Ross Barkley

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
AndyClaret
Posts: 1349
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:08 pm
Been Liked: 217 times
Has Liked: 543 times

Ross Barkley

Post by AndyClaret » Sun Oct 17, 2021 11:07 am

We are interested in a January loan move according to Nixon

Peter Loo
Posts: 1343
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:16 pm
Been Liked: 135 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Peter Loo » Sun Oct 17, 2021 11:19 am

AndyClaret wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 11:07 am
We are interested in a January loan move according to Nixon
:D

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 17930
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3845 times
Has Liked: 2066 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sun Oct 17, 2021 11:22 am

Good, it shows the new owners are going after better players.

He didn't look happy on the Chelsea bench yesterday, obviously thinks he should be on the pitch for them.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4378
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1250 times
Has Liked: 1367 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Elizabeth » Sun Oct 17, 2021 11:30 am

He hardly makes the Chelsea match day squad this season and if the player demonstrates commitment to a 6 month loan to us this reported move by the club gets my support

Burnley1989
Posts: 7347
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2275 times
Has Liked: 2155 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Burnley1989 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 11:56 am

I’m just waiting for the poster that states he’s not good enough for us and genuinely believes it :lol:

Bosscat
Posts: 25372
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8432 times
Has Liked: 18099 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Bosscat » Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:00 pm

Burnley1989 wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 11:56 am
I’m just waiting for the poster that states he’s not good enough for us and genuinely believes it :lol:
🤭

warksclaret
Posts: 6594
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1676 times
Has Liked: 754 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by warksclaret » Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:04 pm

Something drastic needed in Jan. He would be a great addition-a midfielder who can score. Other than Westwood we are woeful in the CM department for scoring. Would also allow a 451 set up, which is the only other formation to 442 that SD is prepared to play

PadihamThickNeck
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2021 5:47 pm
Been Liked: 110 times
Has Liked: 77 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by PadihamThickNeck » Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:09 pm

Massive massive upgrade on what we have now.

Firthy
Posts: 4966
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 1607 times
Has Liked: 275 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Firthy » Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:22 pm

There's a really good player in there and SD might just be the person to bring out the best in him. No brainer if we can get him and afford his wages. Might turn out to be another Trippier, Mee or Keane.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67438
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32242 times
Has Liked: 5255 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:32 pm

AndyClaret wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 11:07 am
We are interested in a January loan move according to Nixon
The interest in August was Chelsea contacting us

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:32 pm

He's usually only good for 6 mths of the season so that's fine for us.

AshevilleNCClaret
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:24 pm
Been Liked: 196 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by AshevilleNCClaret » Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:37 pm

I'd rather have Weston McKennie.
this speculation from last summer might actually get over the line. Juventus is hemorrhaging money right now, and while he does play, a lucrative offer might be too good to pass up.

https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2021/08/31/r ... -mckennie/

jojomk1
Posts: 4735
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 836 times
Has Liked: 574 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by jojomk1 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:55 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:32 pm
The interest in August was Chelsea contacting us
Is that because they were able to steal money from us with Drinkwater last season

And seriously, we said no ? :?

Loftus Cheek showed yesterday that these so called spent players can turn it around

If there is any chance, the likes of Loftus Cheek, Barkley, Oxlade Chamberlain, Winks or even Delph are available in Jan we need a major upgrade on central midfield and they would do so

Is Dale back on the grass yet

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:58 pm

jojomk1 wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:55 pm
Is that because they were able to steal money from us with Drinkwater last season

And seriously, we said no ? :?

Loftus Cheek showed yesterday that these so called spent players can turn it around

If there is any chance, the likes of Loftus Cheek, Barkley, Oxlade Chamberlain, Winks or even Delph are available in Jan we need a major upgrade on central midfield and they would do so

Is Dale back on the grass yet
Chelsea want their loanees to have guaranteed game time, decent loan fees and, where possible, wages covering to a degree.

Liverpool and City tend to have the same sort of demands and that wouldn't suit Dyche, being told who to pick.

Loftus cheek has put in the effort to get back on track after that injury, you can see it when he's playing.

