This isn’t correct. He had a few opportunities he just chose to constantly throw himself on the floor instead of trying to shoot or pass.IanMcL wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:01 amBarnes was brought in, when Kompany changed the system, to 'hold on to the win'.
He was left up on his own, whereas until then, folk were attacking. He is not the reason for anything negative. Just doing as asked.
When we stopped attacking and let them on to us, we lost the 2 goals.
Barnes
-
- Posts: 5794
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Barnes
Re: Barnes
Once.Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:11 amThis isn’t correct. He had a few opportunities he just chose to constantly throw himself on the floor instead of trying to shoot or pass.
Another time he was clearly tripped, edge of box, when really going towards the ball Ref didn't see it.
Re: Barnes
If Kompany asked him to shoot the ball towards goal with his left foot, only for it to hit his right foot and actually bounce backwards, I'd be amazed.IanMcL wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:01 amBarnes was brought in, when Kompany changed the system, to 'hold on to the win'.
He was left up on his own, whereas until then, folk were attacking. He is not the reason for anything negative. Just doing as asked.
When we stopped attacking and let them on to us, we lost the 2 goals.
If Kompany asked him to throw his leg against a defender and throw himself to the floor when he'd actually done some decent work taking the ball round the 'keeper, I'd be equally amazed.
Facts are, he shouldn't be playing.
Re: Barnes
The first was just a flash turn and shot. Happens to most players. Timing very difficult. The 2nd incident, fully agree.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:14 amIf Kompany asked him to shoot the ball towards goal with his left foot, only for it to hit his right foot and actually bounce backwards, I'd be amazed.
If Kompany asked him to throw his leg against a defender and throw himself to the floor when he'd actually done some decent work taking the ball round the 'keeper, I'd be equally amazed.
Facts are, he shouldn't be playing.
-
- Posts: 1229
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:16 am
- Been Liked: 404 times
- Has Liked: 374 times
Re: Barnes
Big fan of Barnes and what he has done for our club. But we look a far better team with JRod playing at the moment.
I'd expect us to start to see more of a younger more mobile striker come through at some point too.
I'd expect us to start to see more of a younger more mobile striker come through at some point too.
Re: Barnes
Just seen the Clarets+ Replay.
From comments on here I expected Barnes to be dreadful. He wasn't.
When he came on Rodriguez was offering little - probably knackered! It was the right decision to substitute him.
We got the usual Barnes falling over, maybe a couple of times. His general play was good though. He was full of movement and offered himself many times for the ball, linking up play well. He had one half chance which he fluffed. Overall a worthy contribution.
From comments on here I expected Barnes to be dreadful. He wasn't.
When he came on Rodriguez was offering little - probably knackered! It was the right decision to substitute him.
We got the usual Barnes falling over, maybe a couple of times. His general play was good though. He was full of movement and offered himself many times for the ball, linking up play well. He had one half chance which he fluffed. Overall a worthy contribution.
This user liked this post: GDK
-
- Posts: 8996
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2013 times
- Has Liked: 2913 times
Re: Barnes
As usual those who have been encouraged to ‘win fouls’ for so long it becomes instinct. Barnes (like Tin Man) used to be hilarious, but now done instinctively rather than intelligently Barnes is becoming embarrassing. I’ve always been a fan of the other side of Barnes play, but sadly that is diminishing and the ‘easy option’ seems now to be Barnes preference. If VK cannot get it out of him, then Barnes place in the team is rightly being criticised. Sad really, because I don’t buy into it being an age thing as he slows down, its a bad habit that has been encouraged.
-
- Posts: 16900
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6965 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Barnes
What was noticeable was that Jay would stand directly between the two Blackpool centre backs. Causing confusion and giving himself space to receive the ball, and as a result space for others to run into. Barnes would just stand on a defender.northeastclaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 10:25 amIn fairness up until yesterday I still felt Barnes could do a job for us but what was so obvious yesterday is that Jay wasn’t once in a physical battle looking for free kick or barging into the centre half. He continuously lost his man, came deep and played the ball without the need of a battle.
This user liked this post: BleedingClaret
-
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2603 times
- Has Liked: 763 times
Re: Barnes
Barnes is ineffective if not in a two. He's also a bellend and that completely unnecessary dive and handball near the end when he was in a decent position summed him up.
This user liked this post: Stevie Morgan
Re: Barnes
Completely disagree here. There is a direct correlation between Barnes coming on and us stopping attacking. Barnes stopped us attacking as he is incapable of doing what Jay Rod did and linking the play effectively by dropping off.IanMcL wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:01 amBarnes was brought in, when Kompany changed the system, to 'hold on to the win'.
He was left up on his own, whereas until then, folk were attacking. He is not the reason for anything negative. Just doing as asked.
