Their number 4
Their number 4
Their number 4 looked a real talent today, blocked everything in his way, and a real man mountain to the long ball.
Sort of player we should be targeting to replace Mee when we go down, would walk into our leaky defence.
Mom for me, and looked a real team player, the sort you need in a scrap.
Sort of player we should be targeting to replace Mee when we go down, would walk into our leaky defence.
Mom for me, and looked a real team player, the sort you need in a scrap.
-
- Posts: 10326
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3340 times
- Has Liked: 1960 times
Re: Their number 4
Played well.
Would have been a good signing for us if he hadn’t thrown his toys out of the pram. Talent wise we identified well.
Let’s hope we go back to our old recruitment model.
Would have been a good signing for us if he hadn’t thrown his toys out of the pram. Talent wise we identified well.
Let’s hope we go back to our old recruitment model.
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
- Been Liked: 843 times
- Has Liked: 1050 times
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: Their number 4
Sean Dyche has got his eyes on him too!
Re: Their number 4
Rumour has it he fell out with the bidding donkey Woan wasn’t it?Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:25 pmPlayed well.
Would have been a good signing for us if he hadn’t thrown his toys out of the pram. Talent wise we identified well.
Let’s hope we go back to our old recruitment model.
I can see why he was unhappy, getting benched when Dyches favourites were unconditionally picked infront of him even when we were playing terrible and conceding a lot of goals.
Bit of a re-occurring problem under Dyche unconditionally picking out of form players
Re: Their number 4
Another Mr W issue ( there are a few )Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:25 pmPlayed well.
Would have been a good signing for us if he hadn’t thrown his toys out of the pram. Talent wise we identified well.
Let’s hope we go back to our old recruitment model.
" a chance" of 6 games in 3 seasons isn't throwing your toys out of the pram Imo
Like it's shown, ( just recently Cork ) Mr Dyche has his favourites, so regardless of form of your challenger of the shirt you dont get a chance.
Anyway it's all irrelevant, he played very well today, 2 clean sheets v a relegation rival ( something we've yet to manage ) and the best defender on the pitch today.
-
- Posts: 10326
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3340 times
- Has Liked: 1960 times
Re: Their number 4
Well he spent a lot of one injured and a lot of another out on loan. All while we were successfully maintaining our Premier League status.MACCA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:31 pm6 games in 3 seasons isn't throwing your toys out of the pram Imo
Like it's shown, ( just recently Cork ) Mr Dyche has his favourites, so regardless of form of your challenger of the shirt you font get a chance.
Anyway it's all irrelevant, he played very well today, 2 clean sheets v a relegation rival ( something we've yet to manage ) and the best defender on the pitch today.
So yes you are right he was a good signing on paper. However sadly for him he had two better players in front of him while he was here.
It’s up to our recruitment team now to go back to signing good players as you rightly point out Gibson was.
Last edited by Bordeauxclaret on Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 3 users liked this post: ClaretTony Burnley Ace dandeclaret
Re: Their number 4
Mee was hopelessly out of form and should have been benched.Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:34 pmWell he spent a lot of one injured and a lot of another out on loan. All while we were successfully maintaining our Premier League status.
So yes you are right he was a good signing on paper. However sadly for him he had two better players in front of him while he was here.
Gibson is a better defender than Mee
-
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 324 times
- Has Liked: 1113 times
Re: Their number 4
Hanley looked a good player today also.
Mind you…
Mind you…
-
- Posts: 10326
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3340 times
- Has Liked: 1960 times
Re: Their number 4
Played fairly well today but it's another relegation under his belt when he's been a regular starter. Didn't get a run in the team with us but didn't do enough to stay in the team when he got a chance. In fact he was very poor when he did play.
-
- Posts: 15254
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6754 times
Re: Their number 4
Wasn't Gibson a possible inclusion in the England squad.Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:37 pmMee was possibly out of form but I’d disagree on the ability front.
