The Penalty
The Penalty
Why was it a penalty?
I looked at it on Match of the Day and I saw no contact and Cornet intent on going down - diving. I felt he could have stayed up and perhaps scored.
By the way, Brownhill played the ball out to him - I mention this because he gets criticised for his passing.
I looked at it on Match of the Day and I saw no contact and Cornet intent on going down - diving. I felt he could have stayed up and perhaps scored.
By the way, Brownhill played the ball out to him - I mention this because he gets criticised for his passing.
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: The Penalty
Cornet did what we are absolutely useless at, he "won" a penalty, can't remember the last one we actually "won", instead of the one's we usually get.Hipper wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 9:12 amWhy was it a penalty?
I looked at it on Match of the Day and I saw no contact and Cornet intent on going down - diving. I felt he could have stayed up and perhaps scored.
By the way, Brownhill played the ball out to him - I mention this because he gets criticised for his passing.
-
- Posts: 3458
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1037 times
- Has Liked: 2039 times
Re: The Penalty
It should have been a retake too as
1/ Fabianski is miles off his line before the ball had been struck
2/ Encroachment by West Ham players prior to the ball being struck
It's also not my claret tinted lenses in play but also that of a number of West Ham supporters too
1/ Fabianski is miles off his line before the ball had been struck
2/ Encroachment by West Ham players prior to the ball being struck
It's also not my claret tinted lenses in play but also that of a number of West Ham supporters too
This user liked this post: Quicknick
-
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 332 times
- Has Liked: 1116 times
Re: The Penalty
They will have their own Claret- tinted glasses on, of course…THEWELLERNUT70 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 2:23 pmIt should have been a retake too as
It's also not my claret tinted lenses in play but also that of a number of West Ham supporters too
-
- Posts: 18014
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4074 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: The Penalty
Must admit, haven't seen a replay, but didn't the keeper clatter him?
I'm assuming there's some doubt about it now.
I'm assuming there's some doubt about it now.
Re: The Penalty
If there was no contact, the keeper would have made more of an issue about it, VAR would also have picked this up. As it was he was lucky to stay on the field as you can't say he was "going for the ball"
-
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:23 pm
- Been Liked: 291 times
- Has Liked: 99 times
Re: The Penalty
It doesn’t matter whether it should have been given or not. It was given, and cornet should not have been on penalties.
I don’t know who's decision it was to have cornet on penalties when we had Jay and Wout in the pitch but if it was Jackson then you can see why he has failed as a manger previously.
Surprising out of all the coaching staff Jackson was the one they kept hold of. Very odd.
I don’t know who's decision it was to have cornet on penalties when we had Jay and Wout in the pitch but if it was Jackson then you can see why he has failed as a manger previously.
Surprising out of all the coaching staff Jackson was the one they kept hold of. Very odd.
Re: The Penalty
1st of all Cornet has scored more goals then any other player at the club this season but most importantly there is an agreement between the player's that's been in place for year's and its who ever wins the penalty takes it. I think Wood had scored two in a game a couple of season's back Barnes won and took the penalty and he explained this when asked why Wood didn't take it for his hatrickthelaughingclaret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 2:31 pmIt doesn’t matter whether it should have been given or not. It was given, and cornet should not have been on penalties.
I don’t know who's decision it was to have cornet on penalties when we had Jay and Wout in the pitch but if it was Jackson then you can see why he has failed as a manger previously.
Surprising out of all the coaching staff Jackson was the one they kept hold of. Very odd.
Re: The Penalty
Not sure about that. On the replay (MOTD and Sky) it shows Jay holding the ball as the designated penalty taker and he reluctantly allows Cornet to take it from him. Jay would have scored it, we all know that. Hindsight is wonderful isn’t itClaretMov wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 2:37 pm1st of all Cornet has scored more goals then any other player at the club this season but most importantly there is an agreement between the player's that's been in place for year's and its who ever wins the penalty takes it. I think Wood had scored two in a game a couple of season's back Barnes won and took the penalty and he explained this when asked why Wood didn't take it for his hatrick
-
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2819 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: The Penalty
How do you know he would have scored it?
Re: The Penalty
Statistically a much better chance of scoring it. You’re right, I didn’t know, but Sod’s law and all that.
Re: The Penalty
It was a pen. It was a red card. Cornet missed. Move on
-
- Posts: 3784
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1831 times
- Has Liked: 2635 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: The Penalty
Almost correct, however, the referee was 100% correct ---move on.
This user liked this post: Zlatan
-
- Posts: 4445
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1165 times
- Has Liked: 1301 times
Re: The Penalty
Fabianski received a yellow card but why was that not a red?
Re: The Penalty
The double jeopardy rule - penalty and yellow card is enough of a punishment for a goalkeeper. Personally I’d like to see that rule scrapped as I think it makes the game more interesting. Keepers would no longer be able to risk taking out a player like they can now.Cirrus_Minor wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 5:58 pmFabianski received a yellow card but why was that not a red?
Re: The Penalty
It was deemed by the referee that he made a genuine attempt to get the ball, unlike Collins at Brentford.Cirrus_Minor wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 5:58 pmFabianski received a yellow card but why was that not a red?
Has he made no attempt at getting the ball, a professional foul , he would have been given red
-
- Posts: 4644
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1031 times
- Has Liked: 3191 times
Re: The Penalty
Look again.......he took out Cornets right leg.Hipper wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 9:12 amWhy was it a penalty?
I looked at it on Match of the Day and I saw no contact and Cornet intent on going down - diving. I felt he could have stayed up and perhaps scored.
By the way, Brownhill played the ball out to him - I mention this because he gets criticised for his passing.
-
- Posts: 16899
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6965 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: The Penalty
I can say with full confidence that this isn’t the case. When Barnes and Wood were our forward pairing I understand it was the agreement between themselves, being two very good penalty takers of roughly equal ability. But there’s not a cat in hell’s chance that if Charlie Taylor, for example, is tripped in the box, that he takes the penalty.ClaretMov wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 2:37 pm1st of all Cornet has scored more goals then any other player at the club this season but most importantly there is an agreement between the player's that's been in place for year's and its who ever wins the penalty takes it. I think Wood had scored two in a game a couple of season's back Barnes won and took the penalty and he explained this when asked why Wood didn't take it for his hatrick
Re: The Penalty
I meant between the forwardsRileybobs wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 6:09 pmI can say with full confidence that this isn’t the case. When Barnes and Wood were our forward pairing I understand it was the agreement between themselves, being two very good penalty takers of roughly equal ability. But there’s not a cat in hell’s chance that if Charlie Taylor, for example, is tripped in the box, that he takes the penalty.
-
- Posts: 4445
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1165 times
- Has Liked: 1301 times
Re: The Penalty
I note that the ‘double jeapardy’ rule did not apply today for Dawson (West Ham again).
-
- Posts: 12371
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5210 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: The Penalty
Double jeopardy rule only applies if you make an attempt to win the ball. Dawson just pulls him back by his shirt so ref correct to send off