ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
-
- Posts: 30273
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 10916 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Jingle Bells Jingle Bells Jingle ALK
These 3 users liked this post: randomclaret2 bfcjg Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 9845
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2344 times
- Has Liked: 3164 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Hi Bfc, I know CT and Goddy have both provided answers. Let me also try to answer.Bfc wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:35 pmWithout trawling through all the posts relating to the takeover, looking for possible answers. Could anyone say what affect a takeover would have on a shareholders ownership?. Also would there likely be an increase in the value of each share, if the takeover values Burnley Football Club at £200m. Finally would a shareholder have a say in whether they could keep a shareholding, after a takeover, or it's a decision decided by the new owners.
1) I believe that the reported £200m is to buy the club, not just MG's shares (or MG + JB). None of the media reports has suggested it is only for MG's shares;
2) The Board of Directors will vote either to accept or reject the offer from ALK;
3) If the BoD is split, i.e. a director opposes the sale, MG and JB have the vast majority of shareholder votes and can force out any director, should it be required, to ensure BoD votes in favour of ALK's offer. (There have been a few posts earlier that suggested there may be different opinions amongst the directors. I don't think any director can stop this happening - or should stop this happening;
4) I don't know whether the BoD can force all other shareholders to sell their (small number) of shares to ALK. I'd expect all shareholders to have the opportunity to sell their shares to ALK - and to receive the same price per share as MG and JB.
5) I don't know why any small shareholder would decline to sell their share - it won't be worth much if they don't sell it when the offer is available (minority shareholdings can not influence/change corporate decisions).
6) Of course, we haven't been informed of the details of any deal. £200 million is a number reported in the media - this may not be the final number.
So, if you own 1 share - your share is now worth £1,500 (or more).
We've seen new companies Alan Pace has set up, Calder Vale and Kettering Holdings. Once the new corporate structures are known it may be that there is the opportunity to buy shares in Burnley FC's new owners - and may give the opportunity for any existing (small) shareholders in BFC to become shareholders in the new owners.
Of course, I should as always qualify my post by declaring I know nothing about what is being negotiated/discussed re BFC's ownership - and my only sources of info are the media reports (all on this thread) and the other comments by posters on this thread.
Exciting times.
UTC
-
- Posts: 2587
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 672 times
- Has Liked: 244 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Actually, I think CT has certainly inferred that he knows what the hold ups were and he also answered my question with "I'm fairly confident I do but I'm not certain so wouldn't wish to comment" which goes further to suggest he thinks he knows what the hold ups have been.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 3:40 pmHow do you expect Tony to answer JT? At no point has CT inferred that he knew what the hold up was, which suggests he is not privy to that information.
I was only asking because I'm genuinely interested to find out what they were and was hoping he would be comfortable letting us all know this once the deal has been completed.....but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
-
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 5:54 pm
- Been Liked: 134 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Question for CT, if as it now seems all the problems with the sale have been ironed out, in your personal opinion can you see any reason PL approval would not be granted
-
- Posts: 67422
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32237 times
- Has Liked: 5253 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
That's a good question. I can think of many reasons why they wouldn't have approved Chris Farnell but I really couldn't offer an opinion on anyone else from either of the bids. The people I've spoken to have suggested there shouldn't be one but we will have to wait and see. I've not been given anything to indicate their might be a problem, there must be no dodgy lawyers or Saudi princes involved.claret3561 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:01 pmQuestion for CT, if as it now seems all the problems with the sale have been ironed out, in your personal opinion can you see any reason PL approval would not be granted
-
- Posts: 8922
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 1983 times
- Has Liked: 2872 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Yes I get that JT we’re all in the same boat on that, just saying anyone can speculate... but it takes us no further.Jakubs Tash wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 4:55 pmActually, I think CT has certainly inferred that he knows what the hold ups were and he also answered my question with "I'm fairly confident I do but I'm not certain so wouldn't wish to comment" which goes further to suggest he thinks he knows what the hold ups have been.
I was only asking because I'm genuinely interested to find out what they were and was hoping he would be comfortable letting us all know this once the deal has been completed.....but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
-
- Posts: 19167
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
They will want to know who is/are the ultimate money person/people and whether they will make the required guarantees to uphold Premier League rules and regs - this is what killed the Saudi bid - will be a bit more complex as ALK has multiple interests,claret3561 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:01 pmQuestion for CT, if as it now seems all the problems with the sale have been ironed out, in your personal opinion can you see any reason PL approval would not be granted
I will say I very much doubt the money is coming from a SPAC - more likely Private Equity, in a perfect world it would be a single family office.
All that said I remain uneasy about the takeover
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Uneasy...about what in particular?Chester Perry wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 6:10 pmThey will want to know who is/are the ultimate money person/people and whether they will make the required guarantees to uphold Premier League rules and regs - this is what killed the Saudi bid - will be a bit more complex as ALK has multiple interests,
I will say I very much doubt the money is coming from a SPAC - more likely Private Equity, in a perfect world it would be a single family office.
