Rooney v Vardy

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by MACCA » Thu Oct 10, 2019 1:21 pm

SammyBoy wrote:This story is a bit like that bit in the film The Departed where they leak disinformation to certain people in an attempt to flush out the rat :lol: :lol:

Rebekahs rat probably does need a good flushing out :o :lol:

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by tim_noone » Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:22 pm

A rendition of.... There's only one Coleen Rooney would be quite amusing At Leicester .
This user liked this post: Bosscat

Bosscat
Posts: 25530
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8485 times
Has Liked: 18202 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Bosscat » Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:31 pm

Coleen Coleen Coleen Collleeeen

Coleen Coleen Collleeeen

Coleen Coleen Coleen Collleeeen

Coleen Coleen Collleeeennnnn

To the tune "amazing grace" would be funny as ****

PhilC
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:37 pm
Been Liked: 40 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by PhilC » Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:33 pm

Foreverly Claret wrote:YOU CAN'T POLISH A TURD !!!
But you can roll it in glitter

Pimlico_Claret
Posts: 1302
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 614 times
Has Liked: 680 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Pimlico_Claret » Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:17 pm

PhilC wrote:But you can roll it in glitter
You can cover both of these two brain dead bimbos in full body glitter, and I still wouldn't touch them with someone else's turd.
This user liked this post: Bosscat

basil6345789
Posts: 2713
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
Been Liked: 482 times
Has Liked: 2292 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by basil6345789 » Fri Oct 11, 2019 10:49 am

Only way to resolve this is to have the pair of them wrestling naked in a big ring of syrup. Film, it, sell it then donate the proceeds to a children's's charity.
This user liked this post: tim_noone

Hibsclaret
Posts: 3956
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1239 times
Has Liked: 491 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Hibsclaret » Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:41 am

Market as the Shrektoe Derby

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10307
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3337 times
Has Liked: 1954 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:34 pm

“Interesting” turn of events being reported on this one this week.

Such a shame Vardy’s messages mysteriously disappeared and her agent dropped her phone into the North Sea.

LS7
Posts: 625
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 9:42 pm
Been Liked: 125 times
Has Liked: 76 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by LS7 » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:04 pm

Yeah. Vardy clearly caught red handed. Pathetic to deny it really.

NRC
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
Been Liked: 908 times
Has Liked: 107 times
Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by NRC » Tue Oct 04, 2022 9:02 pm

Vardy ordered to pay Rooney 1.5m in costs

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3324
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 1094 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Boss Hogg » Tue Oct 04, 2022 9:35 pm

Both daft cows imo. The thicker of the two lost.

Middle-agedClaret
Posts: 1048
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 315 times
Has Liked: 1099 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Middle-agedClaret » Tue Oct 04, 2022 10:04 pm

Boss Hogg wrote:
Tue Oct 04, 2022 9:35 pm
Both daft cows imo. The thicker of the two lost.
I don’t think Colleen Rooney was in any way daft.
She voiced her evidence- based suspicions about Vardy’s behaviour. Vardy began the legal action. Rooney gave her every opportunity to settle. Vardy ploughed on, failed to prove libel, was deemed an unreliable witness, and had Rooneys costs awarded against her.
Nothing “thick” in Rooneys behaviour there.
These 2 users liked this post: Burnley Ace Colburn_Claret

beddie
Posts: 5207
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1406 times
Has Liked: 518 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by beddie » Tue Oct 04, 2022 10:09 pm

Boss Hogg wrote:
Tue Oct 04, 2022 9:35 pm
Both daft cows imo. The thicker of the two lost.
“ What does thick girls mean? The term thick girls is used for women who are considered especially attractive due to their voluptuous or curvaceous figures.” :)

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by tiger76 » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:07 am

Is this farce still going on the lawyers must be loving it.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6944
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1485 times
Has Liked: 1846 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Woodleyclaret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:16 am

Can we stop covering bullshit about these sad loosers please
It's a Burnley supporters site not the Sun newspaper.

Ric_C
Posts: 2067
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
Been Liked: 752 times
Has Liked: 122 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Ric_C » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:22 am

They maybe sad, but I'm not sure how loose they are? :roll:

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5117
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1618 times
Has Liked: 890 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by BurnleyFC » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:24 am

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again - I wouldn’t touch Rebekah Vardy with someone else’s dick.

She’s properly dog rough.

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Top Claret » Wed Oct 05, 2022 1:00 pm

Rebekah Vardy husband must be as daft as a brush and thick as mince marrying her. If I was him I would be consulting my lawyers to see if there is anyway she could stand the settlement in a divorce as it is her mess

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3549
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 654 times
Has Liked: 2894 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Burnley Ace » Wed Oct 05, 2022 3:25 pm

Interesting comments by the Judge. Vardy pays 90% of the costs (interim £800k by 14th Nov) and she is paying on an indemnity basis because she deleted or destroyed evidence! She did get a 10% discount though!

beddie
Posts: 5207
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1406 times
Has Liked: 518 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by beddie » Wed Oct 05, 2022 4:01 pm

Weird, Vardy loses, has to pay 90% costs, is told her evidence wasn’t plausible, destroyed evidence etc, So presumably Rooney although not seeking compensation still has to pay 10%. Vardy in my opinion should have had to pay 100% of the costs and be grateful to Rooney.

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3549
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 654 times
Has Liked: 2894 times

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Burnley Ace » Wed Oct 05, 2022 4:50 pm

beddie wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 4:01 pm
Weird, Vardy loses, has to pay 90% costs, is told her evidence wasn’t plausible, destroyed evidence etc, So presumably Rooney although not seeking compensation still has to pay 10%. Vardy in my opinion should have had to pay 100% of the costs and be grateful to Rooney.
The reason for the 10% is that there had been some overlap of issues and Brady’s success in the truth defence? I don’t think you would ever get 100% of your costs in these type of cases.

Guppyspotter
Posts: 219
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 64 times
Has Liked: 9 times
Location: Bristol
Contact:

Re: Rooney v Vardy

Post by Guppyspotter » Wed Oct 05, 2022 7:25 pm

We're some of the costs pre action and therefore not recoverable?

Post Reply