5-2-3 as an option

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
jdrobbo
Posts: 9205
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4800 times
Has Liked: 943 times
Location: Leeds

5-2-3 as an option

Post by jdrobbo » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:01 pm

Having entered into a discussion about our central midfield, their lack of goals and their strength, which generally is to defend, it got me thinking as to whether a variation of 5–2-3 would be a possibility going forward.

Firstly, I’m not expecting change as 442 or 451 is without doubt SD’s chosen system. However, Nathan Collins has been absolutely excellent since his first league start and he deserves his place in the side. Coupled with the fact that Ben Mee is probably our least error-prone defender, as well as the fact that in Lowton and especially Roberts, Taylor and Cornet, we have players who could easily offer a threat higher up the pitch.

Naturally, it would be best if Cornet and McNeil were used as more attacking options, as opposed to wingback roles, so I would probably play Wood as the central striker, with McNeil and Cornet in arracking positions.

I would revert Westwood back to a deeper, sitting role in midfield alongside either Brownhill or Cork.

Recipe for disaster? Possibly, but would like your thoughts on how you’d address things. One thing of note, I’m convinced Roberts will improve us once given a run in the side.


Pope

Roberts/Lowton
Collins
Tarkowski
Mee
Taylor

Westwood
Cork/Brownhill

McNeil
Wood
Cornet

ksrclaret
Posts: 6810
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2490 times
Has Liked: 761 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by ksrclaret » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:09 pm

I think, once Roberts is fit, for the first time we have the personnel to make that system work. Dyche has experimented with it before so it's not totally out of the question, but he very quickly dropped it again as it has never worked.

Roberts has a lot of experience playing that system for club and for country with a lot of success. The three central defenders are clearly very good players and I'm sure could adapt to a slightly different positional game. I would question the left side a little, as I'm not sure Charlie Taylor has played in a left-wing back slot before. I'd certainly be open minded about that though.

I think in midfield I'd have the two central players, with McNeil given licence to roam in a number 10 role just in front, linking the play through the middle and with both wing backs. Wood and Cornet ahead of McNeil and I think there might just be something to work with there.

It remains to be seen whether the route out of our wretched form is to stick with the tried and tested (which has got us out of bother before), or search for something slightly different.

Codger
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 2 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Codger » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:10 pm

I think that could be a very viable plan, and when you look at the front and back in your line up they look strong indeed. It just reinforces the fact that it is the midfield that is very much the weak link at present.

I was at the game yesterday and would have said hello if I'd spotted you (if only to confirm that I am still around!).

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11039
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1559 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:14 pm

We would get absolutely obliterated with this formation, we don’t have the athletic ability or technical ability to play such a formation.

You need CBS have that can play out from the back and CMs that can retain possession.

jdrobbo
Posts: 9205
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4800 times
Has Liked: 943 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by jdrobbo » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:14 pm

Codger wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:10 pm
I think that could be a very viable plan, and when you look at the front and back in your line up they look strong indeed. It just reinforces the fact that it is the midfield that is very much the weak link at present.

I was at the game yesterday and would have said hello if I'd spotted you (if only to confirm that I am still around!).
I wasn’t at the game sir. Indeed, away games are not commonplace for me at present. I’m hoping to get to Newcastle and Leeds.

jdrobbo
Posts: 9205
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4800 times
Has Liked: 943 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by jdrobbo » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:17 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:14 pm
We would get absolutely obliterated with this formation, we don’t have the athletic ability or technical ability to play such a formation.

You need CBS have that can play out from the back and CMs that can retain possession.
You may be right

taio
Posts: 11520
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3220 times
Has Liked: 340 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by taio » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:19 pm

If results don't improve sharpish (although judging yesterday's game in isolation and on its own merits a PL away point is a decent result) then we will have to try something different and what you've set out would be an option. Personally I'd prefer packing and narrowing the midfield.

Peter Loo
Posts: 1343
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:16 pm
Been Liked: 135 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Peter Loo » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:21 pm

Would be interesting to see it deployed if thought an improvement by the manager.

RalphCoatesComb
Posts: 8049
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
Been Liked: 2415 times
Has Liked: 2115 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by RalphCoatesComb » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:24 pm

I like the idea of playing our best players, even if that means changing our 4-4-2 formation.

We are missing Ben Mee but, who do you drop to make way for him? Certainly not Collins or Tarkowski.

jdrobbo
Posts: 9205
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4800 times
Has Liked: 943 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by jdrobbo » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:25 pm

To counter the argument about cm needing to be good in possession, Westwood was whilst at Villa. Dyche drilled him to become more industrious.

McNeil too, could drop from the 3 up front to form a three in CM, meaning that Cornet partners Wood upfront, as he did for a period yesterday at Southampton.

BleedingClaret
Posts: 3302
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 985 times
Has Liked: 1656 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by BleedingClaret » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:43 pm

………………….….... Hennessy ..…………………………

Roberts …..…Tarks…………..Mee ………….…Taylor

……………..Collins…………………Brownhill……………

………..Vydra…………Mcneil…….…Cornet……………

…………………………….Wood ……………………………….