Winks is an interesting suggestion, but Spurs will want silly money.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67438
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32242 times
Has Liked: 5255 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:00 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:58 pm
Winks is an interesting suggestion, but Spurs will want silly money.
We saw how difficult it was to deal with Spurs when we tried to get Kane on loan

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10846
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5522 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by TheFamilyCat » Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:09 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:58 pm
Chelsea want their loanees to have guaranteed game time, decent loan fees and, where possible, wages covering to a degree.

Liverpool and City tend to have the same sort of demands and that wouldn't suit Dyche, being told who to pick.

Loftus cheek has put in the effort to get back on track after that injury, you can see it when he's playing.

Winks is an interesting suggestion, but Spurs will want silly money.
Wasn't it also reported that Chelsea weren't offering to cover any of his wages?

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3295
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 846 times
Has Liked: 1090 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Boss Hogg » Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:10 pm

If we carry on as we are we will be too far adrift to attract decent players.

KRBFC
Posts: 18018
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3784 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by KRBFC » Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:12 pm

Would be a huge upgrade, would allow us so much flexibility in terms of changing the shape.

DCWat
Posts: 9296
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4131 times
Has Liked: 3599 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by DCWat » Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:18 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:58 pm
Chelsea want their loanees to have guaranteed game time, decent loan fees and, where possible, wages covering to a degree.

Liverpool and City tend to have the same sort of demands and that wouldn't suit Dyche, being told who to pick.

Loftus cheek has put in the effort to get back on track after that injury, you can see it when he's playing.

Winks is an interesting suggestion, but Spurs will want silly money.
I’ve seen this suggested before, but read it to relate more to their promising younger players, than players such as Barkley, who they obviously want rid of as opposed to caring if he plays or not.

Barkley is a huge step up in quality, if he can be motivated to deliver week in and week out.

Quite why we didn’t address a part of central midfield in the summer is anyones guess - it’s been a glaring issue for more than a few windows.

NewClaret
Posts: 13225
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3037 times
Has Liked: 3759 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by NewClaret » Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:19 pm

AshevilleNCClaret wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:37 pm
I'd rather have Weston McKennie.
this speculation from last summer might actually get over the line. Juventus is hemorrhaging money right now, and while he does play, a lucrative offer might be too good to pass up.

https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2021/08/31/r ... -mckennie/
I’d sell a limb for Weston Mckennie & agree Juventus probably need to sell, but Spurs, West Ham & Arsenal are all interested, apparently. London clubs who’d pay more than us. No chance, sadly.

Cirrus_Minor
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 1156 times
Has Liked: 1282 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Cirrus_Minor » Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:24 pm

I have no problem with taking on Barkley on loan but worry that we may putting our eggs all into one basket. The squad needs some new faces though out to catch up on under investment over the last few years, financing Barkley’s wages might restrict any long term recruitment.

NewClaret
Posts: 13225
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3037 times
Has Liked: 3759 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by NewClaret » Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:24 pm

Boss Hogg wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:10 pm
If we carry on as we are we will be too far adrift to attract decent players.
I think that’s a real risk at the moment. We’re playing well, no doubt about that, but we’ve all seen teams that play decent football go down.

As things stand we might need to look to January as an opportunity to sign players that will take us straight back up vs. Prem quality players.

If we’re in with a shout of staying up come January, I think Barkley would be top drawer and could be the difference.

elwaclaret
Posts: 8929
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 1986 times
Has Liked: 2877 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by elwaclaret » Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:43 pm

DCWat wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:18 pm
I’ve seen this suggested before, but read it to relate more to their promising younger players, than players such as Barkley, who they obviously want rid of as opposed to caring if he plays or not.

Barkley is a huge step up in quality, if he can be motivated to deliver week in and week out.

Quite why we didn’t address a part of central midfield in the summer is anyones guess - it’s been a glaring issue for more than a few windows.
I think it very much about control. Burnley are far more attractive for a loan once the season is shaping up. Chelsea can send players where they best suit Chelsea, giving clubs the ammo to take out their rivals while offsetting the cost of depriving clubs of long term planning. It is why the biggest clubs are so desperate to mop up every bit of talent; they may not play but they deprive other clubs of building a base to improve long term.

