Their goal

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8524
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2472 times
Has Liked: 2008 times

Their goal

Post by Tricky Trevor » Thu Oct 06, 2022 7:56 am

Saw Vitinho was getting some stick but he couldn’t have done more. If he gets any closer the guy on the ball would have fed the overlapper in.
It went very close to Muric, who was slow to his right again. Saw him limping, caused by his right ankle, late on. Was it the same as at Baggies? If so he might have a problem that needs addressing.
A40C318E-74F6-4D68-9720-B7BE7999538B.jpeg
A40C318E-74F6-4D68-9720-B7BE7999538B.jpeg (185.64 KiB) Viewed 3204 times

Tread Warily
Posts: 302
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:02 pm
Been Liked: 23 times
Has Liked: 123 times

Re: Their goal

Post by Tread Warily » Thu Oct 06, 2022 8:02 am

A chainsaw might be required.

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretspice » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:31 pm

I don't think the goal is Vitinho's fault at all. Nor do I particularly think it's Muric's fault. It's a very good header, not that far away from the corner snd whilst a top keeper might save it, I don't think Muric can be blamed for not doing so.

I do think its a bad team goal though which reveals much about our present shortcomings though. Roberts clearly should do better - there's no intensity to his challenge at the back post (an improvement on Saturday when he was in no position to challenge at all). Cullen and Brownhill are both a little lackadaisical in their attempts to stop the counter-attack at source. JBG is never in the game and Tella (possibly carrying a touch of cramp) is initially caught goal side of the overlapping full back you identify, and then doesn't sprint back. All round it's a bit complacent.

This is very similar to Saturday- midfield taken out of the game too easily, wide players not in a position to or trying hard enough to influence the game, cross allowed in too easily as a result and insufficient pressure on the attacker.

It boils down to a lack of intensity and a lack of defensive shape. The latter is OK if you are all out committed to scoring goals, but we were clearly in "see the game out" mode and had been for 5 minutes plus. I don't quite understand why we didn't go 442 with JBG and Brownhill wide and Tella (or a sub) up front.

So - there's a tactical and attitude challenge for Kompany, his staff and players to unwind. Quickly, if they have the ambition to get promoted this season.
This user liked this post: KateR

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10168
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:33 pm

Wonder if the Stoke fans will mock their manager chucking a centre half on as a sub and putting him upfront while chasing the game who then scored

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretspice » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:41 pm

I may be wrong but I don't think they did put him up front. I think he came on and they reorganised to a back 4 with the wing backs playing as wide midfielders and Clarke completing the back 4. It just so happened that having made territory down our right he continued his run to get in the box and score the goal.

That incidentally is one reason I thought we'd match them in the last 10 minutes. Kompany knows 442 and has played it, yet he allowed Stoke whilst chasing the game to have a natural overload on both sides given the attacking positioning of our wingers. That calculation is OK if you can use the central midfield 3 to dominate the ball, but Stoke's extra intensity was making that harder for us and as a result we were exposed more than we should have been.

KRBFC
Posts: 18129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3803 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Their goal

Post by KRBFC » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:42 pm

I've been an advocate of Roberts but is that 3 times in the final minutes he's cost us on the back post?
This user liked this post: IanMcL

KRBFC
Posts: 18129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3803 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Their goal

Post by KRBFC » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:43 pm

Their goal also came after weak play from the one footed JBG, who then conceded a free kick. If we win that freekick, we probably win the game.
This user liked this post: warksclaret

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretspice » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:43 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:42 pm
I've been an advocate of Roberts but is that 3 times in the final minutes he's cost us on the back post?
Yes although I've every sympathy with the first (WBA) because it's just an error. The other two are are more culpable because he's just not done the basics.

KRBFC
Posts: 18129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3803 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Their goal

Post by KRBFC » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:44 pm

I think Harwood Bellis has to take control there tbh
These 3 users liked this post: whiffa Zlatan IanMcL

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretspice » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:49 pm

Not sure he can last night. It's a decent ball measured to take him out of the equation - a function of the time we afforded the cross. Cardiff is similar and I think Roberts is probably more culpable there than THB although on that occasion I'd certainly be more critical of THB.

