Burnley v Luton

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
willsclarets
Posts: 1951
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 688 times
Has Liked: 133 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by willsclarets » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:04 pm

https://twitter.com/PxckedIze/status/17 ... pYE3A&s=19

There is no way on earth this is not a foul

bumba
Posts: 3133
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by bumba » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:04 pm

dansch wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:03 pm
Totally agree, and yes Luton probably had the better of the game but what did they actually create? We made the best chances. So much rot on this forum
No rot. We are poor very very poor

Claretlad
Posts: 1124
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:52 pm
Been Liked: 193 times
Has Liked: 216 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by Claretlad » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:05 pm

VAR Stinks

AGENT_CLARET
Posts: 3138
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
Been Liked: 1157 times
Has Liked: 1075 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by AGENT_CLARET » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:05 pm

I think if Trafford didn't throw his arms in the air like he did the foul would of been given, he made a meal of the contact
These 2 users liked this post: cockneyclaret Westleigh

MG70
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:39 am
Been Liked: 75 times
Has Liked: 427 times
Location: Australia

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by MG70 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:05 pm

That should have been disallowed, the replay they played from behind shows exactly what the forward was doing.
But Al Dakill was weak again against Morris, he should have at least challenged him but he was shrugged off as if he wasn’t there.

PWBFC
Posts: 638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 139 times
Has Liked: 59 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by PWBFC » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:05 pm

One of the worst decisions I've ever seen considering VAR got several looks at it. Nobody at all complains if you rule that out.
This user liked this post: oswyclaret

boatshed bill
Posts: 15265
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6762 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:06 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:03 pm
Tbf boatshed even if he wasn’t blocked off he was getting knowhere near that one. Look at the point of contact and where the ball ends up.

I honestly think that’s why the ref gave it. Can’t think of any other reason
That may be the ref's interpretation; but he's not there to judge scenarios, he has to give the obstruction because it happened.

Rick_Muller
Posts: 6142
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
Been Liked: 2635 times
Has Liked: 6464 times
Location: -90.000000, 0.000000

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by Rick_Muller » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:06 pm

As per the Spurs game where I had a positive word for the ref, I’ll comment again today.

I think he was corrupt. Gave nothing to us all game and gave everything to them. Corrupt, seriously corrupt.

aggi
Posts: 8850
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2123 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by aggi » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:06 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:04 pm
Luton never had a sniff yet trafford had a good game? Can’t be both surely?

I don’t think Luton had quality chances but let’s be honest they were worth their point. We were awful and buckled under their constant pressure.
Why not? Part of the reason they didn't have a sniff was Trafford probably having his best game at decisively claiming balls into the box .

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by RVclaret » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:06 pm

AGENT_CLARET wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:05 pm
I think if Trafford didn't throw his arms in the air like he did the foul would of been given, he made a meal of the contact
Ha, did you see Duran the other week at Villa park?

warksclaret
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1704 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by warksclaret » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:06 pm

The result was sickening, but we can't focus on purely a VAR decision that did not go our way.Most of us are bias and feel aggrieved but the neutrals will claim it could have gone either way. For me Trafford who had a good game was bullied out of it. I thought we defended very well, though Dakhill looked exposed against a very good wide player.He is clearly not a full back. Amdouini despite his goal was very disappointing, he must think he is Messi trying the impossible all the time. And I realised tonight if you are in a fight you don't play Tresor-he was gutless, and seems petrified. Foster was magnificent and JBG missed a sitter. We were outplayed for the first 30 minutes and for me a point is all we could ask for. We had the chance to go 2-0 up but as we have done all season, our decisions in the final third were shocking
This user liked this post: Westleigh

4:20
Posts: 2200
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:23 am
Been Liked: 1066 times
Has Liked: 1192 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by 4:20 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:07 pm

criminalclaret wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:01 pm
Trafford is making a run at a parry, any attacking player has no reason to get out of your way and put you off. I don't see an issue with that. There's a touch but really, he wasn't flattened or poleaxed.

