Three match ban for Tarkowski
-
- Posts: 67905
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32549 times
- Has Liked: 5281 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Three match ban for Tarkowski
He accepted the charge but argued against three match ban suggesting it was excessive - lost it and starts his ban immediately.
-
- Posts: 6143
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 6465 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
well thats just a bag of sh!t then
This user liked this post: Foulthrow
-
- Posts: 1856
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:37 am
- Been Liked: 548 times
- Has Liked: 31 times
- Location: South Manchester
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
All that work I did!
What a waste of my time!
I hope both Tarks and I learn from this.
What a waste of my time!
I hope both Tarks and I learn from this.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
What a shocking development.
-
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 10:53 pm
- Been Liked: 237 times
- Has Liked: 1283 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
And nothing for the cheat Murray.
This user liked this post: Clarethalffull
-
- Posts: 18106
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
I have just bought some tomatoes for when Murray visits us. They should be soggy enough to pelt him with by the time he arrives.
-
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
- Been Liked: 908 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
- Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
What was the strategy behind accepting the charge, with the busiest period of games upon us? Wouldn’t denying it, requesting a personal hearing have been the way forward?
-
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2416 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
As expected.
Ben Mee, Kevin Long, time to do your thing!
Ben Mee, Kevin Long, time to do your thing!
-
- Posts: 67905
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32549 times
- Has Liked: 5281 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Short article now on site at
http://www.uptheclarets.com/tarkowski-b ... hree-games" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.uptheclarets.com/tarkowski-b ... hree-games" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Elbow someone like that then expect a 3 match ban.
Last edited by Inchy on Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: Steve1956
-
- Posts: 67905
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32549 times
- Has Liked: 5281 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
What would have been the point? He'd have still lost and he'd still have missed the next three games. He had until 6 p.m. on Tuesday to respond with the decision necessary before the next game.NRC wrote:What was the strategy behind accepting the charge, with the busiest period of games upon us? Wouldn’t denying it, requesting a personal hearing have been the way forward?
-
- Posts: 3923
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1331 times
- Location: burnley
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
And if mee or kev get injuries? We do like to take risks why?
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Only fair. Silly stuff from Tarkowski.
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Both he and we have to just take our medicine.
Let’s get on with it.
Let’s get on with it.
-
- Posts: 3326
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 1304 times
- Has Liked: 318 times
- Location: Accrington
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
He was stupid.ClaretTony wrote:What would have been the point? He'd have still lost and he'd still have missed the next three games. He had until 6 p.m. on Tuesday to respond with the decision necessary before the next game.
Let's get on with it.
-
- Posts: 3282
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
- Been Liked: 843 times
- Has Liked: 1050 times
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
A big blow but not unexpected, let's hope he learns from this, he will be missed, a key contributor to our successful season.
-
- Posts: 18106
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Just looking at the fixtures and would you believe it, the day Brighton come to the Turf should be the day they get relegated.
He who laughs last, laughs longest.
He who laughs last, laughs longest.
These 2 users liked this post: Rick_Muller Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
I wonder if anyone really thought that he wouldn't get a three match ban?
-
- Posts: 67905
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32549 times
- Has Liked: 5281 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
6th in the Premier League the last time I looked - don't think we've got much wrong, just had a bad run with defenders in the last few weekssummitclaret wrote:And if mee or kev get injuries? We do like to take risks why?
These 3 users liked this post: Goddy Juan Tanamera addisclaret
-
- Posts: 6143
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 6465 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Not wasted effort, it certainly changed my opinion of the situation. I no longer think of Tarks as stupid for his actions as I understand that there clearly were mitigating circumstances.2 Bee Holed wrote:All that work I did!
What a waste of my time!
I hope both Tarks and I learn from this.
-
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
- Been Liked: 908 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
- Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Ah, that’ll explain it then! ThanksClaretTony wrote:What would have been the point? He'd have still lost and he'd still have missed the next three games. He had until 6 p.m. on Tuesday to respond with the decision necessary before the next game.
-
- Posts: 67905
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32549 times
- Has Liked: 5281 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
I wondered whether the referee would have automatically shown red had it been seen but once they charged him it was never going to be anything else but a three match ban. We'd have wanted that had it been a player from any other club.Lancasterclaret wrote:I wonder if anyone really thought that he wouldn't get a three match ban?
