fao those who continue to question the moderation

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Locked
ClaretTony
Posts: 67783
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32405 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by ClaretTony » Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:22 pm

Please read para 5 at this thread

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=51350

Inchy
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1333 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Inchy » Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:28 pm

Thanks for the good work.

I need moderating from time to time when I get excited.

Merry Xmas

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8022
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2819 times
Has Liked: 503 times
Location: Earth

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by ClaretAndJew » Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:29 pm

Time to implement an online ID system where all those of us who wish to continue to post should verify their identity. This would hopefully rid the board of trolls.

Bosscat
Posts: 25550
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8488 times
Has Liked: 18214 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Bosscat » Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:31 pm

Had a new Train set delivered this morning for our Grandsons christmas present ...

Should have read thd small print 😏
IMG-20201224-WA0001.jpg
IMG-20201224-WA0001.jpg (225.13 KiB) Viewed 3800 times
These 5 users liked this post: Frenchclaret conyoviejo lesxdp KateR IanMcL

Inchy
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1333 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Inchy » Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:32 pm

ClaretAndJew wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:29 pm
Time to implement an online ID system where all those of us who wish to continue to post should verify their identity. This would hopefully rid the board of trolls.


Nice idea in principle but I imagine there will be some awkward laws to navigate when holding people’s personal information

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8022
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2819 times
Has Liked: 503 times
Location: Earth

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by ClaretAndJew » Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:33 pm

Inchy wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:32 pm
Nice idea in principle but I imagine there will be some awkward laws to navigate when holding people’s personal information
Correct.

Essentially it's the concept of "digital passports". We verify our ID with a place that then stores the information whilst this board doesn't have "access" to it they know it's genuine.

ksrclaret
Posts: 6897
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2540 times
Has Liked: 766 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by ksrclaret » Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:37 pm

This board has seemed far more pleasant since the decision was made to get rid of political stuff, albeit much quieter.

The topic really does bring out the worst in people at the moment, and I certainly include myself in that. Nice to have somewhere to just discuss football.
These 3 users liked this post: Quicknick tiger76 superdimitri

elwaclaret
Posts: 8985
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2009 times
Has Liked: 2904 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by elwaclaret » Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:43 pm

I try to avoid gett8ng involved in contentious stuff generally but occasionally get dragged in at times of stress. I think in general the moderation is far better now.... God forbid we ever return to how embarrassing ClaretsMad got at its height... I took years off the board as a result of every post resulting in sniping. It got completely unenjoyable to discuss anything.
These 2 users liked this post: FactualFrank superdimitri

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by tiger76 » Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:57 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:37 pm
This board has seemed far more pleasant since the decision was made to get rid of political stuff, albeit much quieter.

The topic really does bring out the worst in people at the moment, and I certainly include myself in that. Nice to have somewhere to just discuss football.
Yes I'd agree it's generally a more pleasant place, and the UTC posters are having to use their imaginations more, and this has produced some really interesting threads, that perhaps under normal circumstances we wouldn't have been able to enjoy.

The whole on concept of any political discourse immediately brings out the worst elements on all sides, and I can't totally claim I'm immune from that, so it's best for all concerned if we just agree to disagree, and find some more positive topics to discuss.

Of course the new rules don't mean you are limited to just discussing football, but they do remove a lot of the more volatile topics, where arguments are more likely to spill over, if people want to debate such topics there is plenty of other places for them to do so until their hearts content.

Is it much quieter?, I haven't detected a huge difference in users and threads, but then I'm not always on during the normal working week.

Matchdays will naturally attract traffic I guess, and I assume that's when the boards at it's busiest. Which is as it should be,
This user liked this post: superdimitri

Silkyskills1
Posts: 5870
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1695 times
Has Liked: 2531 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Silkyskills1 » Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:58 pm

I've slipped once or twice into 'contentious issues' but fully understand and appreciate the excellent work that goes on to keep this board working. Lots of good discussion points on here which have helped with my health problems in the last 18 months. Again, thanks and merry Christmas to everyone who contributes

Zom Zom
Posts: 1771
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 688 times
Has Liked: 917 times
Location: The Park

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Zom Zom » Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:08 pm

Moderating can be a thankless task at times.
After the advert overdose that became the old Mad site, I'm just grateful those with the desire and time to create another board did so.

Keep on Tony. It's much appreciated.

Burnley1989
Posts: 7389
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2293 times
Has Liked: 2166 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Burnley1989 » Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:10 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:37 pm
This board has seemed far more pleasant since the decision was made to get rid of political stuff, albeit much quieter.

The topic really does bring out the worst in people at the moment, and I certainly include myself in that. Nice to have somewhere to just discuss football.
I agree, the board has felt like it’s dieing a bit recently but I honestly think things will pick up once those posters that stopped posting due to the trolls and trouble makers return.

williamjblazkowicz
Posts: 380
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 6:21 pm
Been Liked: 176 times
Has Liked: 8 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by williamjblazkowicz » Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:21 pm

ClaretAndJew wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:29 pm
Time to implement an online ID system where all those of us who wish to continue to post should verify their identity. This would hopefully rid the board of trolls.
Why should people have to sacrifice their online privacy and anonymity just because a small minority can't behave themselves?

elwaclaret
Posts: 8985
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2009 times
Has Liked: 2904 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by elwaclaret » Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:29 pm

williamjblazkowicz wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:21 pm
Why should people have to sacrifice their online privacy and anonymity just because a small minority can't behave themselves?
Agree but one thing that has never been replicated was the regular get togethers we used to have organised by Tony and others... it is supervising how tone of voice changes when we have more understanding of the person behind the keyboard. I don’t think some level of ID above IP is unreasonable. Many of us know each other, just do not realise we know each other.

