Daily Mail
-
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 am
- Been Liked: 57 times
- Has Liked: 31 times
- Location: Mancunia
Daily Mail
Just read their sports section on line. Wow they have 4 Burnley articles running more than when we actually played football..!
Doom and more doom .... Players attending parties , out of contract players ,ALK looking to secure more loan money and why on earth are we suing Everton when our relegation is nothing to do with the media darlings from Merseyside.
Poor journalism lots of would,could or shoulds.
Keep the faith clarets - no one likes us .......we don't care.
Doom and more doom .... Players attending parties , out of contract players ,ALK looking to secure more loan money and why on earth are we suing Everton when our relegation is nothing to do with the media darlings from Merseyside.
Poor journalism lots of would,could or shoulds.
Keep the faith clarets - no one likes us .......we don't care.
These 2 users liked this post: NewClaret tarkys_ears
-
- Posts: 9335
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4107 times
- Has Liked: 6590 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Daily Mail
Ahhhh, but we DO.
Re: Daily Mail
Surely Daily Mail readers are as bad as the actual paper aren’t they?
This user liked this post: IanMcL
-
- Posts: 13510
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 3833 times
Re: Daily Mail
Absolutely.
Think we all know some on here will love perpetuating the negativity though. Sometimes I’m not even sure we like us
Think we all know some on here will love perpetuating the negativity though. Sometimes I’m not even sure we like us
Re: Daily Mail
We get no information from the club , what do you expect .Flixton Claret wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 7:54 amJust read their sports section on line. Wow they have 4 Burnley articles running more than when we actually played football..!
Doom and more doom .... Players attending parties , out of contract players ,ALK looking to secure more loan money and why on earth are we suing Everton when our relegation is nothing to do with the media darlings from Merseyside.
Poor journalism lots of would,could or shoulds.
Keep the faith clarets - no one likes us .......we don't care.
-
- Posts: 4293
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
- Been Liked: 1029 times
- Has Liked: 1521 times
Re: Daily Mail
Yeah... all of a sudden every idiot who couldn't find Burnley on a map is suddenly a ******* expert on our club.
It's boring doom mongering shite that keeps getting regurgitated every 5 minutes on some "publication" or other.
Shame they didn't ever show any interest in us before.
It's boring doom mongering shite that keeps getting regurgitated every 5 minutes on some "publication" or other.
Shame they didn't ever show any interest in us before.
These 6 users liked this post: RVclaret NewClaret Zlatan Jörmungandr Pickles boatshed bill
Re: Daily Mail
I read the article where they go full on doom-mongering about the finances but i stopped reading when they wrote "leaving behind a squad with few sellable assets!"...
... Maybe they think 100m of very saleable assets and still being left with a fairly decent Championship squad is a disaster.
... Maybe they think 100m of very saleable assets and still being left with a fairly decent Championship squad is a disaster.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
- Been Liked: 791 times
- Has Liked: 1017 times
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Daily Mail
Interesting front page on the Mail, especially when you compare it every other front page of every other newspaper
Quite illuminating in fact
Quite illuminating in fact
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:08 am
- Been Liked: 28 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
Re: Daily Mail
Public Relations Manual Page 1.
Lack of leadership and clear messaging creates a vacuum, which will be filled with speculation and confusion.
Lack of leadership and clear messaging creates a vacuum, which will be filled with speculation and confusion.
This user liked this post: Boss Hogg
Re: Daily Mail
The sports section will in the Mail is usually ok. They are all out to stick knives in to Burnley at the moment. Some of it may be true but they don’t know the full detail. I’m sure Pace isn’t shocked at having to repay this loan. Only a complete charlatan wouldn’t have planned for this. Bad news and sensationalism sells papers though
-
- Posts: 3563
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 2604 times
- Has Liked: 301 times
Re: Daily Mail
Can you clip up that Eddie Izzard sketch on Princess Diana's death...DavePTClaret wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:09 amPublic Relations Manual Page 1.
Lack of leadership and clear messaging creates a vacuum, which will be filled with speculation and confusion.
Day 1 Nathing..... Day 2 Nathing.....
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: Daily Mail
Mr Pace is a Daily Mail reader unfortunately
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
-
- Posts: 6905
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: Daily Mail
I wont believe a word of all this nonsense until it's in the Morning Star
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Daily Mail
It's true. Daily Mail readers are 100% gullible and only read the news they want to believe. I can't believe how myopic they all are - swallowing guff without a thought in their mindless heads.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:15 amI think he means that people who read the Daily Mail want to believe everything that is in it, and then get annoyed about it
Not at all like the hard-hitting facts of *insert alternative newspaper* that *I* prefer to read. We readers of *insert alternative newspaper* are such a discerning bunch, full of unique and independent thoughts.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Daily Mail
You are right, the Daily Mail is definitely full of "unique and independent thoughts"Rowls wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:25 amIt's true. Daily Mail readers are 100% gullible and only read the news they want to believe. I can't believe how myopic they all are - swallowing guff without a thought in their mindless heads.