What annoys me is yet again, we wasted 3/4 guilt edge opportunitties to kill a game and we didn't. Then we pay for another last minute point robber.

File under West Ham, Palace, etc
Couldn't give a sh1t about how the rest of the game went, how many chances, how much pressure, possession, what hand VK grabbed his dick at half time to **** with....The attacker backed into Trafford, obstructed him, knocked him over, fouled him.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7463
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2257 times
Has Liked: 2171 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by CoolClaret » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:07 pm

God some of our fans have turned into some proper soft arses now with our powderpuff squad! Mirroring them!

We routinely scored from crosses like that under Dyche and would've laughed at other fans for complaining over something like that.

Weak as **** from Ekdal as well.

aggi
Posts: 8850
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2123 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by aggi » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:07 pm

AGENT_CLARET wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:05 pm
I think if Trafford didn't throw his arms in the air like he did the foul would of been given, he made a meal of the contact
It's a fair point. We saw at villa last week what happens when you make a meal of minimal contact.

criminalclaret
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 7:14 pm
Been Liked: 180 times
Has Liked: 72 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by criminalclaret » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:07 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:03 pm
You should watch it again. It’s a clear as day foul. Adebayo literally blocks him by twisting his body and has no eyes on the ball. Luton couldn’t believe their luck that it was given.
If that happens 10 times a weekend, it would be 50/50 every time. To me it's the same today. If Trafford area it so crowded and hangs back abit, it's an easy save on the line for him. I'm not evicerarating the guy, he did overall have a great game all in all (bar that).

We really, really should have been well clear of a 1 goal lead by the 90th + minute though given out chances we missed. Luton were never gonna give up

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 16762
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 3778 times
Has Liked: 7573 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by Buxtonclaret » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:08 pm

willsclarets wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:56 pm
Not for the first time either. Berge and the handball that wasn't at forest. Joke
Your right.
But that tonight was so clearly a foul, even without VAR.

Trafford still has mistakes in him. He is still ' Light Weight ' with high balls. ( I personally think that's why he fell awkwardly earlier )
He's improving though.
But that tonight was a blatant, orchestrated foul.
And VAR, as it's used now, isn't fit for purpose.

cockneyclaret
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 278 times
Has Liked: 3308 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by cockneyclaret » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:08 pm

willsclarets wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:04 pm
https://twitter.com/PxckedIze/status/17 ... pYE3A&s=19

There is no way on earth this is not a foul
A well worked move and it paid off!! Defenders ball watching and the 2 biggest players on the pitch take the keeper down and the other scores.. 99% of the time that's disallowed

Kilson810
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 836 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by Kilson810 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:08 pm

Imagine thinking it is a good idea to bring Tresor on when you are clinging on to a 1-0 lead. Biggest bottle job in a tackle to ever play for Burnley.
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 892 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by BurnleyFC » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:09 pm

In all honesty, we were pretty crap and didn’t deserve to win.
This user liked this post: jojomk1

dansch
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:04 am
Been Liked: 35 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by dansch » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:09 pm

bumba wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:04 pm
No rot. We are poor very very poor
We're in a relegation battle, confidence isn't particularly high. They had next to no clear chances. You need the rub sometimes and we were robbed by bad officiating again

Ampth7
Posts: 1084
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:12 pm
Been Liked: 228 times
Has Liked: 226 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by Ampth7 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:09 pm

dansch wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:03 pm
Totally agree, and yes Luton probably had the better of the game but what did they actually create? We made the best chances. So much rot on this forum
No mate, we were gash again tonight and completely dominated by a route 1 side. Over 60% possession for a pretty woeful team like Luton at home is really poor IMO.

