Boxing

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Bcrollerz
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:32 pm
Been Liked: 25 times
Has Liked: 10 times

Boxing

Post by Bcrollerz » Sat Mar 27, 2021 10:46 pm

Who would you have down as your winner?

I think Whyte loses again

DCWat
Posts: 9296
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4131 times
Has Liked: 3599 times

Re: Boxing

Post by DCWat » Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:14 pm

Thought Whyte came across as a bit of a dick, walking over getting the stool and water bottle. He’d won, time to leave Povetkin to his trainers and then go over to him after that.

Did well Whyte though - that’s Povetkin retiring now.

Belial
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 320 times
Location: On a crazy train

Re: Boxing

Post by Belial » Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:17 pm

That final left hook would put lot of people down. He's quite exciting to watch, but he leaves himself too open imo to challenge the best the division
This user liked this post: DCWat

Burnley1989
Posts: 7346
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2275 times
Has Liked: 2154 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Burnley1989 » Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:35 pm

DCWat wrote:
Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:14 pm
Thought Whyte came across as a bit of a dick, walking over getting the stool and water bottle. He’d won, time to leave Povetkin to his trainers and then go over to him after that.

Did well Whyte though - that’s Povetkin retiring now.
Not at all, he’s not that guy! What would he gain, he always brings the big stool.


Bullied an old veteran and top fighter, I hope he destroys wilder in a big stadium fight later in the year and fights the winner of AJ/Fury after their two fights this time next year, I think he loses to both but I’d love to see him get his chance.

Those top two are much better than the rest at the minute but HW boxing anything can happen at that top 10 level

Burnley1989
Posts: 7346
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2275 times
Has Liked: 2154 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Burnley1989 » Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:37 pm

Belial wrote:
Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:17 pm
That final left hook would put lot of people down. He's quite exciting to watch, but he leaves himself too open imo to challenge the best the division
At the minute only the top two beat him for me, but some great British boxers on his heels

huw.Y.WattfromWare
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 1004 times
Has Liked: 905 times

Re: Boxing

Post by huw.Y.WattfromWare » Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:45 pm

I’m with the OP. Expected Povetkin to win but he looked slow and clumsy from the first bell.
It’s difficult to come back from a KO in a re-match but deserved win for Whyte.

Burnley1989
Posts: 7346
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2275 times
Has Liked: 2154 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Burnley1989 » Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:50 pm

huw.Y.WattfromWare wrote:
Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:45 pm
I’m with the OP. Expected Povetkin to win but he looked slow and clumsy from the first bell.
It’s difficult to come back from a KO in a re-match but deserved win for Whyte.
Looked like he was carrying an injury, doubt he wanted to call it off again and lose his £250k retirement fight

Had a great career, Olympic gold medalist

DCWat
Posts: 9296
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4131 times
Has Liked: 3599 times

Re: Boxing

Post by DCWat » Sun Mar 28, 2021 12:34 am

Burnley1989 wrote:
Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:35 pm
Not at all, he’s not that guy! What would he gain, he always brings the big stool.


Bullied an old veteran and top fighter, I hope he destroys wilder in a big stadium fight later in the year and fights the winner of AJ/Fury after their two fights this time next year, I think he loses to both but I’d love to see him get his chance.

Those top two are much better than the rest at the minute but HW boxing anything can happen at that top 10 level
I may have misread it, but it looked disrespectful. It’s his trainer and team’s responsibility to ensure that their fighter is medically OK and has what is required, not Whyte’s.

For me, it’d have been better to let them do their work, ensure that the fighter was OK and then go to shake hands etc.

I can’t see Whyte beating Wilder to get a shot at Joshua or Fury. He’s not disciplined enough. Only way I’d see him beating Wilder is if he managed to get a big punch in. I can’t see him out boxing Wilder, nor being disciplined enough to avoid being KO’d himself.

karatekid
Posts: 3129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1103 times
Has Liked: 316 times

Re: Boxing

Post by karatekid » Mon May 17, 2021 11:47 pm

It seems a judge in USA has ruled that fury must fight wilder in a 3rd meeting due to the contract. Before September.

