Their number 4

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Their number 4

Post by MACCA » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:20 pm

Their number 4 looked a real talent today, blocked everything in his way, and a real man mountain to the long ball.
Sort of player we should be targeting to replace Mee when we go down, would walk into our leaky defence.

Mom for me, and looked a real team player, the sort you need in a scrap.

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10326
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3340 times
Has Liked: 1960 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:25 pm

Played well.
Would have been a good signing for us if he hadn’t thrown his toys out of the pram. Talent wise we identified well.

Let’s hope we go back to our old recruitment model.

CleggHall
Posts: 3281
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
Been Liked: 843 times
Has Liked: 1050 times
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: Their number 4

Post by CleggHall » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:25 pm

Sean Dyche has got his eyes on him too!

Shaggy
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 8:30 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 149 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Shaggy » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:29 pm

Bordeauxclaret wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:25 pm
Played well.
Would have been a good signing for us if he hadn’t thrown his toys out of the pram. Talent wise we identified well.

Let’s hope we go back to our old recruitment model.
Rumour has it he fell out with the bidding donkey Woan wasn’t it?

I can see why he was unhappy, getting benched when Dyches favourites were unconditionally picked infront of him even when we were playing terrible and conceding a lot of goals.

Bit of a re-occurring problem under Dyche unconditionally picking out of form players

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by MACCA » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:31 pm

Bordeauxclaret wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:25 pm
Played well.
Would have been a good signing for us if he hadn’t thrown his toys out of the pram. Talent wise we identified well.

Let’s hope we go back to our old recruitment model.
Another Mr W issue ( there are a few )
" a chance" of 6 games in 3 seasons isn't throwing your toys out of the pram Imo

Like it's shown, ( just recently Cork ) Mr Dyche has his favourites, so regardless of form of your challenger of the shirt you dont get a chance.

Anyway it's all irrelevant, he played very well today, 2 clean sheets v a relegation rival ( something we've yet to manage ) and the best defender on the pitch today.

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10326
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3340 times
Has Liked: 1960 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:34 pm

MACCA wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:31 pm
6 games in 3 seasons isn't throwing your toys out of the pram Imo

Like it's shown, ( just recently Cork ) Mr Dyche has his favourites, so regardless of form of your challenger of the shirt you font get a chance.

Anyway it's all irrelevant, he played very well today, 2 clean sheets v a relegation rival ( something we've yet to manage ) and the best defender on the pitch today.
Well he spent a lot of one injured and a lot of another out on loan. All while we were successfully maintaining our Premier League status.
So yes you are right he was a good signing on paper. However sadly for him he had two better players in front of him while he was here.

It’s up to our recruitment team now to go back to signing good players as you rightly point out Gibson was.
Last edited by Bordeauxclaret on Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 3 users liked this post: ClaretTony Burnley Ace dandeclaret

Shaggy
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 8:30 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 149 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Shaggy » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:36 pm

Bordeauxclaret wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:34 pm
Well he spent a lot of one injured and a lot of another out on loan. All while we were successfully maintaining our Premier League status.
So yes you are right he was a good signing on paper. However sadly for him he had two better players in front of him while he was here.
Mee was hopelessly out of form and should have been benched.

Gibson is a better defender than Mee

Middle-agedClaret
Posts: 1056
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 324 times
Has Liked: 1113 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Middle-agedClaret » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:37 pm

Hanley looked a good player today also.
Mind you…

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10326
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3340 times
Has Liked: 1960 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:37 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:36 pm
Mee was hopelessly out of form and should have been benched.

Gibson is a better defender than Mee
Mee was possibly out of form but I’d disagree on the ability front.

ClaretMat
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:26 am
Been Liked: 62 times
Has Liked: 22 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by ClaretMat » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:38 pm

Played fairly well today but it's another relegation under his belt when he's been a regular starter. Didn't get a run in the team with us but didn't do enough to stay in the team when he got a chance. In fact he was very poor when he did play.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15254
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6754 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by boatshed bill » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:39 pm

Bordeauxclaret wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:37 pm
Mee was possibly out of form but I’d disagree on the ability front.
Wasn't Gibson a possible inclusion in the England squad.
Good defender, we messed up there.

