ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
-
- Posts: 67891
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32536 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1031 times
- Has Liked: 3190 times
-
- Posts: 67891
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32536 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
And it was, I thought that was as bad a performance as I've seen from a referee this season.
These 3 users liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46 simonclaret Rumpelstiltskin
-
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 5:46 pm
- Been Liked: 412 times
- Has Liked: 87 times
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
A homer if I ever saw one. Didn’t even fancy giving us a throw inClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 10:34 pmAnd it was, I thought that was as bad a performance as I've seen from a referee this season.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1102 times
- Has Liked: 856 times
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
Worst performance I’ve seen from a ref all season and he’s had plenty of competition
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
- Been Liked: 843 times
- Has Liked: 1050 times
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
Shocking, indecisive and afraid to make decisions, missed more than he saw.
Not up to PL standard and wouldn’t wish him on Rochdale or Accrington either.
Not up to PL standard and wouldn’t wish him on Rochdale or Accrington either.
-
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 336 times
- Has Liked: 1516 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
I’m not sure why there’s all the ill feeling towards tonight’s ref? He did little wrong for me. All the **** poor decisions came from VAR or the assistant.
This user liked this post: Claret
-
- Posts: 3784
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1831 times
- Has Liked: 2633 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
It was the small decisions that he didn't give that annoyed me. Vydra was fouled three times and got nothing, one of them being the handball incident! Barnes was fouled and got nothing, he played advantage to us three times when there was no advantage at all.
I normally stick up for officials but I honestly was quite amazed at his performance tonight.
This user liked this post: CleggHall
-
- Posts: 2532
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
Second worst performance this season after Jones at Leeds.
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
He started off really well, I thought, and was ignoring all the minimal-contact-entitled-to-go-down nonsense but then spoiled it with a couple of errors. As bf2k says, it was VAR that cocked up the handball by their keeper. If there was no VAR then we could have accepted the decision but to have had the benefit of seeing it from god knows how many camera angles and decide it was ok is farcical.
Certainly not the worst ref I’ve seen
Certainly not the worst ref I’ve seen
-
- Posts: 67891
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32536 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 67891
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32536 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
VAR can't do anything about that handball once Coote has made his decision, that's what the commentary team were telling us.Claret wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 11:15 pmHe started off really well, I thought, and was ignoring all the minimal-contact-entitled-to-go-down nonsense but then spoiled it with a couple of errors. As bf2k says, it was VAR that cocked up the handball by their keeper. If there was no VAR then we could have accepted the decision but to have had the benefit of seeing it from god knows how many camera angles and decide it was ok is farcical.
Certainly not the worst ref I’ve seen
-
- Posts: 67891
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32536 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
There were two supposed advantages he played in the second half after fouls on the two full backs. Lowton even required treatment. I know you will often defend referees but I didn't think it was possible to defend this guy tonight.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 11:01 pmIt was the small decisions that he didn't give that annoyed me. Vydra was fouled three times and got nothing, one of them being the handball incident! Barnes was fouled and got nothing, he played advantage to us three times when there was no advantage at all.
I normally stick up for officials but I honestly was quite amazed at his performance tonight.
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
That can’t be right surely?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 11:18 pmVAR can't do anything about that handball once Coote has made his decision, that's what the commentary team were telling us.
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
Well then, the commentary team are wrong (and thank goodness everyone can ignore commentators when they want to). I think they are saying it wasn’t stopping a goal scoring opportunity so it would never have been a red even if the ref had spotted it, but I disagree and I think he deliberately hand balled it and prevented Vydra from bearing down on goal with ball.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 11:18 pmVAR can't do anything about that handball once Coote has made his decision, that's what the commentary team were telling us.
This user liked this post: bob-the-scutter
-
- Posts: 67891
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32536 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
I think it was preventing a goalscoring opportunity but from what the commentary team were saying didn't they suggest that Coote had told VAR that there was a covering defender?Claret wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 11:25 pmWell then, the commentary team are wrong (and thank goodness everyone can ignore commentators when they want to). I think they are saying it wasn’t stopping a goal scoring opportunity so it would never have been a red even if the ref had spotted it, but I disagree and I think he deliberately hand balled it and prevented Vydra from bearing down on goal with ball.