ClaretAL
Posts: 2565
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 1044 times
Has Liked: 815 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by ClaretAL » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:58 pm

I was saying the same thing this morning but slightly different lineup... 5 in defence without the ball, 4 in midfield when we have the ball, trying to play in the talent up front

Screenshot_20211024-104302_Samsung Internet.jpg
Screenshot_20211024-104302_Samsung Internet.jpg (334.81 KiB) Viewed 3294 times
This user liked this post: Woonderbah

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by SalisburyClaret » Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:14 pm

2 in our midfield - unbelievable!

We can’t manage with 5

jdrobbo
Posts: 9205
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4800 times
Has Liked: 943 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by jdrobbo » Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:51 pm

SalisburyClaret wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:14 pm
2 in our midfield - unbelievable!

We can’t manage with 5
🤔🤔🤔

Stalbansclaret
Posts: 2487
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
Been Liked: 1658 times
Has Liked: 2963 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Stalbansclaret » Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:58 pm

It isn't as basic as "2 in midfield" is it though...there are 3 defenders plus 2 wing backs who make it a 3-4-3 when we have the ball. Cornet and McNeil either side of Wood certainly gives us threat and creativity. Interesting thought.
These 2 users liked this post: jdrobbo ClaretAL

Roosterbooster
Posts: 2583
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 688 times
Has Liked: 361 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Roosterbooster » Sun Oct 24, 2021 2:27 pm

I thought Brownhill, McNeil and Cornet as a 3 behind Wood yesterday looked really promising. But I thought they were let down by quite a few things: Wood just isn't anywhere near his best atm. Cork and Westwood is a spent deal. Lowton looked defensively woeful. Tarks' head is somewhere else.

I'd base my team around that 3 at the moment. It gives plenty of flexibility, and I think it gets us up the pitch so much better. I just can't see Dyche going back to 5 at the back. I'd like to see Vydra as the striker, Roberts given a chance, and Tarks put under pressure to perform when Mee is back. With Collins performing as he is, Tarks is, for the first time in a long time, droppable.

4231 for me at the moment (and a DCM absolute priority in Jan)

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30275
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 10917 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Vegas Claret » Sun Oct 24, 2021 2:59 pm

Woody needs a goal and but for a very good save would have got one yesterday, I feel we are getting close to that first win

jurek
Posts: 1790
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:38 pm
Been Liked: 309 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by jurek » Sun Oct 24, 2021 3:31 pm

We need to do something in terms of formation but what that something
is up to Dyche. Albeit his options are limited.
Strengthening in midfield seems to be needed but we haven't got the
players to do it. And waiting until the January window to try and
bring someone in might be too late.

My only thought on this is whether Roberts could switch to a more midfield role?

A long shot admittedly.

Darnhill Claret
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 498 times
Has Liked: 992 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Darnhill Claret » Sun Oct 24, 2021 5:58 pm

We need midfielders who are more confident at holding on to the ball a little longer than we have currently and players who come and take short passes off our back four, so that they don’t have to hit it long as often as we do. The Tarks error yesterday would be less likely to have happened. McNeil can hold on to it but has a habit of turning into an ever decreasing circle. When in possession we need to give the man with the ball more options than we currently do.

jdrobbo
Posts: 9205
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4800 times
Has Liked: 943 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by jdrobbo » Sun Oct 24, 2021 8:10 pm

A central midfielder the priority then?

Lord_Bob
Posts: 279
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:58 pm
Been Liked: 137 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Lord_Bob » Sun Oct 24, 2021 8:15 pm

If we are going to play 4-4-2 (which we will) please let the 2 be Vydra and Cornet.

summitclaret
Posts: 3891
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 826 times
Has Liked: 1307 times
Location: burnley

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by summitclaret » Sun Oct 24, 2021 8:25 pm

Dyche will never play 2 smallish strikers. He needs Wood to defend corners. However, Vydra has to get in the team somehow. His pace, coupled with Cornet is the key to us scoring enough to win games and thereby stay up.

jdrobbo
Posts: 9205
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4800 times
Has Liked: 943 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by jdrobbo » Mon Oct 25, 2021 11:34 am

Despite his poor form and slow start to the season, I would not want to see Chris Wood dropped from our starting lineup. He’s integral to how we play

Iloveyoubrady
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:30 am
Been Liked: 296 times
Has Liked: 28 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Iloveyoubrady » Mon Oct 25, 2021 11:50 am

Lord_Bob wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 8:15 pm
If we are going to play 4-4-2 (which we will) please let the 2 be Vydra and Cornet.
We can’t really do that to be honest. Cornet can play wide in a 442 with woody and vyds up top, but then we don’t necessarily get the best out of him. It’s about finding the best compromise between attacking and defending whilst getting our best 11 on the pitch. I think we may have to sacrifice Vydra to do that and go 433, with one of the front 3 dropping back at all times to get the 2 banks of 4. This is what we tried to do on Saturday and it worked at times but when their rb got forward we didn’t quite have the organisation and understanding for it yet with wood, brownhill, Cornet and cork seemingly randomly choosing who plays where.