We have to start planning for next season now, because this season has been an absolute disaster.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15265
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6762 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:10 pm

AGENT_CLARET wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:05 pm
I think if Trafford didn't throw his arms in the air like he did the foul would of been given, he made a meal of the contact
But when the opposition roll over about 5 times (Villa winner) making a meal of it gets them a penalty.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by RVclaret » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:10 pm

criminalclaret wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:07 pm
If that happens 10 times a weekend, it would be 50/50 every time. To me it's the same today. If Trafford area it so crowded and hangs back abit, it's an easy save on the line for him. I'm not evicerarating the guy, he did overall have a great game all in all (bar that).

We really, really should have been well clear of a 1 goal lead by the 90th + minute though given out chances we missed. Luton were never gonna give up
Nonsense, it gets given 9 times out of 10. Keepers get protection in games, sometimes too much, but that’s literally a clear block of his movement. Its completely irrelevant that Trafford could or should have stayed on his line when he’s fouled. Luton created absolutely nothing all game we were robbed.

criminalclaret
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 7:14 pm
Been Liked: 180 times
Has Liked: 72 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by criminalclaret » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:11 pm

4:20 wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:07 pm
Couldn't give a sh1t about how the rest of the game went, how many chances, how much pressure, possession, what hand VK grabbed his dick at half time to **** with....The attacker backed into Trafford, obstructed him, knocked him over, fouled him.
You don't give a s**t that we missed clear opportunities to put the game to bed way before the 90th minute? Nothing is every done with a 1 nil lead.

I'm content to say that decision sometimes goes for you or doesnt (and we had plenty that did in previous time).

That doesn't plaster over the cracks that the game should have been well put to bed a lot, lot earlier by ourselves.

distortiondave
Posts: 797
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
Been Liked: 420 times
Has Liked: 69 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by distortiondave » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:11 pm

Carlton Morris says;
On his goal standing: "To be honest I have seen a couple where goalkeepers get protection and I am pleased they [VAR] have seen sense as the big man just out jumped him."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/footba ... %20him.%22

Out jumped him, has he? Are you sure Carlton? Are you sure your player has out jumped our goalkeeper?

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:11 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:06 pm
That may be the ref's interpretation; but he's not there to judge scenarios, he has to give the obstruction because it happened.
From my understanding that’s exactly why VAR couldn’t reverse the decision.

The law isn’t the keeper has been obstructed, it’s has the player been fouled.

I honestly think the ref thinks Trafford dived (went down to easy under light physical contact). I think that’s why VAR couldn’t intervene and change the on field decision.



I don’t agree with it, as earlier in the game Trafford was given a free kick for a very similar scenario (as was kaminski). It just stinks of poor referees making stupid decisions under pressure. But looking at it from the refs POV that’s what I assume has happened.

dansch
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:04 am
Been Liked: 35 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by dansch » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:12 pm

Ampth7 wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:09 pm
No mate, we were gash again tonight and completely dominated by a route 1 side. Over 60% possession for a pretty woeful team like Luton at home is really poor IMO.

We have to start planning for next season now, because this season has been an absolute disaster.
What did Luton actually create? You telling me it's not a foul on Trafford?

bumba
Posts: 3133
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by bumba » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:12 pm

dansch wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:09 pm
We're in a relegation battle, confidence isn't particularly high. They had next to no clear chances. You need the rub sometimes and we were robbed by bad officiating again
Were a 'possession' based team dominated at home by one of the worst teams in the league.
Open your eyes mate. Tonight was a disgrace
Rightly given as a goal by the way
Last edited by bumba on Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Shaggy
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 8:30 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 149 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by Shaggy » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:12 pm

aggi wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:06 pm
Why not? Part of the reason they didn't have a sniff was Trafford probably having his best game at decisively claiming balls into the box .
He missed as many as he claimed. Made 2 Hollywood saves one which he could easily have caught and kept passing it to their midfield.

I don’t think he had a bad game but certainly wasn’t good either.