Burnley1989
Posts: 7346
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2275 times
Has Liked: 2154 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Burnley1989 » Tue May 18, 2021 6:41 am

karatekid wrote:
Mon May 17, 2021 11:47 pm
It seems a judge in USA has ruled that fury must fight wilder in a 3rd meeting due to the contract. Before September.
You can’t force a man to fight, I’d imagine they will just give up the belt and crack on with the planned fight

Bcrollerz
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:32 pm
Been Liked: 25 times
Has Liked: 10 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Bcrollerz » Tue May 18, 2021 4:00 pm

Wilder wont be interested in a 3rd
Just wants the 20 mil to retire on

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Boxing

Post by tiger76 » Tue May 18, 2021 4:43 pm

Burnley1989 wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 6:41 am
You can’t force a man to fight, I’d imagine they will just give up the belt and crack on with the planned fight
Doubt that the Fury-Joshua fight wouldn't be a unified bout then would it, and that's what they're trying to sell isn't it.

I suspect they'll be some form of compromise probably around money, and then hopefully the much awaited Fury-Joshua contest will finally get the green light.

Richardsbfc
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:44 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 84 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Richardsbfc » Wed May 19, 2021 7:10 am

Burnley1989 wrote:
Tue May 18, 2021 6:41 am
You can’t force a man to fight, I’d imagine they will just give up the belt and crack on with the planned fight
Giving up the belt is irrelevant. It’s a contract fight regardless of belts. It’s all about the money.

Step aside money and Wilder to face the winner for all belts is his best option on the face of it.

s6t9a2f3f
Posts: 414
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 3:29 pm
Been Liked: 82 times

Re: Boxing

Post by s6t9a2f3f » Wed May 19, 2021 2:25 pm

Richardsbfc wrote:
Wed May 19, 2021 7:10 am
Giving up the belt is irrelevant. It’s a contract fight regardless of belts. It’s all about the money.

Step aside money and Wilder to face the winner for all belts is his best option on the face of it.

Difficult one really as the AJ v Fury is a 2 fight deal so ? 1 fight August, 1 fight before Xmas that takes you to spring 2022 for the next fight, if the 2 fights goes 1-1 who's the true undisputed ? waste of time this undisputed anyway as the champions last priority is mandatory fights they just want the mega super fights - so with 4 mandatories for 4 belts all wanting their shot - very messy. Although nothing to do with Eddie Hearn on the dispute with Fury - Wilder he could pay Wilder say 5 million and while waiting for his shot do a 2 fight deal of Whyte and Usky ? something like that to sweeten the pot. Just makes you laugh really that when AJ first became pro Hearn on the bandwagon urging the uk to get behind their man - and now their pimping out the 2 uk guys in a undisputed fight to the highest bidders - thanks for all your previous support guys.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Boxing

Post by tiger76 » Sun May 23, 2021 4:15 pm

Fury-Wilder III now confirmed for July.https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/57216611

So the Joshua bout will have to go on the backburner for now anyway.

karatekid
Posts: 3129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1103 times
Has Liked: 316 times

Re: Boxing

Post by karatekid » Sat May 29, 2021 10:10 am

Fury asked to ditch the belt and fight AJ as planned by his father. Probably good advice as he was totally focused on that and not training for wilder. Beat AJ then go back for Wilders belt. Wilder will land one eventually.

Untinted Glasses
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 132 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Untinted Glasses » Sat May 29, 2021 10:51 am

Richardsbfc wrote:
Wed May 19, 2021 7:10 am
Giving up the belt is irrelevant. It’s a contract fight regardless of belts. It’s all about the money.

Step aside money and Wilder to face the winner for all belts is his best option on the face of it.
I am pretty sure you are wrong there. My understanding is he can give up the belt that has the rematch contract with it and fight who he wants. His dad John Fury is advising him to give up the belts and face AJ but he's not listening. There's a good video clip on YouTube with him talking about it for around 10 minutes.
This user liked this post: Richardsbfc

Milltown1882
Posts: 3063
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
Been Liked: 1102 times
Has Liked: 854 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Milltown1882 » Sat May 29, 2021 11:08 am

Untinted Glasses wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 10:51 am
I am pretty sure you are wrong there. My understanding is he can give up the belt that has the rematch contract with it and fight who he wants. His dad John Fury is advising him to give up the belts and face AJ but he's not listening. There's a good video clip on YouTube with him talking about it for around 10 minutes.
AJ would be mad to even consider that (he won’t consider it). Why would he put all his belts on the line for nothing in return? Makes no sense whatsoever. John Fury talks absolute rubbish on a weekly basis.

karatekid
Posts: 3129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1103 times
Has Liked: 316 times

Re: Boxing

Post by karatekid » Sat May 29, 2021 11:11 am

AJ would fight a beltless Fury no doubt about it. $$$$$ talks.