Jamesy
Posts: 2618
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 802 times
Has Liked: 528 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Jamesy » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:39 pm

Middle-agedClaret wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:37 pm
Hanley looked a good player today also.
Mind you…
Any bang average centre half would have looked decent against us today to be honest.

ksrclaret
Posts: 6915
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2567 times
Has Liked: 767 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by ksrclaret » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:41 pm

Oh come on, the we played today, you could have plonked a couple of lower league journeymen into Norwich's backline. Oh, wait, they were.
These 2 users liked this post: Burnley Ace tiger76

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10326
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3340 times
Has Liked: 1960 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:42 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:39 pm
Wasn't Gibson a possible inclusion in the England squad.
Good defender, we messed up there.
I think he did get in while at Middlesbrough didn’t he?
He’d have played more for us if it hadn’t been for injuries or being a big baby.
As Macca has said Dyche identified the talent well. It just didn’t work out.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67869
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32529 times
Has Liked: 5276 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Their number 4

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:46 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:36 pm
Mee was hopelessly out of form and should have been benched.

Gibson is a better defender than Mee
And when Me was hopelessly out of form, Gibson was out injured with two bouts of surgery.
This user liked this post: dandeclaret

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5356
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1648 times
Has Liked: 402 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:55 pm

Today was comfortably Gibson’s best performance of the season which of course has 38 games. Was it against Brentford in that critical home game recently when he had a shocker, conceded two penalties, and vied with Olympiacos away (which of course was him too) for the worst defensive performance I have ever seen?

Good on his day, but not fit to lace Mee or Tarky’s boots.
These 2 users liked this post: Woodleyclaret Stalbansclaret

MT03ALG
Posts: 2091
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
Been Liked: 429 times
Has Liked: 4566 times
Location: COTTON TREE

Re: Their number 4

Post by MT03ALG » Sun Apr 10, 2022 8:49 pm

Part of the defence that has concede 63 goals this season. Most teams, but not all, have scored against them....

longsidetrumpet
Posts: 690
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:01 pm
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 33 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by longsidetrumpet » Sun Apr 10, 2022 8:50 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:36 pm
Mee was hopelessly out of form and should have been benched.

Gibson is a better defender than Mee
You’re actually wrong on both counts

bobinho
Posts: 9325
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 4105 times
Has Liked: 6588 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Their number 4

Post by bobinho » Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:17 pm

Signed to replace Mee who was stalling on his new contract. Very good business really, we planned ahead knowing it was possible that Mee could leave. As it turns out, he signed another deal which basically put paid to Gibson ever really starting for us.

Of course all what I have written above is just my opinion based on how much money we had, and how much money we usually spent. £13m (ish) to sign a bench warmer? Aye, that’s us all over that. We barely spend £13m on a first team player let alone a second choice centre half.

DCWat
Posts: 9334
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4143 times
Has Liked: 3606 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by DCWat » Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:29 pm

It’s a shame it didn’t work out, whatever the reasons were. I for one thought he’d prove to be a great signing.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:31 pm

bobinho wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:17 pm
Signed to replace Mee who was stalling on his new contract. Very good business really, we planned ahead knowing it was possible that Mee could leave. As it turns out, he signed another deal which basically put paid to Gibson ever really starting for us.

Of course all what I have written above is just my opinion based on how much money we had, and how much money we usually spent. £13m (ish) to sign a bench warmer? Aye, that’s us all over that. We barely spend £13m on a first team player let alone a second choice centre half.
We never paid the full £13 million, we paid barely half that because the clauses for further payments weren't met.
When we sold him we recouped most of the money we'd paid.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18088
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3863 times
Has Liked: 2073 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Quickenthetempo » Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:49 am

I was a little surprised to see the Burnley players hugging Gibson in the tunnel before the game, seems very popular with the lads who were here.

I just thought with all that went on he might not be well liked?

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10913
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5560 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by TheFamilyCat » Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:13 am

Shaggy wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:36 pm
Mee was hopelessly out of form and should have been benched.

Gibson is a better defender than Mee
When Mee was hopelessly out of form, Gibson was injured.

Don't try to rewrite history.

Shaggy
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 8:30 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 149 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Shaggy » Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:19 am

TheFamilyCat wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:13 am
When Mee was hopelessly out of form, Gibson was injured.

Don't try to rewrite history.
Im not. Mee was hopelessly out of form for half of that season. Gibson was available but had to make do on the bench.