As much as some people have an agenda against him there is also an agenda to exaggerate what he does.

Anyway he’ll be playing championship football next season along with the rest of our limp wristed squad.
This user liked this post: bumba

JR1882
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 171 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by JR1882 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:14 pm

bumba wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:12 pm
Were a 'possession' based team dominated at home by one of the worst teams in the league.
Open your eyes mate. Tonight was a disgrace
Rightly given as a goal by the way
Yep 39% possession at home to a relegation rival when our side was assembled at great cost on the basis of keeping the ball.
These 2 users liked this post: jojomk1 Westleigh

KRBFC
Posts: 18138
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3805 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by KRBFC » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:14 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:04 pm
Luton never had a sniff yet trafford had a good game? Can’t be both surely?

I don’t think Luton had quality chances but let’s be honest they were worth their point. We were awful and buckled under their constant pressure.
Trafford was fine, caught some corners and crosses. Luton didn’t create anything though, despite all of their possession. We had considerably more clear openings.

KRBFC
Posts: 18138
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3805 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by KRBFC » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:15 pm

bumba wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:12 pm
Were a 'possession' based team dominated at home by one of the worst teams in the league.
Open your eyes mate. Tonight was a disgrace
Rightly given as a goal by the way
Who’s we? :lol:

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by RVclaret » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:16 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:11 pm
From my understanding that’s exactly why VAR couldn’t reverse the decision.

The law isn’t the keeper has been obstructed, it’s has the player been fouled.

I honestly think the ref thinks Trafford dived (went down to easy under light physical contact). I think that’s why VAR couldn’t intervene and change the on field decision.



I don’t agree with it, as earlier in the game Trafford was given a free kick for a very similar scenario (as was kaminski). It just stinks of poor referees making stupid decisions under pressure. But looking at it from the refs POV that’s what I assume has happened.
Attachments
IMG_2350.jpeg
IMG_2350.jpeg (80.44 KiB) Viewed 1351 times

4:20
Posts: 2200
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:23 am
Been Liked: 1066 times
Has Liked: 1192 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by 4:20 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:16 pm

criminalclaret wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:11 pm
You don't give a s**t that we missed clear opportunities to put the game to bed way before the 90th minute? Nothing is every done with a 1 nil lead.

I'm content to say that decision sometimes goes for you or doesnt (and we had plenty that did in previous time).

That doesn't plaster over the cracks that the game should have been well put to bed a lot, lot earlier by ourselves.
I don't care for any of that what you have just wrote. It's irrelevant.

What I care about is the foul that wasn't given. Nothing else.

dansch
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:04 am
Been Liked: 35 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by dansch » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:16 pm

bumba wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:12 pm
Were a 'possession' based team dominated at home by one of the worst teams in the league.
Open your eyes mate. Tonight was a disgrace
Rightly given as a goal by the way
We were a possession based team. Luton have been better than us this season, they played better than we did tonight but at the end of the day they didn't actually create any real chances, we created more and it was a definite foul on the keeper

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4073
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1507 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by Swizzlestick » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:16 pm

I thought we were so poor tonight. Luton dominating the ball. I just don’t understand what we’re trying to do now. We are so passive, it’s actually ridiculous.

warksclaret
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1704 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by warksclaret » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:17 pm

I hope Fofana signed before watching that

distortiondave
Posts: 797
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
Been Liked: 420 times
Has Liked: 69 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by distortiondave » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:18 pm

I'm calling it a do because I have work tomorrow and another hour of this will lead me down a glory hole of insanity, but the officials, by their own metric, are wrong to allow that goal. We should have won, and more to the point, we should have been allowed to win.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15265
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6762 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:23 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:11 pm
From my understanding that’s exactly why VAR couldn’t reverse the decision.

The law isn’t the keeper has been obstructed, it’s has the player been fouled.

I honestly think the ref thinks Trafford dived (went down to easy under light physical contact). I think that’s why VAR couldn’t intervene and change the on field decision.