All that said I remain uneasy about the takeover
-
- Posts: 9845
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2344 times
- Has Liked: 3164 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
In contrast to CP, I'm not "uneasy" about a takeover by ALK. At this stage the only person that we know identified with ALK is Alan Pace - and we know that he has been an investment banker, plus his link to Salt Lake City. I agree that we don't yet know where the money will come from. I make no distinction between "private equity" and a "single family office" - for all intents and purposes they can be exactly the same thing, a single family being the only investors in a private equity vehicle. I can agree that, at this stage, we are not seeing anything that suggests this will be a SPAC investment, if only because we have no identity for a Special Purpose Acquisition Corporation that has already been funded and is waiting for the target Premier League club to become available for them to acquire. However, I believe there is evidence that the US equity markets are interested in owning Premier League football clubs and it may well be that a SPAC is somewhere in the future for BFC... and, I see no reason to be concerned if this is the case.Chester Perry wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 6:10 pmThey will want to know who is/are the ultimate money person/people and whether they will make the required guarantees to uphold Premier League rules and regs - this is what killed the Saudi bid - will be a bit more complex as ALK has multiple interests,
I will say I very much doubt the money is coming from a SPAC - more likely Private Equity, in a perfect world it would be a single family office.
All that said I remain uneasy about the takeover
Exciting times.
UTC
-
- Posts: 3271
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 690 times
- Has Liked: 172 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Like most other supporters i have been following this thread with a great deal of interest and been trying to view all the shenanigans through a different perspective in order to obtain, what i think, is a logical reason for the takeover.
The recent post by Chester saying he's a bit uneasy comes as no surprise.
My predication on who is the person orchestrating the takeover, using ALK as a front, is a current director.
The recent post by Chester saying he's a bit uneasy comes as no surprise.
My predication on who is the person orchestrating the takeover, using ALK as a front, is a current director.
This user liked this post: StuffyClaret
-
- Posts: 6880
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2742 times
- Has Liked: 4314 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
A current Director is taking over ??
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
I will be pleasantly surprised if this comes off and not at all surprised if it doesn't.
Far to many conflicting reports to take anyone on this thread seriously
Far to many conflicting reports to take anyone on this thread seriously
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 3271
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 690 times
- Has Liked: 172 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Not in so many words. The club is currently owned by individuals.
After the takeover it will probably be a company.
This user liked this post: StuffyClaret
-
- Posts: 8922
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 1983 times
- Has Liked: 2872 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
... or someone that meets them regularly?Nonayforever wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 7:05 pmLike most other supporters i have been following this thread with a great deal of interest and been trying to view all the shenanigans through a different perspective in order to obtain, what i think, is a logical reason for the takeover.
The recent post by Chester saying he's a bit uneasy comes as no surprise.
My predication on who is the person orchestrating the takeover, using ALK as a front, is a current director.
(Pure speculation) = edit
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Pretty much my current thoughts too.Top Claret wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 7:11 pmI will be pleasantly surprised if this comes off and not at all surprised if it doesn't.
Far to many conflicting reports to take anyone on this thread seriously
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Wow, we had 4 days of sensible posts on this thread, its like the school has let out for the weekend. It will be done when its done.
-
- Posts: 3104
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:24 am
- Been Liked: 942 times
- Has Liked: 410 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Dont call it mad friday for nothing
-
- Posts: 67422
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32237 times
- Has Liked: 5253 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
I would be surprised if that was the caseNonayforever wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 7:05 pmMy predication on who is the person orchestrating the takeover, using ALK as a front, is a current director.
This user liked this post: randomclaret2
-
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 545 times
- Has Liked: 51 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Eagerly anticipating this conclusion!
UTC
UTC
-
- Posts: 3271
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 690 times
- Has Liked: 172 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Your article, when the takeover is all done and dusted, is going to make one hell of a fantastic read.
I would imagine a long lie down afterwards .
-
- Posts: 67422
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32237 times
- Has Liked: 5253 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
I doubt it to be honest - it will probably be a one liner with stuff to add later. But definitely a long like down afterwards and relief when Farnell is nowhere near it.Nonayforever wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 8:49 pmYour article, when the takeover is all done and dusted, is going to make one hell of a fantastic read.
I would imagine a long lie down afterwards .
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5154 times
- Has Liked: 795 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
-
- Posts: 6434
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 969 times
- Has Liked: 204 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Interesting comment from the MatchZone section of The Metro today previewing the Burnley v Wolves game next Monday:
"In the run-up to facing Aston Villa last night, Burnley had begun to look much more their normal selves with boss Sean Dyche not planning big changes next month."
Sean not expecting the takeover to go through in time?