When we stopped attacking and let them on to us, we lost the 2 goals.
I am hugely concerned if Kompany does not get another striker, as Jay Rod clearly cannot play 90 minutes and bringing Barnes on makes us worse - unless of course Kompany considers Twine as capable of playing in the position Jay Rod played yesterday.
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Barnes
Barnes is certainly not to blame for us dropping 2 points that lies firmly with the manager who got his team selection and tactics wrong
Re: Barnes
I don't see any reason why Twine can't be converted into an out and out forward. He certainly knows how to finish based on his youtube highlights and that's about 80% oof the job.DanH90 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 12:27 pmCompletely disagree here. There is a direct correlation between Barnes coming on and us stopping attacking. Barnes stopped us attacking as he is incapable of doing what Jay Rod did and linking the play effectively by dropping off.
I am hugely concerned if Kompany does not get another striker, as Jay Rod clearly cannot play 90 minutes and bringing Barnes on makes us worse - unless of course Kompany considers Twine as capable of playing in the position Jay Rod played yesterday.
-
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 691 times
- Has Liked: 362 times
Re: Barnes
I potentially agree
JRod did the job really well. Dropped to link the play when we were keeping posession insode our own third, which also allowed the wide players to exploit their defence by drawing them out, and made really good runs when we pushed up nearer the half way line, and got in the box when it went out wide
No reason Twine can't do this. A number 10 or false 9, rather than an out and out number 9 works well if you have 2 fast wide players playing high up the pitch
It's tried and tested
-
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 691 times
- Has Liked: 362 times
Re: Barnes
I saw it at least twice; but you are right, he was clearly tripped on the edge of the box at one point and the ref gave nothing. The ref was pretty close too. I thought he didn't give it because he thought the ball as too far away and Barnes wouldn't have got it (which is true, but also it's still a foul), but he could have missed it, or seen it and just assumed Barnes dived, which is also usually my first instinct
Re: Barnes
I'd like to see us try two up top with Jay dropping back and Twine running off him. Doesn't look like it'll happen though.
This user liked this post: IanMcL
Re: Barnes
I agree Barnes has never really been as effective when played as a lone forward, working best alongside eg Wood or Vokes. Jay did seem to tire yesterday, but ideally we could have brought Barnes on to play alongside him to help manage the last 30 mins as the ball had already started to come back too quickly. VK will have to learn there is still a place for a solid 442, and defending a 2 goal lead is an obvious example. We can still play possession based football in that shape.
I hope Barnes starts at Shrewsbury and would love him to get a goal or two to get his season up and running.
I hope Barnes starts at Shrewsbury and would love him to get a goal or two to get his season up and running.
Re: Barnes
I thought Barnes did ok yesterday. I was pleased to see him dropping deeper and getting more involved, and at times he held the ball up well and linked players in. There were just two issues that came to my mind. First, relating to his physical ability, he doesn’t look sharp in terms of finishing. The chance he messed up didn’t look great, but it wasn’t an easy one to connect with. Though it’s not the first time this season - he needs a goal to get some confidence. Second, in terms of his decision making, on the right when he went past the keeper, had he had better awareness he could have had a shot as there was a brief moment where there was a clear path to goal, but his attempt to win the free kick made him look foolish. It’s clear that strategy isn’t working for him in the Championship, and he’s going to need to adapt. I think he can adapt and hope he does.
-
- Posts: 2602
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: Barnes
It’s not nice, and we all acknowledge the contribution he’s made over the last 8 years, but if all he’s capable of now is to try and influence games by cheating - and frankly he’s not even very good at it - he’s not not really deserving of much sympathy.GDK wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 10:41 amWow, what a horrible thread about someone who has played a huge part in our success over the last 8 years or so.
I'm sure he'd agree it wasn't his best afternoon but the problems that led to us throwing the points away started long before he came on. How come we are allowed to be more patient with the new players, but allow Ash no time at all to learn how to play this totally new system?
Re: Barnes
There's alot of sentimental people on here.
Thanks for the memories Barnes but you don't offer us anything, so please go a find a new challenge and play as much football as possible in a league that you'll score goals.
Which I assume is what he loves doing considering he's a footballer?
Thanks for the memories Barnes but you don't offer us anything, so please go a find a new challenge and play as much football as possible in a league that you'll score goals.
Which I assume is what he loves doing considering he's a footballer?
-
- Posts: 2602
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: Barnes
I had a pretty good view of that from the JMU, and I would disagree- never enough contact to send him over. But that’s the other point about the way he’s playing now. Refs know he’s always at it, so they’re never going to give the benefit of any doubt.
Re: Barnes
The decision not to terminate his contract after the drink driving episode is really coming back to haunt us.
This user liked this post: AGENT_CLARET