Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by Imploding Turtle » Thu May 25, 2017 9:51 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:There is no greater sign of this board going downhill than a perfectly good and perfectly timed Blazing Saddles quote being ignored by 99% of the contributors.

Its a sad day
I haven't seen Blazing Saddles.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by Lancasterclaret » Thu May 25, 2017 9:52 pm

Frankly, I'm not surprised
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by Imploding Turtle » Thu May 25, 2017 9:54 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:Frankly, I'm not surprised
****

Spiral
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:37 am
Been Liked: 2523 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by Spiral » Thu May 25, 2017 9:59 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:****
Only four stars? How can you rate a film you haven't seen?
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3889
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1216 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Thu May 25, 2017 10:14 pm

I've never even heard of it

Before my time? :lol:

Claret-On-A-T-Rex
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 837 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by Claret-On-A-T-Rex » Thu May 25, 2017 10:31 pm

There are 1.5 BILLION Muslims in the world. Blaming them or their religion for an atrocity committed by 1 makes you sound like a complete idiot. In fact, it makes you sound exactly like you're saying one of the completely idiotic things below...

"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a biscuit will choke and die. Biscuits are evil".

"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who washes their car will be killed by slipping on the wet, soapy floor. Cars are evil".

"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a banana will have an allergic reaction and die. Bananas are evil".

So when you're slapping your fist into your hand and spouting sh1t about Muslims with great conviction and emphasis remember, you look like someone shouting "Bananas are evil. Bananas are evil. BANANAS ARE EVIL!".

In other words, you look like a complete moron. The only people on your side are other morons. There may be loads of people who share the same, stupid, ill-informed opinion. Congratulations, you're in an army of morons.

morpheus2
Posts: 1585
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
Been Liked: 762 times
Has Liked: 1855 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by morpheus2 » Thu May 25, 2017 10:32 pm

Imploding Turtle's Head wrote:Remember, it was you that asked "Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology?" But now you seem to think we should only scrutinise the ideology you want us to scrutinise.

So i guess your answer would be "Yeah, but only one of them. So lets talk about Isl... wait, what are you doing? No!!! You're doing it wrong!!! Talk only about this one!" Followed by one stomped foot, crossed arms and a killer frown.

Were the hints in the OP, and the timing of the post too subtle for you to realise what the particular ideology in question was? Why would we want to talk about the reasons Christians burn witches 600 years ago so soon after another Muslim has committed another mass murder in the name of Islam? This is one of your favourite tricks, trolling posts that you disagree with and swamping them with irrelevant semantics and completely derailing the topic. I don't have as much time on my hands as you, my day has just finished, I don't really have time for your games, you have succeeded with your diversionary tactics and turned another thread which posed a reasonable question into petty squabbles and no doubt soon to be deleted, well done, I hope you are happy, have a gold star *

Claret-On-A-T-Rex
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 837 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by Claret-On-A-T-Rex » Thu May 25, 2017 10:34 pm

BANANAS ARE EVIL!

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by Imploding Turtle » Thu May 25, 2017 10:39 pm

Bananas are not evil, they're proof of God.

This link does not contain satire.

RingoMcCartney
Posts: 10318
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
Been Liked: 2636 times
Has Liked: 2798 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by RingoMcCartney » Thu May 25, 2017 10:43 pm

"There is no limit to the number of terrorists I'd rather commit atrocities than have us abandon the principle of human rights."
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8023
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2819 times
Has Liked: 503 times
Location: Earth

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by ClaretAndJew » Thu May 25, 2017 10:59 pm

Bit of a disgusting thing to say that Ringo
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by Imploding Turtle » Thu May 25, 2017 11:00 pm

Yeah Ringo! You should probably be taken in for questioning and be put on watch lists.

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8023
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2819 times
Has Liked: 503 times
Location: Earth

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by ClaretAndJew » Thu May 25, 2017 11:01 pm

Just reported that to the police.

Log number 1332 with today's date.