The obvious option is to play cornet in a more traditional rigid 442 left/right position but it seems dyche also wants him breaking the back line, which leaves us exposed if nobody is ready to fill in for the counter attack.

Roosterbooster
Posts: 2583
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 688 times
Has Liked: 361 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Roosterbooster » Mon Oct 25, 2021 11:55 am

jdrobbo wrote:
Mon Oct 25, 2021 11:34 am
Despite his poor form and slow start to the season, I would not want to see Chris Wood dropped from our starting lineup. He’s integral to how we play
Integral or not, if he's not doing the things required for that style to work, he's droppable. He's losing the ball too much for me. Don't get me wrong, I'm not Wood's biggest fan, but he has shown plenty of times that he has qualities, and when at the top of his game is a certain starter. But too often he goes weeks or even months where he is so much off the boil, that I think we cannot afford to give him a free pass

Mala591
Posts: 1887
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:02 pm
Been Liked: 681 times
Has Liked: 428 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Mala591 » Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:10 pm

I’m sure Dyche is ‘assessing’ (hoping 🙂) whether Roberts can play right midfield which would allow McNeil to switch back to the left of midfield and allow Cornet a free roaming role behind/alongside Wood. This would free up Cornet from some defensive duties - we need him up front to score goals.

Might be worth trying this against Spurs?

Roberts Brownhill Westwood McNeil
—————Wood————Cornet

Down_Rover
Posts: 1749
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
Been Liked: 445 times
Has Liked: 187 times
Location: Manchester

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Down_Rover » Mon Oct 25, 2021 2:49 pm

I think 4-2-3-2 might be a winner if we get away with it

KRBFC
Posts: 18018
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3784 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by KRBFC » Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:39 pm

I'd prefer 352 with Mcneil in a central midfield role with licence to roam.

Pope
Collins Tark Mee
Roberts Westwood Cork Taylor
Mcneil
Cornet Wood

KRBFC
Posts: 18018
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3784 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by KRBFC » Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:40 pm

I think we look a better side with Vydra starting though, so I'd probably drop Wood for him atm.
This user liked this post: alwaysaclaret

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5744
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1868 times
Has Liked: 835 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:50 pm

Darnhill Claret wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 5:58 pm
We need midfielders who are more confident at holding on to the ball a little longer than we have currently and players who come and take short passes off our back four, so that they don’t have to hit it long as often as we do. The Tarks error yesterday would be less likely to have happened. McNeil can hold on to it but has a habit of turning into an ever decreasing circle. When in possession we need to give the man with the ball more options than we currently do.
Passing and composure from our central midfielders has been a problem for a while. Everything is played at 100mph!

alwaysaclaret
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 234 times
Has Liked: 420 times

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by alwaysaclaret » Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:51 pm

Lord_Bob wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 8:15 pm
If we are going to play 4-4-2 (which we will) please let the 2 be Vydra and Cornet.
Strange how hardly anyone is including vydra in their suggestions and idea's of a different formation, including most importantly as was evident on Saturday dyche, in the right set up now having players like mcneil, cornet wood he is one of our best options, purely because he's prepared to chase lost causes and has pace, but can also play a bit and is on a similar wavelength to cornet and mcneil in terms of an attacking force, the area we clearly seem to be lacking now in this if you can call it rebuild is a cm, this in my opinion should be someone in the mould of if not Ross barkley, clearly jrod and Ashley are fast becoming players classed as not good enough, so let's try to move them on and bring 1 of quality in coupled with fast tracking 1 of Mellon, Thompson, Richardson etc.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8069
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3060 times
Has Liked: 5023 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by Colburn_Claret » Mon Oct 25, 2021 4:54 pm

I'd agree with Newcastle unfortunately, Tarks and Ben are too weak at the passing game to make 3 at the back effective.
Whichever system we use, we need to utilise our quickest playets, and our best passers. That means Cornet, Collins and Roberts need to play.
McNeil, Tarks, Mee and Pope are a given.
Brownhill and Taylor are on the next level, where at their best both should be starting. Brownhill seems to be the new Hendrick jack of all trades, and suffers consequently. Taylor never looks like he's got over his injury, and has been left horribly exposed at times this season, so that Pieters always looks more solid at the back.
Midfield, it always comes back to the Midfield. I love them both,but Westwood and Cork aren't a great partnership. Jack was always very weak in the tackle. When he came back from his long injury last season, he played 6 games where he looked fantastic, but he's back to where he was. Whether Westy would benefit from having a stronger partner, who knows, we haven't tried to find a long term solution, and even then they would need time to forge a partnership anyway.
But change is needed.

houseboy
Posts: 7065
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2238 times
Has Liked: 1617 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: 5-2-3 as an option

Post by houseboy » Mon Oct 25, 2021 9:32 pm

BleedingClaret wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:43 pm
………………….….... Hennessy ..…………………………

Roberts …..…Tarks…………..Mee ………….…Taylor

……………..Collins…………………Brownhill……………

………..Vydra…………Mcneil…….…Cornet……………

…………………………….Wood ……………………………….
Not sure whether that would work but I know one thing, if that front four clicked it would be awesome.
This user liked this post: BleedingClaret

Post Reply