Untinted Glasses
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 132 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Untinted Glasses » Sat May 29, 2021 11:18 am

Milltown1882 wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 11:08 am
AJ would be mad to even consider that (he won’t consider it). Why would he put all his belts on the line for nothing in return? Makes no sense whatsoever. John Fury talks absolute rubbish on a weekly basis.
If £100 million is 'nothing' then yea I would agree

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12345
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5202 times
Has Liked: 920 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat May 29, 2021 11:40 am

If Fury didnt have a belt up for grabs then it wouldnt be that bigger fight and would probably only generate around 20-30% of expected prize money.

Unless you're a proper boxing fan you're not gonna be arsed about AJ fighting a beltless Fury. Only way fight can happen is if both win their next fights
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Burnley1989
Posts: 7346
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2275 times
Has Liked: 2154 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Burnley1989 » Sat May 29, 2021 12:06 pm

AJ v Usyk should be interesting, I’d say it will be a boring one for the casual though.

IanMcL
Posts: 30126
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6340 times
Has Liked: 8654 times

Re: Boxing

Post by IanMcL » Sat May 29, 2021 12:23 pm

The point about Joshua v Fury is unification.

Untinted Glasses
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 132 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Untinted Glasses » Sat May 29, 2021 12:54 pm

IanMcL wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 12:23 pm
The point about Joshua v Fury is unification.
LOL thats very naive, it's never about the belts with these boxers, not since pre 2000s has belts been important. The whole plot is to make the fight happen at a time that maximises cash. ITS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY. Don't be fooled otherwise
This user liked this post: karatekid

Burnley1989
Posts: 7346
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2275 times
Has Liked: 2154 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Burnley1989 » Sat May 29, 2021 1:38 pm

Untinted Glasses wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 12:54 pm
LOL thats very naive, it's never about the belts with these boxers, not since pre 2000s has belts been important. The whole plot is to make the fight happen at a time that maximises cash. ITS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY. Don't be fooled otherwise
And it should be, I love hearing boxers earning huge money for fights.

They train like dogs for 20 years, and some leave with terrible health and no money. It should land in their pocket, not the managers & promoters, to be fair Eddie Hearn has been fantastic for British boxers on that front

IanMcL
Posts: 30126
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6340 times
Has Liked: 8654 times

Re: Boxing

Post by IanMcL » Sat May 29, 2021 5:00 pm

Untinted Glasses wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 12:54 pm
LOL thats very naive, it's never about the belts with these boxers, not since pre 2000s has belts been important. The whole plot is to make the fight happen at a time that maximises cash. ITS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY. Don't be fooled otherwise
Unified belts are normally impossible, owing to folk liking lots of champions, when they are fight promoters.

A unified champion...think of the history and then the money.

Milltown1882
Posts: 3063
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
Been Liked: 1102 times
Has Liked: 854 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Milltown1882 » Sat May 29, 2021 5:03 pm

IanMcL wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 5:00 pm
Unified belts are normally impossible, owing to folk liking lots of champions, when they are fight promoters.

A unified champion...think of the history and then the money.
Exactly. Still find it barmy that Josh Taylor got hardly any UK coverage last week.

IanMcL
Posts: 30126
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6340 times
Has Liked: 8654 times

Re: Boxing

Post by IanMcL » Sat May 29, 2021 5:07 pm

Milltown1882 wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 5:03 pm
Exactly. Still find it barmy that Josh Taylor got hardly any UK coverage last week.
That is because he is Scottish and not from Lundun.