Thinking back though you are right about the free kick. We were slow to react and that is another example of us being a bit lackadaisical. The highlights pick up JBG 20 yards off Brownhill and I'm not sure how that gap opened up, and it reflects badly on Tella's position too. Once we give away the FK, they should be back making 2 banks of 4.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretandy » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:56 pm

Not sure how you can blame Roberts for THB getting beat in the air against Cardiff.
This user liked this post: Quickenthetempo

whiffa
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:58 pm
Been Liked: 515 times
Has Liked: 2605 times

Re: Their goal

Post by whiffa » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:57 pm

I picture that ball into the box with Tarky, Mee or Pope all coming to claim it or head it away with ease. We just need to accept we're in the Championship now and we have a younger squad that are either going to develop into players like the aformentioned, or stay at Championship level for a reason.

I find it more frustrating that we've conceded so late into a game that we've dominated again, than the errors with the actual goal we conceded. We didn't really look like conceding and weren't under pressure.
This user liked this post: It Is What It Is

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Their goal

Post by Lancasterclaret » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:58 pm

I think everyone concerned can do better, including Muric, but its essentially a gaol conceded in the 87th minute of a game in which we should have been out of sight

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretspice » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:58 pm

claretandy wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:56 pm
Not sure how you can blame Roberts for THB getting beat in the air against Cardiff.
Cos THB was backpeddling to make a challenge in the zone Roberts should have been managing. He was caught day dreaming down the right flank and ended up in no man's land.

Last night's goal was scored from a header from a virtually identical position. Roberts was in the position then he should have been in on Saturday (he just wasn't strong enough)

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretspice » Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:59 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:58 pm
I think everyone concerned can do better, including Muric, but its essentially a gaol conceded in the 87th minute of a game in which we should have been out of sight
But we weren't lancs so we had to defend it better. Its such a basic goal.

jrgbfc
Posts: 8508
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2107 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Their goal

Post by jrgbfc » Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:18 pm

claretspice wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:31 pm
I don't think the goal is Vitinho's fault at all. Nor do I particularly think it's Muric's fault. It's a very good header, not that far away from the corner snd whilst a top keeper might save it, I don't think Muric can be blamed for not doing so.

I do think its a bad team goal though which reveals much about our present shortcomings though. Roberts clearly should do better - there's no intensity to his challenge at the back post (an improvement on Saturday when he was in no position to challenge at all). Cullen and Brownhill are both a little lackadaisical in their attempts to stop the counter-attack at source. JBG is never in the game and Tella (possibly carrying a touch of cramp) is initially caught goal side of the overlapping full back you identify, and then doesn't sprint back. All round it's a bit complacent.

This is very similar to Saturday- midfield taken out of the game too easily, wide players not in a position to or trying hard enough to influence the game, cross allowed in too easily as a result and insufficient pressure on the attacker.

It boils down to a lack of intensity and a lack of defensive shape. The latter is OK if you are all out committed to scoring goals, but we were clearly in "see the game out" mode and had been for 5 minutes plus. I don't quite understand why we didn't go 442 with JBG and Brownhill wide and Tella (or a sub) up front.

So - there's a tactical and attitude challenge for Kompany, his staff and players to unwind. Quickly, if they have the ambition to get promoted this season.
We seemed to go into "see the game out" mode the minute we scored. There was no drive or urgency whatsoever to score a second and kill the game off. Was a very strange 30 minutes, of just "nothingness" really.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17986
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4073 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Their goal

Post by ElectroClaret » Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:27 pm

Isn't there a possibility that you're over-analysing things, Spice?

It could be said we simply struggle with high balls into the box (for whatever reason).
It's looking like it with all the points weve dropped in pretty identical circumstances.

We should be closing these games out.

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretspice » Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:29 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:27 pm
Isn't there a possibility that you're over-analysing things, Spice?

It could be said we simply struggle with high balls into the box (for whatever reason).
It's looking like it with all the points weve dropped in pretty identical circumstances.

We should be closing these games out.
Well yes. But that begs a question- why are we so vulnerable, so it's worth answering it. And a quick glance at the goals conceded confirms its not per se due to a lack of height.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretandy » Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:40 pm

claretspice wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:58 pm
Cos THB was backpeddling to make a challenge in the zone Roberts should have been managing. He was caught day dreaming down the right flank and ended up in no man's land.