Good defender, we messed up there.
Re: Their number 4
Any bang average centre half would have looked decent against us today to be honest.Middle-agedClaret wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:37 pmHanley looked a good player today also.
Mind you…
Re: Their number 4
Oh come on, the we played today, you could have plonked a couple of lower league journeymen into Norwich's backline. Oh, wait, they were.
These 2 users liked this post: Burnley Ace tiger76
-
- Posts: 10326
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3340 times
- Has Liked: 1960 times
Re: Their number 4
I think he did get in while at Middlesbrough didn’t he?boatshed bill wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:39 pmWasn't Gibson a possible inclusion in the England squad.
Good defender, we messed up there.
He’d have played more for us if it hadn’t been for injuries or being a big baby.
As Macca has said Dyche identified the talent well. It just didn’t work out.
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32529 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Their number 4
And when Me was hopelessly out of form, Gibson was out injured with two bouts of surgery.
This user liked this post: dandeclaret
-
- Posts: 5356
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1648 times
- Has Liked: 402 times
Re: Their number 4
Today was comfortably Gibson’s best performance of the season which of course has 38 games. Was it against Brentford in that critical home game recently when he had a shocker, conceded two penalties, and vied with Olympiacos away (which of course was him too) for the worst defensive performance I have ever seen?
Good on his day, but not fit to lace Mee or Tarky’s boots.
Good on his day, but not fit to lace Mee or Tarky’s boots.
These 2 users liked this post: Woodleyclaret Stalbansclaret
-
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 429 times
- Has Liked: 4566 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: Their number 4
Part of the defence that has concede 63 goals this season. Most teams, but not all, have scored against them....
-
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:01 pm
- Been Liked: 220 times
- Has Liked: 33 times
-
- Posts: 9325
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4105 times
- Has Liked: 6588 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Their number 4
Signed to replace Mee who was stalling on his new contract. Very good business really, we planned ahead knowing it was possible that Mee could leave. As it turns out, he signed another deal which basically put paid to Gibson ever really starting for us.
Of course all what I have written above is just my opinion based on how much money we had, and how much money we usually spent. £13m (ish) to sign a bench warmer? Aye, that’s us all over that. We barely spend £13m on a first team player let alone a second choice centre half.
Of course all what I have written above is just my opinion based on how much money we had, and how much money we usually spent. £13m (ish) to sign a bench warmer? Aye, that’s us all over that. We barely spend £13m on a first team player let alone a second choice centre half.
Re: Their number 4
It’s a shame it didn’t work out, whatever the reasons were. I for one thought he’d prove to be a great signing.
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Their number 4
We never paid the full £13 million, we paid barely half that because the clauses for further payments weren't met.bobinho wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:17 pmSigned to replace Mee who was stalling on his new contract. Very good business really, we planned ahead knowing it was possible that Mee could leave. As it turns out, he signed another deal which basically put paid to Gibson ever really starting for us.
Of course all what I have written above is just my opinion based on how much money we had, and how much money we usually spent. £13m (ish) to sign a bench warmer? Aye, that’s us all over that. We barely spend £13m on a first team player let alone a second choice centre half.
When we sold him we recouped most of the money we'd paid.
-
- Posts: 18088
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Their number 4
I was a little surprised to see the Burnley players hugging Gibson in the tunnel before the game, seems very popular with the lads who were here.
I just thought with all that went on he might not be well liked?
I just thought with all that went on he might not be well liked?
-
- Posts: 10913
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5560 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Their number 4
Im not. Mee was hopelessly out of form for half of that season. Gibson was available but had to make do on the bench.TheFamilyCat wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:13 amWhen Mee was hopelessly out of form, Gibson was injured.
Don't try to rewrite history.
Gibson was mismanaged
-
- Posts: 9325
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4105 times
- Has Liked: 6588 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Their number 4
Fair enough, thanks for clearing that up. Fact still remains we had no idea it would work out that we WOULDN’T be paying the full amount when we signed him.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:31 pmWe never paid the full £13 million, we paid barely half that because the clauses for further payments weren't met.
