Barton

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10328
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3342 times
Has Liked: 1964 times

Re: Barton

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Fri Dec 08, 2023 1:01 pm

Looks like he’s moved on to women working in football clubs being an issue now.

FeedTheArf
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 349 times
Has Liked: 151 times

Re: Barton

Post by FeedTheArf » Fri Dec 08, 2023 1:06 pm

He's starting to look a little desperate is our Joey

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4075
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1508 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Barton

Post by Swizzlestick » Fri Dec 08, 2023 1:07 pm

He’s being weird again on Twitter today. Comes across as a bit odd and creepy.
This user liked this post: Bordeauxclaret

Darthlaw
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 418 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: Barton

Post by Darthlaw » Fri Dec 08, 2023 1:24 pm

Joey needs to learn its best to be quiet and let some folk think you're stupid, rather than speak and confirm it to everyone.

On the subject, the female commentator in the week for the Wolves game, on Prime, was an absolute shocker getting the majority of things wrong but that's nothing to do with her gender, she just blatantly wasnt up to standard.

Even then, there are plenty of poor male commentators now and have been for years so I don't know why Joey needs to specify his concerns all to one gender.

To double down on his argument with 'they've never played the mens game' is even more strange when I believe the two best commentators in my lifetime, Barry Davies and John Motson (IMO of course), didn't have exactly amazing professional careers.

The cynic in me says Joey needs some listeners for his new podcast and is aiming for the Talksport demographic, where taking an extreme opinion will hopefully grab him some listeners.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 2499
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1031 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: Barton

Post by Big Vinny K » Fri Dec 08, 2023 1:24 pm

He’s got the demons as our Joey.
At least when he’s playing or managing a team he’s only causing controversy within his own club by fighting other managers or attacking his fellow players.

When he’s out of work he gets involved in other things - like making himself look an idiot on Question Time or idiotic things like this week.

Socrates
Posts: 848
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:45 pm
Been Liked: 912 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Barton

Post by Socrates » Fri Dec 08, 2023 1:29 pm

He’s a f**king idiot.

Good footballer. Awful bloke.
These 2 users liked this post: Ziggy Stardust Enola Gay

JohnMcGreal
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 1358 times
Has Liked: 440 times

Re: Barton

Post by JohnMcGreal » Fri Dec 08, 2023 1:58 pm

At least his attacks on women were only verbal this time. A step in the right direction, I suppose.

Jjjack
Posts: 477
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:39 am
Been Liked: 161 times
Has Liked: 308 times

Re: Barton

Post by Jjjack » Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:24 pm

Stayingup wrote:
Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:42 am
You raise an interesting point about men in the womens game. There are men for sure, but I can't recall, for example, men commentating on the recent womens world cup.

Another point in all this is that Joey is entitled to a view. Its called free speech - until he gets cancelled of course.!!!
Freedom of speech is not freedom of consequence. Say what you want, and then expect the backlash when it's something as moronic as what Barton has said.

HahaYeah
Posts: 2194
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 11:33 am
Been Liked: 358 times
Has Liked: 330 times

Re: Barton

Post by HahaYeah » Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:49 pm

As said further back, Barton can always get a job with GB news if he gets cancelled by the Wokestapo.

Jamesy
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 806 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Barton

Post by Jamesy » Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:01 pm

Jjjack wrote:
Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:24 pm
Freedom of speech is not freedom of consequence. Say what you want, and then expect the backlash when it's something as moronic as what Barton has said.
It’s strange isn’t it how nothing happens to that smug, sanctimonious git Lineker when he spouts his crap. Yet we are still expected to cough up for our TV licences to keep him and other wokies in the comfortable lifestyles they are accustomed to.
Oops, wrong thread.

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4075
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1508 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Barton

Post by Swizzlestick » Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:05 pm

Lineker is an excellent presenter who is both professional in his job and can provide an insight into the game as an ex footballer. I imagine that's a rare combination of skills to have. I enjoy watching him and if you have a problem with him because of his political persuasions, that sounds like a you problem.
These 2 users liked this post: simonclaret Falcon

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4075
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1508 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Barton

Post by Swizzlestick » Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:09 pm

Too late to edit - but just to add: As mentioned above - Barton can say all these things, however often he wants, but the way he's doing it is idiotic - shaming young vloggers, calling out current female presenters, being generally offensive - Lineker may say things you don't agree with on Twitter, but at least he usually backs it up and communicates them in a reasonable manner. There's a world of difference.