Last night's goal was scored from a header from a virtually identical position. Roberts was in the position then he should have been in on Saturday (he just wasn't strong enough)
I prefer my centre halfs to mark the dangerman, and not an empty space.
This user liked this post: Tricky Trevor

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretspice » Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:42 pm

claretandy wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:40 pm
I prefer my centre halfs to mark the dangerman, and not an empty space.
I agree. I prefer my full backs to do the same though, which is my point- particularly when the space they are marking is not a useful one.

Firthy
Posts: 4983
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 1613 times
Has Liked: 277 times

Re: Their goal

Post by Firthy » Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:47 pm

Basically poor marking. Roberts stood off him and allowed him the time to place the header. IMO Roberts should have been much closer and challenging for the header.

KRBFC
Posts: 18129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3803 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Their goal

Post by KRBFC » Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:50 pm

claretspice wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:49 pm
Not sure he can last night. It's a decent ball measured to take him out of the equation - a function of the time we afforded the cross. Cardiff is similar and I think Roberts is probably more culpable there than THB although on that occasion I'd certainly be more critical of THB.

Thinking back though you are right about the free kick. We were slow to react and that is another example of us being a bit lackadaisical. The highlights pick up JBG 20 yards off Brownhill and I'm not sure how that gap opened up, and it reflects badly on Tella's position too. Once we give away the FK, they should be back making 2 banks of 4.
Disappointing we've been done with a last minute header from an opposition defender running the length of the pitch into our penalty area while our 2 central defenders are marking space and leaving Roberts to challenge for it in the air. THB should be tunnel visioned on the goalscorer the minute he enters our area.

KRBFC
Posts: 18129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3803 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Their goal

Post by KRBFC » Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:51 pm

as for JBG, why he is keeping hold of the ball and then giving away a free kick, I have no idea. Pass the ball inside to an open team mate, held on to it way too long and showed his one footedness and lack of ability to beat a man.

KRBFC
Posts: 18129
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3803 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Their goal

Post by KRBFC » Thu Oct 06, 2022 3:00 pm

Roberts is also in a bit of a mess, there's a guy completely free behind him (which is his man). Tough one for him, that's on the defenders. And where is Gudmundsson? he just lost the ball and gave away a free kick, the freshest legs on the pitch and nowhere to be seen.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2602 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Their goal

Post by quoonbeatz » Thu Oct 06, 2022 3:03 pm

Roberts wasn't at fault last night. Their man was taller and had the run on him. He was never going to win the header or out him off with a challenge. Decent goal from them but one we should have cut out before it got to the cross.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Their goal

Post by RVclaret » Thu Oct 06, 2022 3:04 pm

Just seen an interview with Brownhill where he admits he should have brought down their man on the wing

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Their goal

Post by claretspice » Thu Oct 06, 2022 3:11 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:50 pm
Disappointing we've been done with a last minute header from an opposition defender running the length of the pitch into our penalty area while our 2 central defenders are marking space and leaving Roberts to challenge for it in the air. THB should be tunnel visioned on the goalscorer the minute he enters our area.
Harsh I think. If THB goes back post he leaves an enormous gap between him and Bayer that I don't think is in any coaching manual - and there's a man well positioned to attack that space. THB is entitled to assume Roberts competes with fellow full back at the back post, in which case there's no issue.

Spijed
Posts: 17124
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Their goal

Post by Spijed » Thu Oct 06, 2022 3:19 pm

It's disappointing that as yet VK hasn't been able to transfer his knowledge as a top class defender into management. As a player he would certainly have been able to read the situation better than the team did last night.

What's also frustrating is that we have little experience in defence which is obviously partly to blame for the lack of game management in these situations. Surely that's down to recruitment.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18087
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3863 times
Has Liked: 2073 times

Re: Their goal

Post by Quickenthetempo » Thu Oct 06, 2022 3:28 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 3:04 pm
Just seen an interview with Brownhill where he admits he should have brought down their man on the wing
Ww shouldn't have to foul to keep the ball out of our net though.

