I haven't seen Blazing Saddles.Lancasterclaret wrote:There is no greater sign of this board going downhill than a perfectly good and perfectly timed Blazing Saddles quote being ignored by 99% of the contributors.
Its a sad day
Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
Frankly, I'm not surprised
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
****Lancasterclaret wrote:Frankly, I'm not surprised
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
Only four stars? How can you rate a film you haven't seen?Imploding Turtle wrote:****
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle
-
- Posts: 3889
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
- Been Liked: 1216 times
- Has Liked: 807 times
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
I've never even heard of it
Before my time?
Before my time?
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 837 times
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
There are 1.5 BILLION Muslims in the world. Blaming them or their religion for an atrocity committed by 1 makes you sound like a complete idiot. In fact, it makes you sound exactly like you're saying one of the completely idiotic things below...
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a biscuit will choke and die. Biscuits are evil".
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who washes their car will be killed by slipping on the wet, soapy floor. Cars are evil".
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a banana will have an allergic reaction and die. Bananas are evil".
So when you're slapping your fist into your hand and spouting sh1t about Muslims with great conviction and emphasis remember, you look like someone shouting "Bananas are evil. Bananas are evil. BANANAS ARE EVIL!".
In other words, you look like a complete moron. The only people on your side are other morons. There may be loads of people who share the same, stupid, ill-informed opinion. Congratulations, you're in an army of morons.
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a biscuit will choke and die. Biscuits are evil".
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who washes their car will be killed by slipping on the wet, soapy floor. Cars are evil".
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a banana will have an allergic reaction and die. Bananas are evil".
So when you're slapping your fist into your hand and spouting sh1t about Muslims with great conviction and emphasis remember, you look like someone shouting "Bananas are evil. Bananas are evil. BANANAS ARE EVIL!".
In other words, you look like a complete moron. The only people on your side are other morons. There may be loads of people who share the same, stupid, ill-informed opinion. Congratulations, you're in an army of morons.
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
Imploding Turtle's Head wrote:Remember, it was you that asked "Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology?" But now you seem to think we should only scrutinise the ideology you want us to scrutinise.
So i guess your answer would be "Yeah, but only one of them. So lets talk about Isl... wait, what are you doing? No!!! You're doing it wrong!!! Talk only about this one!" Followed by one stomped foot, crossed arms and a killer frown.
Were the hints in the OP, and the timing of the post too subtle for you to realise what the particular ideology in question was? Why would we want to talk about the reasons Christians burn witches 600 years ago so soon after another Muslim has committed another mass murder in the name of Islam? This is one of your favourite tricks, trolling posts that you disagree with and swamping them with irrelevant semantics and completely derailing the topic. I don't have as much time on my hands as you, my day has just finished, I don't really have time for your games, you have succeeded with your diversionary tactics and turned another thread which posed a reasonable question into petty squabbles and no doubt soon to be deleted, well done, I hope you are happy, have a gold star *
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 837 times
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
BANANAS ARE EVIL!
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
"There is no limit to the number of terrorists I'd rather commit atrocities than have us abandon the principle of human rights."
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle
-
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2819 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
Bit of a disgusting thing to say that Ringo
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
Yeah Ringo! You should probably be taken in for questioning and be put on watch lists.
-
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2819 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
Just reported that to the police.
Log number 1332 with today's date.
Log number 1332 with today's date.
-
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:35 pm
- Been Liked: 194 times
- Has Liked: 16 times
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
A replyClaret-On-A-T-Rex wrote:There are 1.5 BILLION Muslims in the world. Blaming them or their religion for an atrocity committed by 1 makes you sound like a complete idiot. In fact, it makes you sound exactly like you're saying one of the completely idiotic things below...
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a biscuit will choke and die. Biscuits are evil".
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who washes their car will be killed by slipping on the wet, soapy floor. Cars are evil".
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a banana will have an allergic reaction and die. Bananas are evil".
So when you're slapping your fist into your hand and spouting sh1t about Muslims with great conviction and emphasis remember, you look like someone shouting "Bananas are evil. Bananas are evil. BANANAS ARE EVIL!".
In other words, you look like a complete moron. The only people on your side are other morons. There may be loads of people who share the same, stupid, ill-informed opinion. Congratulations, you're in an army of morons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnOF7y-KuHE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:04 pm
- Been Liked: 125 times
- Has Liked: 458 times
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
We need to start a classics sticky.Claret-On-A-T-Rex wrote:There are 1.5 BILLION Muslims in the world. Blaming them or their religion for an atrocity committed by 1 makes you sound like a complete idiot. In fact, it makes you sound exactly like you're saying one of the completely idiotic things below...
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a biscuit will choke and die. Biscuits are evil".
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who washes their car will be killed by slipping on the wet, soapy floor. Cars are evil".
"1 in every 1.5 BILLION people who eats a banana will have an allergic reaction and die. Bananas are evil".
So when you're slapping your fist into your hand and spouting sh1t about Muslims with great conviction and emphasis remember, you look like someone shouting "Bananas are evil. Bananas are evil. BANANAS ARE EVIL!".
In other words, you look like a complete moron. The only people on your side are other morons. There may be loads of people who share the same, stupid, ill-informed opinion. Congratulations, you're in an army of morons.
This user liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
That's a good response. You should remember what she says about the peaceful majority of all those nations, and how we didn't blame them for what the ones with the weapons did.PutTheWheelieBinsOut wrote:A reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnOF7y-KuHE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2819 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
I'd also like to add, to the YouTube response.
Germany and Russia are countries, with power, with armies, able to mobilise tanks and trained troops.
Islam is not. Yes, they can get weapons, but they can't all mobilise and march as units, they can't go to war with a country.
Germany and Russia are countries, with power, with armies, able to mobilise tanks and trained troops.
Islam is not. Yes, they can get weapons, but they can't all mobilise and march as units, they can't go to war with a country.
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
ClaretAndJew wrote:Bit of a disgusting thing to say that Ringo
You misunderstand mate.
I was quoting what turtles Head said on here in January
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
RingoMcCartney wrote:You misunderstand mate.
I was quoting what turtles Head said on here in January
I'm pretty sure he knew that.
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
I posted this sometime ago but I think it got deleted so I was quite reluctant to re-post it...anyway here goes,,a bit more scrutinising from brigitte.
https://youtu.be/guXBTgAxhIw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://youtu.be/guXBTgAxhIw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
Is this actually a woman
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... apons.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... apons.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Should we be allowed to scrutinise an ideology
More on the same-
http://www.westmonster.com/channel-4-in ... n-t-shirt/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.westmonster.com/channel-4-in ... n-t-shirt/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;