Not at all like the hard-hitting facts of *insert alternative newspaper* that *I* prefer to read. We readers of *insert alternative newspaper* are such a discerning bunch, full of unique and independent thoughts.
So unique and independent that they can completely ignore the the daily news stories that everyone else covers
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Daily Mail
To be serious for a second, the REAL problem with the Daily Mail isn't the constant lies and manipulation of people who aren't as clever as I am (who can't realise how easily they're being manipulated) it's the fact that the Daily Mail just causes division and hatred.
That's literally all it ever does. This constant division of pitting X against Y is what is wrong with this country.
In fact, if it weren't for the Daily Mail readers we'd be living in a much better country. We ought to run them out of it to improve things in my humble (independently reached) opinion.
Just think, we could even re-run the Brexit referendum without the Daily Mail swines!
That's literally all it ever does. This constant division of pitting X against Y is what is wrong with this country.
In fact, if it weren't for the Daily Mail readers we'd be living in a much better country. We ought to run them out of it to improve things in my humble (independently reached) opinion.
Just think, we could even re-run the Brexit referendum without the Daily Mail swines!
Re: Daily Mail
Martin Samuel is a top sports journalist regardless of what paper he writes for.
This user liked this post: Rowls
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Daily Mail
Exactly Lancaster! And the poor dupes who read it are too thick to understand what's happening!Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:28 amYou are right, the Daily Mail is definitely full of "unique and independent thoughts"
So unique and independent that they can completely ignore the the daily news stories that everyone else covers
If only we could dupe them the other way, everything would be better.
-
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:24 am
- Been Liked: 139 times
- Has Liked: 183 times
Re: Daily Mail
People who read the Guardian on the other hand DO believe everything that is in itLancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:15 amI think he means that people who read the Daily Mail want to believe everything that is in it, and then get annoyed about it
Re: Daily Mail
Yes its good to read a few papers to get the different views. For football the Guardian is very good - but otherwise its quite funny. Its not easy keep an open mind is it?Guller Bull wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:03 amLove a good generalisation. But what shocks me more is that people actually read a paper and/or stick to one paper. Is this true?
Re: Daily Mail
Yes like teading the Beano.Venkys4eva wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:36 amPeople who read the Guardian on the other hand DO believe everything that is in it
Re: Daily Mail
A strange view of life if that's his thoughtsLancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:15 amI think he means that people who read the Daily Mail want to believe everything that is in it, and then get annoyed about it
I realise that every paper has political leanings, and I know which way each paper leans. I can read articles in the Mail, the Sun, the Mirror, the telegraph or Guardian, each one has good articles and bad ones, I certainly wouldn't think that every Mail reader reacts the same, likewise Guardian readers.
This user liked this post: Lancasterclaret
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Daily Mail
If you read a variety of news sources, then you'll realise quite quickly that the Mail can have an interesting take on the main news story of the day
(ie ignore it completely)
(ie ignore it completely)
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Daily Mail
You at least have entertained the possibility that I may not have been 100% serious with my replyNori1958 wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:48 amA strange view of life if that's his thoughts
I realise that every paper has political leanings, and I know which way each paper leans. I can read articles in the Mail, the Sun, the Mirror, the telegraph or Guardian, each one has good articles and bad ones, I certainly wouldn't think that every Mail reader reacts the same, likewise Guardian readers.
But sadly the expected replies from the expected posters are bang on message
-
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:24 am
- Been Liked: 139 times
- Has Liked: 183 times
Re: Daily Mail
I read all main papers and find the Guardian to be up itself... Whilst the dailymail is a completely over the top scaremongering panic rag. I like the comments section though thats always worth a laugh. I got banned from the dailymail comments section for life in 2020 ish now that is an achievement
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
- Been Liked: 791 times
- Has Liked: 1017 times
Re: Daily Mail
Lancaster I like your posts but you and I are part of those "expected replies from those expected posters"Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:52 amYou at least have entertained the possibility that I may not have been 100% serious with my reply
But sadly the expected replies from the expected posters are bang on message
Left wing, right wing, central a bit party - it's all ********
(Expected reply from one who does not vote and has no political leaning)
This user liked this post: Lancasterclaret
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Daily Mail
Of course!Guller Bull wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 10:10 amLancaster I like your posts but you and I are part of those "expected replies from those expected posters"
Left wing, right wing, central a bit party - it's all ********
(Expected reply from one who does not vote and has no political leaning)
I'm not left wing, I'm a centrist dad btw
But that is left wing if you are supporting the current government, regardless of what it does
This user liked this post: Guller Bull
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
- Been Liked: 791 times
- Has Liked: 1017 times
Re: Daily Mail
Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 10:15 amOf course!
