll use that % as an example. If (say) we sell a player for £20m we would pay tax on that profit of £5m and only end up with £15m (obviously reinvesting some of it is then an option too but lets ignore that for now).

If (say) Stoke get £4m of that £20m, the tax would be £4m and the club ends up with £12m. So the difference is £3m not £4m. It isn’t as bad as it seems.

None of us know the ‘live’ accounts and this is a crude example not a factual debate (please no), but suffice to say there are more variables at play, and an active trading strategy cam help minimise cash paid out to HMRC which from the club’s perspective is wasted money.

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 5543
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2340 times
Has Liked: 1405 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by gandhisflipflop » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:39 pm

Need to focus now on our attacking options. A winger or two, a pacy striker and a goalkeeper (2 if Hennessy leaves)
This user liked this post: tiger76

Tall Paul
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2564 times
Has Liked: 692 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Tall Paul » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:48 pm

CrosspoolClarets wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:38 pm
Sorry to make a boring financial point but there is also a tax angle too, which is going up to 25% soon so I’ll use that % as an example. If (say) we sell a player for £20m we would pay tax on that profit of £5m and only end up with £15m (obviously reinvesting some of it is then an option too but lets ignore that for now).

If (say) Stoke get £4m of that £20m, the tax would be £4m and the club ends up with £12m. So the difference is £3m not £4m. It isn’t as bad as it seems.

None of us know the ‘live’ accounts and this is a crude example not a factual debate (please no), but suffice to say there are more variables at play, and an active trading strategy cam help minimise cash paid out to HMRC which from the club’s perspective is wasted money.
I doubt we'll be paying any tax on profits any time soon. Almost certainly not this season anyway.

kentonclaret
Posts: 6530
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 982 times
Has Liked: 205 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by kentonclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:53 pm

gandhisflipflop wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:39 pm
Need to focus now on our attacking options. A winger or two, a pacy striker and a goalkeeper (2 if Hennessy leaves)

Just got to hope that they finally noticed we were among the bottom 3 lowest scoring teams in the PL for the past 2 seasons.

Very optimistic to think that we will be grinding out 1-0 wins with such an inexperienced back line so scoring goals will become even more of a priority this season.

Hipper
Posts: 5723
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 1179 times
Has Liked: 922 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Hipper » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:56 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:43 pm
My mentioning of Tarks being free is not a red herring, it is to illustrate that any club in the league could have acquired him on a free transfer. Yet the best deal on the table was from a club that only just survived relegation. Tarkowski is a better player than Collins. So again, talks of Collins definitely being a top 6 player worth £60m+ in future is pure hyperbole. This place has gone mad with wild and unsubstantiated claims.
Firstly, I know which of the two players I would want to go straight into the first team.

There are also other factors: Everton may be short of money to spend; Tarkowski may have wanted to stay in the north west; he may have got a nice signing on fee.

Stayingup
Posts: 5616
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 923 times
Has Liked: 2756 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Stayingup » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:02 pm

So we're selling anybody who is saleable. That is who we can get a half decent fee for. The door hasn't closed yet, so we could end up raking in @£90 million and replaceing the outgoigs with £10 million incomings. It should pay off the debt I suppose, but doesn't bode well for this season.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8155
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3084 times
Has Liked: 5066 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Colburn_Claret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:09 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:32 pm
Strange how we don't hear about sell on fees and clauses in contracts until the player has gone or going. If we don't find out about that, then how can we trust the actual fee we paid in the first place?

Personally, I'd make the disclosure of transfer fees compulsory.
Nothing to do with Burnley at present, but all transfers should be transparent. I'd also like to see them cash only. It's swings and roundabouts, one deal you lose, the next deal you gain, but overall it would stop a lot of the outrageous transfers that go on. Which in turn would, I hope, reduce all transfers. Get teams to start living within their means, rather than living on the never, never.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30717
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11060 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:23 pm

We've replaced Collins with the more experienced England Under 21 captain this season, every chance we wont miss him whatsoever.
These 7 users liked this post: Zlatan RVclaret Burnley Ace buzzclarets79 Quicknick BertiesBeehole mybloodisclaret

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:26 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:23 pm
We've replaced Collins with the more experienced England Under 21 captain this season, every chance we wont miss him whatsoever.
No where near the same quality of player. Plus THB was brought in to replace the various other players that have left.

Collins was Tarks replacement

ClaretInLeeds
Posts: 804
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2021 8:36 pm
Been Liked: 299 times
Has Liked: 176 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretInLeeds » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:27 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:23 pm
We've replaced Collins with the more experienced England Under 21 captain this season, every chance we wont miss him whatsoever.
Stop talking sense will you? You’re supposed to apoplectic with rage.
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:31 pm

Club have confirmed Collins is gone.

Wonder if Cullen will be announced shortly.

jojomk1
Posts: 4852
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 855 times
Has Liked: 584 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jojomk1 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:31 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:23 pm
We've replaced Collins with the more experienced England Under 21 captain this season, every chance we wont miss him whatsoever.
Who have we replaced Tarks and Mee with ?

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30717
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11060 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:32 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:26 pm
No where near the same quality of player. Plus THB was brought in to replace the various other players that have left.