Untinted Glasses
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 132 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Untinted Glasses » Sat May 29, 2021 8:49 pm

Burnley1989 wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 1:38 pm
And it should be, I love hearing boxers earning huge money for fights.

They train like dogs for 20 years, and some leave with terrible health and no money. It should land in their pocket, not the managers & promoters, to be fair Eddie Hearn has been fantastic for British boxers on that front
Totally agree tbh, the few that make it through deserve everything they can get. Too many different versions of belts nowadays. Yea Eddie Hearn has revitalised it like he did with poker before boxing. Shame he wasn't around in the 80s and 90s.
This user liked this post: Burnley1989

Burnley1989
Posts: 7346
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2275 times
Has Liked: 2154 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Burnley1989 » Sat May 29, 2021 8:55 pm

Untinted Glasses wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 8:49 pm
Totally agree tbh, the few that make it through deserve everything they can get. Too many different versions of belts nowadays. Yea Eddie Hearn has revitalised it like he did with poker before boxing. Shame he wasn't around in the 80s and 90s.
The thing with the belts, again I think it’s a good thing, otherwise you end up with top fighters never getting their shot because one fighter is signed into a 3 fight contract and then gets an injury so 3 years go by whilst they’re in their prime.

It’s swings and round abouts I think

SammyBoy
Posts: 1452
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:41 pm
Been Liked: 469 times
Has Liked: 434 times
Location: Sector 7G

Re: Boxing

Post by SammyBoy » Sat May 29, 2021 9:02 pm

If Fury vs AJ is for all the belts it’ll add more hype to the build up and result in more money. I know belts don’t mean much to boxers these days but billing the fight as a once in a generation “undisputed” event will generate more PPV buys than if it was for all the belts except one. In the event Fury relinquishes his belt the winner would inevitably face the “but what about the other guy” conversation.

Untinted Glasses
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 132 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Untinted Glasses » Sun May 30, 2021 6:46 am

SammyBoy wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 9:02 pm
If Fury vs AJ is for all the belts it’ll add more hype to the build up and result in more money. I know belts don’t mean much to boxers these days but billing the fight as a once in a generation “undisputed” event will generate more PPV buys than if it was for all the belts except one. In the event Fury relinquishes his belt the winner would inevitably face the “but what about the other guy” conversation.
The way I understand it is the money is paid by the Saudis, Hearn agrees purses with the boxers and then it’s up to him to sell the fight / promote and get as much money as he can ( maybe a % of that is agreed to the boxers, but there main purse is agreed up front ? )

Richardsbfc
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:44 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 84 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Richardsbfc » Mon Jun 07, 2021 7:09 am

Untinted Glasses wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 10:51 am
I am pretty sure you are wrong there. My understanding is he can give up the belt that has the rematch contract with it and fight who he wants. His dad John Fury is advising him to give up the belts and face AJ but he's not listening. There's a good video clip on YouTube with him talking about it for around 10 minutes.
It’s contracted for immediate rematch and the arbiter ordered it regardless of belts on the line. As we’ve seen with Fury in the past, I am sure if he could then he would give up the belts.

By all means, he can give up the belts and fight/not fight but not without consequence. If he gave up the belts but still fought, he would be sued. If he gave up the belts and didn’t fight then he would be sued even more. Basically, he has to fight otherwise gets sued.

Richardsbfc
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:44 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 84 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Richardsbfc » Mon Jun 07, 2021 7:16 am

SammyBoy wrote:
Sat May 29, 2021 9:02 pm
If Fury vs AJ is for all the belts it’ll add more hype to the build up and result in more money. I know belts don’t mean much to boxers these days but billing the fight as a once in a generation “undisputed” event will generate more PPV buys than if it was for all the belts except one. In the event Fury relinquishes his belt the winner would inevitably face the “but what about the other guy” conversation.
I think the belts will only mean anything for the fighters to be honest. Gone are the days that fans get excited about belts on the line etc. There is far too many belts for Joe Bloggs to become World Champion and nobody know about it - example Trevor Bryan is a WBA HeavyWeight Champion which you probably didn’t know.

Fans would buy tickets/PPV for the fight and undercard regardless of belts on the line (and the fighters would probably earn more with them not on the line due to sanctioning fees of the governing bodies).

