Burnley v Luton
-
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 688 times
- Has Liked: 133 times
-
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:52 pm
- Been Liked: 193 times
- Has Liked: 216 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Burnley v Luton
VAR Stinks
-
- Posts: 3138
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 1075 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
I think if Trafford didn't throw his arms in the air like he did the foul would of been given, he made a meal of the contact
These 2 users liked this post: cockneyclaret Westleigh
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:39 am
- Been Liked: 75 times
- Has Liked: 427 times
- Location: Australia
Re: Burnley v Luton
That should have been disallowed, the replay they played from behind shows exactly what the forward was doing.
But Al Dakill was weak again against Morris, he should have at least challenged him but he was shrugged off as if he wasn’t there.
But Al Dakill was weak again against Morris, he should have at least challenged him but he was shrugged off as if he wasn’t there.
Re: Burnley v Luton
One of the worst decisions I've ever seen considering VAR got several looks at it. Nobody at all complains if you rule that out.
This user liked this post: oswyclaret
-
- Posts: 15265
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6762 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
That may be the ref's interpretation; but he's not there to judge scenarios, he has to give the obstruction because it happened.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:03 pmTbf boatshed even if he wasn’t blocked off he was getting knowhere near that one. Look at the point of contact and where the ball ends up.
I honestly think that’s why the ref gave it. Can’t think of any other reason
-
- Posts: 6142
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2635 times
- Has Liked: 6464 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Burnley v Luton
As per the Spurs game where I had a positive word for the ref, I’ll comment again today.
I think he was corrupt. Gave nothing to us all game and gave everything to them. Corrupt, seriously corrupt.
I think he was corrupt. Gave nothing to us all game and gave everything to them. Corrupt, seriously corrupt.
Re: Burnley v Luton
Why not? Part of the reason they didn't have a sniff was Trafford probably having his best game at decisively claiming balls into the box .
Re: Burnley v Luton
Ha, did you see Duran the other week at Villa park?AGENT_CLARET wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:05 pmI think if Trafford didn't throw his arms in the air like he did the foul would of been given, he made a meal of the contact
-
- Posts: 6696
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1704 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
The result was sickening, but we can't focus on purely a VAR decision that did not go our way.Most of us are bias and feel aggrieved but the neutrals will claim it could have gone either way. For me Trafford who had a good game was bullied out of it. I thought we defended very well, though Dakhill looked exposed against a very good wide player.He is clearly not a full back. Amdouini despite his goal was very disappointing, he must think he is Messi trying the impossible all the time. And I realised tonight if you are in a fight you don't play Tresor-he was gutless, and seems petrified. Foster was magnificent and JBG missed a sitter. We were outplayed for the first 30 minutes and for me a point is all we could ask for. We had the chance to go 2-0 up but as we have done all season, our decisions in the final third were shocking
This user liked this post: Westleigh
Re: Burnley v Luton
Couldn't give a sh1t about how the rest of the game went, how many chances, how much pressure, possession, what hand VK grabbed his dick at half time to **** with....The attacker backed into Trafford, obstructed him, knocked him over, fouled him.criminalclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:01 pmTrafford is making a run at a parry, any attacking player has no reason to get out of your way and put you off. I don't see an issue with that. There's a touch but really, he wasn't flattened or poleaxed.
What annoys me is yet again, we wasted 3/4 guilt edge opportunitties to kill a game and we didn't. Then we pay for another last minute point robber.
File under West Ham, Palace, etc
-
- Posts: 7463
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2257 times
- Has Liked: 2171 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
God some of our fans have turned into some proper soft arses now with our powderpuff squad! Mirroring them!
We routinely scored from crosses like that under Dyche and would've laughed at other fans for complaining over something like that.
Weak as **** from Ekdal as well.
We routinely scored from crosses like that under Dyche and would've laughed at other fans for complaining over something like that.
Weak as **** from Ekdal as well.
Re: Burnley v Luton
It's a fair point. We saw at villa last week what happens when you make a meal of minimal contact.AGENT_CLARET wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:05 pmI think if Trafford didn't throw his arms in the air like he did the foul would of been given, he made a meal of the contact
-
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 7:14 pm
- Been Liked: 180 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
If that happens 10 times a weekend, it would be 50/50 every time. To me it's the same today. If Trafford area it so crowded and hangs back abit, it's an easy save on the line for him. I'm not evicerarating the guy, he did overall have a great game all in all (bar that).
We really, really should have been well clear of a 1 goal lead by the 90th + minute though given out chances we missed. Luton were never gonna give up
-
- Posts: 16762
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3778 times
- Has Liked: 7573 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: Burnley v Luton
Your right.willsclarets wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:56 pmNot for the first time either. Berge and the handball that wasn't at forest. Joke
But that tonight was so clearly a foul, even without VAR.