Collins was Tarks replacement
I think I'll trust the opinion of one the best central defenders in Premier League history over someone on here who quite frankly would complain if he won 500 million on the lottery that it wasn't 501.
This user liked this post: RVclaret

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 892 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by BurnleyFC » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:33 pm

Defence really worries me again now.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:34 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:32 pm
I think I'll trust the opinion of one the best central defenders in Premier League history over someone on here who quite frankly would complain if he won 500 million on the lottery that it wasn't 501.
Please can you forward me the link where Kompany says that THB is Collins replacement? Or are you just talking shite

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:35 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:34 pm
Please can you forward me the link where Kompany says that THB is Collins replacement? Or are you just talking shite
I think THB, McNally and Egan Riley are all replacements, so to speak, for the 3 that have departed.

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3553
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 656 times
Has Liked: 2899 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Burnley Ace » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:43 pm

People seem to forget that, if it wasn’t for injury, Collins wouldn’t have had more than a few games.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5378
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1655 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:45 pm

Feels important now to keep Roberts and Taylor and then play Egan Riley or McNally alongside HB in a back four. That could be solid at this level with good options raiding forward and Cullen dropping back to make a three.

I have a really good feeling about Egan Riley, probably better at right back but like his mentor Walker can play both. Not sure due to his age I would chop and change his position all the time.

Having written that, I’m content while not delighted with today’s news.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:46 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:34 pm
Please can you forward me the link where Kompany says that THB is Collins replacement? Or are you just talking shite
Doesn’t take a genius to work it out.

Wolves we’re first credited with interest in mid-June, first broken by Nixon. We then proceeded to recruit 3 centre backs.

Collins hasn’t taken part in any of our preseason, despite other international players like Roberts and Cornet being back.

The club obviously knew he was going and went ahead with the recruitment based on that.

The only reason it’s taken from mid-June to now is almost certainly because Collins was waiting to see if any other clubs were interested.
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret

boyyanno
Posts: 1643
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 516 times
Has Liked: 117 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boyyanno » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:47 pm

Our defense has been massively downgraded. We've lost two England Internationals and arguably the best defensive prospect we've had since Cahill on loan. We're back to needing a quality spine imo, Goalkeeper, Defender, Midfielder and Striker.

We need established quality and we have no excuse not to pay for it now. Over to you Alan Pace.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:50 pm

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:46 pm
Doesn’t take a genius to work it out.

Wolves we’re first credited with interest in mid-June, first broken by Nixon. We then proceeded to recruit 3 centre backs.

Collins hasn’t taken part in any of our preseason, despite other international players like Roberts and Cornet being back.

The club obviously knew he was going and went ahead with the recruitment based on that.

The only reason it’s taken from mid-June to now is almost certainly because Collins was waiting to see if any other clubs were interested.
But THB was never brought in to replace Collins was he? He plays Left CB for a start. So in reality they have brought in one of McNally or Egan Riley as his replacement.

Vegas saying otherwise is just twisting the truth to fit an agenda.

warksclaret
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:51 pm

Now for two new serious strikers to prevent these young defenders coming under the same pressure as last season

Pearcey
Posts: 3421
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 1151 times
Has Liked: 1446 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Pearcey » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:51 pm

I think we could do with VK coming out of retirement at the moment! Seriously, I’d like to see an experienced centre half come in.

Wokingclaret
Posts: 2094
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 298 times
Has Liked: 781 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Wokingclaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:55 pm

Pearcey wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:51 pm
I think we could do with VK coming out of retirement at the moment! Seriously, I’d like to see an experienced centre half come in.
Don't worry we have Longy :D
This user liked this post: Pearcey

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:56 pm

Jason O’Connor is saying the final fee is confirmed at 20.65m

randomclaret2
Posts: 6906
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2758 times
Has Liked: 4325 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by randomclaret2 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 5:00 pm

Pearcey wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:51 pm
I think we could do with VK coming out of retirement at the moment! Seriously, I’d like to see an experienced centre half come in.
He's younger than Gary Cahill..
This user liked this post: Pearcey

randomclaret2
Posts: 6906
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2758 times
Has Liked: 4325 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by randomclaret2 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 5:01 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:56 pm
Jason O’Connor is saying the final fee is confirmed at 20.65m
Good to see we turned down £20m and only sold when Wolves came back with a significantly improved offer 😉
This user liked this post: Elizabeth

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by quoonbeatz » Tue Jul 12, 2022 5:04 pm

Love this idea that players can only be a direct replacement for another. We knew we were losing 3 centre halves and we've signed 3. Get out of your FIFA mindsets lads.
These 2 users liked this post: Vegas Claret BertiesBeehole

agreenwood
Posts: 3174
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1756 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by agreenwood » Tue Jul 12, 2022 5:04 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:56 pm
Jason O’Connor is saying the final fee is confirmed at 20.65m
He also says Collins agent had a relegation release clause built into that contract, so presumably Wolves triggered it. Which would also suggest Collins didn’t intend to stick around if we were ever relegated.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 5:11 pm

agreenwood wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 5:04 pm
He also says Collins agent had a relegation release clause built into that contract, so presumably Wolves triggered it. Which would also suggest Collins didn’t intend to stick around if we were ever relegated.
He is usually very accurate tbh. So I assume there was one

TsarBomba
Posts: 1635
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1142 times
Has Liked: 292 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by TsarBomba » Tue Jul 12, 2022 5:12 pm

https://twitter.com/secondtierpod/statu ... 0b1h3lY1Hg

Fab Twine strike to lighten the mood..
This user liked this post: longsidepies

Post Reply