Untinted Glasses
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 132 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Untinted Glasses » Mon Jun 14, 2021 2:01 pm

Richardsbfc wrote:
Mon Jun 07, 2021 7:09 am
It’s contracted for immediate rematch and the arbiter ordered it regardless of belts on the line. As we’ve seen with Fury in the past, I am sure if he could then he would give up the belts.

By all means, he can give up the belts and fight/not fight but not without consequence. If he gave up the belts but still fought, he would be sued. If he gave up the belts and didn’t fight then he would be sued even more. Basically, he has to fight otherwise gets sued.
I am not sure where you are getting your info from but I still think your wrong. They just either fight or vacate, **** or get off the pot. Usyk would have gave up his belts and he would have had mandatory challenges, as would Maywesther, Josh Warrington, canelo, Saunders,david haye, just tons of them, obviously I can't remember them all. There's even talk Joshua could vacate as he doesn't like the idea of fighting Usyk next (basically wants to carry on hand picking muppets)

s6t9a2f3f
Posts: 414
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 3:29 pm
Been Liked: 82 times

Re: Boxing

Post by s6t9a2f3f » Mon Jun 14, 2021 2:47 pm

lololololololol irrelevant threads allowed but footballing ones deleted, pathetic

Shaggy
Posts: 1444
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 8:30 am
Been Liked: 389 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Shaggy » Mon Jun 14, 2021 2:48 pm

Nothing wrong with boxing chat. Plenty on here like it.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10088
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4161 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Boxing

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Mon Jun 14, 2021 2:48 pm

s6t9a2f3f wrote:
Mon Jun 14, 2021 2:47 pm
lololololololol irrelevant threads allowed but footballing ones deleted, pathetic
If you are on about your transfer one it has been moved to the main transfer one not deleted. Calm down dear

ClaretTony
Posts: 67429
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32238 times
Has Liked: 5254 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Boxing

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Jun 14, 2021 3:42 pm

s6t9a2f3f wrote:
Mon Jun 14, 2021 2:47 pm
lololololololol irrelevant threads allowed but footballing ones deleted, pathetic
Your post was merged, not deleted, which you can see for yourself if you bothered to look. No, instead you go on thread after thread after thread with this ridiculous and incorrect post.

Richardsbfc
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:44 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 84 times

Re: Boxing

Post by Richardsbfc » Mon Jun 14, 2021 10:10 pm

Untinted Glasses wrote:
Mon Jun 14, 2021 2:01 pm
OnI am not sure where you are getting your info from but I still think your wrong. They just either fight or vacate, **** or get off the pot. Usyk would have gave up his belts and he would have had mandatory challenges, as would Maywesther, Josh Warrington, canelo, Saunders,david haye, just tons of them, obviously I can't remember them all. There's even talk Joshua could vacate as he doesn't like the idea of fighting Usyk next (basically wants to carry on hand picking muppets)
In Fury and Wilder case, the fight was already a signed/contracted fight which is the issue here. Covid hit and postponed the deal/fight. Arbitration ruled that previous contract needs to be fulfilled. If its not fulfilled in full then Team Wilder would sue Team Fury, hence the belts being pretty irrelevant on this occasion.

Joshua and all others mentioned would be fine to vacate as they didn't/don't have a signed contracted fight agreed.

Joshua / Usyk has been ordered by the governing body, its not contracted yet so either sign contract to fight or vacate belt.

karatekid
Posts: 3129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1103 times
Has Liked: 316 times

Re: Boxing

Post by karatekid » Fri Jul 09, 2021 10:23 am

Fury - Wilder has been postponed until October after Fury tested positive for COVID.

IanMcL
Posts: 30126
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6340 times
Has Liked: 8654 times

Re: Boxing

Post by IanMcL » Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:55 am

Oops!

yTib
Posts: 2712
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 704 times
Has Liked: 657 times
Location: Château d'If

Re: Boxing

Post by yTib » Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:49 pm

wow just read that chris eubank's son sebastian has drowned shortly before his 30th birthday.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57786230

dansch
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:04 am
Been Liked: 35 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Boxing

Post by dansch » Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:59 pm

Terrible news. RIP

Post Reply