The club was clearly trying to ‘get by’ having not been able to meet the demands of players we wanted, something that can only be addresses sensibly as contracts run out and free up extra budget as their is unlikely to be many takers willing to offer more to the players than Burnley currently pay them.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:46 pm

DCWat wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:18 pm
I’ve seen this suggested before, but read it to relate more to their promising younger players, than players such as Barkley, who they obviously want rid of as opposed to caring if he plays or not.

Barkley is a huge step up in quality, if he can be motivated to deliver week in and week out.

Quite why we didn’t address a part of central midfield in the summer is anyones guess - it’s been a glaring issue for more than a few windows.
We tried to sign Ryan Christie who can play across midfield, inc as an attacking cm, but he chose Bournemouth instead.

AndyClaret
Posts: 1349
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:08 pm
Been Liked: 217 times
Has Liked: 543 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by AndyClaret » Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:52 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:58 pm
Chelsea want their loanees to have guaranteed game time, decent loan fees and, where possible, wages covering to a degree.

Liverpool and City tend to have the same sort of demands and that wouldn't suit Dyche, being told who to pick.

Loftus cheek has put in the effort to get back on track after that injury, you can see it when he's playing.

Winks is an interesting suggestion, but Spurs will want silly money.
Gilmour on loan at Norwich isn't getting a game.

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5059
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1596 times
Has Liked: 888 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by BurnleyFC » Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:05 pm

Miles better than any of our midfielders.
This user liked this post: Vino blanco

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:16 pm

AndyClaret wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 1:52 pm
Gilmour on loan at Norwich isn't getting a game.
4 league appearances so far, played 90mins for 3 of them and 80 mins in the other.

He's doing alright there for game time

AndyClaret
Posts: 1349
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:08 pm
Been Liked: 217 times
Has Liked: 543 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by AndyClaret » Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:26 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:16 pm
4 league appearances so far, played 90mins for 3 of them and 80 mins in the other.

He's doing alright there for game time
The panel on soccer saturday were talking about him, saying he wasn't getting enough game time but he is on loan for the season unless Chelsea have a break clause in January if he isn't playing.

jojomk1
Posts: 4735
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 836 times
Has Liked: 574 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by jojomk1 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:30 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:58 pm
Chelsea want their loanees to have guaranteed game time, decent loan fees and, where possible, wages covering to a degree.

Liverpool and City tend to have the same sort of demands and that wouldn't suit Dyche, being told who to pick.

Loftus cheek has put in the effort to get back on track after that injury, you can see it when he's playing.

Winks is an interesting suggestion, but Spurs will want silly money.
I think Chelsea would like to see Barkley playing just to get other clubs interested in him being taken off their books permanently

As for silly money - what do we, or other clubs for that matter, consider to be a reasonable amount to give us a better chance of more Premier League football (and financial rewards)

Cirrus_Minor
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 1156 times
Has Liked: 1282 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Cirrus_Minor » Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:33 pm

I am surprised Gilmour is not playing for Norwich. When I saw him playing for Chelsea last season or indeed in the Euros against England (for Scotland) he looked outstanding.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:45 pm

AndyClaret wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:26 pm
The panel on soccer saturday were talking about him, saying he wasn't getting enough game time but he is on loan for the season unless Chelsea have a break clause in January if he isn't playing.
He's played just under half the available league game time plus some time in the cup.

Now I don't know the clauses in the contract, none of us do, but that's still pretty good.
There's a difference between getting no game time to not enough.
The Norwich manager has come out and said Gilmore will get it on merit though.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by tiger76 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:54 pm

Nobody can deny we need a goal scoring midfielder, and if Barkley is available in Jan we'd be mad to not at least consider him, especially as Cornet will be away on international duty for several crucial games in the new year.

And even if he only makes the difference in 3 or 4 games, that could ultimately prove vital to our survival prospects.

Wages might be high, but if it's only for a few months surely we have to take a modest gamble.