Re Barton, I'm starting to think he's having some kind of episode - tweets are almost manic.

Jamesy
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 806 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Barton

Post by Jamesy » Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:16 pm

It’s only a problem to me because I am paying my licence fee and he is allowed to post his political and woke views on twatter or X as it’s now called. Views that I personally find offensive.

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10918
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5563 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Barton

Post by TheFamilyCat » Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:20 pm

Well I firmly believe that Joey is entitled to say whatever he wants and I'm sure he has absolute conviction in his words...

FB_IMG_1702052304895.jpg
FB_IMG_1702052304895.jpg (44.63 KiB) Viewed 7203 times

aggi
Posts: 8851
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2124 times

Re: Barton

Post by aggi » Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:26 pm

His twitter currently has the same energy as those right wing non-entities you see complaining that Alastair Campbell won't go on their podcast to debate them.

pushpinpussy
Posts: 2126
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:57 am
Been Liked: 895 times
Has Liked: 134 times

Re: Barton

Post by pushpinpussy » Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:30 pm

IanMcL wrote:
Thu Dec 07, 2023 10:01 pm
They are commentators not pundits.
You are the only poster who has understood what i meant when i said "do your research" to some idiot.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Jamesy
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 806 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Barton

Post by Jamesy » Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:31 pm

aggi wrote:
Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:26 pm
His twitter currently has the same energy as those right wing non-entities you see complaining that Alastair Campbell won't go on their podcast to debate them.
I’m not on here for a political debate. I just don’t think Lineker should be spouting his political views on platforms like twatter whilst he is a BBC employee, and their highest remunerated one at that.

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10918
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5563 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Barton

Post by TheFamilyCat » Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:33 pm

Jamesy wrote:
Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:31 pm
I’m not on here for a political debate. I just don’t think Lineker should be spouting his political views on platforms like twatter whilst he is a BBC employee, and their highest remunerated one at that.
That's bullshit. You only have an issue because you don't agree with his views.

Jamesy
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 806 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Barton

Post by Jamesy » Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:38 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:
Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:33 pm
That's bullshit. You only have an issue because you don't agree with his views.
Whether I agree or disagree with his views he shouldn’t be spouting them and should be censured for doing so.

aggi
Posts: 8851
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2124 times

Re: Barton

Post by aggi » Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:58 pm

Jamesy wrote:
Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:31 pm
I’m not on here for a political debate. I just don’t think Lineker should be spouting his political views on platforms like twatter whilst he is a BBC employee, and their highest remunerated one at that.
I'm not really sure what this has to do with Barton's twitter and his desperate attempts to promote his podcast.

Personally I don't really care if they have outside opinions but surely if it's that important to you then Alan Sugar would be where you'd be starting. His posts are much more overtly political.

Jamesy
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 806 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Barton

Post by Jamesy » Fri Dec 08, 2023 5:04 pm

aggi wrote:
Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:58 pm
I'm not really sure what this has to do with Barton's twitter and his desperate attempts to promote his podcast.

Personally I don't really care if they have outside opinions but surely if it's that important to you then Alan Sugar would be where you'd be starting. His posts are much more overtly political.
Read my original post.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 9474
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 779 times

Re: Barton

Post by Jakubclaret » Fri Dec 08, 2023 5:08 pm

aggi wrote:
Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:58 pm
I'm not really sure what this has to do with Barton's twitter and his desperate attempts to promote his podcast.

Personally I don't really care if they have outside opinions but surely if it's that important to you then Alan Sugar would be where you'd be starting. His posts are much more overtly political.
You have pretty much contradicted the argument you have set out with the word "outside" the opinions cast aren't outside anything but else we wouldn't even be having this conversation in the first place Sir Alan sugar also deserves & commands far more respect than GL

AlargeClaret
Posts: 4479
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 1160 times
Has Liked: 182 times

Re: Barton

Post by AlargeClaret » Fri Dec 08, 2023 5:44 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:
Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:20 pm
Well I firmly believe that Joey is entitled to say whatever he wants and I'm sure he has absolute conviction in his words...


FB_IMG_1702052304895.jpg
The fact Barton has complimented the rather successful Emma Hayes ( and more so after that tweet as well ) back in 2017 ,surely has no bearing on what he’s currently ranting about ? ie the over representation of female presenters / co comms etc in the men’s game ?

While factually he has a point , he’s surely just ruffling feathers to publicise his new podcast ?