But regardless of that one incident, he got so much wrong tonight.
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
Calamity Coote
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
But isn’t that what VAR is there for, to tell him he’s made an error (I.e. the defender in question was on his arse)?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 11:28 pmI think it was preventing a goalscoring opportunity but from what the commentary team were saying didn't they suggest that Coote had told VAR that there was a covering defender?
But regardless of that one incident, he got so much wrong tonight.
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin
-
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 336 times
- Has Liked: 1516 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
I didn’t see too much wrong and thought the decisions against us could have gone either way. The handball he was unsighted and his assistant and VAR should have helped.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 11:01 pmIt was the small decisions that he didn't give that annoyed me. Vydra was fouled three times and got nothing, one of them being the handball incident! Barnes was fouled and got nothing, he played advantage to us three times when there was no advantage at all.
I normally stick up for officials but I honestly was quite amazed at his performance tonight.
-
- Posts: 3457
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1036 times
- Has Liked: 2039 times
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
The amount of times their number 5 fouled a Burnley player by jumping over them and got away with it was laughable. It was as though he only gave things when he absolutely had too. I thought his positioning was poor throughout too
It really was a horrible display from Coote
It really was a horrible display from Coote
-
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 336 times
- Has Liked: 1516 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
I saw it differently. I thought he tried to keep the game going. I thought he got the booking of their centre mid wrong in the first half (was it on Westwood???). It was late but not malicious. I must have seen it different. I can’t stand ref’s who take centre stage and blow for every little thing.
-
- Posts: 67891
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32536 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
I've reached the point where I don't know what VAR is there for but when it doesn't overturn an incorrect decision we are always told it's because it's not clear and obvious.
But tonight I was more concerned at the fouls he missed. Fulham have one of the worst disciplinary records in terms of yellows in the division and they should have been picking up a few more tonight. He was missing clear fouls and clear cards all night. We all know that Jones got big, big decisions wrong at Leeds but I thought Coote tonight was overall worse than him.
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
Just checked my recording of the game and the commentators say that Stockley Park felt there was a covering defender and therefore couldn’t get involved because it’s not a red card decision. It’s an incredible statement on two levels, how is deciding that there’s a covering defender ‘not getting involved’ and how on earth did they come to that decision in the first place given the defender fell over? Making it up as they go along at its finest!
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
if someone said the ref didn't turn up so they got some random bloke who just happened to be sailing by to do it then I wouldn't have noticed the difference in performance levels.
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin
-
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6963 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
The advantage he played after Lowton got taken out would have been hilarious if I was a neutral. For balance, Tarkowski got away without a booking for the most cynical of fouls on Reid (I think). Fairly incident free first half but a shocking second half.
-
- Posts: 4406
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1259 times
- Has Liked: 1368 times
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
Explaining that because there is a covering defender ( which everyone knows there wasn’t ) the offence could only be a yellow card and not covered by VAR , excuses them from getting involved. That’s all it is , an excuse covering up more sinister goings on between the refs on the pitch and the refs officiating VAR. Who are in effect the same group of refs watching each other’s backs as we know .martin_p wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 11:48 pmJust checked my recording of the game and the commentators say that Stockley Park felt there was a covering defender and therefore couldn’t get involved because it’s not a red card decision. It’s an incredible statement on two levels, how is deciding that there’s a covering defender ‘not getting involved’ and how on earth did they come to that decision in the first place given the defender fell over? Making it up as they go along at its finest!
In the Fulham match we have just watched, the pitch ref can be excused for missing the handball because of his view from the distance he was away from the incident.
The VAR official cannot be excused from his very poor decision that there was a covering defender in a position to deal with Vydra had Vydra been allowed to break away. This will be remembered by the pitch ref for the next time their roles are reversed . I’m not saying all refs are in on this but with the high number of outrageous VAR decisions I think many are.
It has been mentioned by other observers that the assistant referee must have seen it but didn’t help the pitch referee. If that is true then what exactly is their role? Are they that subservient in the pitch referee/ assistant referee relationship .