Vino blanco
Posts: 5345
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 1898 times
Has Liked: 1965 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Vino blanco » Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:58 pm

It wouldn’t be a gamble tiger, he is far better than anything we have in central midfield. I know I am repeating myself but we need a total upgrade in midfield.

joey13
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1767 times
Has Liked: 1230 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by joey13 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:04 pm

Bad attitude, no thanks

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by tiger76 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:07 pm

Vino blanco wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:58 pm
It wouldn’t be a gamble tiger, he is far better than anything we have in central midfield. I know I am repeating myself but we need a total upgrade in midfield.
I don't disagree and I just hope we've got enough to keep ourselves in the PL before we carry out that upgrade next summer, for me we need a minimum of 2 CM'S.
This user liked this post: Vino blanco

RalphCoatesComb
Posts: 8049
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
Been Liked: 2415 times
Has Liked: 2115 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by RalphCoatesComb » Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:10 pm

joey13 wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:04 pm
Bad attitude

Really? Beyond the control of SD ??

Caballo
Posts: 1128
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:31 am
Been Liked: 420 times
Has Liked: 431 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Caballo » Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:12 pm

Barkleys biggest issue at the moment is staying away from the bar, his footballing future hangs in the balance.

Vino blanco
Posts: 5345
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 1898 times
Has Liked: 1965 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Vino blanco » Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:13 pm

“Bad attitude “, it would be like bringing someone like Joey Barton into the club, wouldn’t it.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:29 pm

Vino blanco wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:13 pm
“Bad attitude “, it would be like bringing someone like Joey Barton into the club, wouldn’t it.
I'm not sure anyone ever questioned Barton's desire or commitment, or wonder if he'd turn up and put a shift in when needed etc.

joey13
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1767 times
Has Liked: 1230 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by joey13 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:45 pm

Vino blanco wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:13 pm
“Bad attitude “, it would be like bringing someone like Joey Barton into the club, wouldn’t it.
Joey Barton didn’t have a bad attitude, questionable character maybe .

superdimitri
Posts: 4936
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1005 times
Has Liked: 725 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by superdimitri » Sun Oct 17, 2021 4:08 pm

The drink?
No pun intended but it sounds like it could be Drinkwater MKIi.

Hipper
Posts: 5683
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 1176 times
Has Liked: 918 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Hipper » Sun Oct 17, 2021 4:36 pm

https://fanbanter.co.uk/video-drunk-ros ... -security/

Lower down there are some comments from Villa fans. The difference between him and Drinkwater seems to be that Villa got a very few good games out of him first.

AlargeClaret
Posts: 4428
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 1148 times
Has Liked: 180 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by AlargeClaret » Sun Oct 17, 2021 6:04 pm

Barkley would be a brilliant addition, imagine actually having a cool headed ,powerful ,technically excellent attacking midfielder as opposed to the rubbish we have now.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12345
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5202 times
Has Liked: 920 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sun Oct 17, 2021 6:12 pm

If we had Barkley I could see our midfield/attack lining up as follows

Roberts McNeil Brownhill Barkley
*********Cornet Woods***********
This user liked this post: Vino blanco

elwaclaret
Posts: 8929
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 1986 times
Has Liked: 2877 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by elwaclaret » Sun Oct 17, 2021 6:14 pm

We haven’t seen what a fit Dale Stephens can do yet





… alright, just saying.
This user liked this post: lesxdp

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 17930
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3845 times
Has Liked: 2066 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sun Oct 17, 2021 6:15 pm

What was the last thing Barkley did wrong for this bad attitude tag?

taio
Posts: 11520
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3220 times
Has Liked: 340 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by taio » Sun Oct 17, 2021 6:18 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 6:12 pm
If we had Barkley I could see our midfield/attack lining up as follows

Roberts McNeil Brownhill Barkley
*********Cornet Woods***********
Nah.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 9443
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1180 times
Has Liked: 778 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Jakubclaret » Sun Oct 17, 2021 6:29 pm

We won’t be the only club interested in him if he is made available in January he’ll be on a few radars.

Vino blanco
Posts: 5345
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 1898 times
Has Liked: 1965 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Vino blanco » Sun Oct 17, 2021 6:41 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 6:12 pm
If we had Barkley I could see our midfield/attack lining up as follows

Roberts McNeil Brownhill Barkley
*********Cornet Woods***********
I think we could stop up with that formation.

Burnley1989
Posts: 7347
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2275 times
Has Liked: 2155 times

Re: Ross Barkley

Post by Burnley1989 » Sun Oct 17, 2021 7:05 pm

joey13 wrote:
Sun Oct 17, 2021 3:04 pm
Bad attitude, no thanks
:lol:

Post Reply