I'm not left wing, I'm a centrist dad btw
But that is left wing if you are supporting the current government, regardless of what it does
Whatever!!
This user liked this post: Rowls
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Daily Mail
Centrist dads hate Corbyn and his brand of politics
Centrist dads hate Johnson and his brand of politics
Its pretty simple really
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
- Been Liked: 791 times
- Has Liked: 1017 times
Re: Daily Mail
I used to be a Centrist because it seemed sensible and moderate then I grew up and realised that Career politicians have to follow a party code otherwise they have no career. That stops any free thought and they cease to be public servants. Once a local politician becomes flushed with success you have lost them to the world.
This user liked this post: Lancasterclaret
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Daily Mail
I actually quite like my local MP because she's a good, local MPGuller Bull wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 10:23 amI used to be a Centrist because it seemed sensible and moderate then I grew up and realised that Career politicians have to follow a party code otherwise they have no career. That stops any free thought and they cease to be public servants. Once a local politician becomes flushed with success you have lost them to the world.
Course, she is a massive Corbynistas (which isn't great to put it mildly) but her actual work in the area is good
That will do, especially when you look at the calibre of politicians you see every day on our TV screens, newspapers and radio
-
- Posts: 5370
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1654 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
Re: Daily Mail
Getting back to the Mail’s Clarets stories the Martin Samuel one is the biggest clown writeup. The premise is that nobody is to blame but ourselves.
He is partly on the right track with that of course, but he conveniently forgets that we were on 35 points and that usually is enough to stay up. OK, I’ve been posting for months that we need 38 points unless we relied on luck, and that turned out to be true, but we only marginally deserve to go down, and Leeds / Everton deserved it too. They just had luck, primarily last minute goals and deflections, Richarlison being available not banned and teams not bothering to turn up for some of their final games, unlike Newcastle who were defending like it was their last game on earth with Howe claiming integrity demanded it despite him having the dubious integrity to take the cash from that ownership.
I have always felt Howe was likely to have been sacked by Burnley and they all arranged a convenient story, certainly his focus on the game backed that view up. But that’s an altogether different story.
Back to Samuel. Luck doesn't balance out after 38 games, it is statistically improbable. Maybe 380 games.
He then talks a lot about it seeming like a paranoid conspiracy theory that the power brokers want Burnley down, he talks about it so much it makes one wonder. He then talks about Everton’s finances and that Everton should be punished if guilty - well yes, but if so surely that undermines his whole argument?
I know now how Blades fans felt over the Tevez affair. That was a right royal stitch up too but it took them years to get compensated.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... emise.html
He is partly on the right track with that of course, but he conveniently forgets that we were on 35 points and that usually is enough to stay up. OK, I’ve been posting for months that we need 38 points unless we relied on luck, and that turned out to be true, but we only marginally deserve to go down, and Leeds / Everton deserved it too. They just had luck, primarily last minute goals and deflections, Richarlison being available not banned and teams not bothering to turn up for some of their final games, unlike Newcastle who were defending like it was their last game on earth with Howe claiming integrity demanded it despite him having the dubious integrity to take the cash from that ownership.
I have always felt Howe was likely to have been sacked by Burnley and they all arranged a convenient story, certainly his focus on the game backed that view up. But that’s an altogether different story.
Back to Samuel. Luck doesn't balance out after 38 games, it is statistically improbable. Maybe 380 games.
He then talks a lot about it seeming like a paranoid conspiracy theory that the power brokers want Burnley down, he talks about it so much it makes one wonder. He then talks about Everton’s finances and that Everton should be punished if guilty - well yes, but if so surely that undermines his whole argument?
I know now how Blades fans felt over the Tevez affair. That was a right royal stitch up too but it took them years to get compensated.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... emise.html
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
- Been Liked: 791 times
- Has Liked: 1017 times
Re: Daily Mail
That's exactly what I mean Lancaster - I know local MP's (Conservative/Labour and SNP) I consider them all friends and people with great ideals and wishes. However they are all on an upward trajectory and once they are recognised as bright lights then they have to swallow more of the party cake till eventually they will become bloated and useless.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 10:25 amI actually quite like my local MP because she's a good, local MP
Course, she is a massive Corbynistas (which isn't great to put it mildly) but her actual work in the area is good
That will do, especially when you look at the calibre of politicians you see every day on our TV screens, newspapers and radio