Gibson was mismanaged

bobinho
Posts: 9325
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 4105 times
Has Liked: 6588 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Their number 4

Post by bobinho » Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:29 am

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:31 pm
We never paid the full £13 million, we paid barely half that because the clauses for further payments weren't met.
When we sold him we recouped most of the money we'd paid.
Fair enough, thanks for clearing that up. Fact still remains we had no idea it would work out that we WOULDN’T be paying the full amount when we signed him.

longsidetrumpet
Posts: 690
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:01 pm
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 33 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by longsidetrumpet » Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:42 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:49 am
I was a little surprised to see the Burnley players hugging Gibson in the tunnel before the game, seems very popular with the lads who were here.

I just thought with all that went on he might not be well liked?
At the end of the home game v Norwich Dyche and Gibson were talking seemingly quite amiably as they headed for the tunnel. That surprised me too

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Their number 4

Post by tiger76 » Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:21 pm

Gibson definitely played well yesterday, and you do wonder if he felt he had a point to prove to SD.

Pierre Lees-Melou was also a livewire, and made our midfield look static.

spt_claret
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 744 times
Has Liked: 463 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by spt_claret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:47 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:36 pm
Mee was hopelessly out of form and should have been benched.

Gibson is a better defender than Mee
Laughable.

I know 3 neutrals- Watford, Leicester, Arsenal- who would all pick Mee over even Tarkowski. What he brings to the club is invaluable. There's a reason Keane struggles at Everton, there's a reason Tarks was less impressive for England, there's a reason our defence and collective form always noticeably dips without Mee or if he's out of form.
As a pure defender he's the best we've had in as long as I can remember. Not what most big clubs or international managers look for in 'modern' football, but he's top drawer, and again it's no coincidence that we had such an awful run that season when he was out of form.
This user liked this post: Stalbansclaret

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by MACCA » Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:47 pm

tiger76 wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:21 pm
Pierre Lees-Melou was also a livewire, and made our midfield look static.
I'd make our midfield look static.

At HT yesterday I genuinely believe a conference player could have contributed what Lowton and Westwood did, they hit the first man far too often and contributed nothing, causing more problems than solutions

boatshed bill
Posts: 15254
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6754 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by boatshed bill » Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:52 pm

spt_claret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:47 pm
Laughable.

I know 3 neutrals- Watford, Leicester, Arsenal- who would all pick Mee over even Tarkowski. What he brings to the club is invaluable. There's a reason Keane struggles at Everton, there's a reason Tarks was less impressive for England, there's a reason our defence and collective form always noticeably dips without Mee or if he's out of form.
As a pure defender he's the best we've had in as long as I can remember. Not what most big clubs or international managers look for in 'modern' football, but he's top drawer, and again it's no coincidence that we had such an awful run that season when he was out of form.
I've heard that several clubs would like Mee rather than Tarkowski

Caballo
Posts: 1130
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:31 am
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 433 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Caballo » Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:08 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:36 pm
Gibson is a better defender than Mee
Even DA would be embarrassed by that cast, unless of course you believe it. In which case 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18088
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3863 times
Has Liked: 2073 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Quickenthetempo » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:19 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:52 pm
I've heard that several clubs would like Mee rather than Tarkowski
Which ones?

Has somebody really suggested Arsenal would like to sign Ben Mee?

spt_claret
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 744 times
Has Liked: 463 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by spt_claret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:29 pm

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:19 pm
Which ones?

Has somebody really suggested Arsenal would like to sign Ben Mee?
My God. How do people have such atrocious reading comprehension on this site? Is it deliberate?
I specified fans. Friends who are neutral fans, who rate Ben Mee ahead of Tarkowski.
I'm sick of this, it's become utterly pervasive on this site. People interpreting arguments that people are explicitly not making so that they can make it sound weaker and thus dismantle it to win. It's why I clarify at (sometimes excessive) length in almost all my posts, and still it happens.
People do not discuss or debate in good faith here. They resort to ad hominems, tautologies, "No you're wrong" with no elaboration, insults, playing dumb to bait people into getting angry or tangled up, twisting comments, or just shouting their opinion loudly and angrily as if volume is a substitute for content.
It's no wonder we can't muster up decent new chants that catch on or that Turf Moor is a far cry from even a few years ago in atmosphere.
These 2 users liked this post: Tall Paul CoolClaret