If you want to pack your defence with ball playing/attack minded defenders, you have to score 2 or more goals every game to win.
Or be very lucky.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30696
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11049 times
Has Liked: 5658 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Their goal

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Oct 06, 2022 3:31 pm

The sooner we have a settled back four the better. Robert THB Beyer and Taylor back at left back please. Maatsen further forward if needs be

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Their goal

Post by SalisburyClaret » Thu Oct 06, 2022 4:20 pm

Small player crouches down with his hands behind his back - he's not going to cut out a cross or make a challenge.
Roberts is flat footed
Goalkeeper reacts quickly but for some reason doesn't go near the ball
This user liked this post: IanMcL

warksclaret
Posts: 6687
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1699 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: Their goal

Post by warksclaret » Thu Oct 06, 2022 5:35 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:51 pm
as for JBG, why he is keeping hold of the ball and then giving away a free kick, I have no idea. Pass the ball inside to an open team mate, held on to it way too long and showed his one footedness and lack of ability to beat a man.
The way we play our football now is too quick for both JBG and Barnes. THey are both still used to Dyche tempo

dougcollins
Posts: 6723
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 1820 times
Has Liked: 1800 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: Their goal

Post by dougcollins » Thu Oct 06, 2022 5:44 pm

:!:
Firthy wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 2:47 pm
Basically poor marking. Roberts stood off him and allowed him the time to place the header. IMO Roberts should have been much closer and challenging for the header.
Indeed. Height is not the issue, Trippier always showed how you could make it difficult for a taller man (as forwards invariably were) to get his head on the ball.

boyyanno
Posts: 1640
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 515 times
Has Liked: 117 times

Re: Their goal

Post by boyyanno » Thu Oct 06, 2022 5:46 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 3:31 pm
The sooner we have a settled back four the better. Robert THB Beyer and Taylor back at left back please. Maatsen further forward if needs be
I dont think Vitinho has done anything to warrant dropping to be honest. He has looked defensively more solid than Maatsen and given the majority of the defense have made errors resulting in goals this year he's one of the only ones who hasn't. He starts for me, Maatsen further forward if required. I'd prefer to see Beyer in at RB for Roberts and Taylor and THB in the middle with Vitinho out left. Robert's is the weakest link imo.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15254
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3163 times
Has Liked: 6754 times

Re: Their goal

Post by boatshed bill » Thu Oct 06, 2022 5:49 pm

claretspice wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:43 pm
Yes although I've every sympathy with the first (WBA) because it's just an error. The other two are are more culpable because he's just not done the basics.
I thought THB jumped with the Cardiff scorer?

Firthy
Posts: 4983
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 1613 times
Has Liked: 277 times

Re: Their goal

Post by Firthy » Thu Oct 06, 2022 6:10 pm

Vitinho did nothing wrong he was marking the man with the ball and if you look at the video there were two other Stoke players running outside so Vitinho had to be prepared for the pass outside so couldn't dive in. It was just a bloody good opportunistic cross. THB was stuck in no mans land in the middle. Roberts was the closest to the scorer and stood off as he ran in and his fault was standing off and not challenging for the header but it's easy to say in hindsight. It was a great cross and well taken goal. The biggest mistake was the sloppy play just before when we gave them posession and allowed them the opportunity to attack.
This user liked this post: NewClaret

KlyBfc
Posts: 964
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:38 pm
Been Liked: 214 times
Has Liked: 129 times

Re: Their goal

Post by KlyBfc » Thu Oct 06, 2022 6:34 pm

Disagree on this in regards to Vitinho. He can be and should be closer to the winger he’s in no man’s land standing off the winger and doing that inside our own area is not acceptable and fundamentally cost us a goal. He doesn’t need to commit completely to a tackle and be really tight , he just needs to be close enough to engage if needed and to pressure the crosser whilst still being able to cover the over lap. That is doable with a step or so forward, and for me the man with the ball should always be the primary concern as they will always be primary danger. The winger had all the time in the world to pick that cross out.

What I do agree with is we are very complacent in our defensive duties as a TEAM and we don’t seem to have the mindset that engaging and battling your opponents and defending your goal is as important as say ball possession..

NewClaret
Posts: 13486
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3106 times
Has Liked: 3824 times

Re: Their goal

Post by NewClaret » Thu Oct 06, 2022 6:35 pm

Firthy wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 6:10 pm
Vitinho did nothing wrong he was marking the man with the ball and if you look at the video there were two other Stoke players running outside so Vitinho had to be prepared for the pass outside so couldn't dive in. It was just a bloody good opportunistic cross. THB was stuck in no mans land in the middle. Roberts was the closest to the scorer and stood off as he ran in and his fault was standing off and not challenging for the header but it's easy to say in hindsight. It was a great cross and well taken goal. The biggest mistake was the sloppy play just before when we gave them posession and allowed them the opportunity to attack.
Good goal once they got in to that position as you say.