Accrington claret
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 8:04 pm
Been Liked: 71 times
Has Liked: 155 times

Re: Barton

Post by Accrington claret » Fri Dec 08, 2023 6:18 pm

Well said Joey, totally agree with him

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5378
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1655 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: Barton

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Fri Dec 08, 2023 6:27 pm

Hilarious to see all the lefties that Joey has triggered getting all offended by this.

I think he is right, I’ve been saying for years people should be chosen on ability alone, not gender, skin colour or other demographic. If someone is way better (and maybe Emma Hayes is), great, let’s hear them. But I suspect choices are made on TV shows based on EDI box ticking. Most are useless. That goes for many male pundits too.

The trouble with Joey though, he raises the stakes and makes it OTT, as some say like he is promoting a Talk Sport show.

He was a diamond for us though, we shouldn’t forget that.
This user liked this post: Accrington claret

IanMcL
Posts: 30418
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6390 times
Has Liked: 8743 times

Re: Barton

Post by IanMcL » Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:18 pm

CrosspoolClarets wrote:
Fri Dec 08, 2023 6:27 pm
Hilarious to see all the lefties that Joey has triggered getting all offended by this.

I think he is right, I’ve been saying for years people should be chosen on ability alone, not gender, skin colour or other demographic. If someone is way better (and maybe Emma Hayes is), great, let’s hear them. But I suspect choices are made on TV shows based on EDI box ticking. Most are useless. That goes for many male pundits too.

The trouble with Joey though, he raises the stakes and makes it OTT, as some say like he is promoting a Talk Sport show.

He was a diamond for us though, we shouldn’t forget that.
I am a lefties and I agree with him. It's about football. Not sure how being a 'leftie' or a 'tosser' has anything to do with it.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

Sheedyclaret
Posts: 986
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:44 am
Been Liked: 170 times
Has Liked: 45 times

Re: Barton

Post by Sheedyclaret » Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:35 pm

Massive over reaction it’s his opinion and he makes a few valid points

boatshed bill
Posts: 15275
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3166 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: Barton

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:51 pm

I don't really see how JB's comments are relevant to the ongoing debate about how women are being used to front or commentate on TV sport programme's, or their effectiveness in this role.

helmclaret
Posts: 896
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 325 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Barton

Post by helmclaret » Fri Dec 08, 2023 10:24 pm

He’s perfect for GBeebies now.

What an odd bloke.

Socrates
Posts: 848
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:45 pm
Been Liked: 912 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Barton

Post by Socrates » Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:22 am

Keeps doubling down and doubling down.

He’s gone full Le Tissier this morning.
These 2 users liked this post: Falcon Enola Gay

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2114
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1164 times
Has Liked: 94 times
Location: your mum

Re: Barton

Post by daveisaclaret » Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:34 am

It may be best to have a short pause in calling Barton a **** in case this is a manic episode or similar.

What that says about the people cheering him on is a little troubling but nevertheless.

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4075
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1508 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Barton

Post by Swizzlestick » Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:35 am

I think the tweets this morning confirm that it's not actually about women in football - that was just a convenient gateway - he's just a flat out bigot. If you want to co-sign his views, fill your boots, but let's not pretend that anything else is going on here.

HahaYeah
Posts: 2194
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 11:33 am
Been Liked: 358 times
Has Liked: 330 times

Re: Barton

Post by HahaYeah » Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:40 am

Looked at his twitter...

"Wow. That was joyous. Thank you.

Men and Women working in perfect harmony to produce a brilliant product. All there on their own merit. A band. A true meritocracy. Best musician gets the gig.

No tokenism here. No drop of standards. A beautiful send off for a great character.

Rest In Peace.
Shane. "

Is that it? Is that 'full Le Tissier'?

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2114
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1164 times
Has Liked: 94 times
Location: your mum

Re: Barton

Post by daveisaclaret » Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:43 am

I assume you're capable of understanding he's tweeted more than once this morning?

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4075
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1508 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Barton

Post by Swizzlestick » Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:44 am

Leaving aside using a man’s funeral to further pursue an agenda, there’s been a few tweets posted after that one.

HahaYeah
Posts: 2194
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 11:33 am
Been Liked: 358 times
Has Liked: 330 times

Re: Barton

Post by HahaYeah » Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:46 am

I'm not familiar with twitter, I leave it to you twitts. :lol:

claptrappers_union
Posts: 5900
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1772 times
Has Liked: 359 times
Location: The Banana Stand

Re: Barton

Post by claptrappers_union » Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:48 am

He's completely unhinged. I understood his point initially, but now he’s lost the plot.

helmclaret
Posts: 896
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 325 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Barton

Post by helmclaret » Sat Dec 09, 2023 1:20 pm

Seems mentally ill.

