Cucurrella - £62m

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ecc
Posts: 4233
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 1407 times
Has Liked: 1278 times

Cucurrella - £62m

Post by ecc » Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:51 pm

Chelsea have lashed out £62m on Cucurrella. I remember seeing him play a few years ago for Eibar and he looked a decent player. But I never thought a club would pay that much (especially post-Covid) on a full-back. Gets forward well but one assist last season for Brighton and ten in 100 La Liga games.

Brighton are literally quids in. £47m profit in 12 months.

matttheclaret
Posts: 584
Joined: Mon May 04, 2020 10:17 am
Been Liked: 147 times
Has Liked: 24 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by matttheclaret » Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:53 pm

Linked with us last summer wasn't he? That would have been a handy profit for us!

ClaretTony
Posts: 67783
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32401 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:55 pm

Very much linked with us

Steve1956
Posts: 17246
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6485 times
Has Liked: 2910 times
Location: Fife

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Steve1956 » Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:58 pm

As much as I hate to say it,Brighton at the moment seem to be getting together a good set up....making money hand over fist on transfers...a lovely new ground ..and an up and coming young manager....b@stards! 😏

KRBFC
Posts: 18101
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by KRBFC » Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:58 pm

I said last summer he's a top top player and I'd be very surprised if he went to Burnley or Brighton. Turns out he signed for Brighton.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6952
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1486 times
Has Liked: 1847 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Woodleyclaret » Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:08 pm

Brighton owe millions to the owner and this will help them stay inside any financial rules

ecc
Posts: 4233
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 1407 times
Has Liked: 1278 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by ecc » Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:08 pm

Must be one of the highest fees paid for a full-back.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11114
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1571 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:09 pm

ecc wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:08 pm
Must be one of the highest fees paid for a full-back.
World record for one

Steve1956
Posts: 17246
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6485 times
Has Liked: 2910 times
Location: Fife

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Steve1956 » Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:13 pm

They even got 13 million for Dan Burn

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30621
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11034 times
Has Liked: 5645 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Vegas Claret » Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:16 pm

There's the reason VK mentioned Brighton in his first press conference. That's the model

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6952
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1486 times
Has Liked: 1847 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Woodleyclaret » Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:19 pm

Fao Vegas Claret Brighton have a billionaire owner who had pumped millions into the team over the past 5 yrs .We don't have that luxury.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12360
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Devils_Advocate » Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:25 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:08 pm
Brighton owe millions to the owner and this will help them stay inside any financial rules
I don't think Brighton need any help on staying inside the financial rules at the moment considering the tens of millions ££££'s of revenue they are getting in from transfer fees at the moment.

Wasn't that long ago people on here were scoffing at Brighton around some of their transfer dealings yet they seem to have made a pretty good job of building a young squad with strong saleable assets

KRBFC
Posts: 18101
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by KRBFC » Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:30 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:25 pm
I don't think Brighton need any help on staying inside the financial rules at the moment considering the tens of millions ££££'s of revenue they are getting in from transfer fees at the moment.

Wasn't that long ago people on here were scoffing at Brighton around some of their transfer dealings yet they seem to have made a pretty good job of building a young squad with strong saleable assets
Is it fair to say, a club we hope to follow in the footsteps of?

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3549
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 654 times
Has Liked: 2894 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Burnley Ace » Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:39 pm

and they have sent Duffy on loan to Fulham!

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10898
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5553 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by TheFamilyCat » Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:54 pm

matttheclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:53 pm
Linked with us last summer wasn't he? That would have been a handy profit for us!
There'd have been a £13m release clause if he'd signed for us.
These 2 users liked this post: forzagranata BurnleyFC

forzagranata
Posts: 705
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
Been Liked: 225 times
Has Liked: 439 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by forzagranata » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:00 pm

He played 35 games for Brighton last season. So his value went up by 1.3 million for every game he played in the Premier League.

