Muric

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
taio
Posts: 11639
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Muric

Post by taio » Sat Feb 25, 2023 11:06 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Feb 25, 2023 11:00 pm
Apparently Maatsen has just unfollowed Muric on Instagram.
You're a card

harpers_perm
Posts: 208
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:42 am
Been Liked: 187 times
Has Liked: 27 times

Re: Muric

Post by harpers_perm » Sat Feb 25, 2023 11:07 pm

Casper2 wrote:
Sat Feb 25, 2023 10:53 pm
Truth hurts , he was injured because of a pathetic pass from Muric
Im not suggesting you are intellectually challenged or you may need help crossing the road but if so I’m here for you.

That’s either elite level trolling or if not you are a dribbling clown, if so, you do children’s parties?

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30717
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11060 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Muric

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Feb 25, 2023 11:44 pm

Class on and off the pitch
Attachments
Screenshot 2023-02-25 3.43.31 PM.png
Screenshot 2023-02-25 3.43.31 PM.png (177.68 KiB) Viewed 2281 times
These 5 users liked this post: CoolClaret gukwonan Duffer_ tiger76 KateR

KRBFC
Posts: 18144
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3809 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Muric

Post by KRBFC » Sun Feb 26, 2023 5:03 am

It's just more new account trolls, either Rovers fans on the wind up or old banned posters returning with a vengeance to help burn the house down.

Raconteur
Posts: 316
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:31 pm
Been Liked: 106 times
Has Liked: 204 times

Re: Muric

Post by Raconteur » Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:52 am

Casper2 wrote:
Sat Feb 25, 2023 4:14 pm
Yes , gives the ball away yet again , resulting in an injury to one of our players, brilliant.
I can't remember you on here calling Josh Cullen for tackling THB and injuring him and putting him out for a few months.

Conroysleftfoot
Posts: 2139
Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 352 times
Has Liked: 294 times

Re: Muric

Post by Conroysleftfoot » Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:54 am

Raconteur wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:52 am
I can't remember you on here calling Josh Cullen for tackling THB and injuring him and putting him out for a few months.
Was just going to post this myself.
This user liked this post: Raconteur

Claret53
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 12:27 pm
Been Liked: 55 times

Re: Muric

Post by Claret53 » Sun Feb 26, 2023 12:00 pm

The way in which Muric is asked to play the ball is highly tactical and involves, inevitably, a degree of risk. But the rewards, in the sense of creating space, are there for all to see. It took a bit of adjustment at the start of the season not to have the heebijeebies because it was such a contrast to what we have been used to seeing - this is no criticism of Pope or SD, it was just a different way of playing in a more difficult league.
His quality of passing is as good as any keeper I have seen in any league.
His general goalkeeping also is showing continued improvement and is a tribute to the coaches and Muric himself.
It’s rather surprising that some posters can’t recognise this.
These 11 users liked this post: Bosscat Swizzlestick Pickles GodIsADeeJay81 Darnhill Claret tiger76 jjclaret longsidepies LeadBelly KateR whiffa

KRBFC
Posts: 18144
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3809 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Muric

Post by KRBFC » Sun Feb 26, 2023 1:18 pm

Here's where these GKs were at a similar age as Muric....

Alisson (Internacional in the Brazil league)
Nick Pope (Bury on loan)
Ederson (Benfica B team)
Edouard Mendy (Marseille B team 2nd choice)
Tom Heaton (Wycombe/Rochdale on loan)
Emi Martinez (Rotherham loan)
Robert Sanchez (Rochdale loan)
Jose Sa (Maritimo)

The lad isn't doing too bad for himself, huge time to develop.
These 11 users liked this post: Quicknick CoolClaret GodIsADeeJay81 tiger76 Pickles Napoleon NewClaret Oppycat KateR NRC whiffa

CoolClaret
Posts: 7466
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2258 times
Has Liked: 2174 times

Re: Muric

Post by CoolClaret » Sun Feb 26, 2023 1:21 pm

I actually think Muric has the highest ceiling out of any of our players which is saying something.