One thing Hughton had wrong with his protestations that they should have had two penalties - the first one wasn't and this incident was while the ball was dead waiting for a throw in so nothing other than the throw in could have been awarded.
-
- Posts: 6143
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 6465 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
I hoped the delay was as a result of attempts to clear his name, but it doesn't appear so nowLancasterclaret wrote:I wonder if anyone really thought that he wouldn't get a three match ban?
-
- Posts: 15275
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
A "punch"?
I may take up boxing.
I may take up boxing.
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Correct decision, there has to be uniformity. Tarky has only his self to blame, he's let his team mates down. I imagine SD will be fuming with him behind the scenes.
-
- Posts: 67905
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32549 times
- Has Liked: 5281 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Don't think there was a delay to be honest. He had until Tuesday night to submit to the FA, the commission met yesterday and announced their findings this morning.Rick_Muller wrote:I hoped the delay was as a result of attempts to clear his name, but it doesn't appear so now
-
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:38 pm
- Been Liked: 435 times
- Has Liked: 176 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
on sky as suspended 3 games
-
- Posts: 6143
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 6465 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
They can decide that the dive for Leicester didn't warrant a ban within a few hours, just dont understand the machinations of this process - I dont think there's enough transparency (but happy to be corrected if there is).ClaretTony wrote:Don't think there was a delay to be honest. He had until Tuesday night to submit to the FA, the commission met yesterday and announced their findings this morning.
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
They decided that Tarkowski warranted a ban by Monday afternoon. Once the charge is made it's pretty much a formality that it will be upheld. I can count on the fingers of one foot the number of times I can recall an FA charge that wasn't upheld.Rick_Muller wrote:They can decide that the dive for Leicester didn't warrant a ban within a few hours, just dont understand the machinations of this process - I dont think there's enough transparency (but happy to be corrected if there is).
Can anyone think of one that wasn't?
Last edited by Tall Paul on Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1856
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:37 am
- Been Liked: 548 times
- Has Liked: 31 times
- Location: South Manchester
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
?......NO...you sure?pureclaret wrote:on sky as suspended 3 games
-
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 192 times
- Has Liked: 694 times
- Location: Nottingham
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
ClaretTony wrote:6th in the Premier League the last time I looked - don't think we've got much wrong, just had a bad run with defenders in the last few weeks
...and to be fair, despite all the difficulties we've had with injuries, how many have we conceded in recent weeks?
Siege mentality now...whilst I don't particularly agree with the conspiracy theorists (i.e. the authorities picking on the little clubs), it does mean SD can use that (conspiracy theory) and pull everybody even tighter together and, hopefully, carry on picking up points in spite of everything.
UTC
This user liked this post: addisclaret
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:56 am
- Been Liked: 389 times
- Has Liked: 1022 times
- Location: Dnipropetrovsk
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Injuries, suspensions, all sorts of things happen over a season and we're still not half way through.
Lets just get on with it and see how good or how short we are. It's another learning curve, a bit like last season when Gray got 4 games.
Lets just get on with it and see how good or how short we are. It's another learning curve, a bit like last season when Gray got 4 games.
-
- Posts: 6530
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 982 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
A few days before the match it was reported on SSN that Chris Hughton had declared that the home matches against Burnley and Watford were "must win" games and the Brighton players were obviously prepared to go to any lengths to try and get a result.
I wonder how many Watford players they will manage to get sent off on Saturday? Watford don't normally need any help anyway.
I wonder how many Watford players they will manage to get sent off on Saturday? Watford don't normally need any help anyway.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Taylor or Cork or even Lowton could fill in, we are not devoid of options if Mee or Long gets injured.
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 177 times
- Has Liked: 312 times
- Location: Ribble Valley
- Contact:
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Meanwhile the cheats prosper.
Carry on diving lads.
Carry on diving lads.
These 2 users liked this post: Foulthrow oswyclaret
-
- Posts: 3121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:24 am
- Been Liked: 946 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Was always likely to happen and I know 3 games is 3 games but surely the silver lining to this is that we have 3 games over a short period so we are not missing him for 3 weeks.
I think Long having a run of games with Mee out means that we will not be that worse off in reality. The framework is the success of what we do and thankfully we are blessed with backups for each position that know and can carry out the framework.
No panic or drama from me.
I think Long having a run of games with Mee out means that we will not be that worse off in reality. The framework is the success of what we do and thankfully we are blessed with backups for each position that know and can carry out the framework.
No panic or drama from me.