Trafford still has mistakes in him. He is still ' Light Weight ' with high balls. ( I personally think that's why he fell awkwardly earlier )
He's improving though.
But that tonight was a blatant, orchestrated foul.
And VAR, as it's used now, isn't fit for purpose.
-
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
- Been Liked: 278 times
- Has Liked: 3308 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
A well worked move and it paid off!! Defenders ball watching and the 2 biggest players on the pitch take the keeper down and the other scores.. 99% of the time that's disallowedwillsclarets wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:04 pmhttps://twitter.com/PxckedIze/status/17 ... pYE3A&s=19
There is no way on earth this is not a foul
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 836 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
Imagine thinking it is a good idea to bring Tresor on when you are clinging on to a 1-0 lead. Biggest bottle job in a tackle to ever play for Burnley.
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland
Re: Burnley v Luton
In all honesty, we were pretty crap and didn’t deserve to win.
This user liked this post: jojomk1
Re: Burnley v Luton
No mate, we were gash again tonight and completely dominated by a route 1 side. Over 60% possession for a pretty woeful team like Luton at home is really poor IMO.
We have to start planning for next season now, because this season has been an absolute disaster.
-
- Posts: 15265
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6762 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
But when the opposition roll over about 5 times (Villa winner) making a meal of it gets them a penalty.AGENT_CLARET wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:05 pmI think if Trafford didn't throw his arms in the air like he did the foul would of been given, he made a meal of the contact
Re: Burnley v Luton
Nonsense, it gets given 9 times out of 10. Keepers get protection in games, sometimes too much, but that’s literally a clear block of his movement. Its completely irrelevant that Trafford could or should have stayed on his line when he’s fouled. Luton created absolutely nothing all game we were robbed.criminalclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:07 pmIf that happens 10 times a weekend, it would be 50/50 every time. To me it's the same today. If Trafford area it so crowded and hangs back abit, it's an easy save on the line for him. I'm not evicerarating the guy, he did overall have a great game all in all (bar that).
We really, really should have been well clear of a 1 goal lead by the 90th + minute though given out chances we missed. Luton were never gonna give up
-
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 7:14 pm
- Been Liked: 180 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
You don't give a s**t that we missed clear opportunities to put the game to bed way before the 90th minute? Nothing is every done with a 1 nil lead.
I'm content to say that decision sometimes goes for you or doesnt (and we had plenty that did in previous time).
That doesn't plaster over the cracks that the game should have been well put to bed a lot, lot earlier by ourselves.
-
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
- Been Liked: 420 times
- Has Liked: 69 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
Carlton Morris says;
Out jumped him, has he? Are you sure Carlton? Are you sure your player has out jumped our goalkeeper?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/footba ... %20him.%22On his goal standing: "To be honest I have seen a couple where goalkeepers get protection and I am pleased they [VAR] have seen sense as the big man just out jumped him."
Out jumped him, has he? Are you sure Carlton? Are you sure your player has out jumped our goalkeeper?
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
From my understanding that’s exactly why VAR couldn’t reverse the decision.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:06 pmThat may be the ref's interpretation; but he's not there to judge scenarios, he has to give the obstruction because it happened.
The law isn’t the keeper has been obstructed, it’s has the player been fouled.
I honestly think the ref thinks Trafford dived (went down to easy under light physical contact). I think that’s why VAR couldn’t intervene and change the on field decision.
I don’t agree with it, as earlier in the game Trafford was given a free kick for a very similar scenario (as was kaminski). It just stinks of poor referees making stupid decisions under pressure. But looking at it from the refs POV that’s what I assume has happened.
Re: Burnley v Luton
What did Luton actually create? You telling me it's not a foul on Trafford?Ampth7 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:09 pmNo mate, we were gash again tonight and completely dominated by a route 1 side. Over 60% possession for a pretty woeful team like Luton at home is really poor IMO.
We have to start planning for next season now, because this season has been an absolute disaster.
Re: Burnley v Luton
Were a 'possession' based team dominated at home by one of the worst teams in the league.
Open your eyes mate. Tonight was a disgrace
Rightly given as a goal by the way
Last edited by bumba on Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Burnley v Luton
He missed as many as he claimed. Made 2 Hollywood saves one which he could easily have caught and kept passing it to their midfield.
I don’t think he had a bad game but certainly wasn’t good either.
As much as some people have an agenda against him there is also an agenda to exaggerate what he does.
Anyway he’ll be playing championship football next season along with the rest of our limp wristed squad.