He’s cool as ice, can easily see him being a Barca/Real/Top European club keeper in a few years.

Casper2
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 223 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Muric

Post by Casper2 » Sun Feb 26, 2023 1:22 pm

Raconteur wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:52 am
I can't remember you on here calling Josh Cullen for tackling THB and injuring him and putting him out for a few months.
Maybe you have a bad memory

Casper2
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 223 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Muric

Post by Casper2 » Sun Feb 26, 2023 1:24 pm

harpers_perm wrote:
Sat Feb 25, 2023 11:07 pm
Im not suggesting you are intellectually challenged or you may need help crossing the road but if so I’m here for you.

That’s either elite level trolling or if not you are a dribbling clown, if so, you do children’s parties?
No Muric has got the monopoly on clown gigs

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Muric

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sun Feb 26, 2023 1:25 pm

Raconteur wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:52 am
I can't remember you on here calling Josh Cullen for tackling THB and injuring him and putting him out for a few months.
He made a single comment about it and moved on.

He didn't proceed to flog Cullen over it every chance he had.

I think we can see who his agenda is against

Casper2
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 223 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Muric

Post by Casper2 » Sun Feb 26, 2023 1:26 pm

Taffy on the wing wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 3:14 am
Is it possible Prefeot & Casper2 are the same moron?
If not they should maybe get a room.........Odious.
How often do you have to replace your keyboard ?

The same childish name calling is not a good look for a pensioner :roll:
This user liked this post: Prefeot

Taffy on the wing
Posts: 4649
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
Been Liked: 1031 times
Has Liked: 3192 times

Re: Muric

Post by Taffy on the wing » Sun Feb 26, 2023 4:56 pm

Troll!.........get back under your rock.

Vincent'sCap
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
Been Liked: 246 times

Re: Muric

Post by Vincent'sCap » Sun Feb 26, 2023 8:03 pm

He was OK yesterday not a lot to do,still don't rate the fella though

Leisure
Posts: 18624
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 12499 times

Re: Muric

Post by Leisure » Sun Feb 26, 2023 8:05 pm

Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 8:03 pm
He was OK yesterday not a lot to do,still don't rate the fella though
I don't think he'll be too worried about that!

Leisure
Posts: 18624
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 12499 times

Re: Muric

Post by Leisure » Sun Feb 26, 2023 8:08 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 1:18 pm
Here's where these GKs were at a similar age as Muric....

Alisson (Internacional in the Brazil league)
Nick Pope (Bury on loan)
Ederson (Benfica B team)
Edouard Mendy (Marseille B team 2nd choice)
Tom Heaton (Wycombe/Rochdale on loan)
Emi Martinez (Rotherham loan)
Robert Sanchez (Rochdale loan)
Jose Sa (Maritimo)

The lad isn't doing too bad for himself, huge time to develop.
Not according to Caspar2, he's already written him off!

Vincent'sCap
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
Been Liked: 246 times

Re: Muric

Post by Vincent'sCap » Sun Feb 26, 2023 8:18 pm

Leisure wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 8:05 pm
I don't think he'll be too worried about that!
I really couldn't give a monkeys whether he's worried or not
I just don't rate the guy and I'm not alone in thinking that

Leisure
Posts: 18624
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 12499 times

Re: Muric

Post by Leisure » Sun Feb 26, 2023 9:14 pm

Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 8:18 pm
I really couldn't give a monkeys whether he's worried or not
I just don't rate the guy and I'm not alone in thinking that
Well obviously the manager does and his opinion matters more than yours! :lol: :lol:
These 3 users liked this post: Bosscat NewClaret tiger76

NewClaret
Posts: 13518
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3836 times

Re: Muric

Post by NewClaret » Sun Feb 26, 2023 9:24 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 1:18 pm
Here's where these GKs were at a similar age as Muric....