Bigvince
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:39 pm
Been Liked: 935 times
Has Liked: 699 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Bigvince » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:03 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:58 pm
I said last summer he's a top top player and I'd be very surprised if he went to Burnley or Brighton. Turns out he signed for Brighton.
I thought he was a top player, but didn’t realise he was a top top player🤔

Spijed
Posts: 17120
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Spijed » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:03 pm

Ben White - £50 million for an average PL defender who is unlikely to become an England regular.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12360
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Devils_Advocate » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:08 pm

Ben White is a lot better than average and I reckon he'll easily pick up 20+ England caps over the course of his career
This user liked this post: RVclaret

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by RVclaret » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:15 pm

Brighton seem to be getting it right now. 80m in player sales this summer, 50m last summer, just shows what excellent recruitment can bring and why it’s not impossible for clubs to compete in the PL. Potter has been an outstanding appointment too. They’ve got around another 5/6 players who could easily go for 30m+ (Dunk, Webster, Caicedo, Trossard, MacAllister).

Spijed
Posts: 17120
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Spijed » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:19 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:15 pm
Brighton seem to be getting it right now. 80m in player sales this summer, 50m last summer, just shows what excellent recruitment can bring and why it’s not impossible for clubs to compete in the PL. Potter has been an outstanding appointment too. They’ve got around another 5/6 players who could easily go for 30m+ (Dunk, Webster, Caicedo, Trossard, MacAllister).
But we did compete for six seasons and even got into Europe.

It's as though Brighton are achieving something better than us.

Pickles
Posts: 3586
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:10 pm
Been Liked: 1391 times
Has Liked: 1223 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Pickles » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:19 pm

It's a hell of a lot of money. Looks a decent enough player but difficult to justify that sort of money. Chelsea have something like six left backs now or something daft.

On Brighton - some of the most plastic, entitled fans I've met. Gobby lot considering they've won sod all and have only just stopped watching their team while sat on top of portakabins.

But there's potential for Albion to be massive. Enormous, affluent catchment area; a lot of tourists; billionaire owner.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by RVclaret » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:20 pm

Spijed wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:19 pm
But we did compete for six seasons and even got into Europe.

It's as though Brighton are achieving something better than us.
Very much an established Premier League club now. With their current model and manager it’s highly unlikely they will go down. Plus they play very attractive football.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15228
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3155 times
Has Liked: 6742 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:25 pm

They have had the advantage (over us) in a chairman who has a very large bank balance.

Spijed
Posts: 17120
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Spijed » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:32 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:20 pm
Very much an established Premier League club now. With their current model and manager it’s highly unlikely they will go down. Plus they play very attractive football.
But not every team above us in the league can become established though and stay up, unless every club that comes up goes straight back down for the next few seasons.

Grandpa Claret
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2022 2:08 pm
Been Liked: 12 times
Has Liked: 21 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Grandpa Claret » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:34 pm

matttheclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:53 pm
Linked with us last summer wasn't he? That would have been a handy profit for us!
Chelsea must be gutted Burnley didn't buy him in the summer
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

KRBFC
Posts: 18101
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by KRBFC » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:35 pm

Bigvince wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:03 pm
I thought he was a top player, but didn’t realise he was a top top player🤔
You really quoted my post for this?

Stop cheerleading.

KRBFC
Posts: 18101
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by KRBFC » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:35 pm

Spijed wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:03 pm
Ben White - £50 million for an average PL defender who is unlikely to become an England regular.
If Ben White is average, what on earth are Mee and Tarkowski?

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12360
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Devils_Advocate » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:41 pm

Spijed wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:19 pm
But we did compete for six seasons and even got into Europe.

It's as though Brighton are achieving something better than us.
Its not though. Nobody on here doesn't give Dyche and Burnley all the credit deserved for getting us in to Europe. Its just that for the last 5 years or so you have refused to give any credit to any other teams or managers when they have been successful and instead have used some weird whataboutery logic to downplay anyone else's achievements.

Brighton are a prime example of this and even now you seem unable to admit since Potter took charge Brighton and Potter have got a lot of things right and done brilliantly just like Dyche did at Burnley

Spijed
Posts: 17120
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Spijed » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:49 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:41 pm
Its not though. Nobody on here doesn't give Dyche and Burnley all the credit deserved for getting us in to Europe. Its just that for the last 5 years or so you have refused to give any credit to any other teams or managers when they have been successful and instead have used some weird whataboutery logic to downplay anyone else's achievements.