Hopefully he talks to someone soon and gets some help.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 2499
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1031 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: Barton

Post by Big Vinny K » Sat Dec 09, 2023 3:03 pm

helmclaret wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2023 1:20 pm
Seems mentally ill.

Hopefully he talks to someone soon and gets some help.
Of course if he is ill then I hope he does get help and support.

But he’s been a lot of a tit many times before and compared to most of the the stuff he has done this is way down the list….though he seems to be making it worse trying to defend himself.

For someone who considers himself to be fairly articulate (he’s not btw) you think he would try and put forward a more considered argument rather than headlining grabbing comments. He must be aware that whenever he comments on pretty much any subject that it will be seized upon because of who he is and what he has done

pureclaret
Posts: 1151
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:38 pm
Been Liked: 435 times
Has Liked: 176 times

Re: Barton

Post by pureclaret » Sun Dec 10, 2023 7:20 pm

Barton RIP you sick excuse for a huiman being you have taken freedom of speach and produced a hate filled rant that should have you investigated by the police, for your latest rant . I appoligise if you did not say those commnets and feel you should have the editors of the news papers who have printed these details investigated for there hate speach.
I have 2 dughters and 2 sons , one of my daughters is in a realshionship with another woman , one of my sons does not feel he wants to be labled in a gende identy,(he lives with a woman who feels the same) I have 4 grand daughters and 2 grandsons , I love each one of my children and grand children and would and will fight to the death to defend thier right to live on this planet as they wish as long as they are not hurting any one.
I would not wish for any of them to get a job based on sexist views, but on thier ability to do said job.
Emma Heys is quite right about how woman were banned from football until the late 1960s just so men could earn more money.

elwaclaret
Posts: 9000
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2014 times
Has Liked: 2914 times

Re: Barton

Post by elwaclaret » Mon Dec 11, 2023 12:33 pm

I find the calls for censure of anyone expressing an opinion fundamentally problematic.

We live in a democracy… calling for the thought police is welcoming oppression - a major principle of totalitarianism, a slippery slope… that starts with the cancellation of political satire and investigative journalism…

Oh wait… Mock the Week, Newsnight….

Falcon
Posts: 3215
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:40 pm
Been Liked: 894 times
Has Liked: 1172 times
Location: Proudsville

Re: Barton

Post by Falcon » Mon Dec 11, 2023 1:53 pm

The way I see it, he either

a) doesn't believe this stuff but is courting controversy to stay relevant get more buzz around his podcast etc
b) really believes that that the football industry is now set out to exclude white men (which is mental)

Either way, he's probably ruined his chance of ever getting back into being a football manager. What team is going to appoint someone who holds such views? It would be a PR disaster and unpopular with the fans. Whether you agree with him or not (and I wholeheartedly don't), the younger generation in general don't agree with these kind of views, and they are the future. The world has changed.
This user liked this post: simonclaret

Ric_C
Posts: 2077
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
Been Liked: 752 times
Has Liked: 122 times

Re: Barton

Post by Ric_C » Mon Dec 11, 2023 2:03 pm

pureclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 10, 2023 7:20 pm
Barton RIP you sick excuse for a huiman being you have taken freedom of speach and produced a hate filled rant that should have you investigated by the police, for your latest rant . I appoligise if you did not say those commnets and feel you should have the editors of the news papers who have printed these details investigated for there hate speach.
I have 2 dughters and 2 sons , one of my daughters is in a realshionship with another woman , one of my sons does not feel he wants to be labled in a gende identy,(he lives with a woman who feels the same) I have 4 grand daughters and 2 grandsons , I love each one of my children and grand children and would and will fight to the death to defend thier right to live on this planet as they wish as long as they are not hurting any one.
I would not wish for any of them to get a job based on sexist views, but on thier ability to do said job.
Emma Heys is quite right about how woman were banned from football until the late 1960s just so men could earn more money.
Don't understand a word of this babble
These 3 users liked this post: Vino blanco Bosscat Greenmile

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10328
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3342 times
Has Liked: 1964 times

Re: Barton

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Mon Dec 11, 2023 2:12 pm

He looks to have pivoted today to celebrating Alex Jones being back on twitter( the guy who claimed Sandy Hook was a hoax) and threatening Sky Sports News Reporters.


If I was a betting man I’d wager his wife has left him.