Last edited by clarethomer on Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: addisclaret
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
You just can't elbow people
You can of course cheat by pretending to dive, deliberately set out to cause more damage to an injured opponent and tackle with no regard to an opponent's safety
You can of course cheat by pretending to dive, deliberately set out to cause more damage to an injured opponent and tackle with no regard to an opponent's safety
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
If the authorities really thought that, Kane and Alli wouldn't be playing on Saturday.beddie wrote:Correct decision, there has to be uniformity.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 17280
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6492 times
- Has Liked: 2919 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Elbowing someone like that is not very clever,stupid of Tarkowski,and now he misses two of the biggest games of the season Spurs & United I hope he's is heavily fined by the club as well for his sheer stupidity.Inchy wrote:Elbow someone like that then expect a 3 match ban.
-
- Posts: 6143
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 6465 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Google cant find any...Tall Paul wrote:Can anyone think of one that wasn't?
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
May as well had elbowed him in the face, broke his nose and done him over properly.
That's what frustrated me with these namby pamby "headbutts" these players do and get 3 games.
May as well proper snot them and take half their face with it. Same punishment, leave them in no doubt you wanted to hurt them!
That's what frustrated me with these namby pamby "headbutts" these players do and get 3 games.
May as well proper snot them and take half their face with it. Same punishment, leave them in no doubt you wanted to hurt them!
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 12:19 pm
- Been Liked: 65 times
- Has Liked: 133 times
- Location: Dublin 7
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Can't really complain with Tarky's ban. What grates is the divers getting away with diving, and the apparent loophole that the likes of Kane and Alli have gotten away with their nasty challenges last week
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 836 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
I might be in a minority of one but I would certainly have demanded a penalty for us if for instance Wood had gone down like Murray did under a similar challenge from Dunk for eg.
I am struggling to see what Murray as done wrong tbh. Tarks was utterly stupid with the elbow sore hand or not and got way to close to his man in the box thus conceding a penalty.
I am struggling to see what Murray as done wrong tbh. Tarks was utterly stupid with the elbow sore hand or not and got way to close to his man in the box thus conceding a penalty.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 836 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Their is a limit MACCA. What you're suggesting probably carries a custodial sentence let alone a 3 game banMACCA wrote:May as well had elbowed him in the face, broke his nose and done him over properly.
That's what frustrated me with these namby pamby "headbutts" these players do and get 3 games.
May as well proper snot them and take half their face with it. Same punishment, leave them in no doubt you wanted to hurt them!
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
There are plenty of cases that don't get to charge stage...Tall Paul wrote:They decided that Tarkowski warranted a ban by Monday afternoon. Once the charge is made it's pretty much a formality that it will be upheld. I can count on the fingers of one foot the number of times I can recall an FA charge that wasn't upheld.
Can anyone think of one that wasn't?
https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... u-brighton
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
I know, that's the point. Once the charge is made the FA have already made up their minds.UpTheBeehole wrote:There are plenty of cases that don't get to charge stage...
https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... u-brighton
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Nah doubt it. See nose breaking or leg breaking challenges weekly across the leagues.RocketLawnChair wrote:Their is a limit MACCA. What you're suggesting probably carries a custodial sentence let alone a 3 game ban
If your going to do it, may as well connect.
I agree with your point about Murray though. I'd want a pen and red should it have been Wood on the receiving end.
So in that respect we gained a point if nothing else from the game, as I don't think we would have drew if down to 10 and the pen against.
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
And they're usually fully deserved. Look at the Tomer Hemed one; Brighton contested it, but it's a clear stamp. Three game ban and rightly so.Tall Paul wrote:I know, that's the point. Once the charge is made the FA have already made up their minds.
Show me examples of a player getting a ban for violent conduct where it wasn't warranted.
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
If he had smashed him in the face and blood was flying about I suspect the ref would have given a pen, even if he didn't properly see it.
The joke is if we was playing in League 1 he probably would have got away with the elbow.
The joke is if we was playing in League 1 he probably would have got away with the elbow.
Re: Three match ban for Tarkowski
Why? I'm not arguing that it wasn't warranted. I was responding to Rick's question about the FA process.UpTheBeehole wrote:And they're usually fully deserved. Look at the Tomer Hemed one; Brighton contested it, but it's a clear stamp. Three game ban and rightly so.
Show me examples of a player getting a ban for violent conduct where it wasn't warranted.