This user liked this post: bumba
Re: Burnley v Luton
Yep 39% possession at home to a relegation rival when our side was assembled at great cost on the basis of keeping the ball.
These 2 users liked this post: jojomk1 Westleigh
Re: Burnley v Luton
Trafford was fine, caught some corners and crosses. Luton didn’t create anything though, despite all of their possession. We had considerably more clear openings.
Re: Burnley v Luton
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:11 pmFrom my understanding that’s exactly why VAR couldn’t reverse the decision.
The law isn’t the keeper has been obstructed, it’s has the player been fouled.
I honestly think the ref thinks Trafford dived (went down to easy under light physical contact). I think that’s why VAR couldn’t intervene and change the on field decision.
I don’t agree with it, as earlier in the game Trafford was given a free kick for a very similar scenario (as was kaminski). It just stinks of poor referees making stupid decisions under pressure. But looking at it from the refs POV that’s what I assume has happened.
- Attachments
-
- IMG_2350.jpeg (80.44 KiB) Viewed 1351 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
I don't care for any of that what you have just wrote. It's irrelevant.criminalclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:11 pmYou don't give a s**t that we missed clear opportunities to put the game to bed way before the 90th minute? Nothing is every done with a 1 nil lead.
I'm content to say that decision sometimes goes for you or doesnt (and we had plenty that did in previous time).
That doesn't plaster over the cracks that the game should have been well put to bed a lot, lot earlier by ourselves.
What I care about is the foul that wasn't given. Nothing else.
Re: Burnley v Luton
We were a possession based team. Luton have been better than us this season, they played better than we did tonight but at the end of the day they didn't actually create any real chances, we created more and it was a definite foul on the keeper
-
- Posts: 4073
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1507 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
I thought we were so poor tonight. Luton dominating the ball. I just don’t understand what we’re trying to do now. We are so passive, it’s actually ridiculous.
-
- Posts: 6696
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1704 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
I hope Fofana signed before watching that
-
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
- Been Liked: 420 times
- Has Liked: 69 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
I'm calling it a do because I have work tomorrow and another hour of this will lead me down a glory hole of insanity, but the officials, by their own metric, are wrong to allow that goal. We should have won, and more to the point, we should have been allowed to win.
-
- Posts: 15265
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6762 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:11 pmFrom my understanding that’s exactly why VAR couldn’t reverse the decision.
The law isn’t the keeper has been obstructed, it’s has the player been fouled.
I honestly think the ref thinks Trafford dived (went down to easy under light physical contact). I think that’s why VAR couldn’t intervene and change the on field decision.
I don’t agree with it, as earlier in the game Trafford was given a free kick for a very similar scenario (as was kaminski). It just stinks of poor referees making stupid decisions under pressure. But looking at it from the refs POV that’s what I assume has happened.
Yes, the keeper was fouled.
Fair do to Luton, that tactic just got them a point. I call it cheating, you can call it whatever you want.
If we had produced a goalscoring opportunity in that manner I would have expected it to be ruled out.
Re: Burnley v Luton
We are awful. We have wasted money, wasted an opportunity to build and wasted a good vibe.
We can blame the ref (I think it’s a foul) but that performance, those subs, the tactics and the recruitment etc etc is nothing short of horrific.
We can blame the ref (I think it’s a foul) but that performance, those subs, the tactics and the recruitment etc etc is nothing short of horrific.
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland
-
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 7:14 pm
- Been Liked: 180 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
Haha cheating? Come on, so you think Luton paid of a ref or somethingboatshed bill wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:23 pmYes, the keeper was fouled.
Fair do to Luton, that tactic just got them a point. I call it cheating, you can call it whatever you want.
If we had produced a goalscoring opportunity in that manner I would have expected it to be ruled out.
-
- Posts: 15265
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6762 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
Any foul is cheating.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:24 pmHaha cheating? Come on, so you think Luton paid of a ref or something
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 836 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
Correct, we've gone from one of the best seasons in memory to one of the worst. A team full of lightweights, they are embarrassing.
At least we don't have to listen to the usual 'we are getting better' nonsense that is usually posted.
-
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
Well if that’s the case you can say both sides cheated all game?
-
- Posts: 15265
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6762 times
Re: Burnley v Luton
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:28 pmWell if that’s the case you can say both sides cheated all game?
Yes, unfortunately the modern game is full of it.
The trouble is that we seem to be on the receiving end a bit too often.
What did you think about the Villa penalty? Or the so-called Berge handball?
Re: Burnley v Luton
Mate it was never a foul in a million Sundays, he cocked up.... school boys in a man's game do.
If Luton have been better than us after what we have spent then WHY?
-
- Posts: 3138
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 1075 times