"In the run-up to facing Aston Villa last night, Burnley had begun to look much more their normal selves with boss Sean Dyche not planning big changes next month."
Sean not expecting the takeover to go through in time?
-
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Playing it safe incase it doesn't.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
or man managing the players he has to make sure the dont feel inferior and demotivated?
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Or the reporter has no idea what’s going on at the club
This user liked this post: randomclaret2
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
This takeover thread is akin to the transfer rumour thread!
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Yes but who we sign up as owners?
This lot, other lot, when? How much? How long? Will they play out of their skin or just be here for the money?
Will Mr Garlick still be part of the board? Will he invest his surplus?
Every day a new day...and nothing concrete! Just like the windows!
This lot, other lot, when? How much? How long? Will they play out of their skin or just be here for the money?
Will Mr Garlick still be part of the board? Will he invest his surplus?
Every day a new day...and nothing concrete! Just like the windows!
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5154 times
- Has Liked: 795 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
IanMcL wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 10:20 pmYes but who we sign up as owners?
This lot, other lot, when? How much? How long? Will they play out of their skin or just be here for the money?
Will Mr Garlick still be part of the board? Will he invest his surplus?
Every day a new day...and nothing concrete! Just like the windows!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-voerxRSQ-M
This user liked this post: IanMcL
-
- Posts: 9845
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2344 times
- Has Liked: 3164 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
My take is that it is Sean Dyche preparing to spend every pound that the new owners provide - getting good value for that spend and keeping some of the additional funds to extend Tarky's contract and one or two others, where merited. Being "cool" on the need for new signings tells the market that we aren't going to be paying whatever the selling club thinks they can ask. It gives us "walk away" room, where there is better value elsewhere.kentonclaret wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 9:48 pmInteresting comment from the MatchZone section of The Metro today previewing the Burnley v Wolves game next Monday:
"In the run-up to facing Aston Villa last night, Burnley had begun to look much more their normal selves with boss Sean Dyche not planning big changes next month."
Sean not expecting the takeover to go through in time?
Splashing the cash is not a guarantee of success. It won't keep the Clarets in the Premier League if bringing in new players that are no better than the existing squad, but we've spent more than the existing squad feels is merited and maybe puts the new comers on higher wages than some of the existing first team starters and all we do is end up unsettling the team....Sean Dyche is a lot smarter than that. Evolution, not revolution.
Exciting times.
UTC
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5154 times
- Has Liked: 795 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Me thinks you're going to be very disappointed Paul.
-
- Posts: 6880
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2742 times
- Has Liked: 4314 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
What makes you say that ?
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
I think it may be a case if being told who is coming!
-
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 205 times
- Has Liked: 726 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Come on as paul waine says......Exciting times ..this is the first time in the clubs history that anything like this has happened ...mike garlick cares about the club and I'm sure he will sell to the people who will take the club to the next level
These 2 users liked this post: Paul Waine NewClaret
-
- Posts: 9845
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2344 times
- Has Liked: 3164 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Hi Ian, I doubt Mike Garlick will remain a part of the board. I doubt Mike Garlick will be given the opportunity to re-invest in the club alongside the new investors. If that had been the intention, we wouldn't have seen it reported that Burnley was in "takeover" discussion. It would have been reported that a new investor was buying shares in the club, some of those shares might have been bought from existing (major) shareholders, the majority would have been new shares. Similar style of deal as Leeds and the 49ers.IanMcL wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 10:20 pmYes but who we sign up as owners?
This lot, other lot, when? How much? How long? Will they play out of their skin or just be here for the money?
Will Mr Garlick still be part of the board? Will he invest his surplus?
Every day a new day...and nothing concrete! Just like the windows!
The recent media reports have mentioned Mike Garlick remaining in the short term to assist the new owners. Maybe there will be an "earn out" element in the final price paid for the club - based on remaining in the Premier League being the obvious performance target. If MG does remain, he won't be a board director.
This is just my reading of the Reuters report, which is supported by the other recent media reports.
As always, I add that I have no direct information on what's going on. I'm not "in the know" in that sense. I do not have contacts either in the club or with any party that may be involved in the takeover discussions.
Exciting times.
UTC
These 2 users liked this post: mill hill claret IanMcL
-
- Posts: 9845
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2344 times
- Has Liked: 3164 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Hi Bin Ont Turf. I guess we are all a little disappointed we've not been on t'Turf these past several months.
However, there's very little chance of me being disappointed. My glass is never less than half-full.
Whatever the outcome, it's been exciting times that Burnley are involved in these takeover activities with ALK. If this doesn't complete as we'd like it to, then we will move on to more exciting times.
UTC
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Dyche will undoubtedly play it cool regardless of what he knows or doesn’t.
But there’s no sense in trumpeting a takeover just before the window because it will inflate the asking price when we come calling.