Brighton are a prime example of this and even now you seem unable to admit since Potter took charge Brighton and Potter have got a lot of things right and done brilliantly just like Dyche did at Burnley
But surely the benchmark for any of those other clubs is to get into Europe to be considered as successful as us.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by claretandy » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:52 pm

They've brought 250m in the last 2 years, White and Cuccarella went for more than the Amex cost to build.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12360
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Devils_Advocate » Fri Aug 05, 2022 6:00 pm

Spijed wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:49 pm
But surely the benchmark for any of those other clubs is to get into Europe to be considered as successful as us.
No its not. Thats you just picking something we did well to deflect from other teams success exactly as I stated in my last thread.

If a team gets into Europe and qualifies for the Europa League stages does that mean Dyche wasnt as successful because he didnt make it past the qualifiers. No of course it doesn't change anything but thats the kind of dumb logic you are using in the other direction.

Personally I think the real achievement as a manager is to take a club from the lower leagues into the Premier League and keep theme there the first season like Wilder and Howe did. Dyche couldn't even keep Burnley up first time round and he'd inherited an established Championship team so I think his success is overplayed myself. wouldn't you agree?

bobinho
Posts: 9295
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 4093 times
Has Liked: 6570 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by bobinho » Fri Aug 05, 2022 6:01 pm

matttheclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:53 pm
Linked with us last summer wasn't he? That would have been a handy profit for us!
It would... but somehow I can't help thinking we would've ended up with ten bob and a pickled egg.... ;) :lol:
This user liked this post: Stayingup

boatshed bill
Posts: 15228
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3155 times
Has Liked: 6742 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Aug 05, 2022 6:10 pm

Spijed wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:49 pm
But surely the benchmark for any of those other clubs is to get into Europe to be considered as successful as us.
Am I right in thinking that on one thread you have stated that the only thing that matters to fans is winning trophies? (or very similar).
So unless a club wins that specific European competition there's no point in getting into it. :?

Spijed
Posts: 17120
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Spijed » Fri Aug 05, 2022 6:17 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 6:10 pm
Am I right in thinking that on one thread you have stated that the only thing that matters to fans is winning trophies? (or very similar).
So unless a club wins that specific European competition there's no point in getting into it. :?
No. I said fans don't care how they win trophies. That's all.

Can I ask why you support Burnley?

boatshed bill
Posts: 15228
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3155 times
Has Liked: 6742 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Aug 05, 2022 6:21 pm

Spijed wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 6:17 pm
No. I said fans don't care how they win trophies. That's all.

Can I ask why you support Burnley?
Burnley is my chosen club.
Has been for 60 years (not saying that matters particularly).
I have no trouble taking the rough times, and we have had some. I enjoy watching football, winning is a bonus not an essential.
This user liked this post: Spijed

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Fri Aug 05, 2022 6:24 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:20 pm
Very much an established Premier League club now. With their current model and manager it’s highly unlikely they will go down. Plus they play very attractive football.
There's a handful of clubs that are established.
The rest make up and the numbers.

At somepoint Brighton will go back down, it might take a few years, but it's going to happen, maybe when Potter jumps ship

They play attractive football thanks in part to not having to manage their finances particularly well.
This user liked this post: Zlatan

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by claretandy » Sat Aug 06, 2022 9:59 am

Cucurrella had a tour of Gawthorpe before signing for Brighton.

https://twitter.com/TheAthleticUK/statu ... RmsSUjOhDQ

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3233
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1768 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by arise_sir_charge » Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:17 am

To be honest, had he joined us he’d have been behind Pieters in the pecking order, had to get Dyche fit and “earn the right”……he’d likely be making his home debut today.
These 4 users liked this post: RVclaret MeeActon1 Pickles Juan Tanamera

FeedTheArf
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 348 times
Has Liked: 150 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by FeedTheArf » Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:21 am

arise_sir_charge wrote:
Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:17 am
To be honest, had he joined us he’d have been behind Pieters in the pecking order, had to get Dyche fit and “earn the right”……he’d likely be making his home debut today.
Or going to Chelsea for the £15m we paid for him after they met his release clause. Or off somewhere round Europe on a free loan.

