Some loan fees include a contribution to the players wages, we had Nugent on loan and paid a % of his wages and the loan fee covered the rest of it pretty much
Barkley & Maitland-Niles
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32529 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Barkley & Maitland-Niles
We turned down the offer.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:35 pmEven at this ridiculously low fee it’s sounds a win win no brainer for some clubs. Had Barkley wanted to come to Burnley we would have accepted him.
-
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Barkley & Maitland-Niles
I don't think Barkley is the kind of player that would dig deep when things aren't going well.
He would drop his head.
He's not the kind of player you want in a relegation fight.
Of course he's miles better than what we have, but you have to admit his general persona is just not a good fit for us.
Maitland-Niles however I think could have potential.
We also have Stephens coming back from injury and already have an abundance of CMs when we normally play 442.
He would drop his head.
He's not the kind of player you want in a relegation fight.
Of course he's miles better than what we have, but you have to admit his general persona is just not a good fit for us.
Maitland-Niles however I think could have potential.
We also have Stephens coming back from injury and already have an abundance of CMs when we normally play 442.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Barkley & Maitland-Niles
I tend to agree with you of the two I'd rather have AMN, and it's fine saying we have an abundance of CM'S, but none of them are exactly pulling up trees are they.superdimitri wrote: ↑Wed Oct 27, 2021 6:16 pmI don't think Barkley is the kind of player that would dig deep when things aren't going well.
He would drop his head.
He's not the kind of player you want in a relegation fight.
Of course he's miles better than what we have, but you have to admit his general persona is just not a good fit for us.
Maitland-Niles however I think could have potential.
We also have Stephens coming back from injury and already have an abundance of CMs when we normally play 442.
Whether Ashley Maitland-Niles is the answer I don't know, but we need to strengthen in the midfield urgently as it's proving a major achilles heel to our imminent survival prospects this term.
-
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Barkley & Maitland-Niles
Problem is it takes a special kinda player to slot in and improve us straight away. These things usually take time, and time isn't really something you have when a player joins in January. You also have to factor in it can have a negative rather than positive impact on the team ala Gibson and Drinkwater. Its always a risk, but I'd rather we strengthen with another winger since that's a position we're actually short in.tiger76 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 27, 2021 9:28 pmI tend to agree with you of the two I'd rather have AMN, and it's fine saying we have an abundance of CM'S, but none of them are exactly pulling up trees are they.
Whether Ashley Maitland-Niles is the answer I don't know, but we need to strengthen in the midfield urgently as it's proving a major achilles heel to our imminent survival prospects this term.
I think our problem is more with our strikers than midfield, I think its about time we saw Rodriguez and Vydra get a run in the side ahead of Barnes, and possibly we could do with picking up someone in the transfer window who's capable of coming on and scoring a goal such as Austin.