I do wonder whether this ‘delay’ is just a ploy to drag it out into the window so we can get some business done without paying over the odds.
But there’s no sense in trumpeting a takeover just before the window because it will inflate the asking price when we come calling.
I do wonder whether this ‘delay’ is just a ploy to drag it out into the window so we can get some business done without paying over the odds.
This user liked this post: Paul Waine
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5154 times
- Has Liked: 795 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Just looking at the Premier League table and seeing no medium to small club like ours in there with foreign investment doing well (and never have).
Looking at our brand.
Only a bellend or someone with ulterior motives wants to buy a football club if they aren't a supporter of that club.
My sixth sense.
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5154 times
- Has Liked: 795 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
You keep that glass more than half full Paul. It never does any harm to be that way.Paul Waine wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 11:02 pmHi Bin Ont Turf. I guess we are all a little disappointed we've not been on t'Turf these past several months.
However, there's very little chance of me being disappointed. My glass is never less than half-full.
Whatever the outcome, it's been exciting times that Burnley are involved in these takeover activities with ALK. If this doesn't complete as we'd like it to, then we will move on to more exciting times.
UTC
This user liked this post: Paul Waine
-
- Posts: 9845
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2344 times
- Has Liked: 3164 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
There are only 20 places in the Premier League and Burnley are one of those 20 clubs. Most of the others (all the others?) have already got "wealthy" owners. Burnley is one of the few opportunities to take a "small" club and make positive changes - changes that our current major shareholders don't have the money to make.Bin Ont Turf wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 11:06 pmJust looking at the Premier League table and seeing no medium to small club like ours in there with foreign investment doing well (and never have).
Looking at our brand.
Only a bellend or someone with ulterior motives wants to buy a football club if they aren't a supporter of that club.
My sixth sense.
Moves to build Burnley's brand started in the US over 2 years ago - when the US media started taking notice of the club. So far as the US is concerned, Burnley is part of the same "metro city" district as Manchester and Liverpool. Can you imaging buying one of the 5 Premier League clubs in that "Metro-city" district - also known as the Northern Powerhouse.
Buy in early before someone else gets there and the opportunity is gone - or the price moves up so high that it's moved out of your league.
Yes, Exciting times.
UTC
This user liked this post: IanMcL
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
I think that is the key points made Paul.
The size of Burnley worldwide is irrelevant. We are 1 of the 20 who happen to be called Burnley.
Our overseas sponsorship possibilities are the same as others. The major difference is the size of the crowd we can attract to matches. That does not exclude sales to the world market.
Fingers crossed.
The size of Burnley worldwide is irrelevant. We are 1 of the 20 who happen to be called Burnley.
Our overseas sponsorship possibilities are the same as others. The major difference is the size of the crowd we can attract to matches. That does not exclude sales to the world market.
Fingers crossed.
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5154 times
- Has Liked: 795 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
I like your positivity Paul even if it's stretched.Paul Waine wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 11:16 pmThere are only 20 places in the Premier League and Burnley are one of those 20 clubs. Most of the others (all the others?) have already got "wealthy" owners. Burnley is one of the few opportunities to take a "small" club and make positive changes - changes that our current major shareholders don't have the money to make.
Moves to build Burnley's brand started in the US over 2 years ago - when the US media started taking notice of the club. So far as the US is concerned, Burnley is part of the same "metro city" district as Manchester and Liverpool. Can you imaging buying one of the 5 Premier League clubs in that "Metro-city" district - also known as the Northern Powerhouse.
Buy in early before someone else gets there and the opportunity is gone - or the price moves up so high that it's moved out of your league.
Yes, Exciting times.
UTC
I just hope that when it goes pear shaped that I'm dead by then.
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
I keep hearing about this next level, what actually is it ? Is it sustainable year after year with our fan base plus outside investment against clubs who get a lot more on plus outside investment.
-
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 205 times
- Has Liked: 726 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Tho board at this present moment are going to struggle to keep us at this level
The new owners rumoured to be paying 200m ...why would they pay that amount of money ..not invest ..go down and be worth less than what they paid for us
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Ok, so what is the next level ?mill hill claret wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 11:48 pmTho board at this present moment are going to struggle to keep us at this level
The new owners rumoured to be paying 200m ...why would they pay that amount of money ..not invest ..go down and be worth less than what they paid for us
-
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 205 times
- Has Liked: 726 times
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Maybe replace an ageing squad with a younger squad ....better players than what we have now
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5154 times
- Has Liked: 795 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: ALK Capital or Farnell/Elkashashy takeover
Yes that is the question, why would they pay that sort of money for us?mill hill claret wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 11:48 pmTho board at this present moment are going to struggle to keep us at this level
The new owners rumoured to be paying 200m ...why would they pay that amount of money ..not invest ..go down and be worth less than what they paid for us
Why?