Stayingup
Posts: 5602
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 921 times
Has Liked: 2751 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Stayingup » Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:22 am

matttheclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:53 pm
Linked with us last summer wasn't he? That would have been a handy profit for us!
We would have sold him for about 15 million.

chekhov
Posts: 2957
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
Been Liked: 807 times
Has Liked: 1522 times
Location: France

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by chekhov » Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:29 am

I’m no expert but I think Chelsea (not for the first time) have had their pants pulled down. When I saw him play on the telly he seemed to run around a lot, often these curvy sort of runs, but usually to no great purpose. He does have a terrific head of hair though, so maybe that’s what Chelsea are paying for. I predict he’ll be a big flop.

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3233
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1768 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by arise_sir_charge » Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:30 am

FeedTheArf wrote:
Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:21 am
Or going to Chelsea for the £15m we paid for him after they met his release clause. Or off somewhere round Europe on a free loan.
Depends whether he’d have helped keep us up, in which case likely no release clause would apply.

Imagine had Brighton gone down there’d have been a clause to activate.

Nonayforever
Posts: 3313
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
Been Liked: 699 times
Has Liked: 174 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Nonayforever » Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:45 am

The difference between Brighton and Burnley in the Prime Dyche era was not the fact that their chairman had shed loads of money and ours wasn't prepared to spend, i think it was the fact that Dyche wasn't prepared to trade when an offer came in for our players as demonstrated with Tarks.
I am of the opinion that Garlick sold out because Dyche became intansigent.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7377
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2235 times
Has Liked: 2134 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by CoolClaret » Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:52 am

Nonayforever wrote:
Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:45 am
I am of the opinion that Garlick sold out because Dyche became intansigent.
Christ almighty

Garlick sold out because he could make an absolute mint and covid probably put his personal company in a precarious situation

Nonayforever
Posts: 3313
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
Been Liked: 699 times
Has Liked: 174 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Nonayforever » Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:57 am

CoolClaret wrote:
Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:52 am
Christ almighty

Garlick sold out because he could make an absolute mint and covid probably put his personal company in a precarious situation
Its all opinions

alboclaret
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:39 pm
Been Liked: 143 times
Has Liked: 103 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by alboclaret » Sat Aug 06, 2022 12:18 pm

matttheclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:53 pm
Linked with us last summer wasn't he? That would have been a handy profit for us!

It would but we would have sold him at 30m though.
Clubs know we will take less because of who we are.

Brighton can demand more than us😔

Greekclaret
Posts: 317
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:59 am
Been Liked: 70 times
Has Liked: 2 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by Greekclaret » Sat Aug 06, 2022 12:23 pm

Was more than just linked with him. He was at gawthorpe with his agent having a tour. Led to believe he even had a shirt in his hand at one point. He ultimately chose to go with Brighton and their better play style over us.

forzagranata
Posts: 705
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
Been Liked: 225 times
Has Liked: 439 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by forzagranata » Sat Aug 06, 2022 12:31 pm

arise_sir_charge wrote:
Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:17 am
To be honest, had he joined us he’d have been behind Pieters in the pecking order, had to get Dyche fit and “earn the right”……he’d likely be making his home debut today.
He would have started on the bench for sure, made a few appearances on the left-wing as a sub and played at LB when Taylor got injured.

He would have been sold this summer for little more than what we paid for him - or loaned back to Spain.

Hopefully in the future our 'style of football' won't be a deterrent to signing such players but our chairman needs to also work out how to maximise value from the talent we do sign/develop.

aggi
Posts: 8829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2115 times

Re: Cucurrella - £62m

Post by aggi » Sat Aug 06, 2022 1:28 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:15 pm
Brighton seem to be getting it right now. 80m in player sales this summer, 50m last summer, just shows what excellent recruitment can bring and why it’s not impossible for clubs to compete in the PL. Potter has been an outstanding appointment too. They’ve got around another 5/6 players who could easily go for 30m+ (Dunk, Webster, Caicedo, Trossard, MacAllister).
They do seem to be getting it right now but it took quite a bit of trial and error and a lot of money lost on signings like that Iranian striker. Fortunately for them they had an owner who was willing to subsidise them with hundreds of millions whilst they were losing £50m+ year but obviously that model doesn't work for most. If they keep selling these players for £50m+ they may even turn a profit one year.
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81

Post Reply