Shouldn’t have been allowed to get in to that position.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16885
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6958 times
Has Liked: 1483 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Their goal

Post by Rileybobs » Thu Oct 06, 2022 6:53 pm

A lot to unpick in the build up, particularly how we were caught out so exposed from an uncontested drop ball. But that is diabolical goalkeeping from Muric, I thought so at the time from the JMU but wanted to see it back to get a better perspective. The view from in front of the goal is damming. His feet don’t even leave the floor for what should be a fairly routine save.

It’s ok picking the bones out of everything else because there were plenty of individual errors, but the keeper is there as the last line of defence and for the second game running he’s let in a very soft effort. He must improve.
This user liked this post: ClaretFelix

basil6345789
Posts: 2713
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
Been Liked: 482 times
Has Liked: 2292 times

Re: Their goal

Post by basil6345789 » Thu Oct 06, 2022 8:22 pm

A goal up with a few minutes to go - you play 6 at the back if you have to - we were outnumbered!

conyoviejo
Posts: 5829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
Been Liked: 2491 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates

Re: Their goal

Post by conyoviejo » Thu Oct 06, 2022 8:47 pm

T'was a good goal.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5356
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1647 times
Has Liked: 402 times

Re: Their goal

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Thu Oct 06, 2022 8:51 pm

Ultimately, as the picture at the top shows, we have six back when defending but little wide cover so as they attack down our flanks we get exposed. Very unlike a Dyche setup. We don’t really pull back or track back our wide midfielders.

West Brom exposed this very well.

Spijed
Posts: 17124
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Their goal

Post by Spijed » Thu Oct 06, 2022 8:59 pm

CrosspoolClarets wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 8:51 pm
Ultimately, as the picture at the top shows, we have six back when defending but little wide cover so as they attack down our flanks we get exposed. Very unlike a Dyche setup. We don’t really pull back or track back our wide midfielders.

West Brom exposed this very well.
As we clearly struggle with crosses into the box I'm surprised teams aren't putting far more pressure on us earlier in the game.

It Is What It Is
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:21 pm
Been Liked: 196 times
Has Liked: 407 times

Re: Their goal

Post by It Is What It Is » Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:00 pm

Good cross, good header, good goal.
Hard to defend a cross like that.

warksclaret
Posts: 6687
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1699 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: Their goal

Post by warksclaret » Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:07 pm

If a cross is put in the right spot its hard for defenders to get it-ask Becham or Trippier. All I wiuld say is that 9 times out of 10 Pope and Heaton would have saved that header. THats how good they were. Dyche used to talk about fine margins-the Goal Keepers in the PL have the ability to make master and sensational saves. Thats what distinguishes them

Burnley1989
Posts: 7400
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2309 times
Has Liked: 2172 times

Re: Their goal

Post by Burnley1989 » Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:12 pm

It Is What It Is wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:00 pm
Good cross, good header, good goal.
Hard to defend a cross like that.
Ey don’t say that, there must be blame 😂
This user liked this post: It Is What It Is

fanzone
Posts: 808
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:00 pm
Been Liked: 228 times
Has Liked: 65 times

Re: Their goal

Post by fanzone » Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:50 pm

Muric effort to save last night's header and the Cardiff one were border line p1$$ poor

agreenwood
Posts: 3169
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1749 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Their goal

Post by agreenwood » Thu Oct 06, 2022 10:37 pm

On a slightly related point, their goal was scored after one of their players had been injured and they’d kicked it out for a throw in. The ref restarted with a drop ball rather than throw in.

Is that acceptable under the rules? I thought drop balls were for when the ref stopped the game.

ClaretPete001
Posts: 2122
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 337 times
Has Liked: 163 times

Re: Their goal

Post by ClaretPete001 » Thu Oct 06, 2022 10:45 pm

CrosspoolClarets wrote:
Thu Oct 06, 2022 8:51 pm
Ultimately, as the picture at the top shows, we have six back when defending but little wide cover so as they attack down our flanks we get exposed. Very unlike a Dyche setup. We don’t really pull back or track back our wide midfielders.

West Brom exposed this very well.
And so did Cardiff and Blackpool. This is not a one off by any means...

As New Claret says above it has gone badly wrong way before it gets in the box.

Post Reply