Alisson (Internacional in the Brazil league)
Nick Pope (Bury on loan)
Ederson (Benfica B team)
Edouard Mendy (Marseille B team 2nd choice)
Tom Heaton (Wycombe/Rochdale on loan)
Emi Martinez (Rotherham loan)
Robert Sanchez (Rochdale loan)
Jose Sa (Maritimo)

The lad isn't doing too bad for himself, huge time to develop.
Great post.

Underlines how it’s possible to develop potential in to an elite keeper.

KRBFC
Posts: 18144
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3809 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Muric

Post by KRBFC » Sun Feb 26, 2023 11:31 pm

Vincent'sCap wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 8:03 pm
He was OK yesterday not a lot to do,still don't rate the fella though
Another poster with less than 100 posts who hates Muric..... quite an army developing all with barely any previous posts on this forum. It's almost like they only log in to this site and post to tell us how shite Muric is. Coincidence or the same person on different accounts?

Bigvince
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:39 pm
Been Liked: 937 times
Has Liked: 700 times

Re: Muric

Post by Bigvince » Sun Feb 26, 2023 11:40 pm

Billy Balfour wrote:
Sat Feb 25, 2023 6:22 pm
This place is being killed by trolls.
They soon go away, if no one gives them air by responding to them!

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Muric

Post by quoonbeatz » Mon Feb 27, 2023 12:00 am

NewClaret wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 9:24 pm
Great post.

Underlines how it’s possible to develop potential in to an elite keeper.
Great, except that Muric is 24 so the list should be:

Alisson - Roma
Nick Pope - Charlton
Ederson - City
Edouard Mendy - Reims
Tom Heaton - Cardiff
Emi Martinez - Wolves on loan
Robert Sanchez - Brighton
Jose Sa - Porto

Not that it really matters, Muric is doing brilliantly and his the potential to be as good as any of those listed.

RammyClaret61
Posts: 3106
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1132 times
Has Liked: 302 times
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Re: Muric

Post by RammyClaret61 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 1:18 am

Read this paragraph on a Facebook group report. 🤷🏻‍♂️




“Huddersfield were almost gotten anther chance due to that man Muric….he passed the ball out and it almost intercepted by a Huddersfield player lt just glanced past the players outstretched foot. From this Burnley go on the attack and win a corner” ???

So it was an INCH PERFECT PASS OUT BY MURIC…
That set up a Burnley attack. But let’s clutch at the smallest straw to have a go at Muric?? Alos is the OUTSTRECHED FOOT of the Huddersfield player going to control the ball… ???

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10918
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5563 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Muric

Post by TheFamilyCat » Mon Feb 27, 2023 7:31 am

It's time to ask the really important question about Muric: if asked, would he give us a dance?

NewClaret
Posts: 13518
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3836 times

Re: Muric

Post by NewClaret » Mon Feb 27, 2023 7:46 am

RammyClaret61 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 1:18 am
Read this paragraph on a Facebook group report. 🤷🏻‍♂️




“Huddersfield were almost gotten anther chance due to that man Muric….he passed the ball out and it almost intercepted by a Huddersfield player lt just glanced past the players outstretched foot. From this Burnley go on the attack and win a corner” ???

So it was an INCH PERFECT PASS OUT BY MURIC…
That set up a Burnley attack. But let’s clutch at the smallest straw to have a go at Muric?? Alos is the OUTSTRECHED FOOT of the Huddersfield player going to control the ball… ???
:lol: :lol:

Unbelievable. There’s a reason I’m not in FB!!

I hope someone responded and pointed out the error of his ways?

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 7:49 am

I take it FB is for under 10s?

RammyClaret61
Posts: 3106
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1132 times
Has Liked: 302 times
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Re: Muric

Post by RammyClaret61 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:24 am

NewClaret wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 7:46 am
:lol: :lol:

Unbelievable. There’s a reason I’m not in FB!!

I hope someone responded and pointed out the error of his ways?
The bottom paragraph is my reply. The writer got back to me telling me “the pass was to close for comfort” & “the outstretched foot may not have controlled the ball, but potentially lost us possession”
He also added “ from a coaching point of view, Muric had other options, so was this the best one given the element of risk”?