When we sold him we recouped most of the money we'd paid.
-
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:01 pm
- Been Liked: 220 times
- Has Liked: 33 times
Re: Their number 4
At the end of the home game v Norwich Dyche and Gibson were talking seemingly quite amiably as they headed for the tunnel. That surprised me tooQuickenthetempo wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:49 amI was a little surprised to see the Burnley players hugging Gibson in the tunnel before the game, seems very popular with the lads who were here.
I just thought with all that went on he might not be well liked?
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Their number 4
Gibson definitely played well yesterday, and you do wonder if he felt he had a point to prove to SD.
Pierre Lees-Melou was also a livewire, and made our midfield look static.
Pierre Lees-Melou was also a livewire, and made our midfield look static.
-
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
- Been Liked: 744 times
- Has Liked: 463 times
Re: Their number 4
Laughable.
I know 3 neutrals- Watford, Leicester, Arsenal- who would all pick Mee over even Tarkowski. What he brings to the club is invaluable. There's a reason Keane struggles at Everton, there's a reason Tarks was less impressive for England, there's a reason our defence and collective form always noticeably dips without Mee or if he's out of form.
As a pure defender he's the best we've had in as long as I can remember. Not what most big clubs or international managers look for in 'modern' football, but he's top drawer, and again it's no coincidence that we had such an awful run that season when he was out of form.
This user liked this post: Stalbansclaret
Re: Their number 4
I'd make our midfield look static.
At HT yesterday I genuinely believe a conference player could have contributed what Lowton and Westwood did, they hit the first man far too often and contributed nothing, causing more problems than solutions
-
- Posts: 15254
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6754 times
Re: Their number 4
I've heard that several clubs would like Mee rather than Tarkowskispt_claret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:47 pmLaughable.
I know 3 neutrals- Watford, Leicester, Arsenal- who would all pick Mee over even Tarkowski. What he brings to the club is invaluable. There's a reason Keane struggles at Everton, there's a reason Tarks was less impressive for England, there's a reason our defence and collective form always noticeably dips without Mee or if he's out of form.
As a pure defender he's the best we've had in as long as I can remember. Not what most big clubs or international managers look for in 'modern' football, but he's top drawer, and again it's no coincidence that we had such an awful run that season when he was out of form.
-
- Posts: 18088
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Their number 4
Which ones?boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:52 pmI've heard that several clubs would like Mee rather than Tarkowski
Has somebody really suggested Arsenal would like to sign Ben Mee?
-
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
- Been Liked: 744 times
- Has Liked: 463 times
Re: Their number 4
My God. How do people have such atrocious reading comprehension on this site? Is it deliberate?Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:19 pmWhich ones?
Has somebody really suggested Arsenal would like to sign Ben Mee?
I specified fans. Friends who are neutral fans, who rate Ben Mee ahead of Tarkowski.
I'm sick of this, it's become utterly pervasive on this site. People interpreting arguments that people are explicitly not making so that they can make it sound weaker and thus dismantle it to win. It's why I clarify at (sometimes excessive) length in almost all my posts, and still it happens.
People do not discuss or debate in good faith here. They resort to ad hominems, tautologies, "No you're wrong" with no elaboration, insults, playing dumb to bait people into getting angry or tangled up, twisting comments, or just shouting their opinion loudly and angrily as if volume is a substitute for content.
It's no wonder we can't muster up decent new chants that catch on or that Turf Moor is a far cry from even a few years ago in atmosphere.
These 2 users liked this post: Tall Paul CoolClaret
-
- Posts: 7443
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2249 times
- Has Liked: 2161 times
Re: Their number 4
Totally agree - folk on here deliberately misrepresent posts and then retorts disingenuously in order to point score, rather than actually come to a mutual agreement/common ground/new found outcome.spt_claret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:29 pmMy God. How do people have such atrocious reading comprehension on this site? Is it deliberate?