CoolClaret
Posts: 7443
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2249 times
Has Liked: 2161 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by CoolClaret » Tue Apr 12, 2022 7:51 am

spt_claret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:29 pm
My God. How do people have such atrocious reading comprehension on this site? Is it deliberate?
I specified fans. Friends who are neutral fans, who rate Ben Mee ahead of Tarkowski.
I'm sick of this, it's become utterly pervasive on this site. People interpreting arguments that people are explicitly not making so that they can make it sound weaker and thus dismantle it to win. It's why I clarify at (sometimes excessive) length in almost all my posts, and still it happens.
People do not discuss or debate in good faith here. They resort to ad hominems, tautologies, "No you're wrong" with no elaboration, insults, playing dumb to bait people into getting angry or tangled up, twisting comments, or just shouting their opinion loudly and angrily as if volume is a substitute for content.
It's no wonder we can't muster up decent new chants that catch on or that Turf Moor is a far cry from even a few years ago in atmosphere.
Totally agree - folk on here deliberately misrepresent posts and then retorts disingenuously in order to point score, rather than actually come to a mutual agreement/common ground/new found outcome.

It’s very sad and indicative of the binary yes/no, left/right, like/dislike social-media influenced tripe that dominates discourse these days.

Arguments/debates are about finding the truth, not ‘winning’ per say, well, whatever ‘winning’ means.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18088
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3863 times
Has Liked: 2073 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Quickenthetempo » Tue Apr 12, 2022 9:49 am

spt_claret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:29 pm
My God. How do people have such atrocious reading comprehension on this site? Is it deliberate?
I specified fans. Friends who are neutral fans, who rate Ben Mee ahead of Tarkowski.
I'm sick of this, it's become utterly pervasive on this site. People interpreting arguments that people are explicitly not making so that they can make it sound weaker and thus dismantle it to win. It's why I clarify at (sometimes excessive) length in almost all my posts, and still it happens.
People do not discuss or debate in good faith here. They resort to ad hominems, tautologies, "No you're wrong" with no elaboration, insults, playing dumb to bait people into getting angry or tangled up, twisting comments, or just shouting their opinion loudly and angrily as if volume is a substitute for content.
It's no wonder we can't muster up decent new chants that catch on or that Turf Moor is a far cry from even a few years ago in atmosphere.
Apologies for missing reading your post. It might be easier to write the word fans in your post, when that's what you mean.
Using other fans opinions doesn't really carry weight with strangers on an Internet forum as fans have varied opinions on all issues.
That's why I assumed you meant you knew of clubs interests, because that will carry weight.

We will find out at the end of the season who is the better player, both available on free transfers. Let's see where they end up?

spt_claret
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 744 times
Has Liked: 463 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by spt_claret » Tue Apr 12, 2022 10:11 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Tue Apr 12, 2022 9:49 am
Apologies for missing reading your post. It might be easier to write the word fans in your post, when that's what you mean.
Using other fans opinions doesn't really carry weight with strangers on an Internet forum as fans have varied opinions on all issues.
That's why I assumed you meant you knew of clubs interests, because that will carry weight.

We will find out at the end of the season who is the better player, both available on free transfers. Let's see where they end up?
I referred to 3 neutrals who I know. I didn't say anything about inside knowledge on that front.
Fan opinion is 90% of an internet forum. Neutral fans are sometimes better placed to judge a player than his own club's fans as they're less emotionally charged and more objective- unless there's a particular grudge against a certain player or club.
We won't find out at the end of the season. We've found out for the past 7 seasons. And even though Mee is 32 Vs Gibson at 29, I would expect Mee to be more likely to end up at a Premier League club assuming he doesn't resign with us.

beddie
Posts: 5226
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1408 times
Has Liked: 519 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by beddie » Tue Apr 12, 2022 12:20 pm

longsidetrumpet wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 10:42 am
At the end of the home game v Norwich Dyche and Gibson were talking seemingly quite amiably as they headed for the tunnel. That surprised me too
Lots had been made on here after Gibson left about a big fall out. We weren’t there, perhaps it’s not as we thought.

Herts Clarets
Posts: 3957
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
Been Liked: 1770 times
Has Liked: 470 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by Herts Clarets » Sat Apr 16, 2022 10:42 pm

Had a stormer today. Schoolboy stuff for Uniteds first and at fault again for their second.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17987
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4073 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Their number 4

Post by ElectroClaret » Sat Apr 16, 2022 10:54 pm

Just watched it on MOTD.
Gibson was dreadful.

Post Reply