I still believe a completely unnecessary paragraph, whinging about something that didn’t happen.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:45 am

RammyClaret61 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:24 am
The bottom paragraph is my reply. The writer got back to me telling me “the pass was to close for comfort” & “the outstretched foot may not have controlled the ball, but potentially lost us possession”
He also added “ from a coaching point of view, Muric had other options, so was this the best one given the element of risk”?

I still believe a completely unnecessary paragraph, whinging about something that didn’t happen.
I don't know which incident the article is talking about, but there was one pass out in the first half which was nearly intercepted, whether that led to a corner I don't know, but it may have.
I agree that he doesn't always pick the easiest pass, sometimes playing the ball to Cullen who was under pressure and had to quickly play the ball to a full back, who could have had the ball played to him in the first place without risk.

So perhaps the FB poster was correct, but just unable to put it into a readable format

Vincent'sCap
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
Been Liked: 246 times

Re: Muric

Post by Vincent'sCap » Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:29 am

KRBFC wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 11:31 pm
Another poster with less than 100 posts who hates Muric..... quite an army developing all with barely any previous posts on this forum. It's almost like they only log in to this site and post to tell us how shite Muric is. Coincidence or the same person on different accounts?
It's Eddie Shoestring the master sleuth

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3233
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1768 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Muric

Post by arise_sir_charge » Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:34 am

Nori1958 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:45 am
I don't know which incident the article is talking about, but there was one pass out in the first half which was nearly intercepted, whether that led to a corner I don't know, but it may have.
I agree that he doesn't always pick the easiest pass, sometimes playing the ball to Cullen who was under pressure and had to quickly play the ball to a full back, who could have had the ball played to him in the first place without risk.

So perhaps the FB poster was correct, but just unable to put it into a readable format
The ball to Cullen under pressure who then gives it to the full back is played entirely on purpose. It’s that kid of pass that creates the extra space.

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10328
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3342 times
Has Liked: 1964 times

Re: Muric

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:41 am

12 clean sheets now is it this season.

I think Heaton had 20 in the last promotion season and that was possibly starting every game.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:43 am

arise_sir_charge wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:34 am
The ball to Cullen under pressure who then gives it to the full back is played entirely on purpose. It’s that kid of pass that creates the extra space.
Iam fully aware of that. But sometimes an opposition player puts more pressure on Cullen which makes it riskier than 90% of the times that ball is played, on those occasions what's wrong with playing it elsewhere?

Casper2
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 223 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Muric

Post by Casper2 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 12:46 pm

Taffy on the wing wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 4:56 pm
Troll!.........get back under your rock.
Oh dear , there’s a block facility you know , I suggest you use it instead of calling people names , like I said it’s not a good look for an OAP .

Casper2
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 223 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Muric

Post by Casper2 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 12:47 pm

Leisure wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 8:08 pm
Not according to Caspar2, he's already written him off!
I haven’t written anyone off , just pointing out a fact , which was also pointed out in the match report.

roperclaret
Posts: 753
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 39 times

Re: Muric

Post by roperclaret » Mon Feb 27, 2023 1:51 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:43 am
Iam fully aware of that. But sometimes an opposition player puts more pressure on Cullen which makes it riskier than 90% of the times that ball is played, on those occasions what's wrong with playing it elsewhere?
It’s all about pulling the other team out of shape. A simple ball straight to the full back just means the oppo can shuffle across and more times than not the fullback will play it back to the keeper or to the winger who’s under pressure. The ball to Cullen means they have to move up the pitch creating a big gap in midfield for either Brownhill, JGB or more recently one of our full backs to exploit.

NewClaret
Posts: 13518
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3836 times

Re: Muric

Post by NewClaret » Mon Feb 27, 2023 1:57 pm

RammyClaret61 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:24 am
The bottom paragraph is my reply. The writer got back to me telling me “the pass was to close for comfort” & “the outstretched foot may not have controlled the ball, but potentially lost us possession”
He also added “ from a coaching point of view, Muric had other options, so was this the best one given the element of risk”?