PutTheWheelieBinsOut
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:35 pm
Been Liked: 194 times
Has Liked: 16 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by PutTheWheelieBinsOut » Thu May 25, 2017 11:18 pm

Claret-On-A-T-Rex wrote:There are 1.5 BILLION Muslims in the world. Blaming them or their religion for an atrocity committed by 1 makes you sound like a complete idiot. In fact, it makes you sound exactly like you're saying one of the completely idiotic things below...

"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a biscuit will choke and die. Biscuits are evil".

"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who washes their car will be killed by slipping on the wet, soapy floor. Cars are evil".

"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a banana will have an allergic reaction and die. Bananas are evil".

So when you're slapping your fist into your hand and spouting sh1t about Muslims with great conviction and emphasis remember, you look like someone shouting "Bananas are evil. Bananas are evil. BANANAS ARE EVIL!".

In other words, you look like a complete moron. The only people on your side are other morons. There may be loads of people who share the same, stupid, ill-informed opinion. Congratulations, you're in an army of morons.
A reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnOF7y-KuHE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

cloughyclaret
Posts: 307
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:04 pm
Been Liked: 125 times
Has Liked: 458 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by cloughyclaret » Thu May 25, 2017 11:26 pm

Claret-On-A-T-Rex wrote:There are 1.5 BILLION Muslims in the world. Blaming them or their religion for an atrocity committed by 1 makes you sound like a complete idiot. In fact, it makes you sound exactly like you're saying one of the completely idiotic things below...

"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a biscuit will choke and die. Biscuits are evil".

"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who washes their car will be killed by slipping on the wet, soapy floor. Cars are evil".

"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a banana will have an allergic reaction and die. Bananas are evil".

So when you're slapping your fist into your hand and spouting sh1t about Muslims with great conviction and emphasis remember, you look like someone shouting "Bananas are evil. Bananas are evil. BANANAS ARE EVIL!".

In other words, you look like a complete moron. The only people on your side are other morons. There may be loads of people who share the same, stupid, ill-informed opinion. Congratulations, you're in an army of morons.
We need to start a classics sticky.
This user liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by Imploding Turtle » Thu May 25, 2017 11:28 pm

PutTheWheelieBinsOut wrote:A reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnOF7y-KuHE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That's a good response. You should remember what she says about the peaceful majority of all those nations, and how we didn't blame them for what the ones with the weapons did.

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8023
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2819 times
Has Liked: 503 times
Location: Earth

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by ClaretAndJew » Thu May 25, 2017 11:30 pm

I'd also like to add, to the YouTube response.

Germany and Russia are countries, with power, with armies, able to mobilise tanks and trained troops.

Islam is not. Yes, they can get weapons, but they can't all mobilise and march as units, they can't go to war with a country.

RingoMcCartney
Posts: 10318
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
Been Liked: 2636 times
Has Liked: 2798 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by RingoMcCartney » Thu May 25, 2017 11:39 pm

ClaretAndJew wrote:Bit of a disgusting thing to say that Ringo

You misunderstand mate.

I was quoting what turtles Head said on here in January

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by Imploding Turtle » Thu May 25, 2017 11:41 pm

RingoMcCartney wrote:You misunderstand mate.

I was quoting what turtles Head said on here in January

I'm pretty sure he knew that. :lol:

Dazzler
Posts: 4425
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:10 am
Been Liked: 881 times
Has Liked: 2334 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by Dazzler » Fri May 26, 2017 2:38 pm

I posted this sometime ago but I think it got deleted so I was quite reluctant to re-post it...anyway here goes,,a bit more scrutinising from brigitte.

https://youtu.be/guXBTgAxhIw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

RingoMcCartney
Posts: 10318
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
Been Liked: 2636 times
Has Liked: 2798 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by RingoMcCartney » Fri May 26, 2017 3:02 pm

Is this actually a woman

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... apons.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

RingoMcCartney
Posts: 10318
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
Been Liked: 2636 times
Has Liked: 2798 times

Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology

Post by RingoMcCartney » Fri May 26, 2017 3:13 pm

More on the same-

http://www.westmonster.com/channel-4-in ... n-t-shirt/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Post Reply