I specified fans. Friends who are neutral fans, who rate Ben Mee ahead of Tarkowski.
I'm sick of this, it's become utterly pervasive on this site. People interpreting arguments that people are explicitly not making so that they can make it sound weaker and thus dismantle it to win. It's why I clarify at (sometimes excessive) length in almost all my posts, and still it happens.
People do not discuss or debate in good faith here. They resort to ad hominems, tautologies, "No you're wrong" with no elaboration, insults, playing dumb to bait people into getting angry or tangled up, twisting comments, or just shouting their opinion loudly and angrily as if volume is a substitute for content.
It's no wonder we can't muster up decent new chants that catch on or that Turf Moor is a far cry from even a few years ago in atmosphere.
It’s very sad and indicative of the binary yes/no, left/right, like/dislike social-media influenced tripe that dominates discourse these days.
Arguments/debates are about finding the truth, not ‘winning’ per say, well, whatever ‘winning’ means.
-
- Posts: 18088
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Their number 4
Apologies for missing reading your post. It might be easier to write the word fans in your post, when that's what you mean.spt_claret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:29 pmMy God. How do people have such atrocious reading comprehension on this site? Is it deliberate?
I specified fans. Friends who are neutral fans, who rate Ben Mee ahead of Tarkowski.
I'm sick of this, it's become utterly pervasive on this site. People interpreting arguments that people are explicitly not making so that they can make it sound weaker and thus dismantle it to win. It's why I clarify at (sometimes excessive) length in almost all my posts, and still it happens.
People do not discuss or debate in good faith here. They resort to ad hominems, tautologies, "No you're wrong" with no elaboration, insults, playing dumb to bait people into getting angry or tangled up, twisting comments, or just shouting their opinion loudly and angrily as if volume is a substitute for content.
It's no wonder we can't muster up decent new chants that catch on or that Turf Moor is a far cry from even a few years ago in atmosphere.
Using other fans opinions doesn't really carry weight with strangers on an Internet forum as fans have varied opinions on all issues.
That's why I assumed you meant you knew of clubs interests, because that will carry weight.
We will find out at the end of the season who is the better player, both available on free transfers. Let's see where they end up?
-
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
- Been Liked: 744 times
- Has Liked: 463 times
Re: Their number 4
I referred to 3 neutrals who I know. I didn't say anything about inside knowledge on that front.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 12, 2022 9:49 amApologies for missing reading your post. It might be easier to write the word fans in your post, when that's what you mean.
Using other fans opinions doesn't really carry weight with strangers on an Internet forum as fans have varied opinions on all issues.
That's why I assumed you meant you knew of clubs interests, because that will carry weight.
We will find out at the end of the season who is the better player, both available on free transfers. Let's see where they end up?
Fan opinion is 90% of an internet forum. Neutral fans are sometimes better placed to judge a player than his own club's fans as they're less emotionally charged and more objective- unless there's a particular grudge against a certain player or club.
We won't find out at the end of the season. We've found out for the past 7 seasons. And even though Mee is 32 Vs Gibson at 29, I would expect Mee to be more likely to end up at a Premier League club assuming he doesn't resign with us.
Re: Their number 4
Lots had been made on here after Gibson left about a big fall out. We weren’t there, perhaps it’s not as we thought.longsidetrumpet wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:42 amAt the end of the home game v Norwich Dyche and Gibson were talking seemingly quite amiably as they headed for the tunnel. That surprised me too
-
- Posts: 3957
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1770 times
- Has Liked: 470 times
Re: Their number 4
Had a stormer today. Schoolboy stuff for Uniteds first and at fault again for their second.
-
- Posts: 17987
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4073 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Their number 4
Just watched it on MOTD.
Gibson was dreadful.
Gibson was dreadful.