I still believe a completely unnecessary paragraph, whinging about something that didn’t happen.
What this person fails to understand then, is that VK asks Muric to play that pass. That’s why he plays it so often and looks for it every time. It’s why Cullen or Cork always run back and create an angle for it.

It’s how he, and the team, are coached to play. Hard to fathom that someone who watches the game enough to write an article on it cannot see that.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 1:59 pm

roperclaret wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 1:51 pm
It’s all about pulling the other team out of shape. A simple ball straight to the full back just means the oppo can shuffle across and more times than not the fullback will play it back to the keeper or to the winger who’s under pressure. The ball to Cullen means they have to move up the pitch creating a big gap in midfield for either Brownhill, JGB or more recently one of our full backs to exploit.
At the risk of repeating myself, I know that.
However there are occasions where the attacker puts more pressure on Cullen, or for some other reason is closer to him than normal, making the chance of the attacker winning the ball, and being clear on goal greater. Why risk that happening, when for once he could play a simple ball to another player and we retain possession. Why give the opposition any advantage?

NewClaret
Posts: 13518
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3836 times

Re: Muric

Post by NewClaret » Mon Feb 27, 2023 2:13 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 1:59 pm
At the risk of repeating myself, I know that.
However there are occasions where the attacker puts more pressure on Cullen, or for some other reason is closer to him than normal, making the chance of the attacker winning the ball, and being clear on goal greater. Why risk that happening, when for once he could play a simple ball to another player and we retain possession. Why give the opposition any advantage?
I agree there’s a point on timing, but I don’t recall him getting any decisions wrong in recent games so cannot see why it’s being debated now.

If we get promoted this will become harder when teams will press quicker and will be more likely to punish any mistakes that are made. Muric will need to be more careful with the pass but equally he wouldn’t be entirely to blame if it went wrong - he’s playing a system the manager wants him to play and our midfield will likely be equally culpable for not creating enough space/the right angle for the pass.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 2:18 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 2:13 pm
I agree there’s a point on timing, but I don’t recall him getting any decisions wrong in recent games so cannot see why it’s being debated now.

If we get promoted this will become harder when teams will press quicker and will be more likely to punish any mistakes that are made. Muric will need to be more careful with the pass but equally he wouldn’t be entirely to blame if it went wrong - he’s playing a system the manager wants him to play and our midfield will likely be equally culpable for not creating enough space/the right angle for the pass.
It's being debated because someone posted about it.

I agree at times next season it will be impossible to play. Lots of Premier league teams leave 3 attackers on the edge of the box to stop the goalkeeper playing short passes

roperclaret
Posts: 753
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 39 times

Re: Muric

Post by roperclaret » Mon Feb 27, 2023 2:57 pm

Which means he’ll be able to use his ability to hit mid and long passes more!
These 3 users liked this post: Bosscat tiger76 Greenmile

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 3:01 pm

roperclaret wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 2:57 pm
Which means he’ll be able to use his ability to hit mid and long passes more!
Possibly, though some will argue he should be playing the short pass to Cullen :lol: :lol: :lol:

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12373
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5210 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Muric

Post by Devils_Advocate » Mon Feb 27, 2023 3:21 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 1:59 pm
At the risk of repeating myself, I know that.
However there are occasions where the attacker puts more pressure on Cullen, or for some other reason is closer to him than normal, making the chance of the attacker winning the ball, and being clear on goal greater. Why risk that happening, when for once he could play a simple ball to another player and we retain possession. Why give the opposition any advantage?
If the opposition press us and Muric passes direct to the full back then the full back will be facing inwards rather than forwards and the opposition can quickly pen the full back into that corner of the pitch limiting our passing options resulting in us more likely needing to go long or give away the ball.

We take a risk using Cullen because that completely opens up the centre and both sides of the pitch and so the opposition cant cover all the space meaning there is usually a full back free who can receive the ball facing up the pitch with time and space to run into.