Some use the word corruption , I think there should be an independent inquiry at least or some other strong body that can change the present system. VAR must stay in my opinion and this current set of VAR officials relieved from their role.
-
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
It's kind of funny how people are so quick to blame VAR when a decision goes wrong. I mean, it's still just another official but one behind a screen who can still make the second call wrong. In this instance though as rightly mentioned already the decision wasn't overruled because it was not a red card offence.
The problem today was Coote and no backbone from his assistants either. The issue with VAR was just more incompetence by the VAR ref.
The decisions are made still by refs who don't like to overhaul their mates. It's clear as day. It needs to be sorted out before VAR is scrapped completely and we're stuck with 1 incompetent ref without any hope of any intervention at all again.
The problem today was Coote and no backbone from his assistants either. The issue with VAR was just more incompetence by the VAR ref.
The decisions are made still by refs who don't like to overhaul their mates. It's clear as day. It needs to be sorted out before VAR is scrapped completely and we're stuck with 1 incompetent ref without any hope of any intervention at all again.
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
Fortunately not too much of a homer, or he'd have given a penalty for taylors challenge, and could have booked tarks late on.Local cricketer wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 10:35 pmA homer if I ever saw one. Didn’t even fancy giving us a throw in
Personally I didn't think he did too bad, replays showed he didn't have a good view of the goalkeepers handball, and the non decision on that was made by the VAR official.
-
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1004 times
- Has Liked: 905 times
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
I think the refs have made a decision to allow a lot of the 50/50s to play on. The incident with Vydra is one of these situations, if there is any appearance of backing in they are letting it go. I’m not saying it’s right or wrong but over time consistency will be needed.
I’ve argued for some time that the refs association should release a video, open to the public, on what is and is not acceptable for the new season. If we are all on one page it negates the “we was robbed” and if you are robbed hopefully the ref can learn from his error.
The decision that has wound me up most this season is the sliding, stud leading tackle. There has been no consistency at all. It should be red every time contact is made with the opponent.
I’ve argued for some time that the refs association should release a video, open to the public, on what is and is not acceptable for the new season. If we are all on one page it negates the “we was robbed” and if you are robbed hopefully the ref can learn from his error.
The decision that has wound me up most this season is the sliding, stud leading tackle. There has been no consistency at all. It should be red every time contact is made with the opponent.
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
I too thought var was there to help the referees but after tonight I'm lost with it. The reason given by Banks in the var room about their defender becoming the last man and their keeper not only fouling Vydra but hand balling it has to be the biggest joke of the night. As someone mentioned it's not about var more about that persons opinion. I agree though that they should have had a penalty via Charlie so maybe things evened out. I'm not sure if an assessor will sit down with both coote and banks to discuss their performances but then again I fear it's a bit of a boys club.
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
There was a moment early in the first half where it was a throw in to us, linesman stood gawping at the ref, ref stood in the middle of the pitch looking at the linesman with neither giving a decision then after a pause both agreeing with each other slowly to give it the wrong way.
Oh and the non booking of Tarks was a joke
Burnley to win, Wood to Score, Anguissa to be booked and Tarks to be booked @50/1... he let me down for £255
Oh and the non booking of Tarks was a joke
Burnley to win, Wood to Score, Anguissa to be booked and Tarks to be booked @50/1... he let me down for £255
-
- Posts: 3959
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1774 times
- Has Liked: 470 times
Re: ARTICLE: Coote back with the Clarets at Craven Cottage
They are 2 incidents that stood out for me. It was a clear throw to Burnley and a clear yellow card for Tarks. One of the worst performances i can remember this season.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Tue May 11, 2021 8:20 amThere was a moment early in the first half where it was a throw in to us, linesman stood gawping at the ref, ref stood in the middle of the pitch looking at the linesman with neither giving a decision then after a pause both agreeing with each other slowly to give it the wrong way.
Oh and the non booking of Tarks was a joke
Burnley to win, Wood to Score, Anguissa to be booked and Tarks to be booked @50/1... he let me down for £255