Clarets v Mackems
-
- Posts: 3659
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1402 times
- Has Liked: 2692 times
- Location: varied
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Credit to Sunderland.
They put in some shift. Played well.
Fair result.
Just wish we'd pushed our midfield higher...
They put in some shift. Played well.
Fair result.
Just wish we'd pushed our midfield higher...
-
- Posts: 16750
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3771 times
- Has Liked: 7571 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Not our night.
Few games panned out like that this season.
Lets stuff 'Boro.
Few games panned out like that this season.
Lets stuff 'Boro.
Re: Clarets v Mackems
had the opportunities to score. but its another point.
-
- Posts: 6138
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2634 times
- Has Liked: 6459 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Clarets v Mackems
We are going to do a Fulham and crawl over the line.
-
- Posts: 5091
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1181 times
- Has Liked: 637 times
- Location: Tibet
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Nahhh we we were not on it tonight , hey there you go take a point
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:38 pm
- Been Liked: 133 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
I know it probably would have made no difference but no added time on the 6 mins? They wasted at least 2 of em ahh well makes it more likely we win the title at ewood
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Poor performance, game was crying out for Darko with 30 to go instead we bring on the slow 1 footed Gudmundsson. Obafemi should've been on sooner too. So slow with the ball at the back tonight, has to be so much quicker to turn them over.
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Pitch looked wet
Players slipping
Bad passes
Touches all over
Bad night
But we are going up as champions
Long game
Players slipping
Bad passes
Touches all over
Bad night
But we are going up as champions
Long game
-
- Posts: 16750
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3771 times
- Has Liked: 7571 times
- Location: Derbyshire
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Take the clean sheet and point and move on, who knows both Blades and Boro might slip up tomorrow.
At least we maintain our unbeaten home run and promotion will happen at some stage.
At least we maintain our unbeaten home run and promotion will happen at some stage.
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Anyone calling that a poor performance is just plain wrong. Not as good as our excellent usual selves, sure. But still the better side, far and away, against a team who've come to the Turf better drilled than pretty much any other. Little reason to feel flat after that. Another point on the way to a fine, fine promotion. Up the Clarets.
These 5 users liked this post: RVclaret tiger76 HunterST_BFC Foshiznik Conroysleftfoot
-
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
- Been Liked: 1029 times
- Has Liked: 1521 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Could have done better. Not upset but wish it would have filled my Tuesday night instead of wasting my Friday.
This user liked this post: Foshiznik
-
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 7:14 pm
- Been Liked: 180 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Where you getting that from?
We had a good amount of possession not not many clear cut chances, they defended exceptional well and high. We had marginally more attempts than them.
It was a game played in midfield and a draw was a fair result.
-
- Posts: 6688
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1699 times
- Has Liked: 790 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Disappointing night-a lack of urgency and a general lack of control particularly from our forward play which I thought lacked composure. Maybe lucky not to have lost against an under strength but well organised team. Bit of a reality check for VK
Re: Clarets v Mackems
I think tonight has shown again that despite our deep squad, there’s not much coming off the bench. Certainly not at the moment, anyway.
Churlinov is a mystery. His trickery could and should make a difference.
Churlinov is a mystery. His trickery could and should make a difference.
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Strange performance. Credit to Sunderland to be fair. Funny how it works out sometimes - starting 11 looked really strong, but not the performance or result we were hoping for…… on to Boro away and hopefully we’ve saved a few goals in the tank for that one!
-
- Posts: 6138
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2634 times
- Has Liked: 6459 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Clarets v Mackems
I’m not going to disagree, after all you called the result
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:41 pm
- Been Liked: 7 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
The wheels are starting to come off I’m afraid. No goals in 180 minutes, something needs to change
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
- Been Liked: 648 times
- Has Liked: 102 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Drew on purpose so we can win it at Ewood
-
- Posts: 3891
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1282 times
- Has Liked: 681 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Far too much sideways, backwards......the result was inevitable with 30 minutes to play.
These 4 users liked this post: tarkys_ears Vino blanco winsomeyen gawthorpe_view
Re: Clarets v Mackems
I wouldn’t say they were that bad
-
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 339 times
- Has Liked: 39 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Casper2 that is
Re: Clarets v Mackems
I think Tella is better on the right than the left. Unless Tella is up front with Barnes I don't think there is room for both him and Benson at the same time. Might have been better with one of them and swapping later on. Let one loose later on when they are tiring.
Re: Clarets v Mackems
hahahahahaBFC12345678 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:04 pmThe wheels are starting to come off I’m afraid. No goals in 180 minutes, something needs to change
-
- Posts: 15258
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6758 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Strikers aren't striking, that's all that needs fixing.