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4075
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1508 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Barton

Post by Swizzlestick » Mon Dec 11, 2023 2:17 pm

Falcon wrote:
Mon Dec 11, 2023 1:53 pm
The way I see it, he either

a) doesn't believe this stuff but is courting controversy to stay relevant get more buzz around his podcast etc
b) really believes that that the football industry is now set out to exclude white men (which is mental)

Either way, he's probably ruined his chance of ever getting back into being a football manager. What team is going to appoint someone who holds such views? It would be a PR disaster and unpopular with the fans. Whether you agree with him or not (and I wholeheartedly don't), the younger generation in general don't agree with these kind of views, and they are the future. The world has changed.
This final point is a good one, because I think he expected a few more back slaps and 'yeah you're dead right Joey' from the football lads on there - I think he thought these were pretty boilerplate populist views, whereas the general consensus has been 'what on earth are you doing'? I think most fans, particularly younger fans who are into vlogging and watch alongs etc, are just baffled. Would explain his pivot into general alt right narratives now as he probably realises the football gigs will be drying up and he needs to get on the grift train. Quite a sorry sight - loved him as a player here but he just comes across as a toilet of a man. He's also come across as quite manic in his postings, which suggests something's going on in the background.
This user liked this post: Falcon

Jamesy
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 806 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Barton

Post by Jamesy » Mon Dec 11, 2023 2:27 pm

pureclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 10, 2023 7:20 pm
Barton RIP you sick excuse for a huiman being you have taken freedom of speach and produced a hate filled rant that should have you investigated by the police, for your latest rant . I appoligise if you did not say those commnets and feel you should have the editors of the news papers who have printed these details investigated for there hate speach.
I have 2 dughters and 2 sons , one of my daughters is in a realshionship with another woman , one of my sons does not feel he wants to be labled in a gende identy,(he lives with a woman who feels the same) I have 4 grand daughters and 2 grandsons , I love each one of my children and grand children and would and will fight to the death to defend thier right to live on this planet as they wish as long as they are not hurting any one.
I would not wish for any of them to get a job based on sexist views, but on thier ability to do said job.
Emma Heys is quite right about how woman were banned from football until the late 1960s just so men could earn more money.
I think you need to calm down a bit. Not sure about women being banned from football until the late 60’s was so men could earn more money? If Emma Hayes said this and meant it then she was talking tosh.
The majority of Professional Footballers up until the late 60’s didn’t earn a lot of money at all. Many of them lived amongst us mere mortals on modern housing developments.

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2114
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1164 times
Has Liked: 94 times
Location: your mum

Re: Barton

Post by daveisaclaret » Mon Dec 11, 2023 2:49 pm

I think it's fair to say his time in football was over before this sad little episode. As a player Barton generally played at a lower level than he should have done due to his personality and it looks clear that while his talent on the pitch justified clubs (including us) taking the risk, as a manager he doesn't have that talent. To add to his modest ability as a manager he's been charged with assault while in both managerial jobs he's had, compared his team's defending to the holocaust and I think it's reasonable to say generally acted like someone you wouldn't want around your football club.

There are some spectacularly thick and unpleasant people who make good money from the kind of horrible **** his podcast is obviously going to be but I'm not really convinced he'll make it in that world.

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2114
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1164 times
Has Liked: 94 times
Location: your mum

Re: Barton

Post by daveisaclaret » Mon Dec 11, 2023 2:50 pm

Jamesy wrote:
Mon Dec 11, 2023 2:27 pm
I think you need to calm down a bit. Not sure about women being banned from football until the late 60’s was so men could earn more money? If Emma Hayes said this and meant it then she was talking tosh.
The majority of Professional Footballers up until the late 60’s didn’t earn a lot of money at all. Many of them lived amongst us mere mortals on modern housing developments.
That is why women's football was banned.

xxmunkyennuixx
Posts: 267
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:38 am
Been Liked: 74 times
Has Liked: 142 times

Re: Barton

Post by xxmunkyennuixx » Mon Dec 11, 2023 4:16 pm

I am getting the impression he might be quite unwell mental health wise. The tweets are all a bit frantic and overly aggressive. I hope he has close people that can reach out and make sure he is alright.

Jamesy
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 806 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Barton

Post by Jamesy » Mon Dec 11, 2023 4:22 pm

daveisaclaret wrote:
Mon Dec 11, 2023 2:50 pm
That is why women's football was banned.
Seriously?

Post Reply