Its a simple case of risk and reward and by the ball going into Cullen then out to a full back it really opens things up and gets us past the opposition press

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Mon Feb 27, 2023 3:36 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 3:21 pm
If the opposition press us and Muric passes direct to the full back then the full back will be facing inwards rather than forwards and the opposition can quickly pen the full back into that corner of the pitch limiting our passing options resulting in us more likely needing to go long or give away the ball.

We take a risk using Cullen because that completely opens up the centre and both sides of the pitch and so the opposition cant cover all the space meaning there is usually a full back free who can receive the ball facing up the pitch with time and space to run into.

Its a simple case of risk and reward and by the ball going into Cullen then out to a full back it really opens things up and gets us past the opposition press
Iam not talking about every time
Just the odd occasion when perhaps the opposition player is level with Cullen for example

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12373
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5210 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Muric

Post by Devils_Advocate » Mon Feb 27, 2023 3:42 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 3:36 pm
Iam not talking about every time
Just the odd occasion when perhaps the opposition player is level with Cullen for example
Neither am I but its still the same principle of risk versus reward just that the level of risk VK and the team see as worth taking is just greater than what you and probably many others think.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Muric

Post by quoonbeatz » Mon Feb 27, 2023 4:04 pm

RammyClaret61 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:24 am
The bottom paragraph is my reply. The writer got back to me telling me “the pass was to close for comfort” & “the outstretched foot may not have controlled the ball, but potentially lost us possession”
He also added “ from a coaching point of view, Muric had other options, so was this the best one given the element of risk”?

I still believe a completely unnecessary paragraph, whinging about something that didn’t happen.
The other thing on that is that it wasn't a risky pass, it was absolutely the right ball to play. The issue was that Muric topped it, like he often does when he's playing it along the ground, so it bobbles up and loses speed. Nothing to do with coaching, just execution.

There was a similar pass to Maatsen, a few weeks ago that fell perfectly between two outstretched legs and Maatsen was a way through the middle. One of the passes of the season.

Taffy on the wing
Posts: 4649
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
Been Liked: 1031 times
Has Liked: 3192 times

Re: Muric

Post by Taffy on the wing » Mon Feb 27, 2023 4:16 pm

Casper2 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 12:46 pm
Oh dear , there’s a block facility you know , I suggest you use it instead of calling people names , like I said it’s not a good look for an OAP .
Sad, sad Troll.

Hipper
Posts: 5723
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 1179 times
Has Liked: 922 times

Re: Muric

Post by Hipper » Mon Feb 27, 2023 4:23 pm

There's also the issue of Muric being given the ball by our players when he has few options and is put under pressure. This happened against Huddersfield and, for the first time I can recall, he rolled the ball out for a throw in rather then a very risky pass to a colleague.

The lad is learning as are all the players. Mistakes will happen but they are noticeably getting fewer despite teams knowing how we play.

NewClaret
Posts: 13518
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3836 times

Re: Muric

Post by NewClaret » Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:06 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 3:36 pm
Iam not talking about every time
Just the odd occasion when perhaps the opposition player is level with Cullen for example
I agree with you, there are times where that ball shouldn’t be played, but I can’t remember a time where he’s played it and Muric’s error has led to a goal (the one I can recall was because Cullen took a bad touch or played a subsequent bad pass - can’t remember).

It’ll be targeted next year though, so he’ll need to learn when it’s on and what to do when it’s not (a big long hood that comes straight back as us isn’t the right idea either).

KRBFC
Posts: 18144
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3809 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Muric

Post by KRBFC » Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:21 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 1:59 pm
At the risk of repeating myself, I know that.
However there are occasions where the attacker puts more pressure on Cullen, or for some other reason is closer to him than normal, making the chance of the attacker winning the ball, and being clear on goal greater. Why risk that happening, when for once he could play a simple ball to another player and we retain possession. Why give the opposition any advantage?
The defender would have to go through the back of Cullen to get the ball, it's a clearly important part of our build up, suck one of their players onto Cullen who then quickly receives and plays it to the fullback.

Post Reply