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Poor performance by our own standards, but fair play to Sunderland and Mowbray, they did everything right to nullify us. Thought Beyer and Brownhill played well, but I don't understand why Cork isn't getting on, he and Cullen together were the strength of the team, with Cork, in particular, moving the ball forward through the midfield. Also, Tella is not a winger: he spent most of the game tonight out wide and hence was waisted. Still it's a point towards promotion.
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 123 times
- Has Liked: 12 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Played like a team that hadn’t trained together for a few weeks…
Not a big deal over 46 games having a match like this
Not a big deal over 46 games having a match like this
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Seriously, by that stupid comment you have beat me to it .roperclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:06 pmPay no heed. He’s quickly become the biggest idiot on here
-
- Posts: 16750
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3771 times
- Has Liked: 7571 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Sussed a while back.roperclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:06 pmPay no heed. He’s quickly become the biggest idiot on here
Re: Clarets v Mackems
CarefulVino blanco wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:08 pmPoor performance by our own standards, but fair play to Sunderland and Mowbray, they did everything right to nullify us. Thought Beyer and Brownhill played well, but I don't understand why Cork isn't getting on, he and Cullen together were the strength of the team, with Cork, in particular, moving the ball forward through the midfield. Also, Tella is not a winger: he spent most of the game tonight out wide and hence was waisted. Still it's a point towards promotion.
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
- Been Liked: 562 times
- Has Liked: 1411 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
We beat QPR 0-3 immediately after the last one then stuffed Boro and Brum
Last edited by AfloatinClaret on Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Bit diff that one cause the whole team were training for 2 - 3 weeks solid leading up to it. More meaning these 2 week ones.
Re: Clarets v Mackems
How many draws do we need so we can win it at Deadwood?
-
- Posts: 6727
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1820 times
- Has Liked: 1800 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Clarets v Mackems
If you play sh!t just don’t lose.
On to Boro.
On to Boro.
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Unbeaten home record still intact. Nobody has done a season unbeaten at home yet so we keep on going.
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Draw our next 5 and win at Rovers and we're up.
Simple.
Simple.
Re: Clarets v Mackems
I really don’t get why VK every now and then play them out of position. Every time he does it we look so disjointed and no continuity at all. On paper the starting lineup was seriously strong, after the 21 min interval Tella went left wing, zaroury middle not sure where Barnes was playing. But you could tell those coming back from injury
-
- Posts: 6727
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1820 times
- Has Liked: 1800 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Way too ponderous.
-
- Posts: 2588
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
- Been Liked: 562 times
- Has Liked: 142 times
- Location: the ghost in the atom
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Well played Sunderland worked there socks of , Mowbray got it tactically spot on
These 3 users liked this post: Vino blanco JLR81 longsidepies
-
- Posts: 3659
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1402 times
- Has Liked: 2692 times
- Location: varied
Re: Clarets v Mackems
I thought Barnes did well.
Bar that difficult finsh he missed.
You have to credit Sunderland though - massive shift put it.
Bar that difficult finsh he missed.
You have to credit Sunderland though - massive shift put it.
Re: Clarets v Mackems
I didn’t think we were poor. We had good possession. Two or three good chances that on another day might have gone in. We were up against a well drilled side and we had 13 players away on international duty. All in all I’m ok with a draw.
Onwards and upwards. Although we can’t get any further upwards tbf.
Onwards and upwards. Although we can’t get any further upwards tbf.
-
- Posts: 3484
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 660 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Very frustrating. I don't like to criticize players, but can anyone explain to me why Muric looked to be time wasting on at least three occasions in injury time.
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Thought it was a big ask bringing THB,Brownhill,and Benson all back at once ,and expect them to be match sharp,I think if Gudmonsson had been on at 1/2 time we may have snatched it.
-
- Posts: 9905
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2350 times
- Has Liked: 3181 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Vincent Kompany sending a message to Tottenham. He wants to stay at Burnley. He doesn't want to move elsewhere.
UTC
UTC
-
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
- Been Liked: 420 times
- Has Liked: 69 times
Re: Clarets v Mackems
We were well better than them and on another day would have scored at least 3.
That said, a better team than them (of which there will be 19 next year) will score at least one of the first half mix up/second half bar chances.
That said, a better team than them (of which there will be 19 next year) will score at least one of the first half mix up/second half bar chances.
This user liked this post: Pickles
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:39 am
- Been Liked: 75 times
- Has Liked: 427 times
- Location: Australia
Re: Clarets v Mackems
Classic case of the international break stopping all momentum. Either that, or the City defeat hurt the players more than we think.
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
- Been Liked: 648 times
- Has Liked: 102 times