Steve1956
Posts: 17246
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6485 times
Has Liked: 2910 times
Location: Fife

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Steve1956 » Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:36 pm

I dont know what went on on the joke thread it was just a bit of light hearted fun ..but if we cant have a laugh...some of those jokes on there you certainly couldn't laugh at😊....so be it,there are questions I'd like to ask but I'll just keep stum and go with the flow.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Stanbill05
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:48 pm
Been Liked: 140 times
Has Liked: 54 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Stanbill05 » Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:43 pm

It might seem quieter, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who wanted nothing to do with the toxic version of UTC who is now reading and occasionally posting again...

Nobody wants sterile, but something needed to be done to salvage this board and bring it a little closer to being civilised.
These 2 users liked this post: superdimitri Paul Waine

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18058
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3862 times
Has Liked: 2070 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Quickenthetempo » Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:50 pm

When I first came accross Clarets Mad, I presume before CT took over. It had a Home End and Away End. The Home end was civil (ish) and the Away End was like the Wild West. Pure abuse and bad language to everyone. Normally opposition fans popping in.

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8022
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2819 times
Has Liked: 503 times
Location: Earth

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by ClaretAndJew » Thu Dec 24, 2020 4:13 pm

williamjblazkowicz wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:21 pm
Why should people have to sacrifice their online privacy and anonymity just because a small minority can't behave themselves?
Why do we have a right to online privacy?

superdimitri
Posts: 4955
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1007 times
Has Liked: 725 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by superdimitri » Thu Dec 24, 2020 4:15 pm

It's nice to see some people contributing again who otherwise we're put off by the hostility before. You get the impression now that people who post now are bigger fans of the club too.

mdd2
Posts: 6022
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1665 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by mdd2 » Thu Dec 24, 2020 4:39 pm

I get thst this is a football message board but there was some interesting material posted and the banning of certain topics has not necessarily improved the board because the problems come from the "singers, not the songs". Because there are fewer songs there have been fewer singers on here who have been out of tune or off key.
Merry Xmas to one and all.
These 2 users liked this post: Bosscat Siddo

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 10969
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5185 times
Has Liked: 803 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Thu Dec 24, 2020 4:55 pm

Twitter will be full of the missing posters shouting into an empty room.

Grumps
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 954 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Grumps » Thu Dec 24, 2020 4:59 pm

superdimitri wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 4:15 pm
It's nice to see some people contributing again who otherwise we're put off by the hostility before. You get the impression now that people who post now are bigger fans of the club too.
Bigger fans?

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by FactualFrank » Thu Dec 24, 2020 4:59 pm

To be fair, that's what Twitter is. Having a conversation with yourself, hoping that somebody else joins in.

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5119
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1619 times
Has Liked: 890 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by BurnleyFC » Thu Dec 24, 2020 5:02 pm

We really shouldn’t be joking at times like these. Not when people in the world are dying, and the birth of the baby Jesus too.

Paul Waine
Posts: 9902
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2350 times
Has Liked: 3178 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Paul Waine » Thu Dec 24, 2020 5:05 pm

ClaretAndJew wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:29 pm
Time to implement an online ID system where all those of us who wish to continue to post should verify their identity. This would hopefully rid the board of trolls.
I'd set up a system on all social media where posters are split between two groups:

(1) people who's identity has been verified and is disclosed to all those who "need to know," - ntk would include anyone that the posters interacts with, including addressing in their respective posts;

(2) posters who's identity hasn't been verified.

All social media platforms would give verified users the option to (a) only see posts from other verified users or (b) see all posters, from both verified and unverified users.

Maybe, over time, those choosing to be in group (2) will reduce in number and social media will become truly social.

Merry Christmas, everyone.

UTC

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 10969
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5185 times
Has Liked: 803 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Thu Dec 24, 2020 5:06 pm

Grumps wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 4:59 pm
Bigger fans?
He means fatties :D

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Lowbankclaret » Thu Dec 24, 2020 5:13 pm

I enjoyed being able to discuss other issues with fellow clarets other than the football. Sad we no longer can.
Never been a moderator but I do understand it must be a really difficult job to do for free.
The great thing about Britain has always been its freedom of speech.

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: fao those who continue to question the moderation

Post by Lowbankclaret » Thu Dec 24, 2020 5:18 pm

Paul Waine wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 5:05 pm
I'd set up a system on all social media where posters are split between two groups:

(1) people who's identity has been verified and is disclosed to all those who "need to know," - ntk would include anyone that the posters interacts with, including addressing in their respective posts;

(2) posters who's identity hasn't been verified.

All social media platforms would give verified users the option to (a) only see posts from other verified users or (b) see all posters, from both verified and unverified users.

Maybe, over time, those choosing to be in group (2) will reduce in number and social media will become truly social.

Merry Christmas, everyone.

UTC
Some other forums I am on are open forums where you just need an email address. The level 2 or premium forum you pay for, there is significantly less abuse and rule breaking on the premium services. Whilst there are still heated debates, it does not get abusive due to you get booted and never to rejoin.

Locked