I don’t agree with it, as earlier in the game Trafford was given a free kick for a very similar scenario (as was kaminski). It just stinks of poor referees making stupid decisions under pressure. But looking at it from the refs POV that’s what I assume has happened.

Yes, the keeper was fouled.
Fair do to Luton, that tactic just got them a point. I call it cheating, you can call it whatever you want.
If we had produced a goalscoring opportunity in that manner I would have expected it to be ruled out.

KlyBfc
Posts: 964
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:38 pm
Been Liked: 214 times
Has Liked: 129 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by KlyBfc » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:23 pm

We are awful. We have wasted money, wasted an opportunity to build and wasted a good vibe.

We can blame the ref (I think it’s a foul) but that performance, those subs, the tactics and the recruitment etc etc is nothing short of horrific.
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland

criminalclaret
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 7:14 pm
Been Liked: 180 times
Has Liked: 72 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by criminalclaret » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:23 pm

4:20 wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:16 pm
I don't care for any of that what you have just wrote. It's irrelevant.

What I care about is the foul that wasn't given. Nothing else.
See what you wanna see bud.

We didn't lose the game on one independent, we lost it through not taking out chances

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:24 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:23 pm
Yes, the keeper was fouled.
Fair do to Luton, that tactic just got them a point. I call it cheating, you can call it whatever you want.
If we had produced a goalscoring opportunity in that manner I would have expected it to be ruled out.
Haha cheating? Come on, so you think Luton paid of a ref or something

jojomk1
Posts: 4851
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 855 times
Has Liked: 584 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by jojomk1 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:25 pm

KlyBfc wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:23 pm
We are awful. We have wasted money, wasted an opportunity to build and wasted a good vibe.

We can blame the ref (I think it’s a foul) but that performance, those subs, the tactics and the recruitment etc etc is nothing short of horrific.
Sums VK up perfectly

boatshed bill
Posts: 15265
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6762 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:27 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:24 pm
Haha cheating? Come on, so you think Luton paid of a ref or something
Any foul is cheating.

Kilson810
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 836 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by Kilson810 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:28 pm

KlyBfc wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:23 pm
We are awful. We have wasted money, wasted an opportunity to build and wasted a good vibe.

We can blame the ref (I think it’s a foul) but that performance, those subs, the tactics and the recruitment etc etc is nothing short of horrific.
Correct, we've gone from one of the best seasons in memory to one of the worst. A team full of lightweights, they are embarrassing.

At least we don't have to listen to the usual 'we are getting better' nonsense that is usually posted.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:28 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:27 pm
Any foul is cheating.
Well if that’s the case you can say both sides cheated all game?

boatshed bill
Posts: 15265
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6762 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by boatshed bill » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:33 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:28 pm
Well if that’s the case you can say both sides cheated all game?


Yes, unfortunately the modern game is full of it.
The trouble is that we seem to be on the receiving end a bit too often.
What did you think about the Villa penalty? Or the so-called Berge handball?

bumba
Posts: 3133
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by bumba » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:35 pm

dansch wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:16 pm
We were a possession based team. Luton have been better than us this season, they played better than we did tonight but at the end of the day they didn't actually create any real chances, we created more and it was a definite foul on the keeper
Mate it was never a foul in a million Sundays, he cocked up.... school boys in a man's game do.
If Luton have been better than us after what we have spent then WHY?

bumba
Posts: 3133
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by bumba » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:35 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:15 pm
Who’s we? :lol:
Best you can do to support your man?

AGENT_CLARET
Posts: 3138
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
Been Liked: 1157 times
Has Liked: 1075 times

Re: Burnley v Luton

Post by AGENT_CLARET » Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:37 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:06 pm
Ha, did you see Duran the other week at Villa park?
Yes I did, it was a different foul in a different game with a different Ref. So your point is ?????

Post Reply